Wednesday, October 31, 2018

FRED VICTOR CENTRE, BROKE THE LAW, BY TAKING REPRISAL ACTIONS, AGAINST BLOGGER.

TORONTO SHELTER SUPPORT AND HOUSING EXECUTIVES, TOOK NO ACTIONS TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC, OR TO ENFORCE THE SHELTER STANDARDS ACT, IN THIS CASE. IT CAN BE VIEWED IN TWO WAYS: CULPABILITY (A CRIMINAL ACT) AND COMPLICITY, IN REGARDS TO THEIR ACTIONS. OTHER ACTIONS ON THEIR PART INCLUDED, CONSPIRACY(SPECIFICLLY, THAT THEY HAD CONSPIRED, TO CAUSED FURTHER INJURY TO THIS BLOGGER, BY TAKING NO ACTIONS TO PROTECT HER SAFETY), CORRUPTION AND BREACH OF TRUST.

ANYONE CAN BECOME HOMELESS, FOR VARIOUS REASONS.  WHEN THAT HAPPENS, IT IS ALSO A HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUE. SHELTERS EXIST TO PROVIDE FOR THE IMMEDIATE NEED, OF THE HOMELESS. TO PUT 
SOMEONE WHO IS HOMELESS, OUT ON THE STREET AND IN THE COLD, WITHOUT ANY JUSTIFIABLE REASONS, OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT A PREVIOUS RESTRICTION WAS STILL IN PLACE, IS NOT A GOOD ENOUGH REASON, TO ENDANGER THE SAFETY OF ANYONE.

FRED VICTOR CENTRE, AS A HOUSING  PROVIDER, THAT IS UNDER CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF TORONTO, TO PROVIDE EMERGENCY AND LONG TERM SHELTER SUPPORT, TO THE HOMELESS.  IT HAS BROKEN SHELTER STANDARDS REGULATIONS, BY TELLING A HOMELESS WOMAN THEY HAD PUT OUT IN THE COLD WITH HER ANIMAL, THAT IT WOULD TAKE THEM ANOTHER TWO WEEKS, TO MAKE A DECISION, WHEN OR IF THE WOMAN CAN RETURN TO THE SHELTER. THIS UNUSUAL DELAY IS ALSO AGAINST SHELTER SUPPORT AND HOUSING STANDARDS ACT, FOR RESTRICTIONS THAT DO NOT INCLUDE THE SAETY OF OTHERS, BUT IS BASED ON SOME PREVIOUS ACTIONS, THAT WAS DONE SOME SIX YEARS PREVIOUSLY, THAT ALSO DID NOT INCLUDE ANY THREAT, OR VIOLENCE TO OTHERS.
Marcia Gilmore, a shelter manager, at the Fred Victor Centre
has delayed her response, in making a decision, under Shelter Support
and Housing Regulations, after a homeless woman was put out in
the cold last week with her animal, when she was told that she was
still restricted after six years, from all Fred Victor Centre shelters,
after she had reported (six years ago) in the media about the abuse of
power, and other practices, by Fred Victor Centre's shelter managers
and other staff.


Marcia Gilmore's comment, to this blogger: "Can you take down the article, that you wrote on your blog, about Fred Victor", before giving an answer to the woman, this blogger, concerning the six year restriction, that was put on her by another Fred Victor Centre Manager, Danielle Ashby, back in 2013, after reporting on the actions of Fred Victor's staff. When the blogger said no, that she was obligated to the public and not to the Fred Victor Centre, in regards to what she report on her blog, she was then told by Marcia Gilmore, that she would have to wait, "until  next week", to get an answer from her, if and when she could return to the shelter.
The Blogger had lost her home last week and had gone to the shelter, which is also the only shelter in Toronto, that also takes animals on a long term basis. Aside from the Fred Victor Centre shelters, there are only a few other housing providers, that operate on a drop in basis, that may take animals, on a day to day basis, in regards to their 24 hour respite. With those ones you also have to meet specific criteria as well. Such as Sprott House, a LGBQT, shelter in Toronto that takes animals on a temporary basis. And most of them are also full on any given day.
On the same day that the homeless woman was asked to leave the Fred Victor shelter, located at 545 Lakeshore Blvd. West in Toronto, a fight had broken out between two men at the same shelter and one of them had assaulted the other man, in front of other witnesses. The man who had assaulted the other resident, was not asked to leave the shelter. He was allowed to stay at the shelter by the two staff, who had also witnessed the incident. (The fight had broken out at a resident meeting, where staff was also in attendance). Fred Victor staff, Michael Joseph and Tracy Baker, allowed the man to remained at the shelter, after committing the assault). When that incident was brought up with the manager, Marcia Gilmore, she responded that "each case was different". Not only was that resident not evicted from the Fred Victor shelter, for his violence, but he also did not have to wait two weeks, for an answer from the Fred Victor staff and management, if he could stay at the shelter. If their treatment of residents is based on fairness and equality, then that is also lacking, in regards to their decision in my case. There is also a "conspiracy of silence", in regards to the Shelter Support and Housing, Management, while they continue to ignore the situation. For instance, under the SSHA, a housing provider, is suppose to get the approval from Shelter Support And Housing Administration, first, if they have imposed a restriction on a resident, or former resident, that is longer than 3 months. According to Brad Boucher, Manager at Shelter, Support and Housing, he had "approved the restriction, longer than 6 months", from Fred Victor Centre, in regards to my case, back in 2013, when it was first imposed. When I asked him to provide me with a copy of that document, Brad Boucher, SSHA, has so far refused and has since remained silent on the matter. Other Shelter Support and Housing Administration staff who has also remained silent in regards to this current situation, include the following: Mark Kim, Tamika Givens, Natalie Williams, Milton Berra, who is also acting in place of the Director, Gordon Tanner, (who is back on November 6th) and Paul Raftis, (Interim)General Manager.

A CASE OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW
This blogger is adding their names to the list of other Canadian government officials and others who have acted in a conspiracy with those officials, to violate her human right and to cause her harm, with the International Criminal Court. As a part of that process, the victim and this blogger, can also add any new evidence to the process, which has started before this incident, had occurred and at any stage in the proceedings before that court. As I have officially been contacted by the Office of the Prosecutor of the I.C.C. and my case also officially acknowledged by the I.C.C. and is still in the "Preliminary Stage", which do not have a specific timeline, but could proceed as long as there is additional evidence that is needed by the International Criminal Court, to proceed with my matter before that court, I will continue to provide new evidence to that court, in regards to the crimes that have been committed against me, by those officials, under the Rome Statute, Article 7, in regards to Crimes Against Humanity, against me.   




















Monday, October 29, 2018

PROCEEDING, IN THE INTERNTIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.


THERE WILL BE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, WITH A CANADIAN JUDGE PRESIDING OVER CASES, THAT ARE CURRENTLY BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CIMINAL COURT.  WHICH  HAS ALSO IMPLICATED THAT COUNTRY, IN CRIMES COMMITTED, UNDER ROME STATUTE.                                                                                                                                                                                               

Unfortunately, she got in. All six judges are there to re-enforced, the UN's
New World Order, in regard to their decisions. Leading towards a one
world government and jurisprudence. Do you honestly believed, that
the countries of Africa, are the only ones committing those crimes,
which are outlined in the Rome Statute?. Conveniently absent from prosecutions
 are the countries of Canada and the USA, as well as Israel, Russia, China and
the countries of the Middle East. All of which are prone to committing gross
human rights violations. 


A Canadian judge, with high hopes of becoming a judge of the International
Criminal Court. Unfortunately, this one also got in and is now a part of that
court. In fact, Canada is both a defendant (it's officials) before the I.C.C,
as well as being a part of the prosecution team, as a presiding judge.
















BUILDING A CASE BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, THROUGH PERSISTENCE, KNOWLEDGE, SKILL AND DEDICATION. AND WITH FORE KNOWLEGE OR FORESIGHT. 

One of the more interesting things about the I.C.C. is that there is no statue of limitations, as to how far back one can go, to initiate a criminal proceeding against individuals of a State, that has ratified its treaty with the I.C.C. Likewise, there is no timelines provided in the Statue either, for when a preliminary examination may be completed by the Prosecutor. Since it is an ongoing process in gathering the necessary evidence needed to bring the case together, or to established if there is sufficient evidence, for a case and to proceed to trial, then the victim of those crimes and their legal team can use that time to bring additional evidence before the Prosecutor, adding to the information  that they already have concerning the criminal charges, that are before the court. New evidence and new witnesses can be added along the way. Which brings me to the point that I am trying to make here. That of adding more names to the list of individuals, who has committed those atrocities against me, under the Rome Statute and consisting of Crimes Against Humanity. The list against those Canadian officials, representing both the government and non-governmental organizations, that has worked together with that government, to carry out those crimes against me, that falls under that section of the Rome Statute. 

It should also make them very nervous, since I am also determined to proceed, in the International Criminal Court against them. It is a long process and especially for someone like me who is also determined to win. If the Prosecutor need a bit of a prod to continue with the proceedings before the I.C.C, then that is what will happen. And what better way to continue with the proceeding before the court, than to provide new evidence to the court on the crimes that were and continue to be committed against me by Canadian government officials. And with impunity. That is also where the I.C.C. come in. It claim that its role is to destroy the impunity that most government officials enjoy, at the expense of the victims of their alleged crimes. All of which happen to fall under the Rome Statute and the jurisdiction of the I.C.C. And just because you bring a case before the I.C.C. also do not mean that the I.C.C. is also particularly interested in investigating it, or in bringing those responsible for committing those crimes against you to trial. It is not interested in any of that. I am of the opinion that the I.C.C. has its own agenda that is also inextricably tied to the UN's and that both of them do not necessarily represent the interest of justice, or of stopping those crimes that are committed by those States. Some think that it is all a show and that the I.C.C. is not really that serious in prosecuting any State officials per say, only in appearing to do so. Which brings me to another important point. That is, on the I.C.C's relationship with some of those countries, or States and the conflict of interest that it also create when bringing those State officials before the I.C.C. for prosecution.  I am talking about countries like Canada, and especially with the appointment of a Canadian judge Kimberly Prost, as one of the six new judges that are now presiding over that court. Some may find it hard to believe that Canada is also guilty of some of the worst kinds of human rights abuse, such as Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and even Crimes of Aggression. Can we get an impartial ruling from the I.C.C, with a Canadian judge sitting as a trial judge to its hearings?. I do not think so.
Particularly relevant to this article, is the Crimes Against Humanity ATTROCITIES, which it has committed against me and which is no laughing matter. Though it may appear to be humorous to those Canadian government officials who are also carrying this out against me. Continuing to amuse me, all the way to a conviction. Prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda and the I.C.C cannot tell me that I do not have a case either, before the I.C.C. Not with the abundance of evidence that I have presented here on my Blog and elsewhere. Such as the overwhelming evidence that exist in regards to my matters before the Canadian courts, over the years.  Unrefuted evidence, that shows a continuous effort by that government, to abuse my human rights. 

SHELTER SUPPORT AND HOUSING ADMINISTRATION: THE CONSPIRACY TO DENY HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGER, ACCESS TO EMERGENCY HOUSING AND SHELTER.

HOW CANADA CARRIES OUT TORURE AND OTHER CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS, AGAINST BLOGGER.

NEW:  CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS TO BE CHARGED IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR CARRYING OUT CRIMES AND OTHER HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, AGAINST BLOGGER.
THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS TO BE CHARGED IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.

Shelter, Support and Housing Division:  Gord Tanner, Director
                                                                  Paul Raftis, General Manager
                                                                  Milton Berrera
                                                                  Brad Boucher
                                                                  Mark Kim
                                                                  Natalie Williams
                                                                  Tamika Given
Housing Provider:  Fred Victor Centre
Staff: Mark Aston, Mandy Aston, Daniela Ashby, Tracy Baker, Michael Joseph.
Charges against agency: racism, failing to carry out and to implement the rules, regulations and guildelines, under the SSHA, in regards to the victim.                                                                                                                                                                        
All of them has blocked the victim from getting any immediate shelter, or housing, under their emergency program and then forced the victim out in the cold.

lied on behalf of the housing provider to the detriment of the victim

acted in a conspiracy to deny the victim assistance in getting immediate help and to provide her with temporary emergency housing or shelter.

acted corruptly to obstruct justice

openly mocked the victim

THE VICTIM HAS ASKED THE, UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE, TO INTERVENED
ON HER BEHALF.

IT HAS HAPPENED AGAIN!  Canadian government officials, acting in a conspiracy to cause serious injury to Blogger, by denying her access to emergency shelter.
Anyone can lose their housing and for various reasons. But when Blogger, Valerie Guillaume lost her residence last week and went to one of the emergency centers in Toronto, she was forced out on the street in the cold, after the Manager at the shelter, Daniela Ashby, told the frontline staff, to evict the blogger, based on a restriction that was put in place by the service provider, Fred Victor Centre, some  six  years ago, after the Blogger reported to the public on Fred Victor's lack of regards for the homeless people and their animals at the shelter. One of the reports that the Blogger had made against Fred Victor Centre, showed two staff playing pool, while no one remained in the office to take telephone calls, from perspective clients.  Her other report touched upon the gross abuse of power by the staff and management, such as Daniela Ashby, who is a senior manager with Fred Victor Centre.


This should not be happening and it is also a very unusual case. Unusual in that most people do not get to experience this kind of treatment, unless you're a target and a persecuted individual like this blogger, who was denied emergency housing and shelter. Further, she alleges that those in the SSHA blocked her efforts in getting emergency shelter, by ignoring her request and by minimisizing the severity of the situation,after reprisal actions were taken against her, by the housing provider Fred Victor Centre, after complaing about staff conduct, resulting in a restriction put on her by the housing provider, six years ago, that now seem indefinite.

Friday, October 12, 2018

RACIST T.O. CITY OFFICIALS, BEGS BLOGGER TO RECANT STORY, TO SAVE THEIR REPUTATION.

THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY'S BOARD CHAIR AND ITS MANAGEMENT STAFF, ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR REPUTATION, AFTER BEING LABELED AS BEING RACIST, AND FOLLOWING A SYSTEMATICALY RACIST POLICY, THROUGH THE TPL'S POLICY OF TREATING BLACK AUTHORS, WRITERS AND OTHER LITERARY AGENTS DIFFERENTLY, REGARDING ITS SERVICES.


DISRESPECTING ONE PERSON BASED ON THEIR RACE, IS THE SAME AS DISRESPECTING, A GROUP OF PERSONS OF THE SAME RACE. AND IN THE CASE OF THE TPL, IT IS ONE TOO MANY CASES , LEADING TO CHARGES OF RACISM, AGAINST ITS MANAGEMENT STAFF AND BOARD.



City of Toronto Librarian, Vickery Bowles, Susan Caron, Acting Director, of the Toronto Public Library and Michele Melady, Manager of Acquisitions and Collections, as well as Sue Graham-Nutter, Chair for the TPL and Strahan McCarten, Vice Chair, are all concerned about their reputations, after being exposed as following a racist policy of the Toronto Public Library.




To this I say: When reporting on the truth in Canada, one is also protected from prosecution and from also being sued. The ugly truth of racism is all to prevalent and that it has now become a normal way of thinking by some (like yourself) and also of treating certain persons, or groups of people living in Canada, differently and to a way that also fundamentally infringes upon their rights, under Canadian law.  And to which the Toronto Public Library, through its policies, most notably implemented by its Management Staff and its Board's Chair and Vice Chair, are also guilty of. Through my own personal experiences and through my research, I have come upon this truth and have also exposed it. And that


the audacity that you have shown in trying to hide and to cover up your corruption, despite the fact that you are also accountable to the public, which has appointed you to the present position that you now occupy, shows that you are also incorrigible and beyond redemption. And that the best response would be, to have you removed from your public position. And I also say further that: "When you want others to accept your corrupt behaviour as normal, then it is time to vacate your position, as the City Librarian, Board Chair, or Vice-Chair and as a publicly appointed person"












"The fact that you want the public to buy your bullshit, and to accept your dishonesty, shows the level of your corruption". Do not act corrupt and think that you can also hide behind your positions, because you will be exposed. Racism is a harmful thing to be experienced for some members of this
society, which you also do not seem to acknowledged, or accept. So I have made a list of "Do's and Don'ts" which may help you to understand. You must also live by these tenets while occupying your public positions:






1."I will treat all persons the same, regardless of race, class, creed, or religious background.
2. "I will be transparent, while occupying this public position.
3. "I will not betray the public's trust in my office"
4."If I do, I expect to pay for my mistake, with a full disclosure and removal from my position".
5"I will not act to pervert justice, or break the law to cover up my actions".
7."I will at all times make myself available to the public while occupying this job".
 8. "I will not dishonor my office and position".
9. "I will not act corrupt".
10."I will expect to be judged by my actions, and not seek to keep my office, if I screw up"


On October 11, 2018, the Toronto Public Library's Children Books Selection Committee, allegedly met to decide if the TPL, was going to purchased the 5 children books from Author and Blogger Valerie Guillaume, based on the contents of those books. And as part of its ongoing racist attitudes towards the Author/Blogger, she was also not contacted by the TPL's Management Staff, about the decision of her books, since that meeting. Further, the Toronto Public Library's Management Staff, such as Vickery Bowles, Susan Caron, Michele Melady and its Board Chair, Sue Graham-Nutter and Vice Chair, Strahan McCarten, has also personally acted dastardly and unprofessional towards the Author/Blogger and her publishing company, and in a manner that is so disrespectful, and full of contempt, that it also infringes on her rights legally. A person's dignity and self-respect are also protected under Canadian Law and those staff of the TPL's Management and its Board, do not seem to be aware of this. Or seem to care to apply it to certain persons whom they feel, should not have come up against them.




On the verge of making a decision, (so they claimed) over the Author's children books, the Toronto Public Library's Management Staff, then contacted the Author, to retract her statements about them and the TPL, or to face a defamation lawsuit, as they felt that the exposure given to the TPL by the blogger, also negatively reflected on them personally. Well!, what do I care, if it is also based on the truth?. It would appear that their motive for contacting the Author, on the eve of deciding on her books to the Toronto Public Library's collections, was to "strike up a bargain" with the Author/Blogger, which goes something like this. "Take down your articles about us and we may buy your books". "If not...what?". Well, since it is now October 12th and the Author/Blogger also did not get a response from the TPL's Management Staff, over the purchase of those books, then perhaps they did go ahead and implemented that threat, (whether implied or not) against the Author/Blogger, in acquiring those books, or not. At any rate, the TPL's Management Staff, will face a lawsuit over their decisions, concerning the Author/Blogger. The Author/Blogger will be claiming in that lawsuit that the TPL's Management Staff, violated her rights under the Human Rights Code and other sections of the law, in their treatment of the Author. And that they also specifically and intentionally caused injury to her dignity and self respect, among other tortious actions on the part of those TPL's staff and Board members. The Author/Blogger will also be suing the TPL for tort and not just for injury, but also for economic tort, and especially against her business, in regards to the Toronto Public Library's policy of systematic racism, not to mention the personal racism of its Management Staff and Board against the Author/Blogger, that has caused her harm. And that those actions were also intentionally inflicted upon the Author/Blogger, to caused her serious injury. Both to herself and to her business.



























Thursday, October 11, 2018

CANADA, RELENTLESSLY PERSECUTE, HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGER: VALERIE GUILLAUME.

CONFRONTING STATE TERROR: MY LIFE AS A PERSECUTED BLOGGER, LIVING IN CANADA.  This is the title of a book by human rights blogger and author, Valerie Guillaume, that is based entirely on facts, relating to the many years of being tortured and subjected to cruel and vicious attacks by Canadian authorities, all acting in one accord, to silence her. 

HERE IN THE AUTHOR'S OWN WORDS ARE SOME OF THE ATTROCITIES THAT ARE BEING COMMITTED AGAINST THE HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGER, STILL AND UNDER THE VERY NOSES OF HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS, WHO ALL BECAME A PARTNER WITH CANADA, IN COMMITTING THOSE CRIMES AGAINST HER.




CANADIAN AUTHORITIES, HAS QUIETLY CARRIED OUT THE PERSECUTION, OF HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGER, VALERIE GUILLAUME, UNABATED FOR YEARS.


"I am subjected to 24 hours surveillance, so severe and unrelenting in its scope, that I am striped of every human dignity, in the process. Aside from employing agents to spy on me, the Canadian authorities also follow me in marked cars, some of them saying "security" on the sides of the car. Other times I am watched by police cars that would be parked in the very area that I usually take every day. They know my routine and would watch me constantly. The worst of the surveillance by Canadian authorities, is in using hidden cameras to watch me. I know this is so because, it would have been impossible otherwise for them to know exactly when I leave, or return and to park themselves just across the street, and to watch me come and go. Even when I switched up my routine,
I can never seem to shake their physical presence, as the police, or CSIS and others, carry out those surveillance of me. To say that it is also harassing in nature, would be an understatement.


"People have no idea what I go through on a daily basis". "It is beyond human endurance and because I have been able to endure it, they don't seem to want to stop their crimes against me".


"They also forced me repeatedly from my home, causing me to become homeless and if anyone offers to assist me with housing, they also influence them not to".  "Homelessness is a very useful tactic of the Canadian police and other authorities against me".  The Canadian police has repeatedly illegally evicted me from my home, on behalf of landlords. All of whom have also been agents for the police. To try and get some remedy of the court, when this is caused by others acting on behalf of the Canadian authorities, is also that is blocked by the courts.


"The Canadian government and its officials, has waged a war of attrition against me, in order to break my spirit". The elements of this attack involved both psychological and physical torture against me." And I am expected to endure it indefinitely, or to "crack". "So far I have proven to be a tough opponent to beat and the Canadian authorities also knows this". "Anyone else would have succumb by now, to those attacks, by the Canadian government, against them".


"Character assassination by Canadian authorities, is also a very effective tactic, that is used constantly against me". "It is used to gain the trust of those who would eventually betray me to the Canadian government, by becoming agents of the Canadian authorities against me". "This group of traitors included those who has access to me, including so called friends and acquaintances, family members and those strangers who are willing to become a hired agent for the Canadian government".


"It has become clear to the Canadian authorities, that I do have some power and influence through my Blog and this also causes them to persecute me, relentlessly because of this fact". "As with other countries that persecute bloggers, who are critical of the governments, Canada does the same thing with me, only it carries out its attacks against me, both covertly and overtly. And also mocking me in the process, because no one has stepped in to say, "enough, you are in violation of international laws concerning this blogger". "Canada has been able to sabotage my efforts, in getting international help, for its human rights abuse against me".


"However, mine is not a lost cause, as my case against Canadian government officials that is also currently before the International Criminal Court, with more Canadian officials to be added to that list, shows that I can and will fight back, and that I believe also that they will be brought to justice for their crimes against me".


"Last night several cars were trailing me and making it known that I was also being watched". "The first of those cars was parked directly opposite where they thought I would be and I was there". "As soon as its occupant saw me, he drove off". "The second car also was parked at a strategic location, where I have to past and it was marked "security". "Sometimes they also used minivans with occupants wearing dark glasses and staring directly at me". "If I go too close to the minivan, or the cars that they often used, including the ones that says "Security", or a marked police cruiser, they always drive off, or the occupant would lower his head and pretends to be reading or listening to something". "At no time do the occupants of those vehicles makes eye contact with me". "Almost every day, I would walk up to one of those vehicles and they would immediately drive off". "Worst, if they see me taking out my phone to record them, they have shown to be extremely fearful of any kind of video recordings of them, or their activities".


"There is a difference in being a targeted individual and being a target of the government because of one's activities to exposed that government's corruption and other actions that leads to human rights violations, under international human rights laws". It means that the scope of the targeting is more sophisticated and deadly in its application, against such targets as myself".


"CANADA HAS BLOOD ON ITS HANDS. NOT JUST THE BLOOD OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE, BUT ALSO OF MODERN DAY VICTIMS OF ITS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES, INCLUDING BLOGGERS SUCH AS MYSELF".




'CANADA SHOULD DEFINITELY BE ON THE SAME LIST AS THOSE OTHER COUNTRIES THAT PERSECUTE HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGERS, BECAUSE OF ITS ONGOING PERSECUTION OF ME AND OTHERS WHO HAVE BEEN OPENLY CRITICAL OF ITS HUMAN RIGHTS RECORD".



Tuesday, October 2, 2018

VICKERY BOWLES, SUSAN CARON, SUE GRAHAM-NUTTER, STRAHAN McCARTEN, MICHELE MELADY, OF THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY, ALL HAVE CONSPIRED TO BLOCK MY BOOKS., BECAUSE THE DO NOT WANT TO PAY THE SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT FOR THOSE BOOKS.

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND MY CLAIM AGAINST CANADA. MORE CORRECTLY, AGAINST PERSONS WHO ARE A PART OF THAT COUNTRY'S GOVERNMENT AND WHO HAS USED THEIR INFLUENCE AND POWER, TO CARRY OUT ATTROCITIES AGAINST ME. AS PART OF THE ONGOING TARGETING OF ME, BY THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT. 


A RECENT EXAMPLE IF THIS CONSPIRACY TO BLOCK ME, INVOLVED THE TORONTO PUBLIC LIBRARY AND ITS MANAGEMENT AND BOARD CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR.






Vickery Bowles: City Librarian, Toronto Public Library
Susan Caron: Acting Director
Michele Melady: Acquisition and Collection
Sue-Graham-Nutter: Chair
Strahan McCarten: Vice-Chair




Part of the job of being publicly appointed, is show respect for the position that you hold and also when dealing with the public. However, I have come up against a conspiracy, by those persons of the Toronto Public Library, that I have just mentioned, that is so repugnant and outright unlawful, that it is my public duty to exposed them and to educate the public concerning them.  They are very corrupt individuals who are hiding behind the façade, of  being mindful of others differences, but who in fact has a secret agenda, to do the contrary.


I plan to talk very openly about their actions, until the public get sick of hearing it. I plan to use every medium available to discuss their corruption openly and to force them out of their position. I plan to exposed the truth about them and how they act in secret when they think that no one will ever find out about their actions. The first mistake that they made, was in disrespecting me. I am still waiting to hear back from Vickery Bowles, Michele Melady, Sue Graham-Nutter, Strahan McCarten and Susan Caron, about what they decide about my being in the library. 


You see, they do not want to purchase the books, and for one reason only. They do not want to pay me the kind of money that they think would be too much for someone like me. An we are talking about not a lot of money, but a few bucks, when compared to the Toronto Public Library's annual budget, most of which comes from Toronto City Council and from public donors. If they pay me, it would interfere with their bigger plan to try and ruin me financially. This is what the conspiracy is all about. So these TPL Management Staff and its Board Chair, Sue Graham_Nutter an Vice-Chair, Strahan McCarten, have decided to do the following things. To ignore all things concerning me. That includes not responding to my emails about the date of the Children Books Selection Committee, which meets every two weeks and who should be the ones making the decision on the merits of the books.


They chose to carry out a "conspiracy of silence" and to disrespect me, in the process. Well, that is a direct attack on my dignity and self respect and are also grounds under the Human Rights Code, for a lawsuit against The Toronto Public Library and its Management Staff.


They were happy when I wanted to withdraw the books from being reviewed by the selection committee, because of how they had treated me and because they did not want to purchase my books anyway. I knew that and recanted my earlier statement and asked them to forward the books to the committee. What I have met from them since, is a "wall of silence". They feel that by ignoring my request, that I would be so angry, that I would withdraw the books, from the selection process. Neither Vickery Bowles, City Librarian, nor Sue Graham-Nutter, Board Chair, and Strahan McCarten, Vice Chair, has chosen to get back to me on that. Sue Graham-Nutter has sent me one email, that she (not the Board) was going to investigate the actions of those TPL staff mentioned.


When I made further inquiries into the matter, she refused to follow up my requests and to respond, either by telephone, or email. Strahan McCarten also did like wise. Vickery Bowles, was just pissed off that I wrote about her actions on my Blog and so she did not respond either.
So just to get information on when the selection committee would be reviewing the books has been an arduous ordeal for me. This matter is far from being closed at this time. Aside from legal actions against the Toronto Public Library and its Management Staff, Vickery Blowles, City Librarian, Susan Caron, Manager of Collections, Michele Melady, Acquisitions and Collections, and Sue Graham-Nutter, Chair and Strahan McCarten Vice_Chair, these corrupt, depraved (of any morality) and nefarious (as in evil) persons, must also answer to the public over their actions as well.





ROXANNE PARIS, A MANAGER, IN THE URGENT CIVIL INTAKE OFFICE, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, TO BE FACE A CHARGE, OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, AND BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST. IN DELIBERATELY, BLOCKING, MY URGENT MOTION, IN THE COURT.

AFTER FILING MY URGENT MOTION, AT THE COURTHOUSE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, I WAS TOLD THAT IT WENT DIRECTLY, TO THE CIVIL URGENT MO...