Wednesday, June 20, 2018

ONTARIO JUDGE, RACHEL GRINBERG AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DIANE MCALEER, UPHOLDS RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.

A PUBLIC DEMAND, FOR RECORDINGS, IN CANADIAN COURTROOMS, TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS, OF VULNERABLE PERSONS, APPEARING, BEFORE THE COURT.

A Toronto Corrupt Judge, Rachel Grinberg. Her court demeanor
and actions as a judge, belies her other involvements, as an
upstanding community member and as a Board member, of a
Canadian Charity. What the public do not know, is how she
and other judges, operates behind closed door.

Some of the practices of Ontario Judge, Rachel Grinberg, included, having   closed door hearings and excluding the public from participating. THIS JUDGE IS KNOWN TO LOCK THE COURTROOM DOOR, when dealing with the unrepresented and under privileged persons, appearing before her. Those who are most likely unable, to get any further assistance with their cases, through legal aid and are then forced, to represent themselves in the courtroom. Although they are often assisted by the duty counsel in the courtroom, this is also misleading, because both the duty counsel and the crown attorney, for the sake of argument, are on the same team. The duty counsel, will also not necessarily act, in either their best interest, or that of the public. 

The corruption comes from judges, like Ontario Provincial Court judge, RACHEL GRINBERG, who has a duty to uphold, by having her courtroom, being made accessible to the public. And it would not hurt either, to have cameras and other recording devices in the courtroom, that are designed to protect both the proceedings and the rights of the participants. It is shameful to see how this CANADIAN JUDGE, Rachel Grinberg, has allowed the public, including lawyers attending the courtroom for their other clients and others, to be barred from the courtroom, while she has the judicial pretrials and sometimes trials for the accused, who is also self represented. In fact, the courtroom door is locked, on her instructions. What does that say for any transparency, in the Canadian court?. Not much at all. It is shameful and illegal, how Judge Rachel Grinberg and other corrupt judges, disregard the rights of the individuals, appearing before them and persisting in operating the courtroom, in a manner that is also inconsistent with international human rights laws and even its own constitution.  One of the other charges, against Canadian judge, Rachel Grinberg, is to also continue with a criminal charge, against one of the accused, even after the sole witness could no longer be located and there is no sign that he would even appear in court, even for a trial. The judge was willing to continue with this "phantom case" in the court, in order to nail the accused. And even commenting on what might occur in the future, at a trial with no witness. Still, she was also willing to waste tax payors money on a trial that is unlikely to succeed, due to the lack of a witness. Not that it would have also succeeded, with the single witness, in regards to  his allegations based on his sole statements to the police. It is a case of a "he says, she says" and also a lot of unanswered questions for the police, in regards to their motive, for proceeding with a charge that is based on the testimony of a sole witness, who they also are unable to locate, because he has moved on and does not seem to have an interest in pursuing the charge, he has helped to lay against the accused for his own selfish reasons. Perhaps he also feared any counter charges being laid, with more credible and unrefuted evidence against him.  And that he is also unwilling to take that chance. And going along with this conspiracy, to pervert justice for the accused, is also Assistant Crown Attorney, Cheryl Blondell.  Blondell, has consistently refused to update the court, on the status of the witness and has also refused to provide full disclosure. WORST OF ALL, SHE HAS A PERSONAL AND VESTED INTEREST IN THE CASE, WHICH GOES BEYOND THE DUTY OF A CROWN. 
Toronto Crown Attorney, Cheryl Blondell, is known for her CORRUPTION
in cases before the court. As a Crown Attorney, she is known to lie openly and to also participate
in actions that are so corrupt and that also goes against public interest, that she is beyond
being corrigible. She has no morals, ethics, or any other redeemable qualities, which would
make her trustworthy, or that would also instill any confidence in her ability, to represent the
public, in her present job as a Crown attorney.
  I encourage members of the public to expose her corrupt actions, in letters to the Ministry of Attorney General, AND IN PUBLIC SHAMINGS, as I am now doing. For too long those like Crown Attorney, Cheryl Blondell-King, has relied on their actions being hidden from public scrutiny. Public shaming, is one way of getting those that she answers to, including the public, from tolerating her corrupt practices, and booting her out of her current position. Using her position to go after any members of the public, because of her personal interest in a case, or in acting in other ways to either pervert justice, or to interfere with the rights of persons, appearing before the court, is intolerable. The public will not accept this degenerate and wants her out of her present position, to act on their behalf.

  TWO OF ONTARIO'S CURRENT JUDGE AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE. JUDGE RACHEL GRINNBERG AND JP DIANE MCALEER. PROFILES:  FROM BEING PRIVILEDGED WHITE WOMEN, TO NOW UPHOLDING THE RACIST JUDICIAL SYSTEM, THAT BOTH PROMOTES AND PROTECTS WHITES.

HOW THEY BOTH PRACTICES RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS. AND WHY THIS IS ALSO A COMMON PRACTICE, AMONG OTHER JUDGES, JPS, CROWN ATTORNEYS AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, IN ALL CANADIAN COURTS.   




                           


ROXANNE PARIS, A MANAGER, IN THE URGENT CIVIL INTAKE OFFICE, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, TO BE FACE A CHARGE, OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, AND BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST. IN DELIBERATELY, BLOCKING, MY URGENT MOTION, IN THE COURT.

AFTER FILING MY URGENT MOTION, AT THE COURTHOUSE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, I WAS TOLD THAT IT WENT DIRECTLY, TO THE CIVIL URGENT MO...