JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, J. GAIRY.

His Deliberate Attempt, To Hinder, The Legal Process, More Than Once, Should Also Lead To Judicial Misconduct.

I Have Come Across Many Black Justices Of The Peace, in the Ontario Courts and He is One of the Worst. His $190,000 plus salary per year, with benefits, is also a great incentive for his corruption.
They get many accolades, from their community, for their "achievements", but behind the scenes, some of them, have acted corruptly.

Justice of the Peace, John Gairy. His Actions: Not An Oversight, but Personal Corruption, On His Part.

Justice of the peace Gairy knew what he was doing on July 30, 2012, when he deliberately did not signed the second section of the private information document, regarding the charges against the police officers and also the accused in the July 9, incident involving my animal. And unbeknown st to me at the time, his actions, would also have a profound and also negative effect regarding my case, since the JP at the pre-enquette hearing on August 3, 2012, also refused to hear the case, because the first JP, did not sign and complete the document properly. He also adjourned that hearing to another date in September.

This was not an oversight, but also a deliberate attempt, on his part, to foul up the process, in getting those officers charged. The JP at the pre-enquette hearing, also refused to proceed, with those charges, because he also claimed, that, I was not properly identified, by the first Justice of the Peace, John Gairy, who did not fill out, neither the second, nor the third sections, of the private information, document. That was sufficient for him, not to proceed, he also determined, but he was also not satisfied, with my identification, himself. So he gave me time to replace my driver's license, and to come back in September, for the pre-enquette hearing. Never mind, that, I also had someone, in the courtroom, who could also positively, identified, me, besides the picture identification.

The JP also claimed, that, he could also not identify, the police officers, in my private information. He read aloud their last names, on the court's 'docket list', alongside the word "unknown" marked, beside their names. He also did not want to hear, that, I had also provided, their badge numbers and also their initials, along with their last names, in the information, that I had also filed against them. He read: "Hamilton, unknown, P.C Ross, unknown, etc..." and never mind, that, he was also looking, directly, at the private information, in front of him, that also had, other identifying information, about those police officers, such as their badge numbers and even their full names, for some of them. The Justice of the Peace, claimed that the police officers too, were also not "properly identified". And when I also pointed out to him, about their badge numbers, in the private information, that was also laid. He kept saying, that, I was interrupting him.

I was also caught off guard, because I had never been asked, before, at a pre-enquette hearing, to again provide documentation. That is usually done at the first stage of the process, when the information is being laid, or after the pre-enquette hearing, when process is also issued. Since none was ever issued, in all of my other cases, and though I also should have been prepared, still, I was surprised, that the Justice of the Peace, John Gairy, had also not acted, to complete this process properly and instead had just told me to "Sign here". and "Do you swear, or affirm?". That was it. I even tried to present, my identification again, the second time and he was just not interested. It now explains, why he also did not want, my friend, in the room also, because he, JP Gairy, specifically told the clerk, that, he should also not come in with me, this time.

I presumed that his actions, were also based on the fact, that, I was in the same office, earlier that day and had also identified myself to the previous JP, including bringing also a witness, who knew me personally. And that they had also acted satisfied with this. But again, the fact that JP John Gairy, did not want my friend in the room, the second time, nor did he also requested, my identification, the second time also, yet went ahead and handed in an incomplete document, which shows, that he also knew, what he was doing and had also acted deliberately, in this case.

That was also not the first time, that Justice of the Peace, John Gairy, had also acted corruptly, in my matter. The first time, on a another day, he also acted inappropriately, as well. In fact he acted in reverse. He asked for my identification, then begun to tape the proceeding, before he also realized, that, he was too busy to continue. Showing me the documents on his desk, he commented, that, I should come back, another day and complete what he had apparently already started. He was too busy he said. "Come back another day". And each JP, at the Old City Hall courthouse, has been saying the same thing, until they were told to take the information. Basically to stop telling the public that they were too busy. At least in my case, anyway.

JP John Gairy, also still found a way to f--k up my case. And I want to expose him, as a corrupt Justice of the Peace, in the Ontario court system and that he should also be removed, from his position. Since he also does the public, no good, by his actions. He should also be severely disciplined, because he also knew, exactly, what he was doing. He knew the procedure better than I did, I also presumed, so when he told me to "just sign here" on the two private information, I also did, as well as to affirm, the contents of the documents and then he ended the meeting. I thought that was it. Only later to find out that it was not. That the JP, John Gairy, in fact, was also acting deliberately and was supposed to have also completed the forms, completely, not halfway, by signing all of the them and he also did not. He must have known, that the matter, was also not going to proceed, without this section, also being completed by him.

It was still another attempt, to hinder the charges, against those persons, and especially to prevent the charges, against the police officers, I also believed.
This seemingly innocent action, was in fact, a very thought out attempt, on his part, to continue with his practice, of trying to see that those charges, do not get laid, against those police officers. The first time he also tried to act inappropriately, in the matter, as well as the second time also. I could also see right through his ruse, both times also and the negative consequences, that his actions, also had on my case. It is up to the Ontario Judicial Council, to also determine, if he has also acted, deliberately, in this case.

ANOTHER BLACK, ONTARIO JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, IS IN HOT WATER.


Ontario Justice of the Peace, Errol Massiah.


Oshawa Justice of the Peace, Errol M. Massiah, was found guilty, of sexual misconduct, by the Judicial Council, towards the female court staff. Clerks in his office has also testified, against the Justice of the Peace, for inappropriate conduct towards them, including about their physical appearance.

One clerk has testified, that he has "slapped her on the rear", while another one has also accused him, of making inappropriate comments, towards her. When the clerk inadvertently walked in on him, unbuttoning his shirt, he commented to her, that, "If anytime, you want to see me, with my shirt off, just let me know". He also told another clerk, that, "You have beautiful eyes and I want to gaze into them". He then asked her, what color they were, and if they also changed, with the weather. Still yet another clerk, has also testified, against the Justice of the Peace, that he has commented to her, that, "I could picture clerks, not wearing anything under their gowns", after asking the same clerk, what she was also wearing. The incidents were alleged to have taken place between 2008 and 2010.

For his actions, the Justice of the Peace, was found guilty of sexual harassment and got a 10 day suspension, without pay, but with other benefits, a reprimand and orders to provide signed letters of apology, to the complainants, and also to attend judicial training, for gender sensitivity. Blah, blah, blah. As if those actions are really going to act, as a deterrent, in the future, against this a-- hole.

ON A MORE POSITIVE NOTE,(I THINK), JUSTICE MICHAEL TULLOCH, IS APPOINTED, TO THE ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL.

Justice Michael Tulluch, seem to be a rare breed, among black judges and justices of the peace, practicing in the Ontario courts. In fact, all of Canada. The Brampton, Ontario, Judge, has been appointed, to the Ontario Court of Appeal, in June of 2012 and this also does not seem, to surprise anyone, including me. Okay, he was my former lawyer, so I can attest to his personal integrity and I don't usually show this kindness, to lawyers, but I also think, that he deserved this latest promotion. Mainly, because he has also, benefited, his community, through his efforts, to be a positive role model, by setting an example for others to follow.

As my former lawyer, dealing with the custody case, involving my children, he was also both professional and also empathetic, towards my case, although I also fired him, which he also meekly accepted, at the time. It is important, for lawyers to believe, in their clients and he believed in me. Perhaps, not that much appreciated, by me, at the time. Later, he became a judge in the Brampton court and now he is also being appointed to the Ontario Court of Appeal. I seriously, think that one day, he may also be a judge, in the Supreme Court of Canada and also changed the face of it, for the better. Not just for his community, but also for Canada. Because the Supreme Court of Canada, as I know it right now, is also corrupt. Just asked the many people, who are now, exposing its actions.

Popular posts from this blog

WARNING! GOVERNMENT SPONSORED GANG STALKING AND TERRORISM.

TORONTO FIRE SERVICES DEPUTY CHIEF, JIM JESSOP, FAILED TO ASSIST THE TENANTS, WHO WERE DISPLACED, BY THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES, LAST WEEK.

THE DISHONORABLE JUSTICE D. BALTMAN BRAMPTON SUPERIOR COURT