Tuesday, November 26, 2019

MURDER FOR HIRE. DID ANGELA STERLING, HIRE PAUL WRIGHT, TO KILL ME?

THE POLICE KNOWS, THAT THE DANGER TO MY LIFE, IS REAL. THEY ARE JUST WAITING, FOR IT TO BE CARRIED OUT, AS THEY STAND BY AND WATCH. THIS IS WHY, THEY HAVE ALSO PRETENDED, TO BE BLIND TO THE EVIDENCE, OF THE ASSAULTS AGAINST ME, IN THE VIDEOS. AND LAID NO CHARGES AGAINST THE ASSAILANT.

 I WILL GIVE A NUMBER OF REASONS, INTO THAT FACT.  THE MAIN ONE BEING, THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST, BETWEEN THE ASSAILANT, THE LANDLORD AND THE POLICE.


Paul Wright, in one of t he attacks against me, on November 17th. 
THE TORONTO POLICE, HAS STOOD BY SILENTLY, WHILE ATTEMPTS WERE MADE ON MY LIFE AND THE DANGER TO MY SAFETY, HAS INCREASED, AFTER THE ATTACK AGAINST ME, BY PAUL RIGHT, A TENANT OF THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, ON NOVEMBER 17, 2019. THE POLICE WHO SHOWED, UP DID NOT CHARGE, OR ARREST HIM, FOR THE CRIMES, INCLUDING FOR OTHER ASSAULTS WITH A WEAPON, AS SHOWN IN THE VIDEO, POSTED ON THIS BLOG. SINCE THE ATTACKS, HE HAS CONTINUED, TO POSED AN IMMEDIATE DANGER TO ME. AND TO BE ALLOWED TO RESIDE AT THE PROPERTY, STILL. HE HAS ALSO MADE DEATH THREATS, AGAINST ME, SINCE THE ATTACK ON NOVEMBER 17TH,  SAYING, "SOME PEOPLE FE GET KILLED", AND "SOME GAL FE GET BEAT UP" AND "ME A BAD MAN, PABLO, FROM MAY PEN", IN JAMAICAN PATOIS, AS HE PASSED MY DOOR. 

THE LINK BETWEEN HIM AND THE OWNER, ANGELA STERLING, OF THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, SHOULD BE EXAMINED MORE CLOSELY. BECAUSE THAT IS WHERE THE MOTIVE LIES, I BELIEVE, IN REGARDS TO HIS ATTACKS AGAINST ME.

ANGELA STERLING, THE OWNER OF THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, HAS MADE AT LEAST FOUR DEATH THREATS, AGAINST ME, THAT HAS EITHER BEEN RECORDED ON VIDEO, OR HAS BEEN WITNESSED, BY OTHERS. INCLUDING, STATING ON VIDEO, (MY CELL PHONE), THAT I WILL  BE SHOT. HER LATEST THREAT TO HARM ME, WAS MADE ON OCTOBER 30TH, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, IN FRONT OF NUMEROUS WITNESSES. SHE NOT ONLY THREATENED ME, BUT ALSO SPAT AT ME, AT LEAST TWICE. WITNESSES WERE SO CONCERNED FOR MY SAFETY, THAT THEY ADVISED ME TO NOT GO BACK TO MY HOME, WITHOUT POLICE ESCORT, OR TO STAY AWAY FOR A WHILE, "UNTIL SHE CALMS DOWN', THEY SAID. ONE WOMAN SAID TO ME, "IF SHE CAN ACT THAT WAY, IN FRONT OF SO MANY PEOPLE, IMAGINE WHAT SHE CAN DO, AT THE PROPERTY". AND THAT IS EXACTLY, WHERE THIS IS LEADING TO. BEHIND EVERY CRIME, THERE IS A MOTIVE.

THE LATEST ATTACK AGAINST ME, BY PAUL WRIGHT, WAS A PREMEDITATED ATTACK, THOUGH HE ALSO APPEARED, TO BE ENRAGED, IN THE VIDEO SHOWING HIS ATTACK. WHY WAS HE SO ENRAGED AT ME?. I WILL PROVIDE AT LEAST FOUR REASONS AND THEY MOSTLY HAVE TO DO, WITH ME AS A TENANT, OF THAT RESIDENCE.

 # 1. PAUL WRIGHT, WAS HIRED BY THE LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, I BELIEVE, TO KILL ME. SO THE ATTACK WAS ALSO PREMEDITATED. THIS IS ALSO IN LINE WITH THE ACTIONS OF ANGELA STERLING, DIRECTLY, WHERE SHE HAS REPEATEDLY, STATED, THAT I WOULD BE KILLED. IN ONE COMMENT, THAT I HAVE RECORDED ON MY CELL PHONE, SHE STATED THAT, "YOU WILL BE SHOT". AND AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, ON OCTOBER 30TH, SHE MADE IT CLEAR TO ME, THAT "IF I COME BACK INTO HER HOUSE, I WILL SEE WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO ME". IT WAS THIS COMMENT OF HERS, THAT PROMPTED ONE OF THE EYE WITNESSES, TO PROVIDE ME WITH HER CONTACT INFORMATION, AS A WITNESS AGAINST, ANGELA STERLING, IN THE EVENT OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, AGAINST HER AND WHICH I HAVE ALSO GIVEN TO THE POLICE, AFTER I HAD REPORTED THE THREATS. THE POLICE DID NOT ACT UPON THE INFORMATION, THOUGH THE OFFICER WAS GIVEN THE NAME AND PHONE NUMBER OF THE WITNESS. HE SAID THAT HE HAD TO, "SEE THE VIDEO AT THE BOARD FIRST", BEFORE HE EVEN INVESTIGATED. A TENANT OF THE BUILDING, WHO HAS STATED TO ME THAT, "THIS IS A LOONEY HOUSE AND SOMEBODY COULD STAB SOMEONE AND CLAIMED THAT IT WAS TEMPORARY INSANITY", TO GET OFF. AT THE TIME, I HAD OVERLOOKED THE COMMENT, BUT NOW IT ALL SEEM TO TIE IN WITH THE EVENTS, IN REGARDS TO THE ATTACK AGAINST ME, BY ANOTHER TENANT, PAUL WRIGHT. THOUGH I HAVE NO ABSOLUTE PROOF, IT DOES SEEM TO SUGGEST THAT HE, MAINLY, OR ANOTHER TENANT OF THE ROOMING HOUSE, COULD "ACT ON BEHALF OF THE LANDLORD", TO HARM ME, SINCE I WAS THE REASON FOR THE BUILDING, BEING ORDERED SHUT DOWN. IN REALITY, THE ROOMING HOUSE WAS ORDERED SHUT DOWN, BECAUSE THE OWNER BROKE THE LAW, ABOUT ITS OPERATIONS AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO, WITH ANY TENANT OF THE BUILDING, SINCE THEY DO NOT MAKE THE LAW, OR ENFORCED IT.


#2. PAUL WRIGHT, AS A TENANT OF THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, DO NOT WANT TO MOVE. NOT WITHSTANDING THE FACT, THAT WHERE HE IS LIVING, CURRENTLY, IN THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, HAS NOT BEEN AUTHORIZED UNDER THE LAW, FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES. HIS ROOM IS LOCATED, DIRECTLY, OFF THE KITCHEN AND IS ACCESSED, THROUGH THE KITCHEN. TORONTO FIRE SERVICES AND BUILDING DIVISION, HAVE ALSO OVERLOOKED THIS FACT. I HAD INITIATED AN INVESTIGATION, INTO THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE AND HIS TENANCY IS IN JEOPARDY, BECAUSE OF ME. INCLUDING HIS LATEST ATTACK ON ME, WHICH IS A CAUSE FOR HIS EVICTION, UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT. HE DOES NOT LIKE THAT FACT.

# 3. PAUL WRIGHT, BLAMED ME, FOR THE LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, BEING DIAGNOSED, WITH STOMACH CANCER. IT FUELED HIS ANGER AT ME, AS HE HAD SAID IN THE PAST, THAT, "I CAME THERE WITH MY BAD SPIRIT". HE ALSO MENTIONED TO SOMEONE, HE WAS TALKING TO ON THE TELEPHONE, THAT, "A KILL ME WANT TO KILL HER", REFERRING TO ME.

# 4. PERHAPS THE BIGGEST REASON, FOR HIS ATTACK AGAINST ME,  I BELIEVE, IS BECAUSE HE HIMSELF BELIEVE, THAT HE COULD GET AWAY, WITH HIS ACTIONS. I BELIEVE THAT BASED ON THE FACT, THAT, HE HAS SEEN THE AUTHORITIES, "LOOK THE OTHER WAY", CONCERNING HIMSELF, THE LANDLORD ANGELA STERLING, AND THE ILLEGAL PROPERTY, HE HAS COME TO THE CONCLUSION, THAT THEY WILL CONTINUE, TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY, IN ANY KIND OF INVESTIGATIONS, OF ANYONE, BESIDES ME, AT THAT BUILDING. THIS TENANT HAD MENTIONED, PREVIOUSLY, THAT CSIS AND THE LANDLORD, HAD ALLEGEDLY, INSTALLED CAMERAS, IN FRONT OF MY DOOR, TO WATCH ME. HE HAS SAID A LOT OF THINGS IN THE PAST, WHICH HAS LED ME TO BELIEVE, THAT HE IS AN AGENT, HIMSELF. AND THAT THIS POSITION, HAS ALSO PROVIDED HIM WITH IMMUNITY, FROM PROSECUTION. THIS IS WHAT HE ALSO BELIEVED. HE WAS WRONG.  THE CURRENT CHARGES AGAINST HIM, IN REGARDS TO THE ATTACK ON ME, ON NOVEMBER 17TH, THAT I HAVE INITIATED AGAINST HIM, AT THE COURT, WILL PROCEED AGAINST HIM, WITH THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, THAT I HAVE AGAINST HIM, SOME OF WHICH I HAVE ALSO POSTED ON THIS BLOG. IN THE VIDEO, THERE IS EVIDENCE OF AT LEAST TWO ASSAULTS, BY HIM, AGAINST ME. 


 YOU MAY ASK YOURSELF, THIS QUESTION. HOW COULD A POLICE SERGEANT, RUTH WARNER, WHO ATTENDED THE 911 CALL, ON NOVEMBER 17TH, DID NOT EVEN CHARGE HIM, FOR THE ATTACK AGAINST ME. YOU MUST KNOW THAT THIS POLICE SERGEANT, DID NOT EVEN VIEW THE VIDEO OF THE ATTACK, PURPOSELY, AND WHEN I PLAYED THE VIDEO, I WAS TOLD TO "TURN IT DOWN". THE POLICE WAS ALSO NOT INTERESTED IN MY INJURIES, EITHER. WHEN THEY COULD NOT FIND A REASON TO BLAME ME AND OR ARREST ME, THEY LEFT THE BUILDING. I WAS TAKEN TO THE HOSPITAL BY AMBULANCE AND LATER MY INJURIES WERE EXAMINED AND A MEDICAL REPORT WAS MADE, WHICH I BELIEVE WILL HELP ME, IN MY FIGHT FOR JUSTICE, AGAINST THIS MAN, PAUL WRIGHT, WHO HAD ATTACKED ME. AND MAY HAVE ALSO BEEN ACTING, ON BEHALF OF THE LANDLORD, IN REGARDS TO THE ATTACK ON ME. IN A LEGAL DOCUMENT, THE LANDLORD CLAIMED THAT, "MY CAT, HAD SCRATCHED MY NECK, AS I HAD GONE INTO THE KITCHEN WITH MY CAT, AROUND MY NECK", ON NOVEMBER 17TH. THAT, "IT WAS NOT HER TENANT, PAUL WRIGHT, WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE, FOR THE INJURY TO MY NECK, AS SHOWN ON THE MEDICAL REPORT, BUT MY CAT".  SHE CONTINUES TO ALLOW THIS DANGEROUS TENANT, TO REMAIN IN THE BUILDING, INSTEAD OF EVICTING HIM.

ON MONDAY NIGHT, OF NOVEMBER 25TH, WHILE PASSING MY DOOR, THE ACCUSED PAUL WRIGHT, MADE THE FOLLOWING THREATS, AGAINST MY LIFE. THAT, "SOME PEOPLE FE GET KILLED", AND OTHER COMMENTS, TO THE EFFECT, THAT HE IS STILL ABLE TO CARRY OUT HIS VIOLENCE, TO HARM ME. THAT IS HIS INTENTION, I BELIEVE AND THIS IS WHY HE ALSO NEED TO BE ARRESTED, IMMEDIATELY, FOR HIS ATTACKS AGAINST ME, AS SHOWN BY THE EVIDENCE IN THE VIDEOS, PROVIDED.

THE CONCLUSION, IS THAT HE STILL INTENDS TO HARM ME, BECAUSE HE HAS SEEN THAT HE CAN GET AWAY WITH HIS ACTIONS, EVEN WHEN THERE IS PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, SUCH AS A VIDEO, WHICH SHOWS HIS ATTACK AGAINST ME. AND TO WHICH THE POLICE, HAS SO FAR BEEN BLIND.

NO ONE CAN BELIEVE, THAT THE POLICE HAS ALLOWED HIM, TO CONTINUE TO RESIDE AT THE SAME BUILDING, DESPITE THE VIDEOS SHOWING HIS ATTACKS, UPON ME. INCLUDING THE ASSAULT, WITH A FRYING PAN, WHERE HE HAD ATTEMPTED TO HIT ME WITH IT. AS WELL AS TO KNOCK THE CELL PHONE FROM MY HAND, DURING THE ATTACK. THEY POLICE ARE STANDING BY AND WAITING FOR MORE SERIOUS HARM TO COME TO ME.











Friday, November 22, 2019

CORRUPTION: SGT. RUTH WARNER, TORONTO 41 DIVISION POLICE, DID NOT CHARGE...

WHY DID THE THE TORONTO POLICE, AND SERGEANT RUTH WARNER, NOT CHARGE THIS MAN, PAUL WRIGHT, FOR THE ASSAULT WITH A WEAPON, THAT IS CLEARLY VISIBLE IN THIS VIDEO?. HOW IS IT, THAT SHE CAN OVERLOOK THIS ACTION, AND DID NOT ARREST THE ASSAILANT, COMMITTING THIS ASSAULT?. 

THE VICTIM OF THIS ASSAULT WITH A WEAPON, BY PAUL WRIGHT, THE MAN SHOWN IN THIS VIDEO, STILL CONTINUES, TO FEAR FOR HER SAFETY AND HER LIFE. THE POLICE DID NOT ARREST THIS MAN FOR HIS CRIME, AND HAVE ALLOWED HIM TO CONTINUE TO RESIDE IN THE BUILDING, WHERE THE VICTIM OF THIS ATTACK, STILL LIVES. 

THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST, BETWEEN THE MAN IN THE VIDEO, THE POLICE AND THE OWNER, OF THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, WHERE THIS INCIDENT, TOOK PLACE, WAS THE REAL REASON, THE POLICE DID NOT CHARGE HIM. A BUILDING THAT WAS ORDERED, SHUT DOWN, NINE MONTHS AGO AND IS STILL OPERATING, WITH DANGEROUS TENANTS, LIKE THIS MAN. AND THIS WITH THE BACKING OF THE POLICE.
SECTION 267, OF THE CRIMINAL CODE, DEFINES WHAT AN ASSAULT IS. AND IT COVERS ALL FORMS OF ASSAULT, INCLUDING AN ASSAULT WITH A WEAPON, AS SHOWN IN THIS VIDEO HERE. IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, WHY IS THIS MAN WALKING AROUND FREE AND CONTINUES TO POSE A DANGER TO THE VICTIM, VALERIE GUILLAUME, AS WELL AS TO THE PUBLIC?.

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

TORONTO POLICE CORRUPTION: NO ARREST MADE, AGAINST MAN, WHO FAILED IN HIS ATTEMPT, TO COMMIT MURDER.

THE CASE, FOR AN ATTEMPTED, MURDER CHARGE, AGAINST THE ACCUSED, PAUL WRIGHT.


PAUL WRIGHT, OF 8 MEDFORD AVENUE, IN SCARBOROUGH, IS BEING ACCUSED OF ATTEMPTING TO MURDER, ANOTHER TENANT, IN THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE. HE IS STILL WALKING AROUND FREE, AT THIS TIME, THANKS IN PART TO THE TORONTO POLICE'S, LACK OF INTEREST IN CHARGING HIM. DESPITE A VIDEO EVIDENCE OF HIM, ATTACKING THE VICTIM IN A RAGE. THOUGH THAT VIDEO, ONLY SHOWED AN ATTACK WITH A FRYING PAN, UPON THE VICTIM, AND ALSO KNOCKING, THE VICTIM'S CELL PHONE FROM HER HAND, AS SHE RECORDED HIS ACTIONS. THE INJURY AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF THE ATTACK, CAME FROM A MEDICAL REPORT AND FROM THE VICTIM, DIRECTLY.  YET THE POLICE DID NOT CHARGE HIM. 

IT DOES NOT MATTER, IF IT WAS PREMEDITATED, OR NOT. IN A VIDEO OF THE ATTACK, THE PERPETRATOR, WAS CLEARLY ENRAGED, AND THIS WOULD BE ENOUGH, ALONG WITH THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF THE INJURY TO THE VICTIM, FOR THE COURT TO BELIEVE, THAT THIS MAN HAD ATTEMPTED TO MURDER THE VICTIM. BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THE CRIME WAS. HE HAD INTENDED TO KILL HIS VICTIM, HENCE THE KNIFE IN HIS HAND, RAISED TO STAB THE VICTIM IN THE CHEST, ALLEGEDLY AND THE GRABBING OF THE VICTIM, BY THE THROAT, CHOKING THE VICTIM. 

THE VICTIM WAS GRABBED BY THE THROAT AND THE ASSAILANT, THEN RAISED HIS OTHER HAND, HOLDING A KNIFE, TO STAB THE VICTIM, IN THE CHEST. 
THE ATTACK WAS UNSUCCESSFUL AND THE VICTIM ONLY SUSTAINED INJURY TO THE NECK, AS DESCRIBED IN THE MEDICAL REPORT. YET THE T.O. POLICE SERGEANT, RUTH WARNER, FROM 41 DIVISION, WHO ATTENDED THE CRIME SCENE, LAID NO CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST THE ACCUSED. THE VICTIM LATER LAID THE CHARGE, OF ASSAULT WITH A WEAPON AND ASSAULT, AGAINST THE PERPETRATOR, ONE PAUL WRIGHT, OF 8 MEDFORD AVENUE, IN SCARBOROUGH, ONTARIO. 

THE INFORMANT AND VICTIM IN THIS CASE, WANT THE COURT TO ISSUE A WARRANT FOR THE ARREST OF THE ASSAILANT, AT THE NEXT COURT HEARING, SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 2ND, OR BEFORE THAT TIME. THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, ACCEPTED THE INFORMATION, FROM THE VICTIM, THAT SHE WAS ATTACKED WITH A KNIFE, BY THE PERPETRATOR, PAUL WRIGHT AND WAS CHARGED, UNDER THE CRIMINAL CODE. BUT THE VICTIM IS NOT SAFE, AS THE POLICE REFUSED TO ACT, TO "SERVE AND PROTECT", IN HER CASE, LEAVING HER TO FILE A REQUEST FOR IMMEDIATE INTERVENTION, FROM THE IACHR, IN ORDER TO PROTECT HER LIFE AND LIBERTY, UNDER ITS TREATY, THE CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. MORE SERIOUS CHARGES, AGAINST THE PERPETRATOR, INCLUDING, FOR ATTEMPTED MURDER, COULD BE LAID AGAINST HIM, AT THE COURT, AT THE NEXT HEARING.  THE VICTIM IS HOPING THAT THIS IS THE CASE AND THAT A WARRANT WILL ALSO BE ISSUED FOR HIS ARREST, IN THE ATTACK.  THE VICTIM IN THIS CASE, IS ALSO THE AUTHOR OF THIS ARTICLE AND THIS BLOG. SHE BELIEVES THAT THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST, BETWEEN THE 41 DIVISION POLICE AND THE PERPETRATOR, WAS A FACTOR, IN THEM NOT LAYING ANY CHARGES, AGAINST HIM, IN THE ATTACK.

THE VICTIM ALSO BELIEVES, THAT IT WILL TAKE MUCH EFFORT AND LEGAL ASSISTANCE, TO GET THE ATTACKER CHARGED, WITH THE MORE APPROPRIATE CHARGE, OF ATTEMPTED MURDER. AND IS PREPARED TO GET OUTSIDE ASSISTANCE, TO PROTECT HER BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS, AGAINST THE ATTACKS AGAINST HER, COMING FROM THE POLICE AND THEIR AGENTS. SHE ACCUSED THE POLICE OF DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY, CONTRIBUTING TO THOSE ATTACKS, AGAINST HER, DUE TO THEIR RELATIONSHIP, WITH THE PEOPLE WHO SURROUNDS HER AND THE POLICE INFLUENCE ON THEM. BASICALLY, THAT THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH ANY ACTIONS, AGAINST THE VICTIM, IN THIS CASE.

ROXANNE PARIS, A MANAGER, IN THE URGENT CIVIL INTAKE OFFICE, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, TO BE FACE A CHARGE, OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, AND BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST. IN DELIBERATELY, BLOCKING, MY URGENT MOTION, IN THE COURT.

AFTER FILING MY URGENT MOTION, AT THE COURTHOUSE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, I WAS TOLD THAT IT WENT DIRECTLY, TO THE CIVIL URGENT MO...