CANADA, HAS IGNORED INTERNATIONAL LAWS, ON HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, REGARDING ITS ABUSE OF MY RIGHTS.
CANADA HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, IN ITS OWN COUNTRY, GOES LARGELY UNNOTICED, TO THE REST OF THE WORLD. INCLUDING CARRYING OUT, OPPRESSIVE ACTIONS AND ALSO INDIVIDUAL ACTS OF TERROR, AGAINST ITS OWN PEOPLE.
THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT'S CONSPIRACY, TO DESTROY MY LIFE. IT HAS FAILED, DELIBERATELY, IN PROTECTING MY LEGAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY HUMAN RIGHTS, UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAWS. MOREOVER, IT HAS ALSO CONTINUED TO ABUSE, THOSE HUMAN RIGHTS THAT I HAVE AND TO DO SO OPENLY, WITHOUT BEING CHALLENGED, BY ANY HUMAN RIGHTS AGENCIES, COURTS, OR COMMISSIONS, OVER ITS ACTIONS SO FAR.
WHAT SHOULD CANADA'S ROLE BE, INTERNATIONALLY, WHEN IT CONTINUES TO CARRY OUT HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, IN ITS OWN COUNTRY?. AND WHY HAS IS IT NOT TREATED, LIKE OTHER COURTRIES THAT DO THE SAME THING?. (ITS ROLE SHOULD BE REGARDED AS A MAJOR VIOLATOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS, TO THE POINT WHERE INTERNATIONAL ACTIONS, ARE ALSO TAKEN AGAINST IT. NOT UNLIKE THOSE OTHER COUNTRIES, WHICH IT ALSO HELPED TO BRING ABOUT THOSE ACTIONS AGAINST). THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT HAS CARRIED OUT, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, AGAINST ME. THIS IS ALSO A FACT. WHICH I WILL ALSO PROCEED WITH IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, AGAINST THAT COUNTRY.
JUSTICE OF THE PEACE LENA CRAWFORD'S, COMMENTS, ABOUT A CRIMINAL CHARGE: "The charge went on as an error". So now the court has no record of it, and the previous position of the court, to proceed with that criminal charge against the accused, has also now been viewed as an error, by the court. We are not talking about the charge being withdrawn by the crown attorney, we are talking about a new and very corrupt, Justice of the Peace, Lena Crawford, refusing to proceed with a criminal charge, because she also believed, that her colleague, Justice of the Peace, L. Stethem, made an error by proceeding with that charge against the accused. And all of this before a trial took place, which would have also brought about the hearing of all the evidence, from all of the witnesses. What proof, or new evidence, did this Justice of the Peace, Lena Crawford, have on the matter now, for her to decide that it was an error of the court in the first place, to proceed with that charge?. THAT IS WHAT PROOF, OTHER THAN CORRUPTION, ON HER PART?.
THE FACT, THAT, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, LENA CRAWFORD, OF THE OLD CITY HALL COURT IN TORONTO, HAS BEEN ALLEGED, TO HAVE COMMENTED ABOUT A CHARGE BEFORE THE COURT, OF ASSAULT, AGAINST THE ACCUSED, SHAMSUN BASHAR, THAT WAS ISSUED BY A PREVIOUS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, L. STETHEM, ON AUGUST 12, 2015, THAT, " THE CHARGE WENT ON, ON AN ERROR". WHICH MEANS THEREFORE THAT THE COURT WILL NOT PROCEED WITH THAT CHARGE. AND ALSO DID NOT DO SO.
This information was also given to me, by a clerk at the Old City Hall courthouse, name Beverly in the court support office, on October 27, 2015. She has alleged that those were the statement of the court, when the accused, Shamsun Bashar, was also before the court on October 26, 2015. She also alleged that the accused who was in court on September 28, 2015, was also not scheduled to be in court, on October 16, 2015, but instead on October 26, 2015. This is also a direct contradiction to the evidence that also exist, which is that the accused was in fact, in court on October 16, 2015, on the said matter, that was also put over from September 26, 2015. So how did the court date of October 28, 2015 come up?. I believe that date was also conveniently mentioned by the court staff, because the court, also wanted to dismiss the matter and to not proceed on it. Further, I also believe that this was done, because the court also knew that the following day, I also had other matters in that court, consisting of more criminal charges, against the same accused and other Canadian government officials, that, it had also decided beforehand, to not proceed with and to disregard as well.
What about the October 16th date and why was this date later changed in the court record, to October 26, 2015 and then the court also claimed, that no date of October 16, 2015, has ever existed?.
Who is the accused and what is her role, in regards to this cover up and also corruption by the court?
Why did the court said that it has made a mistake in the criminal charge against the accused, after the same court, also decided on August 11, 2015, to proceed with the criminal charge against the accused?.
Is the court saying that the previous Justice of the Peace, L. Stetchem, who also issued process on the charge, did so as an error?. Because I can also tell you that this same Justice of the Peace, L. Stethem, also heard a full day of evidence against the accused, by way of a pre-enquette hearing on my part, before issuing process and also issuing a summons for the accused to appear in court, on that charge. So therefore the court, according to Justice of the Peace, Lena Crawford, can now change its opinion on the matter, and all this is done before it even went to a trial?. Just by simply reversing the decision, of the previous Justice of the Peace, L. Stethem, who is also obligated under the law to hear evidence and to proceed with the matter, based on the evidence that was provided to the court.
I was not told that the crown attorney withdrew the charge, presumably, because there was no chance of getting a conviction, against the accused. Which is usually the legal reason to do so, (but I have also seen a crown attorney's do the very opposite, and that is to withdraw a charge, because there would be evidence of a conviction. Or that to protect the accused, she did not want the charge to proceed in the court). I am told on October 27th by the court clerk, that the court has regarded the charge laid, as an error, on the part of the other Justice of the Peace, L. Stethem, on August 11, 2015. And you have to wonder how that could also be the case, unless the present Justice of the Peace, L. Crawford, has also acted corruptly, in the matter. I don't have to point out here that she did.
My other opinion on the matter, is that from the start, the court, has only pretended to proceed on the matter and then just as quickly aborted its effort to continue to keep up with the farce. And what should that tell you, as members of the public, about the Canadian court's role in the protection of my rights, since the accused was charged with committing an offence against me, and for which the court has also previously heard a full day of evidence and then had decided then to issue process and with that action ,also, for the accused to also appear in court, and to answer to that charge. Now the same court has simply reversed its position and just turn around and just say that it has made an error on its part, in regards to the charge. And to learn further, on the following day, on October 27, 2015, that the other charges against that accused and others, will also not be proceeded with, by the same court. Since those charges were also laid by me, as well. Do you not see the direct correlation between those two events?. The first on October 26th, to view a charge against one of the accused, as an "error", on the part of a previous Justice of the Peace, and also to disregard the other charges, on which a decision was made in regards to those other charges, on October 27th, as also a waste of the court's time. and the fact that all of those charges, against all of the accused, were also laid by me?.
Let me tell you this, that when the Canadian court wants to act corruptly against you, it will do just that. On another matter at the same court, today, on October 27, 2015, at a pre-enquette hearing, that was also heard by another corrupt Justice of the Peace, at the Old City Hall court, name Ana C. Costa, was also thrown out, and despite the seven video evidence, which I had also presented to the crown attorney, John Scutt and which the court also heard (and also viewed), prior to her decision today, which also in my opinion also demonstrated the prima facie evidence, which the court also need to proceed on the charges, against the accused. Those video evidence were also dismissed by the court, on October 27, 2015 and it is hardly a coincidence, that I was also told about another charged that was allegedly thrown out against the same accused the previous day, On October 26, 2015, which in my opinion was also not the truth. If the accused was told to come back to court on October 26th, when the accused also attended court on October 16th, then that would also make more sense.
The actions of the Canadian government against me, in abusing my human rights and especially in the courts, is simply that government saying to me and everyone else, that it does not regard me at all. Certainly, its so called constitution with its so called guaranteed rights, also do not apply to me. My question is this?. Does it really think that it can make a mockery of international laws, which says that I have those same rights, which it has also ignored and or disrespected, and also not have to answer for its actions?. I am not dead yet, though it wish this to be the case. And as long as I have life and the continued use of my faculties, I will also demand that justice be done, to protect my rights as a human being. I AM NOT ASKING FOR THIS TO BE DONE. I AM SAYING THAT THIS WILL BE DONE.
If the Canadian government is saying to me and to the rest of the world, that my life do not matter, when in fact it does, under international human rights laws, then its actions should also be viewed as a crime against humanity, including the action of trying to commit genocide, in the act of torturing me, to bring that about, since as a member of an ethnic group, it has tried to bring this about. Whether I have survived its actions to carry out the act of genocide, against me, because of my belonging to a particular ethnic group that it has also targeted to get rid of, and also in so many different ways of going about accomplishing this, then that is what it should be charged under.
We know that this act of genocide by the Canadian government, was also committed against the Aboriginal Peoples of Canada. But hasn't it been quietly also committing genocide, regarding other ethnic groups, such as Blacks, in Canada?. Since in the eyes of that country, those people's lives do not matter one bit and therefore is also not in need of protection, under its so called constitution. That they can be excluded from having the protection of their legal rights, under the Canadian constitution. And also by the government also carrying out other means of eliminating them?. And it also do not matter, whether this is also done on a mass scale, or not. The targeting of any person of an ethnic group, in Canada, is also the same as targeting the group as a whole. And how long can it hide behind its so called laws and carry those actions out?. Or to hide behind the banner of human rights and still carry those actions out?. CANADA: YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS THAT WE HAVE TO RESPECT, OR TO PROTECT
There is a long list of Canadian government officials and those of the courts, including the judges and the justices of peace, who will be charge, under international law, for committing crimes against humanity, against me. And the paper trail goes back for many years. It also hopes that I will either be dead, or to suffer some other detrimental effect, before I get to see any of its actions against me, brought to justice. I wish to say that I will be around to see all of this take place. And that I will also be the one to see that it also happen.
I do not like, as this country and its courts are wont to do, when Justices of the Peace, such as Ana C. Costa, who has no legal background, also decides on a matter in court, for obvious reasons. And why should they stop?. Unless people like me, who also reports on their corrupt in the media, do more to make this practice also stop, with the court. There are Justices of the Peace, with a legal background, but imagine the injustice to the person whose rights are also violated, when those other Justices of the Peace, who has no legal background, gets to decide on their matter. And with this practice, it also do not matter to them, since no one gets to view their actions. Or so they believed.