A CORRUPT CANADIAN JUDGE : SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, HARIET SACHS.
JUDGE HARIET SACHS: SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, TORONTO. ANOTHER CORRUPT, CANADIAN JUDGE.
JUDGE HARIET SACHS J., TOLD THE REGISTRAR , OF THE DIVISIONAL COURT, TO SCHEDULE THE URGENT MOTION, FOR TWO WEEKS LATER. - Regarding, Valerie Guillaume.
The Blogger's accussations against Canada, to the United Nations Committe against Torture. Accusing Canada, as a State Party, to the United Nations Convention Against Torture, which it has ratified, but has also never implemented. Canada is guilty in the case of this Blogger, Valerie Guillaume, in carrying out Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment, or Punishment, against her. Currently, the Blogger has been left homeless, in a consorted effort by the Canadian court, to deprive her of her civil rights and human rights, under its Constitution and under International Human Rights laws. THE INTENTION, OF THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT, THROUGH ITS COURTS, IS TO BRING ABOUT THE INTENSE SUFFERING, INCLUDING, MENTAL SUFFERING, TO THE VICTIM, VALERIE GUILLAUME, AS A MEANS OF PUNISHMENT. - this is against all international human rights laws. And it won't be tolerated.
|Judge Hariet Sachs|
Superior Court of Justice (Divisional Court)
The activist urgent motion that was filed with the Divisional court on April 22, 2016 and also went before the same judge, Sachs, for authorization, from the Registrar of the court and also to be heard on an urgent basis, was instead ignored. Instead, this so called "honorable" judge, saw it fit to schedule an urgent motion hearing date, before a panel of three judges, on an appeal from the order of a single judge, Maria Linhares de Sousa J. on April 18, 2016 against the this Blogger, for May 10, 2016. That is more than two weeks for the motion to be heard.
Keep in mind that it was filed on an urgent basis, to prevent the appelant from suffering irreparable harm. But that was exactly the intention of the judge, Hariet Sachs. She wanted the order of the previous judge, Maria Linhares de Sousa J. to be carried out in this case and so she did not view the motion as being urgent. Nor did she care about the consequense to the appellant. The order of the previous judge, on a motion brought by the lawyer, David S. Strashin, was to quash the appellant's appeal in the Divisional Court and to also instruct the office of the Sheriff, to evict the tenant, "forthwith" and "without notice". The decision of that single motions judge, Maria linhares de Sousa, was on the face of it, "cruel and unusual punishment", And for what action by this Blogger?. Since there was never any indication, that the appellant has posed any danger to anyone. Not in her previous hearings at the Landlord and Tenant Board, or at any other times.
How one human rights activist, Valerie Guillaume, fares under the corruption, of some Canadian judges.
This is also the reason, that, immediate international intervention, has to be taken to prevent the futher abuse, of the Blogger's human rights and to prevent further irreparable harm form happening.
Who to report to against Canada's acts of torture, including mental suffering and creating situations in its courts that it knows will cause me irreparable harm and the conspiracy of the judges, and justices of the peace and court administrative staff, who are involved in violating my human rights in that manner. ALL REPORTS OF CANADA AS A STATE, COMMITTING ACTS OF TORTURE AGAINST AN INDIVIDUAL, CAN BE REPORTED TO THE UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE, AGAINST TORTURE.
Similarly, on April 26, 2016, a Justice of the Peace, Paul Welch, at the Old City Hall Court, in Toronto, "did not even bother, to take the informant's (Valerie Guillaume), information, for an assault, that was committed against her, back in 2015. He was also overheard, to be commenting, to other justices of the peace, afterwards, saying, "I don't care". Apparently, the other justices were also advising him, about the informant, clearly. (In fact, the JP, Paul Welch , also had a stack of other informations, on the desk before him, that the informant had also previously tried to commence with at that court. And he also read all of them). The informant then dryly asked him, what the relevance was, in regards to the current charge that she was filing with the same JP, at the time. (He then put the other informantions away, on his desk, but also refused to take the new information). His attitude after rejecting the Blogger's information, on a private charge, was to come out of the room and to "chat it up" with his colleage. And also making the above mentioned comment. This same Justice of the Peace, Paul A. Welch, had also pleaded guilty to an obstruction of justice charge, previously. And also received an absolute discharge. Justice of the Peace, Paul A. Welch, was also a former police officer, for 32 years, before becoming a justice of the peace. In this case, the JP Paul Welch, was convicted over "ticket fixing". By lowering the amount of the ticket to be paid, (to half of its original fine), without a court appearance, by the offender.
The JP, also took the time to advise the informant, Valerie Guillaume, that he was also from "out of town" and not a regular JP, at the Old City Hall court. Apparently, this old corrupt JP, (and also former cop) was from Hamilton, Ontario, where had also faced the criminal charge, over his conduct. And also got off scotch free.
Note: Information on Organizations to report any violations by Canada, as a State Party, to the United Nations Treaties. Including those under the Rome Statutue, of the International Criminal Court, which also has a joint agreement with the United Nations, on carrying out the reprimands against any country, which has ignored its recommendations to implement those treaties, as a State Party. Meaning those countries like Canada, which has also ratified those treaties. But at the same time has also failed to carry out the recommendations by the United Nations, or the International Criminal Court. Or even with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Though Canada did not ratify the treaty with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The human rights court for the North America, South America and Caribbean regions.
THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE (CAT), IS THE GOVERNING BODY, THAT CANADA IS MANDATED TO REPORT TO ON ITS IMPLEMENTATIONS, OF THAT TREATY. CANADA RATIFIED THAT TREATY WITH THE UNITED NATIONS, ON JUNE 24, 1987. IN 2012 CANADA ALSO REPORTED TO THE UNITED NATIONS, ON ITS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TREATY ON THE COVENTION AGAINST TORTURE, WHICH IT ALSO IN VIOLATION OF.
- Committee Against Torture and others
- (CCPR, CERD, CAT, CEDAW, CRPD, CED, CESCR and CRC (you can go directly to those websites)