Tuesday, January 31, 2017

TORONTO SCHOOL BOARD TRUSTEE, NANCY ELGIE, USES RACIST SLUR, AGAINST A BLACK MOTHER.

A TORONTO SCHOOL BOARD TRUSTEE, NANCY  ELGIE, GETS TO KEEP HER JOB WITH THE TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD, AFTER CALLING A BLACK PARENT, A "NIGGER", IN FRONT OF OTHER WITNESSES.

Nancy Elgie, a Toronto District School Board Trustee, showed her racist attitude
in calling a black mother, at "nigger", at a school board  meeting.


Since when is an apology enough to right the wrongs done to a particular community, or a  group of people, without the necessary actions to back it up?  And by that I mean the kind of action that would ,also, clearly, send the message to the offender and all others who would act the same way, that it is going to cost you, one way or the other, for your lack of judgement.  And especially one that was as disingenuous, as the one that was provided, by Toronto School Board Trustee, Nancy Elgie.  Elgie claimed, that her lapse in judgement, was the result of a "bump to her head". Really? That was too easy. That is what you'd call 'adding an insult to an injury'.  And Nancy Elgie also knew the full extent of what her words and actions would also bring about. She intended to slay that black mother with her words, And so she chose her word carefully, hoping to deliver the full impact. It's too bad that she also thought, that were are also a neanderthal, like she is and could not see clearly her intentions. Or the motive behind her action. To dehumanized a community, by her carefully chosen words.

Why is a school board trustee, using such an offensive word towards a group of people, while at the same time, being entrusted with the education of our children?. Why is this neanderthal still occupying her seat, as a school board trustee?.

The question is not should this woman be fired over her comment?. The obvious question is why did the Toronto District School Board, decided to keep her on and by doing so, has also deeply insulted a particular community, over this racist woman's comment and insult?. If you think that Nancy Elgie's action, is also an isolated incident, among Toronto city officials, you should think again. Racism is very much a part of the overall systematic problem, that is also very much ingrained in this society. Should we allow those racists who runs this city, to continue to mock us by calling us names and insulting us, and at the same time keep their positions?. Let us send a clear message, to Nancy Elgie and to the rest of the Toronto city officials, and there are many just like her, that we will not tolerate openly racist comments, from any of them. That we as a society and also as a marginalized group, will also do whatever is in our power, to kick them out of office. Stop complaining and start acting.
I suggest that the Black community's protest goes beyond the petition that members of the public has already signed, to get this racist out of office. I suggest that we also take legal actions to recover damages, for this injury. Both from Nancy Elgie, the Toronto district School Board and also from the city. I suggest that we get this woman where it hurts the most. In her pocket. We also owe it to our children to make sure that Nancy Elgie and those other racists like her, are not allowed anywhere near our children, in the future, to cause any further damage to their developing minds. That is why it is so important for Nancy Elgie, to be forced out of her position, as a school board trustee. Surely, the Black community, has enough power to bring this about? Seriously, could she have done this to another community and still be occupying her seat?. I think not.





Saturday, January 28, 2017

THE SLAVE MENTALITY, OF SOME BLACKS AND THE DIVIDE AND CONQUER RULE, OF THE OPPRESSORS.


DO YOU WANT TO SPEND YOUR DOLLARS, ON BLACK BUSINESSES, OR ORGANIZATIONS, THAT DO NOT SUPPORT OTHER BLACKS, WHO ARE ALSO DOING WHAT THEY CAN, FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY?

Here is a list of some of the ones who has not supported me or this Blog. Which is dedicated to fighting systematic discrimination, against the Black community and other marginalized groups.

Giving the appearance, that they are for black culture and the black community, when they don’t support other blacks, who are also be doing what they can for the advancement of the black community. Most of them capitalized on the fact that they are from the black community, when it comes to promoting their own self interest. (which may have the appearance of a black owned business, or agency), but that is where the similarity ends with some of them.  They don't really support others who are dealing with the same unjust system, that targets us as a community. In fact most, if not all of the ones that I have mentioned here, are sell outs, in one way or another. 
To 'sell out' is defied, as an act of deliberate betrayal, or compromised.  And the reason in my opinion doesn't really matters why you do it.  I would term anyone who betrays someone of their own race, community, e.t.c, as a sell out.  Keep your reasons, or excuses for yourself.  It is the act of betraying, that makes you a sell out.  This would even include those blacks who 'turns a blind eye', i.e refused to support another black person, whose actions are in helping to maintain the same community. Or on the other hand, someone who may do something for the wrong reasons.

And Unless you are blind and dumb, this Blog of mine, does help to advance the cause of the Black community. It has done so from day one, and has made a public stance against the discrimination and other negative actions against the black community. The truth is that some blacks fear the backlash, for supporting someone like me, from the establishment. It is the divide and conquer rule, that has worked so well against us, for the last four hundred years of slavery. Yes, I said slavery, because we are still an enslaved race. Some of us has managed to free ourselves, but the majority are still slaves today.

Are Black people weaker than other races?. Some are beginning to ask this question, as so many blacks are so susceptible to outside influences and has a lack of racial pride.  This is a down right personal attack against some of them, in the hope that they would change. The reason being that they are also visible members of the black community and for some they are also so called role models and or mentors, without others knowing how they treat other blacks, as members of the same community.  If you are going to represent your community, to the broader community, as businesses, organizations, or whatever, then at least show some solidarity. Else you may be exposed and then look like a fool.
Don’t mind the dreadlocks that some of them wear, or the fact that they are promoting black culture, by making money off of it. They are still slaves in their mentality. This still rings true today, as it did during the four hundred years of slavery. For some of them slavery has not really ended. They’ve never freed their minds from the mental slavery, that this system has perpetrated on them. The result is a divided community, along the lines of social status, and those who are in with the establishment, against those who are not.
You don’t have to ask yourself if those blacks, like me, are also making a difference, because it is  very obvious. For one thing, the so called powers that be only goes after those who are really making a difference and, or appears as a threat to them. Those like myself, who has been persecuted by the Canadian establishment, for simply telling the truth about its unjust system.

I have personally experienced the lack of  support from some of the most well known black businesses and organizations in Toronto. I left it up to you to decide on the matter. Do you want to support black businesses and organizations, who against other blacks advancing like they are, like crabs in a barrel?.  Aren’t we all in this thing together?. Do the system not treat us all the same, because of the color of our skin? So why are these negroes so ignorant of this fact and continues to sit on the sideline and watch the very system tear down other blacks.  Some of the ones that I have asked for support, but did not support me are the following:

The Black Action Defence Committee (Has never returned my telephone calls, after the Death of Dudley Laws, whom I knew very well).
The African Canadian Legal Clinic
The Jamaican Canadian Association
Knowledge Bookstore, in Brampton, owner Sean Liburd
A different Booklist, owner Itah Sadu, (Another children book Author like myself)
Black Lives Matters, Toronto Chapter (All of its Leaders)
Black Lawyer Selwyn Peters, (So called Human Rights Lawyer)

The list goes on and on.

I also intend to exposed, the Black Lives Matters organization, even further, in my next article. And for the simple reason that as a so called black organization, it has been well funded by whites. In the tune of 100 million dollars. One white, Jewish Billionaire alone, George Soros, a Globalist and Zionist, has personally pledged, to give to the Black Lives Matters organization, 30 million dollars. And for what? For being disruptive and for misleading the Black community, into believing that either they, or those white organizations that are supporting it, actually cares about the Black community.  The same goes for the Canadian government subsidizing some of those Black organizations and or businesses and in exchanged for their loyalty. This couldn't be more true for the Black Action Defence Committee, the African Canadian Legal Clinic and the JCA.

 

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

TORONTO'S CORRUPT JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, LOURDES M. CRUZ, ORDERED A CLOSED DOOR HEARING, AT A PRE-ENQUETTE PROCEEDING, ON JANUARY 25TH.

A TORONTO JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, LOURDES M. CRUZ, ORDERED TWO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, FROM A COURTROOM IN TORONTO, IN WHICH SHE WANTED TO CONDUCT A "PRIVATE HEARING". She told the two confused looking persons, "This is a closed door hearing". And they were ordered out of the courtroom.

TORONTO BLOGGER, VALERIE GUILLAUME, THEN WALKED OUT OF THE CLOSED DOOR HEARING, FOR A PRE-ENQUETTE HEARING AGAINST TWO ACCUSED, IN WHICH SHE WAS A WITNESS.  AND ONLY AFTER THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, ALSO, WANTED TO VIOLATE HER LEGAL RIGHTS, IN THE PROCESS.

BLOGGER, "THIS MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE, WITH CANADA OPENLY ABUSING PEOPLE'S RIGHTS, BY HAVING PRIVATE HEARINGS AND CLOSED DOOR HEARINGS, BECAUSE IT WANTS TO ACT CORRUPT".  "CLOSED DOOR HEARINGS MEANS NO TRNASPARENCY AND THAT ALWAYS MEAN AN UNFAIR JUDICIAL PROCESS. THERE IS A REASON FOR THE PUBLIC'S PARTICIPATION IN THE JUDICIAL PROCESS, AND THAT IS TO PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC. AND TO ALSO ENSURE THAT JUSTICE IS SEEN TO HAVE TAKEN PLACE". THAT CAN'T HAPPEN IN PRIVATE HEARINGS, OR CLOSED DOOR HEARINGS". 

"CANADA, MUST ALSO NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE, TO OPENLY ABUSED MY RIGHTS AND THEN MOCKING ME IN THE PROCESS" "EVERY ACTION OF THE COURTS, INCLUDING THIS LATEST ONE, IS ALSO DESIGNED TO CAUSE ME HARM.  VARIOUS KINDS OF INJURY".

"THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, L. CRUZ,  HAD NO INTENTION OF PROCEEDING IN A FAIR MANNER, NOR OF RESPECTING MY RIGHTS. IT WAS A FARCE AND SHE ALSO KNEW THAT HER ACTIONS WOULD BE INJURIOUS TO ME. AFTER ALL, I HAD TURNED TO THE COURT TO PROTECT MY RIGHTS AND IT WAS NOT GOING TO DO THAT, BASED ON THE ACTIONS OF THE JP, INSISTING, ON HAVING A PRIVATE HEARING, OF THE CASE. AND THEN ORDERING THE PUBLIC OUT OF THE COURTROOM. THAT IS FREAKING OUTRAGEOUS!

There was kind of a mayhem in the courtroom, as Blogger Valerie Guillaume, also, refused to participate in the pre enquette hearing, after the Justice of the Peace, excluded the public. The Blogger, then told the court that it was not in the interest of justice, nor in the protection of her legal rights, for the court to have a closed door hearing, which excluded the public from observing the proceeding. The Crown Attorney, J. Cruess, also acted like an idiot. One of his tactics was to try to engaged the witness, (Blogger), in a (pre-trial) conversation in the courtroom, about the charges and of the two accused. He was told that the Blogger, (me), wanted all conversations, to be "on the record" and then he shut up.
The JP, Lourdes M. Cruz, acting on the advice of the crown, then issued no process on the charges against the two accused, Barbara O'conner and Dudley Woodstock, who were both charged under a private information, that was laid by the Blogger (see preceding article). What this also means, is that the Blogger, must now go and lay those charges over again, against the two accused and then hoped to have a hearing that does not exclude the public. Which is how it is supposed to be, based on Canada's claim to be both a democratic country and also as a country its responsibility to various international governances, which it has an obligation to follow, but does not.

This is a matter which should also be addressed, by the International human rights court, for this region, the Inter American Court of Human Rights and also by the United Nations. Against Canada's continual refusal, to adhere to the treaties, of those human rights bodies and to participate in proceedings, that has abused the rights of persons before the court. And that were also against the interest of justice.
Outside the courtroom, the court reporter, then told the Blogger, "You came here looking for a fight"
Valerie Guillaume, in hindsight : " No, I came here looking for justice, which was not forthcoming, due to the corruption of the court and also of the conspiracy, that also exist by the court, against me".

Blogger, "I absolutely did not want anything to do with that hearing, after seeing that the court did not respect the legal and democratic rights of the witness and was also clearly prepared to act corruptly". "I told the JP that I was not going to continue with the proceeding if she insisted that the court be closed to the public. Based on the actions of the court in the past and today, it was also obvious that it was not going to respect my rights in the proceeding". "A lot of arguments were going back and forth in the courtroom, with the Crown Attorney and the Justice of the Peace, wanting to proceed with a closed door hearing and the witness refusing to participate".  "I anticipated that the reason the JP wanted to exclude those two members of the public, that I also did not know. Just two ordinary people, from the court room, was because she was not going to respect the rules of law, or of the court and she that gave every indication, that the proceeding should be done in private. I told the JP that it was also a matter of public interest in regards to her actions and that as a member of the media, I was also going to make it public information. When I asked the court if I could later get an copy of the audio tape of the hearing, the JP said that was the case. Later, however, I found out that copies of the audio tapes of the hearing, was only available to, "lawyers and paralegals". Not to the public, even if you are also a party to the proceeding. To get an audio copy of a hearing in Canada, one must also have a court order, to do so. Yet, Canada's court proceedings, are also supposed to be opened to the public. In fact there are two sections of the law in regards to this fact, which are also conflicting. On the back of the Request Form to the Court for Access to Digital Court Recordings, it also states that under s. 136 (1) of the Courts of Justice Act, that it contravenes the act to record court proceedings and then just  a little way further down of the same section, s. 136 (2), it allows such a recording. It is stated as an "Exception". But what the Act really does is to allow Canadian courts, to act in a manner that is also undemocratic, by banning all recordings in any of its courtrooms and then to try to cover it up, to allow this small section of the same act, to offer some leeway. I can also tell you that the former and not the latter, is in fact the reality in the Canadian courts. One simply has to be prepared to either (a) exposed the lie of Canada's so called democratic and transparent courts and (b) To be prepared to defend one's rights personally, even if that means defying the (Canadian) law on that issue and going to jail for doing what is right. (And which other democratic countries also readily complies with this process, of having an open and transparent courtroom).  And if s. 136(2) does apply, that should also not be the case.




Tuesday, January 17, 2017

DEPUTY CROWN ATTORNEY, NICOS FASSLER, AT THE ONTARIO PROVINCIAL COURT.

EXPOSING, CORRUPTION AND OTHER INCONSISTENCIES, WITHIN THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM. 

Some People Must Fight Really Hard, To Preserve and To Protect Their Legal Rights, Against The Corrupt Practices, that are so prevalent in the Canadian courts. Blame it on The Judges, Justices of the Peace and Crown Attorneys, who are the ones to abuse this process. When they want to act corrupt, they usually find a way to do so. 

TWO ACCUSED PERSONS HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH CRIMINAL OFFENCES AGAINST ME.  ONE OF THE ACCUSED, IS BARBARA O'CONNER, WHO HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH CRUELTY TO AN ANIMAL AND INJURING AN ANIMAL, FOR (ALLEGEDLY) KICKING MY CAT IN THE FACE, CAUSING AN INJURY.  AND THE OTHER ACCUSED PERSON, IS DUDLEY WOODSTOCK, WHO IS FACING A SLEW OF CHARGES, RANGING FROM CRIMINAL HARASSMENT AND INTIMIDATION, TO SEXUAL ASSAULT, (FOR EXPOSING HIMSELF). 

The pre-enquette hearing, in regards to both of the accused persons, is slated for January 18, 2017.  However, I am not able to make it for that date and contacted the Crown Attorney's Office, to adjourn the matter to another date. (Not wishing to have those charges against the accused thrown out, which I also believed that is what was also intended. For instance, the charges could not be found on their computer system, by the clerk, Sina, when I called that office, for an adjournment. That is always a bad sign, when the court do not really intend, to go ahead with those charges, against the accused. Unless, forced to do so. (such as making the matter public, where any "reasonable" person can also judge the matter). And it seem has never really processed the information, that I had also layed against them last year. 
The Deputy Crown Attorney Nicos Fassler, also agreed to the adjournment, as I was told by the clerk in that office, by the name of Sina. But there is also a catch, as there always are, with the Canadian courts and myself, when it want to violate my rights. I was informed by the Deputy Crown Attorney, through this clerk, that the Justice of the Peace, may not agree to the adjournment and that the charges could be thrown out. because of that fact. Wait just a minute! Let me review for you, how the court usually works. IF THE CROWN ATTORNEY WANTS, OR AGREE TO AN ADJOURNMENT, THEN THE COURT ALWAYS GO ALONG. ESPECIALLY, IF IT IS FOR REASONS THAT ARE ALSO BEYOND THE INFORMANT'S ABILITY TO ATTEND.

I also provided the court and Nicos Fassler, Deputy Crown Attorney, with another date in which I could also attend. That date is Wednesday, January 25, 2017. However, I was told by Sina the clerk, to also be prepared for my matter to be thrown out, if I do not attend on January 18th. IS THERE AN END TO ALL OF THIS?. OR AM I GOING TO BE FIGHTING THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT AND ITS CORRUPT COURTS, JUST TO BE ABLE TO PROTECT MY RIGHTS?. WHAT WILL IT TAKE, ALSO, FOR THOSE CANADIAN OFFICIALS, WHO WORK IN VARIOUS CAPACITY, TO STOP ABUSING MY RIGHTS?, SO THAT I CAN ALSO EXPECT EQUAL TREATMENT AND ALSO THE BENEFIT OF THE LAW?. 

Deputy Crown Attorney, Nicos Fassler, at the Ontario Provincial Court, located at 2201 Finch Avenue West, in Toronto, has been working from the Office of the Crown Attorney, for some time now. It is not a stretch to say that he is also well acquainted with the court process, and the relationship between the Judges, Justices of the Peace and the Office of the Crown Attorney. I have seen Justices of the Peace, throw out charges on the request of a Crown Attorney. Even when the JP, wanted to proceed with those charges and the Crown Attorney did not. If the Crown Attorney, Nicos Fassler wants an adjournment, to another date, he can also get it from the court. The court looks at the circumstances and because this is also the first time requesting such an adjournment, it is also not a waste of the court's time to agree to it. As I said, if the matter is on consent with the crown attorney, the court usually agrees to it. EXCEPT WHEN IT WANTS TO ACT CORRUPT, OR DISREGARD THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, WHOSE MATTER IS ALSO BEFORE THE COURT.




Monday, January 9, 2017

THIS JUDGE IS INVOLVED IN THE OVERALL CONSPIRACY, WHICH INVOLVED FORCING ME FROM MY HOME AND TO RENDER ME HOMELESS.

Judge found excuse to delay (and to deny making an order for an injunctive relief) sought by me, to get back into my home, as I believed that I was forced out on the orders of the police and the government working clandestinely to carry out further human right abuse against me.

What make this case so heinous is the fact that this past weekend was also one of the coldest so far this winter. And to think that they had also planned it with such precision, even going so far as to block available funds that would also be available to me, around that time, just to ensure that I would be out in the cold and without financial availability to assist me. It was one of the cruelest forms of human rights abuse that Canada has carried out against me and it has now also taken it upon itself to mock me openly, about its human rights abuse against me. But I am no fool. This last effort is the one that will bring, finally, the involvement of other governing bodies to investigate its actions, where I am concerned.
Judge Darla Wilson of the
Superior Court of Justice
in Ontario, Canada.

On January 9, 2017 I was before this judge ,seeking an order for injunctive relief, after I got wind of the fact that the Canadian police, CSIS and the government are involved, in yet another attempt to render me homeless, as part of that country's continuing persecution of me.

It was an urgent motion which should speak for itself. Meaning, that it should have been heard by the said judge. As most urgent motions are to prevent further harm to the party seeking relief from the court. That is, unless you are also me. Valerie Guillaume, persecuted person in Canada. Then every effort will be made to disregard my rights further by the court. When I had confronted the Judge in the courtroom about seeking equitable relief, as I would also be facing irreparable harm, further, since that action was already carried out against me on the weekend , she also made every excuse not to hear the case. This judge was also in the CPC court (civil practice court) and it was also one of those rare occasions when the courtroom was just about empty. Perhaps five cases in total to be heard. And as usual mine was also last on the list, as it was also an add on. Judge Darla Wilson then made the excuse that she had another case at 10 a.m. which was true since no other lawyers, or any other persons were also present, besides me in the courtroom. she has dealt with all of the others and mine as it was also an add on to the list, was the last one to be heard.

Because she did not want to grant me the relief that I had sought via an injunction or mandatory order to let me back into my home, she also made it so that the matter was to be heard on January 10th, as a regular motion and that the defendant was also to be served prior to the hearing of the motion.
Most urgent motions are exparte motions. I told the judge that because I was out in the bitter cold as a result of the defendant's action and that the present financial costs to me and other injury sustain by me she should also make an interim or even an interlocutory order and that should bring the matter back in the near future on notice to the defendant. But that I was in need of the protection of the court now. That also fell on deaf ears as far as this judge was concerned.  She insisted that since I did not as yet file a claim against the defendant, as if somehow that this also  weaken my case for injunctive relief. she knew damn well that an injunction or  mandatory order can also be made on an impending proceeding. Then she tried to tell me that I may not have a case since I did not has yet started one. Well what did you think the motion was? This corrupt judge who was also part of this conspiracy against me did not want to help me in this case.

i began ot unerstatn the obe rall conspei int he whole matter.

Thursday, January 5, 2017

THE INTER AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. AND THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES.

THE PETITION OF THIS BLOGGER, BEFORE THE IACHR, FOR PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES, AGAINST CANADA, FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE.


This is what the OAS members do, sit on their arses, while heinous crimes are also being committed by its Member States, including Canada and the US. Both of which has never really come under fire for their actions. 
General Assembly, of the OAS. 

AN UPDATE: A letter sent to the petitioner and Blogger, Valerie Guillaume, on December 13, 2016, from the Inter American Commission on Human Rights. The letter outlined the status of the petition, which was also accessible online, through its Petition Portal. The Blogger, had also filed the Petition online, with the IACHR. The request was for Precautionary Measures to be taken against Canada, for its current human rights abuse against the Blogger, was received by the Inter American Commission on Human Rights and is still at the preliminary stage of the investigation. Officially, the status is classified as "Under Study". What this means is that the petition, is still at the very initial stage with the IACHR. And this does not sit very well with this Blogger.  Not all petition requests are marked as "urgent", but mine was. Therefore I had also expected the IACHR, to deal with it on an urgent basis. This latest petition was also filed in October, of 2016. Too much of a delay, in my view.

About the Inter American Commission on Human Rights. It is the 'first step or stage, in a two part process, in the protection of human rights. That is, for the of North American region. Which both Canada and the United States of America falls under. It also include, South and Central America and the Caribbean. The second stage is with the Inter American Court of Human Rights. All proceedings with the court, also begins with the IACHR. 

Canada is a part of the Organization of American States. What's more, it has also NOT ratified its treaty with the OAS. The OAS treaty, basically, is based on the American Convention on Human Rights.  This means that Canada unlike all other Member States, has also disagreed to follow the mandate of the OAS and to respect the rights of everyone living in that country and not to abuse their human rights. Unfortunately, it has not done so. Until Canada has ratified the treaty with the OAS, under the American Convention on Human Rights, the Inter American Court of Human Rights cannot be a last resort, for those seeking the protection from the court, against Canada's human rights abuse.  The OAS and the IACHR's, rather narrow view of focusing on just one group in Canada, its Aboriginal Peoples, which they also recognized as being in need of protection, should also focused on other groups and individuals in Canada as well, who are also facing human rights abuse, for one reason or another. Including, Muslim Canadians and Afro Canadians, among other groups. 

In fact, the IACHR, has now extended its so called protection to include a "legal entity".  As if the protection offered to the individuals, under those "legal entities" were not enough. We all know what a legal entity is, don't we?. For those who do not, it is a legal term used by the court, to mean a non human being. For instance, a corporation, is a legal entity. The city of Toronto is a legal entity. I know because I have been to court, with the city of Toronto, which in fact is a corporation. 

Part of the request from the petitionor and this Blogger, was to expedite the matter, as in an Urgent Petition and not to lump it together with other petitions, which also do not require an urgent response from the IACHR. I need to make this very clear to the IACHR. That I also need an immediate intervention in order to ensure my safety and to protect my human rights. Surely, the IACHR could have moved much faster. Instead the matter is still at the preliminary stage and classified as Under Study. Maybe, the IACHR also chose spend its time and as part of the investigation, in reading my Blog. If so, then it should also get on with the investigation and help to protect my rights. My problem is with its current President, Tracey Robinson, a Jamaican, who in my opinion is also a bitch. Tracey Robinson, who three years ago was also one of two Rapporteurs to Canada, (the other person was Dinah Shelton), who was assigned to look into human rights abuse concerns, in that country, (for which I was also invited to participate, by the hypocritical IACHR, but which I also declined). And I still also need its intervention at this time, to help with my fight to protect my human rights. 

IACHR's President, Tracy Robinson, on the left
was a Commissioner to Canada, in 2013, to
investigate human rights abuse concerns, in
Canada. Her report did very little to stop
that country's actions, in regards to its
human rights abuse practice, against
marginalized groups.
Tracy Robinson, status has now elevated to, President of the Inter American Commission on Human Rights. I don't like Jamaicans, though I was also born in that country, yet raised in Canada. I hardly know that country and don't miss it one bit. In my eyes it is a small island in many ways. To me Cuba is big. It has done some really big and extraordinary things for its people. Jamaica has not. What it has done is to submit to both the US and Canada, at the expense of the people. The new President of the IACHR, also chose to takes her sweet time in investigating my complaint against Canada, while I also continue to endure more human rights abuse. I am also not surprised at this. Black people as a whole would rather do more harm to their own, than to help them. I am so unlike them in my approach, that I am often told that I am "different", by most everyone. I am still loyal to my race, but they are not loyal to me. Just ask the many Canadian officials, who has also managed to get them to betray me and to act as agents for the Canadian government, in spying on me, or in acting as an agent provocateur, in causing me harm. Most of this has been done by my own people, even as I speak. So excuse me for being bitter and for thinking that most of them are like that. Perhaps I am also being unfair, but certainly the evidence also speak for itself. 

Besides, I care not where on this planet one happens to live, everyone is entitled to the protection of their human rights. It is a universal law, by nature and one that was also initiated by the United Nations, which should be enforced. I am a global citizen and I have no allegiance to any particular country. Since most are also similar in how their governments function. From my religious point of view, all countries has given their allegiance to the New World Order and to its Antichrist system, meant on enslaving the earth's populations. I am also entitled to my beliefs and also to expressing those views. As a writer and Blogger, freedom of speech is also important to me. I am not kind in my criticism to those who abuse the rights of other human beings. Everyone should be entitled to the enjoyment of the same freedoms and the right to live without discrimination of any kind. By taking those basic rights away, you have also reduced their status as a human being. 




Wednesday, January 4, 2017

HOW CANADA GET AWAY, WITH CARRYING OUT TORTURE AND OTHER CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.


TORTURE IN CANADA. THE SECRET CRIME AGAINST VICTIMS, OF THE CANADIAN POLICE. AND ALSO FROM ITS INTELLIGENT AGENCY, CSIS.

 

  STOP THE LIE!  CANADA CARRIES OUT TORTURE!

WHY THIS LIE NEED TO BE EXPOSED, TO HELP VICTIMS OF TORTURE IN CANADA.
Canada's Foreign Minister, Stephane Dion, at a conference on the Optional Protocol to Convention Against Torture.
Canada has hypocritically, joined that organization, though it also continues to carry out torture, in its own country.
What is torture?  According to the Rome Statute, "Torture" means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions; 
 The United Nations:  Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. (Ratified and also entered into force on June 26. 1987).
Under the United Nations Convention Against torture 1984, torture is described as: "...any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity...".

THIS IS HOW THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT CARRIES OUT ITS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE AGAINST ME. IT IS ONLY ONE OF MANY TACTICS, THAT ARE USED BY ITS POLICE AND WHICH ARE DESIGNED TO CAUSE ME SERIOUS PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM. 





AMONG THE OTHER TACTICS USED AGAINST ME, IS SLANDER AND THE MALIGNING OF MY CHARACTER. THIS ALSO PROVED TO BE AN EFFECTIVE TOOL, THAT ALLOW ITS AGENTS, TO ACT AGAINST ME, BY BELIEVING THE LIES FED TO THEM, BY THE POLICE AND OR BY CSIS.

 
2017 AND IT’S A NEW YEAR AND THE SAME OLD STRATEGIES AND TACTICSS, ARE BEING USED AGAINST ME, BY CSIS AND THE CANADIAN POLICE. TO HARASS, INTIMIDATE AND TO CAUSE SERIOUS PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY TO ME. IT IS ALSO TIME THAT THIS GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE AGAINST ME ALSO STOP.
I recently moved into a new residence and I immediately began to see certain patterns of behaviour from my landlord which would indicate that there is some kind of secret collaboration between the police, CSIS and the Canadian government and the property owner, to disrupt and end my tenancy. In other words to destabilized me and to bring about the mental and other kinds of sufferings, that goes with it.

And unbeknown to the landlord, about me being cognizant of the whole thing. His handlers did not tell him the whole thing and he doesn’t seem to be aware, that I am aware of his actions, as an agent provocateur, in this whole thing.
The telltale signs of the Canadian police and CSIS, in carrying out its agenda against me. Their goal is to see me homeless, in order to destabilized me. This is accomplishes through them working with my landlord and trying to get me evicted. This happens so frequently that not only is it a psychological abuse and physical torture, but also one that need to be addressed, as a specific crime that is being carried out against me, by the Canadian government.
I took a recent vacation in another Canadian Province over the Christmas holiday, for a few days. And lo and behold, there were, I believed, agents posted at the hotel where I was staying and I was also being followed, both in my hometown of Toronto and when I was away on holidays. It never lets up.

Putting pressure on the Inter American Commission for Human Rights to take precautionary measures to protect my human rights. Even if it involves getting others to put pressure on that agency directly. It is simply not doing its job as it is supposed to in my case. The IACHR is simply complicit in allowing the Canadian government and its police to openly violate my human rights and to endanger my safety continually, without taking the appropriate steps to stop this kind of human rights abuse. I plan to give much more exposure to the conspiracy that is involved and to force those responsible to do what they are mandated to do in this case.  It is now  a matter of demanding that my rights are respected, both by the Canadian government and also by the IACHR, the regional human rights body, that is supposed to enforced, the protection of persons living in Canada. Something that it has not done and should also answer for its actions, on that issue. The complacency on the part of the IACHR, in regards to Canada's human rights abuse, against specific victims, such as myself, is no longer acceptable. The effort now is to force it to do what it is suppose to do, under the OAS treaty, which that country has also hypocritically, pretended to adhered to, but in reality do not. I also see the year 2017, as a turning point in which the human rights abuse, that I have been facing from the Canadian government and its police, continually and without justification, comes to a stop.

The following are other links, to other victims of CSIS, the police and the Canadian government's torture campaign, against specific victims. 
 https://www.facebook.com/TheCityOfKingston/posts/561762237189670

www.democracynow.org/2010/6/25/stefan_christoff

Makes you wonder what Canada plans to do, with all of the new Fema camps, that has cropped up in Canada. All of them on or near to Walmart grounds. There is definitely an attack against certain persons, activists, who are also outspoken against that country's human rights abuse. It is now sufficiently believed, that it also wants to curtailed the freedom of speech, freedom of association,
and many of the other fundamental human rights, of select victims of Canada's human rights abuse.
It also wants to carry out secret crimes, such as torture against them and to even subject them to unlawful arrest and detention, in the near future.
Fema camps aside, Canada has no right to be secretly torturing people, in its own country and to get the other international human rights agencies and governing bodies, to go along with it. I for one, will not shut up about it. I can't remember a time for the last few years, when I have had any kind of peace of mind. It is one constant harassment and many other situations committed against me by the Canadian police and CSIS, in order to break me down. When I didn't go crazy but kept on blogging about my experiences and about its human rights abuse, they also found new ways to continue with the attacks against me. Well, I will continue to blog and to get international attention, to the crimes that are being committed in Canada, against unwitting victims of its human rights abuse.