Tuesday, May 31, 2011



Individual Cases Of Human Rights Abuse.
The Organized Stalking And Targeting Of Some Of Those Victims

The Unholy 'Marriage' Between The Canadian Politicians And Those Big
Corporations. Rich Companies Who Can Also Buy Off Corrupt Politicians.
Who Also Have The Protection Of The Police, And Who Has Also 'Worked'
With Them To Combat Corruption In Government, Or With Other Corporations,
But Who Are Corrupt Themselves. Some Of Those Big Corporations Like
Deloitte & Touche, Who Are Also Immune To Prosecution In That Country,
Because Of The Corruption That Is Also Involved. It Is Only One Of Many
Such Corporations, Who Also Has Corrupt Politicians Backing Its Actions.

My goal is to bring some of those corrupt corporations like Deloitte & Touche
before the international human rights tribunals for committing crimes against
humanity, even if it is only one documented case and for also working with the Canadian government, in regards to its police agencies, in carrying out some of
those crimes against the individual in that country. I will also prove that
Deloitte & Touche was also involved directly, in working with the Canadian
government and its police, in carrying out the torture and other crimes against
me personally. It was Deloitte & Touche, who also gave the Canadian police access, in order to carry out those torture against me in my home.

Human rights abuse and crimes against humanity are taking place in Canada on unprecedented levels, based on the number of reports that are also coming out of that country. Blogs like mine are springing up all over the Internet, detailing those crimes of human rights abuse by the Canadian government, targeting individuals.

Yet, despite these horrible crimes that are also being committed in front of the whole world, no one also seem to be listening to those victims, like myself and
others, who are the target of the Canadian government in its direct attacks
against them. Jeopardising their very lives and also freedom. For human rights activists like me, being the direct target of the police is also a daily

Not just the local police, but all of the Canadian police agencies combined.
This is hard to ignore, because they also used illegal means to target and also
to cause injury to those victims like myself. It is not just about carrying out surveillance and harassment, they are also using advance weapons to attack those victims and to also cause them injury. It also known that one of Canada's most notorious police agency on this subject, is also the RCMP. It has both
targeted and also used some of the most illegal methods against human rights activists, in that country. Methods that are expressively forbidden under international human rights treaties, against those victims.

Those impotent international human rights governance's, like the Inter-
American Commission on Human Rights, The International Criminal Court and others, also need to take notice of those cases of human rights abuse that are coming
out of Canada, very seriously. They are not that interested because they also do not care about going after the Canadian government for violations under international treaties, concerning human rights standards in that country. They are also part of the worldwide effort towards a one world government, called appropriately, the new world order. The ICC, cannot even try those visible cases of human rights abuse in other countries, such as those detailing war crimes, how much more those other cases that are also less obvious?

When you also have those like the former US governor Jessie Ventura and many others like him also giving credence to those reports of government abuse that are happening in his country and also making it known that this is also happening all over the world, in other countries like Canada, then the world need to also take notice. This information is not just coming from individuals, who are also labeled as being deranged, but it is also coming from other very credible sources as well.

Aside from blogging, I am also involved with helping to put a stop to those
crimes against humanity that are being committed against individuals living in Canada. My newly formed organization called PAGE, or People Against Government Exploitation and Human Rights Abuse, is also committed to making the Canadian government accountable for its actions before those international human rights bodies, for those crimes that it has also committed against both individuals and also groups of people in that country.

It is a silent crime that is also being committed by this government right under
the so-called watchful eyes of the UN and others. It is an unspeakable crime
against those victims that must also be acknowledged by those who has also made it their duty to investigate those kinds of crimes by autocratic governments like Canada. It is also extremely offensive to the victims and also to moral standards and the human dignity for those crimes of humanity to also continue without something being done against it.

Monday, May 30, 2011


The Conspiracy To Obstruct Justice By These Crown Attorneys

The Goal Is To Traumatized The Victim And To Also Create The
Circumstances, To Also Bring This About. It Is Called Psychological Torture. A Very Useful Tool In The Hands Of The Police And Others Involved.

As a human rights activist in Canada, I have had more than enough evidence, to also prove that human rights abuse is also a chronic problem in that country.

Below is just one more examples of this abuse that I have also dedicated this
blog to exposing, concerning the attacks against my own individual rights and freedom, by the Canadian government and the corruption that is involved in those actions, by the people who also do not want this information to be made public.

The information also needs to get out, in order to educate the world on what
is also happening, to some people, in that country. The recent exposure on
my blog, in regards to the corruption involving some Canadian government
officials, has also garnered more attacks against me, by the police and also
by those who are also directly affected by the exposure that this article
also brought to them.

The Obstruction of Justice By These Crown Attorneys Involving My Case.

Case Number One: Crown Attorney, Kene Canton.
A Justice of the Peace, at a Toronto court, the 1000 Finch Avenue Courthouse,
in Toronto, has decided to issue process, on a charge of assault, against a
Deloitte & Touche employee, Jim Cook, for an assault against me. After giving evidence concerning the charge, at the pre-enquette hearing, the JP also decided, that there was also a prima facie evidence, established, on the charge for assault, against this person, Jim Cook, in regards to me. He then decided to also issue process on the private charge, that I had also laid, concerning that person, in regards to that matter. It was also the first time that this court, had also decided to proceed with any charges, against any of the people, who were also involved, with the personal attacks, against me and also despite the surmounting evidence against them.

The crown attorney, Kene Canton, had also decided, as a last attempt, to stop this proceeding and to also withdraw the charge, where process had also just been issued, by the justice of the peace, against that person. The Justice of the Peace, responded, to the crown attorney's actions, by also claiming, that under the law, the crown attorney, was also allowed to withdraw a charge. That the matter was also out of his hands, as far as the crown attorney's attempt, to prevent me from proceeding, with the matter in the court.

This is because of the conspiracy, that was also involved, regarding them and the police, also, in regards to this matter, in abusing my rights. It was the police, I also believed, that has also prevented, those charges from being laid, against them, for a number of years, and also with the cooperation of the court, as this case also shows and by the crown attorneys involved with those cases, in also preventing the charges from also being laid against any of them.

He had also not convinced the court, in regards to the prima facie evidence,
of why the charge should also not be laid and the Justice of the Peace, had
also read back to the crown attorney, the areas of the law, that he had also
relied upon, in also issuing process on the charge. In desperation, the crown attorney, Kene Canton, then also addressed the court and simply withdrew the
charge, rather than to see that it also proceeded, in the court. Now it is also
up to me to challenge this legally. Which include, also, an obstruction of justice
charge, against the crown attorney, Kene Canton.

The Issue Regarding Crown Attorney Number Two.

The second matter, also involved the actions of another crown attorney, in
also trying to prevent me, from also exercising my rights, as a member of the
public. It also clearly shows, that she has also tried to obstruct justice, in
this case, as the evidence also seem to suggest.

A mandamus writ was issued by a Judge, in the Superior Court of Justice, on
May 2, 2011, in regards to my application, before that court, against another employee, Alex Gaisiner. The crown attorney, in regards to that case, also did
two things, that were both illegal and also unethical.

First, she has told the Judge that she also has a date, at the 1000 Finch Court,
for the return of the matter, on May 26, 2011, when she was also asked by the same Judge, to get this information and to also present it to the court. I was then instructed by the court, to return to the other court, on the date that the crown had also given, in regards to the pre-enquette hearing and to also lay the charge. The crown attorney, whose name I also have a problem in getting, at this time, also told the Superior Court Judge, that she would be forwarding, the necessary documents, back to the other court, in regards to the matter. She also never did.

On May 26, 2011, I showed up for the pre-enquette hearing, at the 1000 Finch Avenue Court, in Toronto and the Justice of the Peace, who was in the courtroom, had no idea about the mandamus writ, that was also granted, because the crown attorney, did not send the information, to that court. Finally, the manager at the 1000 Finch Avenue Court, also claimed, that she was able to have the Superior Court of Justice, also fax, the necessary documents, to that court and the matter was also rescheduled for another date.

The biggest question, that I also have, about this matter, is, whether the
crown attorney, also tried to obstruct justice in my matter, by also not doing,
what she was asked by the court to do? Why did she not forward the documents to
the other court?, as she had also said to the court, that she would also do. The
date of May 26, 2011, which was also on a Thursday, that she also gave to the court
for the pre-enquette hearing, also does not occur at that court. It was later revealed, that this court, at the 1000 Finch Avenue West, courthouse, also did not hold any pre-enquette hearings, on a Thursday. Which was also the date, that the crown attorney, who was involved with the matter, had also suggested, to the other court, the Superior Court of Justice and also to the Judge of that court, in regards to the mandamus application, before that court.

The matter was simply toss aside, by either the crown attorney, by the court, or by both, in this case and I was also not able to proceed, as I also should have.
Later the court, also tried to cover up this action, by also suggesting another date, for the matter to be heard. Was it a coincidence or was it also deliberate?
Of course, I also do not believed, that it was a coincidence.

The direct links with the Metropolitan Toronto police, 13 Division, especially, has also offered to those involved, the protection that they also needed, to carry out those attacks against me. And the conspiracy also goes much further, to also
include the courts, as well. Which I as a member of the public, must also rely on, to also protect those rights, but which also do not result in this happening. As for the Metropolitan Toronto Police, 13 Division, most of the time, they are also parked outside of my home and doing apparently nothing. Just watching my movements, daily. As soon as they see me, either enter, or leave the building, they also drove off. The police has also denied doing this.

Whenever I also put up an article, on my blog, that has really exposed those
actions of the police, or others, involving corruption, or some other issue, I
also tend to see an increase in those attacks against me. Like some of my most recent articles for instance, that has also exposed, the unethical conduct, of
some government officials. As a writer and journalist, I am also strongly committed, to exposing the truth on corruption and other issues of human rights abuse. It is also important for the world, to know that human rights activists, like myself, are also daily, subjected to every attempt by this government, or its police agencies, regarding the further abuse, of their individual rights and freedoms. And also other attempts, that has also, increasingly, subjected them to harm. All of this are also carried out against them, in order to cover up the human rights abuse, that are also occurring in Canada.

Thursday, May 19, 2011



The Unanswered Questions, Surrounding The Actions Of The Assistant Deputy Minister, Janet Hope, In The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.

1. Her Personal Influence, In The Decisions, Concerning The Private Companies, Kehilla Residential Programme and Deloitte & Touche, Who Were The Only Contenders For The Bid, To Take Over The Moshav Noam Non-Profit Cooperative Housing Corporation. Providing Them With The Ministery's Approval, Despite Their Other Questionable Actions, That Also Goes Against The Public Interest.

2. Not Providing To The Public, Or To The Other Interested Parties, The Names, Of Who The Other So-Called Applicants Were, That Were Also Being Considered For The Same Bid, Regarding The Purchase.

3. The Personal Influence Of the Others Involved, In The Funding and Risk Management Branch, Of The Ministry. Keith Extance, The Director, Alison Coke, the Manager And David Stone, The Analyst, In Regards To This Specific Matter, And How This Is Also An Indication, Of How These Public Officials, Quietly Go About Disregarding The Law, To Serve Their Own Interest, Or The Interest, Of That Those They Are Also Involved With.

4. The Assistant Deputy Minister, Janet Hope And Others, In The Funding And Risk Management Branch, Putting The Interests, Of Private Companies, Ahead Of The Public. The Illegal Aquisitions Of Those Companies And Other Procruements By Them, That Are Also Questionable And Also Against Public Interests.

The corruption scandal, that is now surfacing, concerning the Assistant
Deputy Minister, Janet Hope and her role, in allowing the transfer, of the
Moshav Noam Non-Profit Co-operative Housing Cooperation, over to Kehilla
Residential Programme, after it was brought to her attention, through the
complaints of the public, to also investigate Kehilla's actions, concerning
the property and its residents. The scandal also involved others, in the
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, in the Funding and Risk
Management Branch, including the Director, Keith Extance and also the
Manager, Alison Coke, as well as the Analyst, David Stone. The Manager of
the City of Toronto Social Housing Unit, Funding and Risk Management
Branch, Maria Varlokostas, is also involved, and also its General Manager,
Phil Brown.

Upon the recommendations, of the City of Toronto, directly, through
the Toronto Social Housing Unit, Funding and Risk Management Branch, as
well as the Receiver, Deloitte & Touche, Kehilla Residential Programme,
seem to have been the only choice, for the transfer of the Coop, from
Deloitte & Touche, over to Kehilla Residential Programme. In fact the
claim that is also being made, against the Deputy Minister, Janet Hope and
the others, are that they have also put through the proposal, to have Kehilla
Residential Programme, take over the sale and transfer of the Moshav Noam
Non-Profit Cooperative Housing Corporation, exclusively and has also denied
this opportunity, to the other qualified applicants, thanks to the corruption
that was also involved, in their actions, to also make Kehilla, the exclusive
and only choice, for the project.

All of them were also directly involved, in the decision, to allow Kehilla Residential Programme, to purchase the assets, of the Coop and to also
take over the Moshav Noam Non-Profit Co-operative Housing Corporation, on
a permanent basis, from the current Receiver, Deloitte & Touche, who has
also recommended, Kehilla Residential Programme, exclusively, for this bid.
And who was also, along with the others, in the Funding and Risk Management
Branch, of both the Toronto Social Housing Unit, as well as the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing, has excluded all other qualified applicants,
who may have also been interested, in the purchase, to take over the Coop,
from the current holder, Deloitte & Touche, directly. All of this, also,
outside of the democratic process of the Coop, or its residents and also
outside of the boundaries of the law.

By this I also mean, that, there was also clear evidence, of a monopoly,
by those in the Funding and Risk Management Branch, to put forward the agenda,
of those private companies, before the interest of the public. And worst, that
they all had a pecuniary interest in the matter, to see that Kehilla Residential Programme, was also the sole contender, for this bid, and no one else. All
available evidence, seem to also point to this fact. There has also been no
other information, that has been made available, to either the members of the
Coop, or even to the court, to suggest, that, anyone else, were also being considered, by those in the Funding and Risk Management Branch, as a possible candidate for this bid, to take over the Coop. Except of course, Kehilla
Residential Programme, who has also been managing the property, on an interim
basis and who has been seeking, to also take over, on a permanent basis. Something that the residents of the Coop, do not want and has also voice their concerns, to those in the Funding and Risk Management Branch, of the Ministry, as well as to the Assistant Deputy Minister, Janet Hope and which were ignored, by all of those involved, who has also quietly, went behind their backs and pushed through the agenda, of this private company, before that of the public.

As a formality, the residents were also requested, in January 2011, to provide information, about Kehillla's management of the Coop, during the interim.
They also responded negatively, in regards to Kehilla, and sent their response
back to the Ministry, detailing the concerns, that they also had about Kehilla,
including the open racism, that is also practiced by Kehilla's staff, to some
of the residents. All of this was also quietly ignored, by those persons
mentioned, in the Funding and Risk Management Branch, of the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing, including, also, the Assistant Deputy Minister,
Janet Hope, who also oversees that branch, of the Ministry and who is the also
direct boss of its director, Keith Extance and the others. She is also mandated
to put the interest of the public first, before that of any private company,
which also did not happened in this case. Keilla's illegal actions, regarding
the management of the Coop, was also diregarded, by them, in order for them,
to put through its agenda, to take over the Coop.

All of those persons who were involved, in the Funding and Risk Management Branches, of those government agencies, in excluding all of the other possible applicants, who might also have been interested, in the bid to transfer the Coop, over to another management. They have all consented, also, to Deloitte & Touche's hand picked choice, which was Kehilla Residential Programme, to take over from Deloitte & Touche, directly and no amount of requests, that has also been made, to them, or anyone else involved in this matter, has also been able to make them also provide, the information, directly, as to the other so-called applicants, for this purchase. It is a secret among themselves only and no one else. It would be interesting, also, for this information, to be provided to the public, because it will also show, that, from the very begining, they had all monopolized, the bidding process and that no one else, were also being considered by any of them, in regards to the transfer of the Moshav Noam Coop and that this action, was also agreed upon, by the Assistant Deputy Minister, Janet Hope and those other persons, who were also involved, directly, in the Funding and Risk Management Branch, of the Ministry. She also,
as a necessity, had to ignore the concerns from the public, about those companies actions, in order for her and those others mentioned, in the Funding and Risk Managemen Branch, of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, to also provide them, with, the Ministry's consent, to go ahead with this deal.

I have been following this situation, closely and I can also say, that, based
on the evidence, that has been made available, both to me directly, as a member
of the Coop and also to the court, that those involved, also had a pecuniary interest, directly, in this project. This is also in regards to Kehilla
Residential Programme, as well as Deloitte & Touche. They also did not provide
any information, concerning the other so called applicants, who were also, supposedly, considered for this bid, in regards to the transfer of the Coop, based
on the fairness rule, and that Kehilla was their one and only choice
for this project.

There is much evidence available, to also suggest, that the Assistant Deputy
Minister, Janet Hope, also knew about the actions, of those involved, and in
fact, was also directly involved, in the decision, in putting forward the
agenda, of this private company, before the interest of the public. This
decision, on their part, has also landed those involved, in the Funding and
Risk Management Branch, of both government agencies, under investigation,
for violations under the Conflict of Interest Act. And there are also those,
like myself, who also believed, that, the Assistant Deputy Minister, Janet
Hope, should also be investigated, by the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, for her role, as someone who holds office, in also ignoring the interests of the public, in this regard and also in putting forward the private interests, of those companies, Kehilla Residential Programme and also Deloitte & Touche, before that of the public. An action, which is also an open violation,
of the public trust in her office.

It was a decision, that was also made, exclusively, outside of the legal requirements, of the law, including those under the Conflict of Interest Act
and also the Municipal Act. That has now, also, implicated, the Assistant Deputy Minister, Janet Hope, in that decision, along with the others, for not complying, with those rules and regulations, under those Acts, concerning the sale, or purchase, of a property and to also participate, in a manner, that has also indicated, that there was a conflict of interest, on their part, to favour the current holder, Deloitte & Touche, as well as Kehilla Residential Programme, exclusively, to take over the bid, in regards to the transfer, of the Moshav
Noam Non-Profit Cooperative Housing Corporation, from them and over to
Kehilla Residential Programme. And while at the same time, also, clearly
excluding, all other qualified applicants, in the process. It is also a case,
where those city and government officials, has also used their positions,
to influence this decision. Which also, clearly, favoured Kehilla, over any
other qualified applicants, as well.

This latest development, regarding their actions, has also shed a light,
on how private companies, are also able to get through, with their agendas,
with those corrupt city and other government officials. In this case, the
claim, that was also made, against the Assistant Deputy Minister, Janet Hope
and also the others, in the Funding and Risk Management Branch, of the
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, along with the Toronto Social
Housing Unit, was also based on documented evidence. Evidence that is also
a part of the public record, concerning their actions. The corruption in
regards to their actions, also comes from the fact, that, they have decided
to take their public duties, so lightly and to also act upon their own
interests, outside of that duty, and also in regards to the public.

For instance, neither the Assistant Deputy Minister, nor those other
persons, in the Funding and Risk Management Branch, of the Ministry, acted
upon the complaints of the public, in regards to Kehilla's actions. David
Stone, is an analyst, in the Funding and Risk Management Branch of the
Ministry and both he and Alison Coke, were also in charge, of handling the complaints, about Kehilla Residential Programme, in regards to the Coop,
directly. They were also a part of the team, in the Funding and Risk
Management Branch, who were also considering, Kehilla's application, to
take over the transfer of the Moshav Noam Non-Profit Cooperative Housing
Corporation, from Deloitte & Touche and also over to Kehilla. Alison Coke,
manager in that branch, has also has confirmed to me, directly, that she has
also received the complaints, from the residents, of the Moshav Noam Non-Profit
Housing Coop, concerning Kehilla's actions, and that those complaints would
also be addressed by the Ministry, before any decision was made, on Kehilla's eligibilty, as a potential applicant for this bid. That also did not happened,
and we as the public has also come to know why. That Alison Coke and also the others
in the Funding and Risk Management Branch of the Ministry, has also never
deviated from their positions, to have kehilla Residential Programme, take over
the Coop, from Deloitte & Touche. It was what those companies wanted and also
what those other persons, including Alison Coke, David Stone, Keith Extance
and even the Assistant Deputy Minister, Janet Hope, in the Funding and Risk Management Branch also wanted. It was also not the public interest that they were
also adhering to, but thwir own and also that of those private companies.

One has only to look, further, into their actions, as well and at the information, that is also available, in regards to those actions, to see that they, also had a conflict of interest, with regards to this decision, on their part. And that the obvious conflict of interest, in regards to their actions, also stems from the
fact, that, they also wanted to promote those private companies interest, over
that of the public. In this case, also, it is both their own private interests,
as well as the interests of those two companies, Kehilla Residential Programme
and also Deloitte & Touche, that also takes presidence, with them, over those
of the public.

The Assistant Deputy Minister, Janet Hope, also knew of the complaints, of the public, against Kehilla Residential Programme and has also chose to ignore it.
In fact, She was asked directly, to investigate those concerns, before the
Ministry, has also made its decisions, regarding kehilla's application, that the
Ministry was also considering, at the same time. She also chose not to do so, because, this would also pose, a direct conflict of interest, with her own private agenda, as well as the private agendas, those of the other two companies, at the center of this controversy, who were also looking to make this acquisition, for their own personal reasons and the Assistant Deputy Minister, Janet Hope also
acquiescence, without giving any thought to what her public duties also requires her to do in this case. Which is also to put the needs of the public first, before those
of any private individual or entity.

The residents of the Moshav Noam Non-Profit Co-operative Housing Corporation,
has also not been told, officially, by those in the Funding and Risk Management Branch, of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, about their complaints, against Kehilla Residential Programme. Nor about how the Assistant Deputy Minister, Janet hope, has also decided, to deal with those complaints, in regards to Kehilla's actions, as well. They are usually, the last ones to know, if at all, about the very issues, that also concerns them, in regards to the actions, of these city and other government officials. Or that those involved, are also now go ng back, to the court, to have a further extension, given to them, to complete this purchase. A process which has also now taken, almost three years, from when it was started in 2008, and at the time when, Deloitte & Touche's term, as the Receiver, was also ended. And which they have also mandaged, to have extended, on an ongoing basis, to the cost of the taxpayers also. I also first became aware of Kehilla Residential Programme, as a possible candidate and also Deloitte's only choice to take over, from them, around January of 2008. Now, they are also going back to the court, to have this process, dragged on even longer, which is also no loss to them, financially. In fact, it is also the very opposite. They have all stand to gain, substantially, from this very long and costly process. Which, somehow, the City of Toronto, has also overlooked. This process, has also been financially, rewarding, for all of those involved and the Auditor General's office, has also shown an interest, to examine the financial records, of the Receiver, in regards, to the management of the Coop.

Thursday, May 12, 2011





She was recently appointed to the Ontario Provincial Court, located at
1000 Finch Avenue west, in Toronto, on March 23, 2011. Her previous
role, had been as a judge in the Bermuda courts. She has also claimed,
as a crown attorney, in the Canadian courts, to have helped in prosecuting,
violent crimes, againt women, although this does not seem to be the case,
regarding her recent appointment, as a judge, where her severe lack of
judgement, regarding violence against women, has already been noticed,
in her decisions of the court. Decisions that could also have, dire
consequences, for women, if she also keeps this up. Since her appointment
on March 23, 2011, as a provincial court judge, she has also not wasted
any time, in showing that she was also incapable, of dealing with some
of those cases, that were before her. Whether this was also due, to her
own personal influence, in those cass, including corruption, or some
other factors, including, also, incompetence, on her part.

This should also be taken seriously, since her actions, also has a negative
effect, upon the public and also the victims of violence, in this case.
Women whose lives are put more at risk, because of her actions. That is what
you would also call the decision, that she has made recently, in acquitting
a man, Daniel Osei, a reputed drug dealer, who had also threatened the life
of a woman, and was also still facing, the same charges, uttering a death
threat, against someone else. As also one of the victims, in those cases,
she has also acquitted him, of the death threats, that he has also made,
towards me, but he is still facing the same charges, against another person,
in another unrelated case. The man, Daniel Osei, who also has a history, of
violent convictions, against women, was also denied bail, recently, in his
charges against the other victim, but he was also acquitted, of the same
charges, in relation to me, also recently, by the provicial court judge,
Sandra Bacchus. This judge, also did not regard, either my rights, or my
safety, in this case, as well.

During the trial on April 29, 2011, I had also happened to see, the same
judge, Sandra Bacchus, in the caffeteria, located at the same court, during
the adjournment, of the trial, which was to resume, after the lunch break
and she gave me a most disapproving "look", that was also full of malice.
She also clearly did not like me and I believed that this also influenced
her decision, in her ruling, to acquit the person, despite the evidence
and also his criminal history, regarding his violent actions against women.
Clearly, also, his threats against me, or any other persons, should also,
not have been taken lighty, by the judge, Sandra Marina Bacchus, who has,
also, a public duty, to protect lives, and also the interest, of the
victims who are before the courts, and especially those relating, to
violence against women, by a repeat offender, like Daniel Osei. I was
even more suspicious of her decision, in this case, in also acquitting,
the accused, Daniel Osei, after he was charged by the police, but also
not before, they had also ignored, my original complaint, of his threats
earlier and when he had also let himself into my building, where I also
had to call 911 emergency services. The police also took several hours,
to respond to my 911 call, of the incident, claiming that they were also
very busy, at the time. He eventually turned himself in to the police
later, regarding the same incident.

At the trial, he also did not deny, that he had also came to my home and
had sneaked into my building, on the same night, though he also put it
at an earlier time, than my 911 call to the police. Which the judge,
simply bought, along with the rest of his testimony and also found him
not guilty, of also making death threats against me. The court also did
not have the same opinion, regarding his other victim, who also faced
the same threats from him. They simply held him in jail, for that
incident. Of course my life is also of less value, to all of them, as
well and so I should also not have expected to have the same treatment,
or the protection of the court, also, in regards to my case. The message
that this judge, Sandra Bacchus, has sent in acquitting him, of those
charges, against me, was the same, as the other judges, or justices of
the peace and especially at that court. It is as if they also wanted him,
to carry out his actions against me. This also seem to be the case,
when the police did not respond immediately, to my 911 call, of the

Sandra Bacchus, is also part of a list, of judges, and justices of the peace, including, also, both black judges and justices of the peace, at that court,
whose actions, should also be more closely examined. Due also to their
personal influences, in cases, before that court. It is a general rule, by
the judges and justices of the peace, at that court, not to prosecute anyone,
who has also committed a crime against me, or who has threatened my
safety, in anyway. It would also explain, why I could not get any justices
of the peace, at the 1000 Finch Avenue court, in Toronto, to also issue,
a summons,in at least a dozen private informations, that I have also tried
to lay, at that same court, against those who has threatened my safety.
There is also evidence, that they have also been involved in the conspiracy,
with the police, also, in preventing those charges, from being laid, against
those person, because most of them, were also, I believed, working as agent
provocateurs, for the police, directly. And the police also did not want
to see those persons charged.

In my opinion, also, the recent trial, was also a mock trial. It was also a
pretence, when they all knew, also, what the outcome would also be, despite
the evidence at the trial. It is the same, as with all of the other mock
trials, that has also been carried out, and also with the aim, of perverting
justice, in all of those cases, involving me. It is also the reason, why, this matter, should also be investigated, further, for any more evidence of human
rights abuse, by those who are also responsible. That of course, would also
include this government, its courts and also its police agencies, against me.