DOES TORONTO NEED, A CITY LIBRARIAN, LIKE VICKERY BOWLES, WHO DO NOT RESPOND, TO A PUBLIC INQUIRY?. AND TO HOLD MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC IN CONTEMPT, IN REGARDS TO HER ACTIONS?. NO, WE DO NOT.
 |
| Vickery Bowles. No response from her, or the TPL, regarding the outcome of the Children Book Selection Committee's alleged meeting on October 11th, to review my children books. It has been one month of waiting for them to respond to my inquiries, as to the outcome of the meeting. I have gotten from them a "wall of silence" concerning that alleged meeting. My guess, is that the Committee did not get to review those books, because it was not given to the Committee, due to the personal reasons, of those TPL's Management staff. In other words I believed that they have either blocked the books from being reviewed. Or have covered up the response from the committee, for their own personal reasons. Which is also corrupt. |
 |
| Sue Graham Nutter, TPL Board Chair. Sue Graham Nutter, has failed to respond to my written complaint, about TPL's staff. Or to present my complaint to the TPL's other Board Members. |
For making it known that they have acted and continues to act racist, and also corrupt, towards a member of a visible minority. And that they have also implemented a racist policy towards members of a visible minority. One that included their personal opinions and attitude, as well as other disturbing actions on the part of the Toronto Public Library's Management and Board Chair and Vice Chair.
It is one month now since October 11th and the day that I was informed by the Toronto Public Library's Management staff, Michele Melady (and also acting on behalf of Susan Caron and Vickery Bowles), that the Children Book Selection Committee, would be meeting on October 11th, to decide on the five books that I had sent to the TPL for review by that committee, in the hope of purchasing them. Now after waiting for one month (and still counting) to get a response as to the outcome of that Committee's meeting, regarding those books, I have yet to get a response from the TPL and specifically, from Vickery Bowles, Susan Caron and Michele Melady, regarding the outcome of that alleged Committee meeting.
Personally, I am of the opinion that the Committee did not get to see my books. Here are the reasons why. # 1 That those persons mentioned, did not in fact present the books to the Selection Committee, on that date, or at any other times. #2. That they also never intended to present the books to the Committee. (Based on their own reasons). #3. That this was done because they did not want to purchase the books. #4. That they intended to defraud me out of the rights of those books, by holding on to the books still and not returning them to me, after one month of waiting, for a response. #5. That they acted in conjunction with others to sabotage my efforts to get those books purchased by the library. #6. That they have used their personal influence to that end. #7. That they have acted corruptly regarding the matter. #8. That they have also breached the public trust in this matter, if it was proven that they had lied about the Committee's meeting and the reviewing of the books #9. Or to have withheld the decision of the Selection Committee, in regards to those books, because they also intended to cause me harm, over that decision.
Corruption among Toronto officials is nothing new. That is how they operate and will continue to operate, unless their secrets are exposed to the public.
