BLOGGERS, NEED AS MUCH PROTECTION, AS OTHER JOURNALISTS, AND AGAINST ATTACKS FOR REPORTING, ON A COUNTRY'S ACTIONS.

ARTICLE 19, OF UNESCO, WAS INTENDED TO PROTECT BLOGGERS, PARTICULARLY, AGAINST THE STATE’S ENCROACHMENT, ON THEIR FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

In 2003, from September 29 to October 27, at its 32 session, the United Nations, through one of its governing bodies, UNESCO, implemented Article 19, to protect Bloggers, from unwarranted persecution and other limitations, to their expression in the electronic media. Usually, through social media.

Article 19, was then formally launched in June of 2011, after its third session.

On September 26, 2017, new guidelines were put in place, which is supposed to guarantee, the protection of journalists and among them, Bloggers, who are also reporting, on the ongoing (actions), of governments around the world. The new guidelines set out the commitment that States have, to prevent and protect against, and prosecute attacks in UN Human Rights Council resolution, under resolution 11/2. It says nothing about if those actions, such as persecution, is also directed by the State, against a journalist, or blogger.  And as is often the case in a country that does not respect freedom of speech, because of its own mandate to hide its actions. The guidelines also sets out how UN human rights mechanisms, should be used, to ensure the safety of all of those who reports on what is happening, in those countries.

For Bloggers in Canada, who report on human rights abuse in that country, like myself, that article is very important, in getting the other world governances, to take our complaints seriously, when it comes to the protection of our freedom of speech, in reporting on human rights abuse in Canada.

About Article 19, of the Convention, and Its Objective: The Exchange, Analysis and Dissemination, of Information.  (A short synopsis, or in a nutshell). It is intended to “facilitate, through the use of existing mechanism within the Secretariat, the collection, analysis and dissemination of all relevant information, statistics and best practices”.  And further to that, “ to ensure the relevance, and to the extent possible, the comparability of information, statistics and best practices, to be collected, analyzed and disseminated..”

And one of its main focus is on cultural expression. And that’s a term that can be used broadly, here. It should be taken as, reflecting, on a particular society, or State, within the confines of the UNESCO Convention, as far as the implementation of Article 19.  Meaning, that Article 19, is hereby calling for the freedom of expression of “anyone” within that culture, to be free to collect, analyzed and disseminate, information about that society, or culture. And also within a State.  Article 19, as far as its interpretation  is also intricately linked, to Article 9, on information sharing and transparency. And that is where the protection of Bloggers, come into force, under Article 19.  

Under the section, “Contribution of Civil Society”, under Article 19, it gets more specific, in regards to who is protected. And the answer is almost anyone, really. But here is what it says, specifically, under section 10, of Article 19. “ Civil society actors should be involved as information and data producers as well as distributers”.  Although I do not like the word ‘actors’ in the wording of that provision, it would mean that Bloggers too, should be able to get involved in the information gathering and data producing, as well as in the distributing of that information, about the society that they live in. Whether the State likes it or not.

And websites such as Blogger.com, which is a popular site for bloggers who have expressed their opinions, and also without having to worry about if their contents will be censored, or actually removed, i.e. shut down by the host site. So far, Blogger.com, is pretty lenient and somewhat liberal about its views, in allowing for freedom of expression, via blogging, on its website. And unless you are breaking the law, it will not shut you down. In some countries though, it does not matter which site is used, and the mere attempt by anyone, and usually bloggers, to exposed it actions, mean that it will take measures to persecute you. And the means of carrying that out, can either be overt, or covert. Or both. 
The whole purpose of any article that is written, by either a blogger, or a regular journalist, is to educate the public. At least that is what it should be about. But we know, also, that some countries also regulate, very stringently, what is written, or said, about its actions. The regular media also cooperate with the country's position, on such important issues, as the dissemination of information, which also reflected the "official" position of the government, it is reporting on. A blogger has no allegiance to any government, but only to the public. So bloggers will report on the actions of some governments, that they would rather that information, did not get out to the public. When a blogger does that, she will be persecuted and for most bloggers, they also do not have any protection from the kind of persecution, that a particular country, or government, is also willing to carry out against them, for exposing their actions.


In my opinion, it remains to be seen how much teeth, Article 19 actually has, as far as the protection of bloggers, in particular. Why?. Because it should also be challenged by Bloggers, everywhere. And I  intend to follow up on the provisions, that are also supposed to be made available to bloggers and to all journalists, as far as the safety measures that are offered to them, under the UNESCO Convention, and Article 19. Including, contacting the UN, if any of those measures are also not being implemented, which are to protect my rights as a blogger. According to Article 19, civil society actors (meaning anyone), should be involved in the information process, as data producers and distributers. Article 19, also ties in with Article 9, on information sharing and transparency. And that is one of the most accurate description of a blogger, that exist.  

THE CASE OF THE MISSING DOCUMENTS, FROM THE DIVISIONAL COURT FILE, IN TORONTO.

A PUBLIC REQUEST, TO THE REGISTRAR, OF THE DIVISIONAL COURT,  LOCATED AT 130 QUEEN STREET WEST, IN TORONTO, TO FIND OUT WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO MY MISSING COURT FILE DOCUMENT?.

To:  The Registrar, of the Divisional Court, Tashekah Gentles.

Could you answer this pertinent question, as to why an important document, such as the Certificate of Perfection, which is necessary in order to proceed with my Appeal, in the Divisional Court, has now gone missing from the file?. Could it be tied in with the overall conspiracy, by Canadian courts, to hider and or to block all of my efforts in those courts?. On the day that my Appeal book and Compendium and Factum were filed with the Divisional Court, in regards to my appeal, from the Landlord and Tenant Board, you were also present at the counter and witnessed that the document in question was also filed. In my subsequent conversation with you, in regard to that matter, you said that it may have been an error, on the part of the staff.  Well, if that is the case and it was not done deliberately, then I am requesting that you fix the problem. 

We know that the Divisional Court, has already acted and in its typically usual bias manner against me, has also not allowed my appeal to be heard earlier. That is, to shorten the time of the Appeal, which can often be a very long process in the courts. According to the Judge of the Divisional Court, who is also the Administrative judge of that court, Judge I. Northheimer, and to whom you did take my matter to, (without me filing a formal motion to have the time shortened), he had also denied me the request to shorten the time of the Appeal and had responded that if I wanted that to be done, to file a motion and to make the request to the court. (In that case, it would have just gone before another judge like him, who more than likely, would not have granted that request anyways. Thanks to the conspiracy in the Canadian courts against me. And which also involved ALL judges, and justices of the peace and administrative staff, of the court.  Which brings me back to the issue, of why my Certificate of Perfection, was not filed on your electronic system? And why do the Divisional Court, has the Appeal showing up as not being perfected?. I even perfected my Appeal in less than a week, just so that the matter could be heard sooner, than the usual time. Which as I said before, usually take months to be heard. Now after waiting for the 60 days for the respondent to file his response, (which he has not done), I am now being told by the court, that "My appeal is not perfected as yet". Which you know to be an error, on the part of the court. So again, I ask you, as the Registrar of the court, to fix this problem, as I am sure that it was one of the administrative staff, who has made this "error". In fact, I believe that it was also done deliberately. Now you have my opinion on the matter.
I do not have to tell you here, that, removing documents from files, hat would either cause unnecessary delays and for other more insidious reasons, would indicate an attempt by such a Divisional Court staff, to interfere with the normal procedures of the court and with the appellant's
right to have her matter by the court without such hindrances. And also without a court staff trying to impede justice in this case. I hope that it was an oversight and that the matter can now proceed properly, as it should have been. I have had many dealings with this court and do know that my matters has NEVER been treated fairly by this court. Let's hope that an administrative staff, attempting to obstruct justice in this case, is also now not an issue that I would have to deal with at this time. In the past I have seen such attempts made by Rina and others in that office, to hinder my matters from proceeding as they should, in the Divisional Court. And I have also made complaints about her actions to the previous Registrar. As for my dealings with the scheduling clerk, Sobey Boweja, I also hold the same sentiment, in this case.

As the Registrar, I am also publicly asking you, how my document could go missing and  not be filed as it should have been, in this case?. (Especially since you also witnessed it being filed) and what has really happened in this case?.  I also expect you and the Divisional court, to due its due diligence and not to delay my matter any further, as you are aware that it is also of an urgent nature, still,  in regards to my appeal and I would like to prevent any further delays, to having my appeal heard as soon as possible. As this office already know, that this is a matter that the Landlord and Tenant Board also did not address and this was the primary nature of this appeal, concerning that error of law, when the Board dismissed the matter without holding a hearing, by the Member, Louise Horton.

Also, since I spoke with you last, maybe you can also explain to me, publicly, why the actual file, was not in the administrative office of the court, but in some records department?. And as I also posed this question to you directly?. That since the Appeal has not been heard by the court as yet, shouldn't the file be made available, so that if either party comes to the court to file any thing, it is also available to them?. Who at the Divisional Court, as far as the administrative staff are concerned, are also trying to undermine my matter before that court?.

As this may not have been an error on your part, but on the part of your staff, I will now expect you to investigate this matter further, as I have also requested on your voice mail, after one of the clerks in the Divisional Court, Rina, also refused to either look into the matter, as she had said that she would do, or even to get back to me about it. What she did was to hang the telephone up when I asked her to transfer my call to you, in order for you to investigate, both her actions, as well as those of the other clerks in the Divisional Court, whose job it was to file those documents and to update that information on your electronic system. So that this information is available to everyone, involved in the proceeding. According to my conversation with you, you said that you would.

 I have asked you to look into the request of the missing document, my Certificate of Perfection that was filed, along with my Appeal Book and Compendium and Factum, as you well know and have also witness and which has now gone missing from my file. As reported to me, by one of your delinquent and may I also add disgustingly rude staff, Rina, today, as I wanted to know about the dates, that would also be provided by the court, to have my appeal heard and in  in regards to my landlord and tenant matter.
It was not enough that the Administrative Judge, I Northeimer, has denied my request to have the matter heard sooner, but now I'm told that my Certificate of Perfection which I also filed, has now gone missing. At the very least, it was not filed on your electronic system, with the court and that also makes all of the difference, because that is where both of the parties, as well as the court, keep up to date, with the processes, involving the Appeal.

As an afterthought:

To those members of the public who are not aware of the details of this matter, here is a synopsis of the events leading up to the appeal, in the Divisional Court. I, as a tenant was forced out of my home by Canadian government officials, meaning those in the fire services. I was not evicted by the Landlord and Tenant Board, nor did my landlord ever applied for an order evicting me as a tenant. Yet, as part of the conspiracy involved, the landlord and Tenant Board, decided not to hear the matter and to dismiss it at the preliminary stage. And thereby committing a whole bunch of errors and wrongs against me, as a tenant. Including, some of the most important ones, which was to leave me homeless and without any kind of compensation, to which I am also entitled as a tenant, under the Residential Tenancies Act. Which is precisely why the Member, Louise Horton, dismissed the matter and without holding a hearing. Most people has never heard of such a thing, as that which was done to me, by the Canadian authorities and the Landlord and Tenant Board. It is beyond the presumption of bias against me, by the Landlord and Tenant Board Member. It is also about the denial of natural justice, in my case, and how the entire matter, was designed to bring about that result. Now I am also seeing the extension of that with the Divisional Court and it is also not the first time. Such actions won't be tolerated by me. And should not be tolerated by anyone.

A FORMER ADVOCATE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOM, IS NOW ACCUSED OF GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.

NOBEL PEACE PRIZE LAUREATE, AUNG SAN SUU KYI, OF MYANMAR, FORMERLY BURMA, HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF HUMAN RIGHTS ATTROCITIES, AGAINST THE MUSLIM MINORITY, IN MYANMAR.


AUNG SAN SUU LYI, HAS TURNED HERSELF INTO A DICTATOR, THOUGH NOT OFFICIALLY, THE LEADER OF THE COUNTRY. SHE HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF ETHNIC CLEANSING, OF THE ROHINGYA MUSLIM MINORITY, IN MYANMAR.

Aung San Suu Kyi, was a 1991 Nobel Peace Prize Winner.




THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE COMMITTEE, HAS PUBLICLY STATED, THAT HER AWARD WILL NOT BE REVOKED!.
"A peace prize has never been revoked and the committee does not issue condemnations or censure laureates", So says former Norwegian politician and Committee member. He continued. "The principle we follow is the decision is not a declaration of saint". "When the decision has been made and the award has been given, that ends the responsibility of the Committee".
We know the people who give out the award are also exceptionally MAD, because they have also given the award to George Bush Jr. and Barak Obama! George Bush Jr. as most people believed, should also be tried for war crimes. Along with George Bush Sr. Aung San Suu Kyi, has publicly stated that the sufferings of the Rohingya Muslim minority, in her country, is not an "ethnic cleansing". No one expected her to keep silent on the matter, has she has done so far, rarely commenting on the issue. But more and more accusations has been thrown at her, over the crisis. They say that silence is agreement and Aung San Suu Kyi, has chosen to not speak out on issue.  That certainly says a lot.

THE OAS, HAS NOT LIVED UP TO ITS OWN STANDARDS, WHEN IT COMES TO CORRUPTION.

THE OAS IS RIFE WITH CORRUPTION. TAKEN FROM A FIRST HAND ACCOUNT, BUT THERE ARE ALSO PLENTY OF OTHER REPORTS, TO BACK UP WHAT I AM SAYING. THE OAS IS JUST ANOTHER US GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED ORGANIZATION, ACTING AS AFRONT AGENCY FOR THE US GOVERNMENT. WHOSE MAIN GOAL IS TO TAKE THE FOCUS OFF OF THE US (AND CANADA) AND TO GO AFTER THOSE LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN COUNTRIES, THAT THE US WANTS TO TAKE OVER.
I HAVE BEEN NAIVE FOR A LONG TIME, OVER WHY THE OAS AND THE IACHR, REFUSES TO GO AFTER CANADA, FOR ITS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE AGAINST ME. NOW I KNOW THE REAL REASON. AS FAR AS THE OAS AND ITS OWN CORRUPTION?. CANADA AND THE US GOVERNMENTS, WILL NEVER BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE, FOR COMMITTING HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, AGAINST ITS PEOPLE.
CAN IT GET ANY WORST?. IF THE OAS WILL NOT HELP HUMAN RIGHTS VICTIMS, BECAUSE OF ITS  OWN CORRUPTION, THEN IT SHOULD ALSO CEASED TO EXIST. IT HAS BECOME TOTALLY USELESS.

OAS, Secretary General, Luis Almagro. He is just another puppet, of the US government and Washington D.C. backed
organization, which was created to further the US agenda, in those Latin American and Caribbean countries.
Without the USA's involvement, also, becoming too obvious, to the public. Countries like Venezuela, which is a target of the
US government and for several reasons, (including for it's oil) has faced major accusations from the OAS. It is a primary target of the OAS, over its alleged human rights abuse, and corrupt government. The real reason of course, is something entirely different.

THE BIG QUESTION IS, WHY THE OAS, WILL NOT GO AFTER, THE USA AND CANADA?

HOW DOES THE OAS PLAYED THE GAME?.  IT DOES WHAT THE US GOVERNMENT TELLS IT TO DO, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. IF YOU HAVE EVER WONDERED, WHY THE USA AND CANADA, HAS NEVER COME UNDER FIRE, OVER THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, NOW YOU KNOW WHY.

THE OAS IS FULL OF CORRUPTION. AT LEAST TWO SECRETARY GENERALS AND A FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE OAS, HAS RESIGNED OVER CORRUPTION CHARGES. AND THE CURRENT PRESIDENT, LUIS ALMAGRO, HAS ALSO THREATENED TO RESIGNED, SOME MONTHS AGO, AS A WAY OF CONTROLLING THE VENEZUELAN ELECTION. IT WAS A TACTIC THAT WAS IMPOSED ON HIM BY HIS BOSS, IN WASHINGTON D.C. AND THE US CAPTIAL.  ALMAGRO HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO FOLLOW HIS ORDERS. BUT IF HE THOUGHT THAT HE HAD SOME PEOPLE FOOLED, OR IF HE WAS TRYING TO ELECIT ANY SYMPATHY, OVER HIS SOCALLED INTEGRITY, IT ALSO DID NOT WORK.  THE VENEZUELAN GOVERNMENT, CERTAINLY WAS NOT FOOLED. AND NEITHER WERE SOME OF THE OTHER ORGANIZATIONS IN THE KNOW, LIKE CELAC. (OF NOTE HERE, IS THE FACT, THAT, CELAC MEMBER COUNTRIES, ALSO DO NOT INCLUDE BOTH THE USA AND CANADA). CELAC, OR THE COMMUNITY OF LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN STATES, TOOK OVER FROM CALC, OR THE LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN SUMMIT ON INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT. CALC, WAS FORMED BACKED IN 1986, AS AN OAS REPLACEMENT. IT DID NOT HELP THAT HUGO CHAVEZ, THE FORMER VENEZUELAN PRESIDENT, WHO DIED ON MARCH 5, 2013, WAS AT ONE TIME, A LEADER OF THE CELAC SUMMIT BACK IN 2011.

ROOSEVELT SKERITT, PRIME MINISTER OF DOMINICA, AND A MEMEBER OF CELAC, HAS DEMANDED THAT LUIS ALMAGRO, DO IN FACT RESIGNED FROM THE OAS. SKERITT'S POSITION IS THAT CELAC, WHICH INCLUDES THOSE COUNTRIES, WHICH MOSTLY DO NOT GO ALONG, WITH THE USA'S BACKED AGENDA, TO WHICH THE OAS HAS PROMOTED OVER THE YEARS. (AND CONSPICIOUSLY MISSING, FROM THOSE COUNTRIES, IS THE LITTLE ISLAND OF JAMAICA. A COUNTRY WHICH IS SOLIDLY BACKED BY THE US GOVERNMENT, AND IS ALSO A PUPPET OF THAT COUNTRY).


THE QUESTION SHOULD BE, WHY WOULD LUIS ALMAGRO RESIGNS, IF VENEZUELA HOLDS A FREE ELECTION?. ISN'T THAT WHAS THE OAS IS ALL ABOUT?. DEMOCRACY?. SO THE OAS DOES NOT WANT THE VENZUELAN GOVERNMENT, TO HOLD A FREE ELECTION, TO HELP TOPPLE THE CURRENT PRESIDENT, NICHOLAS MADURO, AND SO MUCH SO THAT IT'S LEADER, IS ALSO WILLING TO RESIGN OVER IT. THE FACT THAT LUIS ALMAGRO, HAS THREATENED TO RESIGN OVER VENEZUELA'S ELECTION, PROVES THAT THE OAS IS ALSO BACKED, BY WASHINTON'S POLITICAL AGENDA, ONE HUNDRED PERCENT. THE OAS IS NOTHING BUT A PUPPT ON A STRING, TO KEP ANY OF THOSE COUNTRIES UNDER THE OAS'S JURISDICTION IN LINE.


THE OAS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION, IS ONE SYSTEM THAT WAS PUT IN PLACE BY THE OAS TO DEAL WITH GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION IN THE AMERICAS AND THE CARIBBEAN COUNTRIES.  BUT WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT THE OAS ITSELF WOULD ALSO BE DISCREDITED OVER ITS OWN CORRUPTION?

THE OAS AS THE REGIONAL BODY FOR NORTH AMERICA, SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA, AS WELL AS THE CARIBBEAN, HAS NOT LIVED UP TO ITS OWN STRINGENT STANDARDS WHEN IT COMES TO DEALING WITH CORRUPTION. SO HOW CAN ANYONE THINK THAT THE OAS IS ALSO FIT, TO INVESTIGATE CORRUPTION, IN REGARDS TO THOSE COUNTRIES, THAT IT HAS JURISDICTION OVER?.  I AM TALKING THE ONES THAT HAS COOPERATED (AND CANADA HAS NOT DONE SO, BUT IT WOULD ALSO BE A MISTAKE TO UNDERESTIMATE, IT’S INFLUENCE WITH THE OAS, ESPECIALLY IN REGARDS ITS OWN CORRUPTION).

THE OAS GOES AROUND POLICING THOSE COUNTRIES AND SOME OF THEM LIKE VENEZUELA, IT HAS ALSO DELIBERATELY TARGETED, IN REGARDS TO THEIR ALLEGED CORRUPTION. EVEN THE SMALL COUNTRY OF JAMAICA, DID NOT ESCAPE AN OAS REPORT ON CORRUPTION BACK IN 2014, DESPITE JAMAICA HAVING PROVIDED, SEVERAL CITIZENS WHO ARE ON THE OAS STAFF. AND JAMAICA IS A CORRUPT COUNTRY BY THE WAY. FOR A SMALL LITTLE ISLAND, IT IS BIG ON CORRUPTION. FROM THE OFFICE OF THE PRIME MINISTER ALL THE WAY DOWN, YOU WILL FIND THAT IT’S GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS OFTEN ACTS WITH IMPUNITY, AND FACES NO REAL PENALTIES OVER THEIR ACTIONS. I MYSELF HAS DEALT WITH A FEW OF THEM, DIRECTLY AND KNOWS THIS TO BE TRUE. INCLUDING, SOME OF THE ONES HOLDING POSITIONS IN CANADA AND ON BEHALF OF THAT GOVERNMENT. THEY INCLUDE THE HIGH COMMISSIONER OF JAMAICA, JANET MILLER, THE CONSULATE GENERAL IN TORONTO AND ALICIA TAYLOR, A CONSUL IN THE CONSULATE GENERAL’S OFFICE AND SOME OTHER ONES. BUT THE FOCUS OF THIS ARTICLE IS THE OAS, NOT SOME LITTLE  COUNTRY LIKE JAMAICA, THAT FOLLOWS THE NORTH AMERICAN COUNTRIES, LIKE A LAP DOG.
AND WHICH, ALSO, UNLIKE VENEZUELA, HAS NO REAL NATURAL RESOURCES AND THEREFORE NO SOURCE OF WEALTH, OTHER THAN BAUXITE. WHICH OF COURSE, THE TWO COUNTRIES IN QUESTION, CANADA AND THE USA, HAS ALSO TAKEN OVER, EXCLUSIVELY, FOR A VERY LONG TIME. TO BOTH THE DETRIMENT, OF THE JAMAICAN PEOPLE, AND ESPECIALLY THOSE LIVING IN CLOSE PROXIMITY, TO THOSE BAUXITE COMPANIES, WHO HAS BEEN DYING OFF WITH ALL KINDS OF CANCERS, FROM THE TOXINS LEAKED INTO THE WATER SUPPLY, FROM BOTH ALCAN AND ALCOA COMPANIES, IN RURAL JAMAICA. AND ALSO TO THE JAMAICAN ECONOMY. BUT OF MORE INTEREST TO ME AT THIS TIME AND TO ALSO MOST OTHER INTELLIGENT PERSONS, IS THE OAS AND DEALING WITH ITS OWN CORRUPTION, ESPECIALLY REGARDING THOSE COUNTRIES THAT COMMIT FLAGRANT HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE. AS FAR AS COUNTRY OF VENEZUELA IS CONCERNED AND WHY IT HAS BECOME THE TARGET OF BOTH THE OAS AND THE US GOVERNMENT?. COULD IT BE BECAUSE VENEZUELA IS ONE OF THE RICHEST OIL PRODUCING COUNTRIES ON EARTH?. YET ALSO DESCRIBED AS "ONE OF THE POOREST COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD". COULD THE USA BE AFTER THAT COUNTRY'S OIL RESERVES?. IS THAT WHY ITS EVILS ARE SO, WELL, EVIL?. AND THE REAL REASONS BEHIND THE SANCTIONS AGAINST THAT COUNTRY?. WHY DOES THE OAS TARGETS ONE COUNTRY, LIKE VENEZUELA, OR EVEN CUBA, AND NOT SAY, CANADA?. WHY IS THE OAS COVERING UP THE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE OF BOTH CANADA AND THE US, DELIBERATELY. DOES THE PROVERBIAL SAYING, ONE DOES NOT BITE THE HAND THAT FEED YOU, MATTERS IN THIS CASE. OBVIOUSLY IT DOES. AS MUCH AS THE CARIBBEAN AND LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES, UNDER CELAC, HAS TRIED TO DISMANTLE THE OAS, THROUGH THEIR ORGANIZED EFFORTS, THE OAS WILL UNFORTUNATELY CONTINUE TO EXIST, AS LONG AS THE US AGENDA FOR THOSE REGIONS EXIST. THE OAS IS A FRONT ORGANIZATION, THAT WAS CREATED BY THE US AND THE POWERS THAT BE, TO FORWARD THE AGENDA OF THAT COUNTRY AND OTHERS LIKE IT. IT WILL ONLY CEASE TO EXIST WHEN THEY WANT IT TO BE SO. OTHERWISE IT WILL STILL CONTINUE TO PROMOTE THE US AND CANADAS INTERESTS AND TO ALSO IGNORE THOSE COUNTRIES HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES.

THE BEST THAT THE PUBLIC CAN DO TO TOPPLE THAT ORGANIZATION, IS TO CUT OFF ITS FUNDING. LIKE THE IACHR AND MANY OF THOSE OTHER USELESS HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS, THEY ARE ALSO ALWAYS ASKING FOR MONEY ON THEIR WEBSITES. DO NOT FUND THEM. ONE YOU NOW KNOW THAT THE OAS IS ALSO GUILTY OF THE SAME THINGS WHICH IT HAS SWORN TO PROTECT, LIKE HUMAN RIGHTS AND PEOPLE'S LIVES, BUT DO  NOT DO SO, WHY SHOULD YOU CONTINUE TO SUPPORT IT?. I HAVE PERSONALLY SUFFERED BECAUSE THE OAS AND THE IACHR DID NOT TAKE ANY ACTIONS AGAINST CANANDA, OVER ITS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE AGAINST ME. THERE ARE ALSO MANY OTHER VICTIMES LIKE ME, WHO HAS ALSO BEEN DENIED THE HELP THAT THEY NEEDED FROM THE OAS AND THE IACHR, DUE TO THOSE ORGANIZATIONS OWN CORRUPTION.

FOR THE SAKE OF HUMAN RIGHTS VICTIMS, IN NORTH AMERICA, LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN, DO NOT SUPPORT THE OAS, FINANCIALLY. IT SERIOUSLY IS A TERROR ORGANIZATION, BEING COMPLICIT IN HELPING TO CAUSE INJURY TO VICTIMS, OF THEIR GOVERNMENT'S HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, BY TURNING A BLIND EYE AND NOT LIFTING A FINGER TO HELP THOSE VICTIMS. PETITIONS AFTER PETITIONS COMING FROM CANANDA, HAS BEEN IGNORED BY THE OAS. THE OAS HAS BEEN PROVEN GUILTY IN CAUSING MORE HARM AND MORE DEATHS, IN REGARDS TO HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO THE SAME, IF ITS ACTIONS ARE IGNORED. AGAIN I SAY, STOP THE FUNDING TO THE OAS, IN ORDER TO STOP ITS OWN CORRUPTION. IN THAT WAY, YOU WILL BE HELPING THE VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE.