THREE JPS AT OLD CITY HALL REFUSED TO TAKE THE INFORMATION CHARGES, AGAINST TORONTO POLICE OFFICERS.

The 14 Division Toronto Police
Officers charged in the case involving their arrest of man.

Man who made death threats, was released by the police, soon afer his arrest, back on to the property, where the victims live.

-The 14 Division Toronto Police also did the following:
Releasing the man, after his death threats to the victim, on a form 10 and without any conditions, on his part, as a part of his release, back unto the same property.
-Changing the order of his name, making his first name the last name.

The Toronto police also did not lay the proper charges, of assault with a weapon and uttering death threats, against the man, who they also claimed, was arrested and charged by the police. The charge laid by the police, against him, is for 'threatening an animal', not threatening to kill an animal, as it should be. Since the threats were also told to the police directly.

It is unheard of for the police, to release someone, who has threatened death and who has also made the statement to them, back into the residence, where the victim lives. It is also unthinkable, to the public, that the same police, would also ignore the statements, made to them, by the person committing the crime, by also refusing, to lay the appropriate charges, after being a witness, to this person's actions directly. The 14 division Toronto police did all of this and more. They also changed the order of the accused name from Hugues Ibholo Yala to the last name being Hugues. And several days, or a week later, his information could also not be found in their computer data base, without an intent search made.

THESE JPS ARE THE SUBJECT OF A JUDICIAL REVIEW FOR REFUSING TO TAKE THE PRIVATE INFORMATION, BY A CITIZEN, AGAINST SOME TORONTO POLICE OFFICERS, RECENTLY AND ALSO FOR ACTING CORRUPTLY. THE JPS ARE J.H. JACKSON, D. KEILTY AND S. JOHN, THE WORST OF THE THREE. IN FACT THE COMPLAINT FOR CORRUPTION IS AGAINST HIM MOSTLY. THE TWO OTHER JPS SIMPLY DID NOT WANT TO BE INVOLVED IN THE LAYING OF CHARGES AGAINST THOSE POLICE OFFICERS, BUT JP S. JOHN, HAD TO ALSO TRY TO PERSONALLY INTERFERE IN THE LAYING OF THOSE CHARGES THAT GOES EVEN BEYOND THE ACTIONS OF THE OTHER JPS AT OLD CITY HALL IN TORONTO, RECENTLY AND BY ALSO COMMENTING THAT "THESE CHARGES ARE AGAINST POLICE OFFICERS, SO DON'T TELL ME HOW TO DO MY JOB". NO ONE WAS DOING THAT. THE JP INSTEAD OF ACCEPTING THE INFORMATION AS HE WAS SUPPOSE TO DO, WAS MORE INTERESTED IN GATHERING MORE EVIDENCE IN THE CASE AND ASKING QUESTIONS THAT WERE ALSO INAPPROPRIATE AT THAT HEARING. HE READ THE INFORMATION IN DETAIL AND WAS ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CHARGES AND WANTED MORE "EVIDENCE" FROM THE WITNESS, BEFORE HE GO AHEAD AND ACCEPT THE CHARGES, WHICH HE IS ALSO NOT ALLOWED TO DO. JP J.H JACKSON ACTED CORRUPTLY BY ATTEMPTING TO START THE PROCESS OF TAKING THE PRIVATE INFORMATION AGAINST THE POLICE AND THEN LATER INTERUPTED THE PROCESS BY STATING THAT HE HAD A LOT OF OTHER PAPER WORK AND WAS TOO BUSY AND THAT THE VICTIM SHOULD COME BACK ANOTHER DAY TO LAY THE CHARGES. THIS AFTER HE HAD ALSO BEGUN RECORDING AND THEN TOLD THE VICTIM THAT HE COULD NOT CONTINUE BECAUSE OF HIS WORK LOAD. WHY NOT JUST SAY THAT IN THE BEGINING?
LATER ON A WOMAN IN THE REGIONAL JUSTICE OF THE PEACE OFFICE WHICH IS ALSO LOCATED AT THE SAME COURT ALSO CLAIMED THAT IT WOULD BE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR HER AND THE OTHER JUSTICES OF THE PEACE TO CHARGE THOSE POLICE OFFICERS. PRESUMABLY BECAUSE THEY ALSO DEAL WITH THEM EVERYDAY, INVOLVING OTHER CASES. SHE EVEN WENT AS FAR AS TO SAY THAT THE PRE ENQUETTE HEARING OF THOSE 14 DIVISON POLICE OFFICERS WOULD ALSO HAVE TO BE HEARD AT ANOTHER COURT, BECAUSE OF THIS CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND ALSO THAT EACH JP HAS THE RIGHT TO ACT ACT DIFFERENTLY IN EACH CASE. SHE SOMEHOW DID NOT MENTIONED THAT THE JPS ALSO HAD THE LEGAL OBLIGATION AFTER THEY HAVE RECEIVED ALL OF THE INFORMATION TO ALSO LAY THE CHARGES. IN FACT UNDER THE LAW, THEY CANNOT REFUSED TO DO SO. ONCE THE PERSON CAN IDENTIFY THEMSELVES PROPERLY THEN THEIR IS ALSO NO REASON FOR THE JP SUCH AS S. JOHN TO REFUSE THE LAYING OF THOSE PRIVATE INFORMATION AGAINST THE POLICE OFFICERS AND AS HE HAD ALSO DONE IN THIS CASE.
JP D. KEILY SIMPLY REFUSED TO TAKE THE INFORMATION CLAIMING THAT HE WAS BUSY ALSO. YET NEITHER HE NOR JP J.H JACKSON WAS TOO BUSY TO SEE THE NEXT PERSON IN LINE AFTER ME AND TO SIGN HIS AFFIDAVIT.

ARE THESE TORONTO JPS SAYING THAT THOSE POLICE OFFICERS ARE ABOVE COMMITITING OFFENCES AND THAT THEY SHOULD ALSO GIVE THEM THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT. THE MATTER HAS NOT EVEN REACHED A HEARING YET AND THERE IS SUCH EVIDENCE OF BIAS AND CORRUPTION REGARDING THOSE POLICE OFFICERS BREAKING THE LAW AND ALSO ACTING OUTSIDE OF THEIR DUTIES, REGARDING THIS CASE. THE DIFFICULTY IN LAYING THE CHARGES AGAINST THOSE TORONTO POLICE OFFICERS, HAS ALREADY SHOWN THAT IT WILL ALSO BE A FIGHT TO THE VERY END TO HAVE THEM MADE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS.

THE CONSPIRACY TO ACT CORRUPTLY AND TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE RECENT CASE INVOLVING SOME TORONTO POLICE OFFICERS FROM 14 DIVSION WHO HAD REFUSED TO LAY THE PROPER CHARGES AGAINST A MAN, HUGUES IDHOLO YALA, AFTER HE HAD TOLD THEM, DIRECTLY, THAT HE INTENDED TO KILL AN ANIMAL. THE MAN HAD ALSO ADVANCED WITH A KNIFE TOWARDS THE VICTIM WITH THE INTENTION OF KILLING HER ANIMAL, OR HER DIRECTLY.

THE 14 DIVISION POLICE DID NOT LAY THE MORE SERIOUS CHARGES OF UTTERING DEATH THREATS AND ASSAULT WITH A WEAPON, IN THAT CASE, BUT INSTEAD CHARGED THE MAN WITH THE LESSER CHARGE OF ONLY "THREATENING AN ANIMAL". NOT THREATENING TO KILL AN ANIMAL, OR UTTERING DEATH THREATS TO KILL AN ANIMAL. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, WHICH WILL ALSO BE REVEALED FULLY AT A HEARING, WILL ALSO SHOW THAT THE POLICE, IN THAT CASE, MAY ALSO HAVE OTHER REASONS, NOT TO CHARGE THE MAN, WITH THE MORE SERIOUS CHARGES. THE POLICE EVEN WENT SO FAR AS TO CHANGE THE ORDER OF HIS NAME. HE IS REFERED TO IN THEIR REPORT AS HUGUES, BEING HIS LAST NAME AND NOT HIS FIRST NAME AND THIS IS ALSO AGAINST OTHER DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE THAT HIS NAME AS IT IS STATED ABOVE, IN THIS ARTICLE, IS HUGUES IDHOLO YALA. HE IS ALSO KNOW TO DROP THE LAST NAME YALA AND JUST GO BY THE NAME OF HUGUES IDHOLO. ACCORDING TO ONE POLICE OFFICER AT THE SCENE, ITS THE NAME THAT THE MAN GIVE TO THEM THAT THEY WILL ALSO USE AND NOT WHAT HE IS KNOWN TO USE, IN OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES.
THERE IS ALSO QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS IMMIGRATION STATUS IN CANADA. THE CONCERN IS THAT THE MAN, WHO I ALSO BELIEVED WAS AND STILL IS, WORKING AS AN AGENT PROVOCATEUR FOR THE 14 DIVISION POLICE, HAS ALSO BEEN PROTECTED BY THEM, DURING THIS ARREST, AND THE POLICE BY IGNORING THE DEATH THREATS THAT HE HAD ALSO MADE TO THEM DIRECTLY, HAS ALSO ACTED TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE IN THE MATTER.
THE VITIM (ME, SEE ALSO MY VIDEO, BELOW THIS ARTICLE) WAS TOLD THAT THE POLICE OFFICERS FROM 14 DIVSION HAD DISCUSSED AT THE STATION AFTER THE MAN'S ARREST, TO RELEASE HIM ON A FORM 10 AND ALSO BACK INTO THE SAME BUILDING THAT THE VICTIM AND HER ANIMAL LIVED THAT HE HAD ALSO MADE THE DEATH THREATS AGAINST.

THE VICTIM IN THIS CASE, WHO IS ALSO ME, THEN LATER TRIED TO CHARGE THOSE POLICE OFFICERS WITH OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE REGARDING THEIR DECISION TO IGNORE THE INFORMATION THAT WAS TOLD TO THEM DIRECTLY AND ALSO FROM THE ACCUSED, TO KILL THE ANIMAL. THE VICTIM AND THE OWNER OF THE ANIMAL, IS ALSO A WITNESS AGAINST THE POLICE, IN THIS CASE, HAVING HEARD THE DEATH THREATS BEING TOLD TO THE POLICE OFFICERS WHO ATTENDED THE CALL, BY THE MAN DIRECTLY. WHO ALSO STATED THAT HE "DIDN'T CARE, I'M GOING TO KILL HER CAT". THE POLICE OFFICERS AND ALSO THEIR SUPERIORS AT THE 14 DIVISION POLICE STATION, LATER IGNORED THAT INFORMATION IN THEIR REPORT AND DID NOT CHARGE THE MAN WITH THE MORE APPROPRIATE AND ALSO MORE SERIOUS CHARGE OF UTTERING DEATH THREATS, TO THE VICTIM IN THIS CASE.

"COME BACK ANOTHER DAY AND LAY THE CHARGES IF THOSE OTHER JPS REFUSED", THE VICTIM IS TOLD. AND THAT IS ALSO WHAT WILLBE DONE, IN THIS CASE.