Wednesday, October 31, 2018

FRED VICTOR CENTRE, BROKE THE LAW, BY TAKING REPRISAL ACTIONS, AGAINST BLOGGER.

TORONTO SHELTER SUPPORT AND HOUSING EXECUTIVES, TOOK NO ACTIONS TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC, OR TO ENFORCE THE SHELTER STANDARDS ACT, IN THIS CASE. IT CAN BE VIEWED IN TWO WAYS: CULPABILITY (A CRIMINAL ACT) AND COMPLICITY, IN REGARDS TO THEIR ACTIONS. OTHER ACTIONS ON THEIR PART INCLUDED, CONSPIRACY(SPECIFICLLY, THAT THEY HAD CONSPIRED, TO CAUSED FURTHER INJURY TO THIS BLOGGER, BY TAKING NO ACTIONS TO PROTECT HER SAFETY), CORRUPTION AND BREACH OF TRUST.

ANYONE CAN BECOME HOMELESS, FOR VARIOUS REASONS.  WHEN THAT HAPPENS, IT IS ALSO A HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUE. SHELTERS EXIST TO PROVIDE FOR THE IMMEDIATE NEED, OF THE HOMELESS. TO PUT 
SOMEONE WHO IS HOMELESS, OUT ON THE STREET AND IN THE COLD, WITHOUT ANY JUSTIFIABLE REASONS, OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT A PREVIOUS RESTRICTION WAS STILL IN PLACE, IS NOT A GOOD ENOUGH REASON, TO ENDANGER THE SAFETY OF ANYONE.

FRED VICTOR CENTRE, AS A HOUSING  PROVIDER, THAT IS UNDER CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF TORONTO, TO PROVIDE EMERGENCY AND LONG TERM SHELTER SUPPORT, TO THE HOMELESS.  IT HAS BROKEN SHELTER STANDARDS REGULATIONS, BY TELLING A HOMELESS WOMAN THEY HAD PUT OUT IN THE COLD WITH HER ANIMAL, THAT IT WOULD TAKE THEM ANOTHER TWO WEEKS, TO MAKE A DECISION, WHEN OR IF THE WOMAN CAN RETURN TO THE SHELTER. THIS UNUSUAL DELAY IS ALSO AGAINST SHELTER SUPPORT AND HOUSING STANDARDS ACT, FOR RESTRICTIONS THAT DO NOT INCLUDE THE SAETY OF OTHERS, BUT IS BASED ON SOME PREVIOUS ACTIONS, THAT WAS DONE SOME SIX YEARS PREVIOUSLY, THAT ALSO DID NOT INCLUDE ANY THREAT, OR VIOLENCE TO OTHERS.
Marcia Gilmore, a shelter manager, at the Fred Victor Centre
has delayed her response, in making a decision, under Shelter Support
and Housing Regulations, after a homeless woman was put out in
the cold last week with her animal, when she was told that she was
still restricted after six years, from all Fred Victor Centre shelters,
after she had reported (six years ago) in the media about the abuse of
power, and other practices, by Fred Victor Centre's shelter managers
and other staff.


Marcia Gilmore's comment, to this blogger: "Can you take down the article, that you wrote on your blog, about Fred Victor", before giving an answer to the woman, this blogger, concerning the six year restriction, that was put on her by another Fred Victor Centre Manager, Danielle Ashby, back in 2013, after reporting on the actions of Fred Victor's staff. When the blogger said no, that she was obligated to the public and not to the Fred Victor Centre, in regards to what she report on her blog, she was then told by Marcia Gilmore, that she would have to wait, "until  next week", to get an answer from her, if and when she could return to the shelter.
The Blogger had lost her home last week and had gone to the shelter, which is also the only shelter in Toronto, that also takes animals on a long term basis. Aside from the Fred Victor Centre shelters, there are only a few other housing providers, that operate on a drop in basis, that may take animals, on a day to day basis, in regards to their 24 hour respite. With those ones you also have to meet specific criteria as well. Such as Sprott House, a LGBQT, shelter in Toronto that takes animals on a temporary basis. And most of them are also full on any given day.
On the same day that the homeless woman was asked to leave the Fred Victor shelter, located at 545 Lakeshore Blvd. West in Toronto, a fight had broken out between two men at the same shelter and one of them had assaulted the other man, in front of other witnesses. The man who had assaulted the other resident, was not asked to leave the shelter. He was allowed to stay at the shelter by the two staff, who had also witnessed the incident. (The fight had broken out at a resident meeting, where staff was also in attendance). Fred Victor staff, Michael Joseph and Tracy Baker, allowed the man to remained at the shelter, after committing the assault). When that incident was brought up with the manager, Marcia Gilmore, she responded that "each case was different". Not only was that resident not evicted from the Fred Victor shelter, for his violence, but he also did not have to wait two weeks, for an answer from the Fred Victor staff and management, if he could stay at the shelter. If their treatment of residents is based on fairness and equality, then that is also lacking, in regards to their decision in my case. There is also a "conspiracy of silence", in regards to the Shelter Support and Housing, Management, while they continue to ignore the situation. For instance, under the SSHA, a housing provider, is suppose to get the approval from Shelter Support And Housing Administration, first, if they have imposed a restriction on a resident, or former resident, that is longer than 3 months. According to Brad Boucher, Manager at Shelter, Support and Housing, he had "approved the restriction, longer than 6 months", from Fred Victor Centre, in regards to my case, back in 2013, when it was first imposed. When I asked him to provide me with a copy of that document, Brad Boucher, SSHA, has so far refused and has since remained silent on the matter. Other Shelter Support and Housing Administration staff who has also remained silent in regards to this current situation, include the following: Mark Kim, Tamika Givens, Natalie Williams, Milton Berra, who is also acting in place of the Director, Gordon Tanner, (who is back on November 6th) and Paul Raftis, (Interim)General Manager.

A CASE OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW
This blogger is adding their names to the list of other Canadian government officials and others who have acted in a conspiracy with those officials, to violate her human right and to cause her harm, with the International Criminal Court. As a part of that process, the victim and this blogger, can also add any new evidence to the process, which has started before this incident, had occurred and at any stage in the proceedings before that court. As I have officially been contacted by the Office of the Prosecutor of the I.C.C. and my case also officially acknowledged by the I.C.C. and is still in the "Preliminary Stage", which do not have a specific timeline, but could proceed as long as there is additional evidence that is needed by the International Criminal Court, to proceed with my matter before that court, I will continue to provide new evidence to that court, in regards to the crimes that have been committed against me, by those officials, under the Rome Statute, Article 7, in regards to Crimes Against Humanity, against me.   




















ROXANNE PARIS, A MANAGER, IN THE URGENT CIVIL INTAKE OFFICE, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, TO BE FACE A CHARGE, OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, AND BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST. IN DELIBERATELY, BLOCKING, MY URGENT MOTION, IN THE COURT.

AFTER FILING MY URGENT MOTION, AT THE COURTHOUSE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, I WAS TOLD THAT IT WENT DIRECTLY, TO THE CIVIL URGENT MO...