Wednesday, May 8, 2019

CANADA IS CORRUPT. WHAT THE WORLD DO NOT KNOW, ABOUT GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION, CANADA.

CORRUPT CROWN ATTORNEY, BLOCKED CRIMINAL CHARGES, AGAINST TORONTO CITY OFFICIALS.

A TORONTO CROWN ATTORNEY, BROCK JONES,  NOT SURPRISINGLY, HAS BLOCKED ALL CHARGES, AGAINST THOSE  CITY OF TORONTO OFFICIALS, WHO WERE CHARGED, OVER THEIR RELATIONSHIP, WITH THE OWNER OF A PROPERTY, THAT LEADS TO CRIMINAL CHARGES, AGAINST THEM.


Brock Jones has threatened to use his position as the crown attorney to withdraw the charges of assault and threatening bodily harm, against the same property owner, if the court also decided to issue process on those charges. Jones claimed that the video evidence provided to the court, in regards to those charges, were also not able to be played on the court's recording equipment, for some strange reason. He claimed also that the CD containing the video of the assault, that was also provided as evidence against the accused, did not contain anything on it. This was quite a statement to make, because the informant had gone to great length, to make sure that the court had the evidence from the video of the assault, that it also needed in order to prosecute the accused. We must all now questioned, what this crown attorney did with that evidence?. He made this statement after he had contacted the 41 Division Police, as he had also advised the court that he was going to do, during the break, in order to get more evidence or information, on the matters that were before the court, at the pre-enquette hearing.  When the court had resumed after the break, he then tried to use this heresy evidence from the police in court, claiming that the police had told him, presumably during the lunch break, that the victim (I, in this case) had told the police, that she did not want the accused charged. He also came back with personal information about the accused, such as her  age and other personal information, that he no doubt also got from the police, which he also tried to use to minimized the situation against her and that were also irrelevant to the charges against her. 

That was one of the ways that he was trying to get the charges against that person thrown out. Once he started bringing evidence from his friends in the 41 Division Police, I of course objected very loudly to the court about that and told both him and the court, that if he wanted to use evidence from the police, then he was to have them brought to the court and to undergo the same process as everyone else. That is to swear to the evidence that they were giving to this corrupt crown attorney, over the telephone. He then threw out all of the charges against the city officials and the other private persons who were also charged. And knowing that a video existed of the assaults and the threats, by one of the accused against me, he also proposed to the court, that since the cd in his position contained nothing on it, nor will the cd/dvd player in the courtroom, be able to play such a video, then he also suggested, to the Justice of the Peace presiding over the matter, that no process should also be issued against the accused. And that if process was issued, then as the crown attorney for the case, he would also use the statutory powers, provided to him as crown attorney and withdraw those charges. After issuing his threats to withdraw the charges, Brock Jones sat down and then waited for the Justice of the Peace, to decide on whether to issue process or not.

The Justice of the Peace agreed with him on all of the other charges and did not issue process for those charges. But he decided that process should be issued against one of the accused, Angela Sterling, in regards to the assault charge and the threatening bodily harm charge. I waited for the Crown Attorney Brock Jones, to then get up and to announced to the court, that he was indeed going to do as he had earlier threatened to do, but he did not go against the JP's decision. Perhaps he was more influenced by the fact that I am a writer and journalist, which the court also became aware of during the hearing, and as further evidence as to why I and the court should also believed, that the Crown Attorney Brock Jones, was also trying to knock the charges down, against the city officials, as well as the other accused, because of the bigger conspiracy involved, to block those charges from proceeding against them in the court.

Canada has a different standard of justice, than anywhere else in the modern world. It is a very corrupt country, where government officials are rarely, if ever charged for their corruption. It is even more unheard of for any private citizen to succeed in any prosecution against them, in any Canadian court. The best that anyone, including me, can do in such a case, is to bring the matter before the international governing bodies that are set up to deal with such actions by Canada, and to also give it as much public exposure, as necessary, in order to protect the individual rights and freedoms, of those who are harmed in any way, by the corruption of those Canadian government officials.

ROXANNE PARIS, A MANAGER, IN THE URGENT CIVIL INTAKE OFFICE, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, TO BE FACE A CHARGE, OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, AND BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST. IN DELIBERATELY, BLOCKING, MY URGENT MOTION, IN THE COURT.

AFTER FILING MY URGENT MOTION, AT THE COURTHOUSE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, I WAS TOLD THAT IT WENT DIRECTLY, TO THE CIVIL URGENT MO...