Tuesday, January 17, 2017

DEPUTY CROWN ATTORNEY, NICOS FASSLER, AT THE ONTARIO PROVINCIAL COURT.

EXPOSING, CORRUPTION AND OTHER INCONSISTENCIES, WITHIN THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM. 

Some People Must Fight Really Hard, To Preserve and To Protect Their Legal Rights, Against The Corrupt Practices, that are so prevalent in the Canadian courts. Blame it on The Judges, Justices of the Peace and Crown Attorneys, who are the ones to abuse this process. When they want to act corrupt, they usually find a way to do so. 

TWO ACCUSED PERSONS HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH CRIMINAL OFFENCES AGAINST ME.  ONE OF THE ACCUSED, IS BARBARA O'CONNER, WHO HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH CRUELTY TO AN ANIMAL AND INJURING AN ANIMAL, FOR (ALLEGEDLY) KICKING MY CAT IN THE FACE, CAUSING AN INJURY.  AND THE OTHER ACCUSED PERSON, IS DUDLEY WOODSTOCK, WHO IS FACING A SLEW OF CHARGES, RANGING FROM CRIMINAL HARASSMENT AND INTIMIDATION, TO SEXUAL ASSAULT, (FOR EXPOSING HIMSELF). 

The pre-enquette hearing, in regards to both of the accused persons, is slated for January 18, 2017.  However, I am not able to make it for that date and contacted the Crown Attorney's Office, to adjourn the matter to another date. (Not wishing to have those charges against the accused thrown out, which I also believed that is what was also intended. For instance, the charges could not be found on their computer system, by the clerk, Sina, when I called that office, for an adjournment. That is always a bad sign, when the court do not really intend, to go ahead with those charges, against the accused. Unless, forced to do so. (such as making the matter public, where any "reasonable" person can also judge the matter). And it seem has never really processed the information, that I had also layed against them last year. 
The Deputy Crown Attorney Nicos Fassler, also agreed to the adjournment, as I was told by the clerk in that office, by the name of Sina. But there is also a catch, as there always are, with the Canadian courts and myself, when it want to violate my rights. I was informed by the Deputy Crown Attorney, through this clerk, that the Justice of the Peace, may not agree to the adjournment and that the charges could be thrown out. because of that fact. Wait just a minute! Let me review for you, how the court usually works. IF THE CROWN ATTORNEY WANTS, OR AGREE TO AN ADJOURNMENT, THEN THE COURT ALWAYS GO ALONG. ESPECIALLY, IF IT IS FOR REASONS THAT ARE ALSO BEYOND THE INFORMANT'S ABILITY TO ATTEND.

I also provided the court and Nicos Fassler, Deputy Crown Attorney, with another date in which I could also attend. That date is Wednesday, January 25, 2017. However, I was told by Sina the clerk, to also be prepared for my matter to be thrown out, if I do not attend on January 18th. IS THERE AN END TO ALL OF THIS?. OR AM I GOING TO BE FIGHTING THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT AND ITS CORRUPT COURTS, JUST TO BE ABLE TO PROTECT MY RIGHTS?. WHAT WILL IT TAKE, ALSO, FOR THOSE CANADIAN OFFICIALS, WHO WORK IN VARIOUS CAPACITY, TO STOP ABUSING MY RIGHTS?, SO THAT I CAN ALSO EXPECT EQUAL TREATMENT AND ALSO THE BENEFIT OF THE LAW?. 

Deputy Crown Attorney, Nicos Fassler, at the Ontario Provincial Court, located at 2201 Finch Avenue West, in Toronto, has been working from the Office of the Crown Attorney, for some time now. It is not a stretch to say that he is also well acquainted with the court process, and the relationship between the Judges, Justices of the Peace and the Office of the Crown Attorney. I have seen Justices of the Peace, throw out charges on the request of a Crown Attorney. Even when the JP, wanted to proceed with those charges and the Crown Attorney did not. If the Crown Attorney, Nicos Fassler wants an adjournment, to another date, he can also get it from the court. The court looks at the circumstances and because this is also the first time requesting such an adjournment, it is also not a waste of the court's time to agree to it. As I said, if the matter is on consent with the crown attorney, the court usually agrees to it. EXCEPT WHEN IT WANTS TO ACT CORRUPT, OR DISREGARD THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, WHOSE MATTER IS ALSO BEFORE THE COURT.