DISTURBING FACTS, TO CONSIDER, ABOUT CANADIAN JUDGES AND JUSTICES OF THE PEACE: MOST CANADIAN JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, DO NOT HAVE A LAW DEGREE. MOST OF THEM ALSO EXCEED THEIR JURISDICTION, IN THE MAJORITY OF CASES, THAT ARE BEFORE THEM. ALL OF THEM ACT WITH IMPUNITY, AND THEY ALL DO AS THEY PLEASE, IN THE COURTROOM. WHICH DO NOT ALLOW ANY KIND OF RECORDING, OF THE PROCEDURE. (EXCEPT FOR THE COURT'S OWN AUDIO RECORDING, WHICH MEANS VERY LITTLE, TO THE PROTECTION OF JUSTICE). For instance, in order to get a copy of the court's audio recording, of a hearing, you have to make an application to a judge, and also have an actual hearing before the judge, who will most likely deny this request, based on the reasons for it.COMPLAINT TO BE MADE, AGAINST ANOTHER TORONTO JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DAVID LIPPINGWELL, TO THE JUDICIAL REVIEW COUNCIL.
Complaint included these facts.
1. That the JP refused to accept her information, based on a conspiracy to obstruct justice, in her case. 2. That the JP, David Lippingwell, literally "tried" the case, at that stage of the process, which also exceeded his jurisdiction. 3. The Justice of the Peace, David Lippingwell, told the informant, that she was "basically lying", about the charges. 4. The Justice of the Peace also made other insensitive remarks, tot he Informant. 5. The JP told the Informant that she needed to "type up the charge herself" and to "look for the section of the law, it falls under". 6. JP changed the original charges to a lesser charge for "Intimidation/threats, against the accused. 7. JP, David Lippingwell, then ignored the for other more serious charges, against the accused, that the Informant wanted to lay. 8. When the Informant refused to sign the Information, on the lesser charge against the accused, the JP, David Lippingwell, then ended the meeting with her. 9. JP, David Lippingwell, then advised the secretary in the office, not to provide to the Informant, with the section of the law, when she had typed up the lesser charge, of intimidation/threat, against the accused. 10. The Informant had to complain to the Manager of the court, in order to get her to released this information to her, on the JP's order.
RACISM, CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, HAS PLAYED A ROLE IN THE DECISION, OF
A TORONTO JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DAVID LIPPINGWELL'S DECISION, NOT TO ALLOW, THIS BLOGGER, TO EXERCISE HER RIGHTS AND TO LAY A PRIVATE CHARGE.
THIS HAS ALSO HAPPENED, IN EVERY OTHER CASES, INVOLVING HER. DUE TO THE CONSPIRACY, INVOLVED. IN ONE HUNDRED PERCENT OF HER CASES, BEFORE A CANADIAN JUSTICE OF THE PEACE.
|Blogger, Valerie Guillaume|
Other comments in regards to Canada's corrupt legal system, from other writers, like myself.