TAXPAYORS PAY FOR DEFENSE IN PERSONAL LIABILITY CASE
Mark Siboni, a corrupt City of Toronto lawyer, has billed the City of Toronto and taxpayors for legal defense, in a personal liability claim, against the defendants, in a lawsuit that was filed against them. The Defendants, Tiffany Woodfield, Adam Sherman and Howard Rubenhoff, were all named in the lawsuit for their personal actions, in carrying out attacks against the plaintiff, me. The City of Toronto and Maria Varlokostas, former Acting Director for the Toronto Social Housing Unit, are also named in the claim and besides the city's employee, Maria Varlokostas, in this claim, the other indiduals mentioned, who has worked not for the City, or even for the company that was hired by the City, but for its subsidiary company, M&P Property Management Ltd., a private company, has also had their defense paid for by the taxpayors in this civil case, which is also usually not covered by legal aid. Thanks to Mark Siboni, their legal defense is also being paid for by the taxpayors, for personal actions that were committed by them, against a member of the public. And while some of the defendants, such as Mintz and Partners Ltd, are also agents of the Crown, the Proceedings Against the Crown Act, still does not protect them from such a liabity that arises out of their own personal actions that may have resulted in the injury of another member of the public. It is the same for those City of Toronto employees, who are also not protected under that Act from such a liablity, while carrying out their public duties and this is a means of also protecting the public from any actions from them, that were also made in tort against the public. The background information for the legal actions taken against them, is that the City's employee Maria Varlokostas, Funds Manager and one time Acting Director of the Toronto Social Housing Unit, has renenged on her responsibilty to protect my rights as a member of my coop (it goes back even further than that)and has also worked with the other defendants, to carry out attacks against me that not only were injurious to me, but has also interfered with those rights that I have, that are also protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom. Since this lawsuit was initiated by me, the police in the area where I live, 13 Division Police, has also stepped up their harassment towards me, watching me and following me and intimidating me in other ways, proving that they are also directly connected to the conspiracy involved in those actions against me. Some of the defendant's actions against me were related to the carrying out of their public duties and others were direct personal attacks on their part. All of which has violated my rights under under the law. In their arrogance, they had also failed to file a defense, in the time also alloted to them by law. Realizing that they no longer has a legal defense, they have also resorted to other means and has also acted corruptly to pervert justice in this case. The question is why should the public pay for their legal defense in regards to their personal liability, in this case against another member of the public? They also most likely, do not want this fact to be made public either, which is unfortunate for them, since all court proceedings are also public information, unless banned. Others who have also acted corruptly in the case involving the defendants, has also included these Judges of the Superior Court of Ontario. Judges G. Morawetz and F. Newbould.
More Legal Aid Denied to Ex-Cop
Ex-cop who ran up $1.2M in legal aid denied more cash for appeal
TORONTO — Ontario's top court has denied a convicted murderer who ran up a $1.2-million legal aid bill more taxpayer funding for an appeal.
Constable Richard Wills was convicted in 2002 of the first-degree murder of his mistress Linda Mariani.
Wills, a former Toronto police officer and one-time self-described millionaire, systematically divested himself of his assets and then applied for legal aid.
He made an application to Ontario's Appeal Court for funding to provide legal assistance with his appeal, but the court dismissed it.
In a judgment released today, the court writes that Wills is a "well-educated man" with long experience in the justice system and is capable of presenting his appeal without a lawyer.
Sexual Misconduct of Canadian Immigration and Citizenship Official
TORONTO- A Canadian Immigration and Citizenship Judge is on trial for Sexual Misconduct regarding a Refugee claimant.
The Adjudicator accused of sex bribery was seen on video meeting with the refugee claimant. The immigration judge was on trial for allegedly offering to approve the refugee claimant's application in exchange for sex and had told the woman it's all right if they "do things together on the side," court heard Tuesday.
Steve Ellis, 50, has pleaded not guilty to breach of trust and an Immigration and Refugee Protection Act charge of bribery. "Mr. Ellis has the power to decide about my application of refugee claim," Kim said through a Korean interpreter. "I had to kind of decide between the status of my refugee claim and the relationship between Mr. Ellis and me." Ellis was the adjudicator at Kim's refugee hearing in 2006. After he twice visited her at a restaurant where she worked, Kim then 25 years old and her boyfriend secretly videotape her third meeting with Ellis.
"I want to be good friends with you, and I know you've got a boyfriend," Ellis can be seen and heard saying on the video, which was played at his judge-alone trial. "I've got a wife, so I mean, if we do things together on the side, that's OK."..."Are you good at keeping secrets?" Ellis asked at the meeting.
"If you do this and it's shown that I did this for improper purposes then you're screwed, too. Definitely don't tell your boyfriend."
Ellis can be seen telling Kim he initially was going to deny her application, but that "for some reason I can't say no to you, I don't know why... You're a really special person." Ellis is also a former Toronto City Councillor and lawyer who was appointed to the Immigration and Refugee Board in 2000.
In my November 2008 article I mentioned that vulnerable women, some of them who were also illegally in the country, were being pressured into having non consensual sex with Immigration officers. Some were taken to hotels and were forced to engaged in sexual intercourse with those officers in exchanged for their freedom.