FACING MORE PERSECUTION: MY REPORT ON DECEMBER 16TH, HOW THE COURT FAILE...

TENANT TARGETED BY LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, HAS NO ELECTRICITY. WHILE OTHER TENANTS, IN THE BUILDING AND THE LANDLORD, HAS FULL ELECTRICITY.  LANDLORD'S HARASSMENT, IS ONGOING, SAYS TENANT.

AN ATTEMPT MADE, TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, IN A LEGAL PROCEEDING:
A BLACK CLERK, NAME ALLYSON, IN THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE OFFICE, AT THE 1911 EGLINGTON AVE. EAST, COURTHOUSE, CROSSED OUT WITH A BLACK MARKER, THE MOST SERIOUS CHARGE, OF AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, AGAINST THE ACCUSED, PAUL WRIGHT. ONLY FOR ME TO CATCH THIS "ERROR", ON HER PART, AFTER THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, HAD ALREADY ACCEPTED AND HAD WRITTEN THE CHARGE, ON THE BACK OF THE INFORMATION. WITHIN A FEW MINUTES, I HAD THE INFORMATION RESIGNED, AND THE JP STATING, THAT IF I SAW THAT THE INFORMATION WAS MISSING "AGAIN", TO COME RIGHT BACK INTO HIS OFFICE AND LET HIM KNOW.  I HAD WONDERED TO MYSELF, HOW SHE COULD HAVE CROSSED OFF A CHARGE, WITHOUT HIS KNOWLEDGE IN THE FIRST PLACE?. BUT, TO GIVE HIM THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT, THIS CLERK THEN DULY TYPED UP, THE SAID CHARGE AGAIN, AS INSTRUCTED BY THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, A SECOND TIME THAT DAY.

UPDATE:  THE ACCUSED, PAUL WRIGHT, IS FACING MORE CRIMINAL CHARGES, COMING FROM THE NOVEMBER 17TH, ATTACK AGAINST ME. HE IS NOW FACING THE ADDITIONAL CHARGES, WHICH THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, LYNN TIVEY, HAD OVERLOOKED, ON DECEMBER 16TH, AT THE PRE ENQUETTE HEARING. 
PAUL WRIGHT, OF 8 MEDFORD AVENUE, IN SCARBOROUGH, IS NOW FACING THESE CRIMINAL CHARGES, BY WAY OF A PRIVATE PROSECUTION: AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, ASSAULT WITH A WEAPON AND ASSAULT. THE PRE-ENQUETTE HEARING, IS ON JANUARY 13TH, AT 1911 EGLINGTON AVENUE, COURTHOUSE IN SCARBOROUGH.

MORE HARASSMENT: THE ELECTRICITY,  IN MY RENTAL UNIT HAS BEEN SHUT OFF, BY THE LANDLORD, WHO HAS REFUSED TO TURN IT BACK ON. THIS COMING ONLY DAYS AFTER SHE WAS TOLD, TO TURN THE POWER BACK ON IN THE KITCHEN, BY MLS. AFTER MONTHS OF NOT HAVING FULL POWER IN THE KITCHEN. RESULTING IN NO COOKING, AS POWER WAS ALSO CUT OFF TO THE STOVE, BY THIS LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING. TODAY, IT IS STILL WINTER AND I AM WITHOUT ELECTRICITY, IN MY RENTAL UNIT. EVERYONE ELSE IN THE BUILDING, HAS ELECTRICITY, BUT ME. WHEN I TELEPHONED THIS LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, TO TURN THE POWER BACK ON, SHE REPLIED, "FUCK OFF". SO 311 IS NOW PROCESSING THE REQUEST, TO HAVE THE ELECTRICITY, (A VITAL SERVICE), TURNED BACK ON IN MY HOME.


NO SIGN OF MLS OFFICER, TEJAN ALLEYNE, ONSITE TODAY, TO HAVE MY ELECTRICITY, RESTORED. SINCE SEPTEMBER, HE HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING, HAVING THE FILE, TO HAVE THE POWER RESTORED TO THE KITCHEN, SO THAT I COULD COOK. IT TOOK ME TALKING TO THE AREA DIRECTOR, EARLIER THIS WEEK, TO HAVE THE ELECTRICITY RESTORED, IN THE KITCHEN.  WHEN THAT WAS TURNED BACK ON, I NOW FIND MYSELF, ONCE AGAIN, WITHOUT ELECTRICITY, IN MY RENTAL UNIT.

NO ONE ELSE IN THE BUILDING, IS ALSO WITHOUT ELECTRICITY, EXCEPT ME. (THE LANDLORD PAYS THE HYDRO DIRECTLY). LAST FEBRUARY, THE ELECTRICAL SAFETY AUTHORITY, ISSUED HER A NOTICE, TO DO SOME MAJOR RENOVATIONS, TO BRING THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, UP TO STANDARDS, WITH THE ONTARIO ELECTRICAL SAFETY CODE AND THE ONTARIO ELECTRICITY ACT AND OTHER LAWS. THIS LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING,  HAS NEVER COMPLIED AND HAS KEPT ON ENDANGERING, HER TENANTS AND PUBLIC SAFETY, WITH HER ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, THAT HAS FAILED TO PASS, ELECTRICAL STANDARDS, SET OUT UNDER THE LAW. AND STILL NO SIGN OF SHUTTING IT DOWN, BY THE AUTHORITIES.


DOES MY ELECTRICITY BEING SHUT OFF, ILLEGALLY, BY MY LANDLORD AND THAT I HAVE NO ELECTRICITY, TODAY, HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THAT HEARING COMING UP?. I BELIEVE SO. AND I ALSO BELIEVE THAT THE POLICE IS BEHIND HER ACTIONS AS WELL. ONLY A FEW DAYS AGO, SHE WAS FORCED, BY THE AREA DIRECTOR. SCOTT SULLIVAN, OF  MUNICIPAL LICENSING STANDARDS, TO RESTORE THE ELECTRICITY TO THE KITCHEN, AFTER SHUTTING OFF THE POWER, PARTIALLY,  FOR THE PAST FOUR MONTHS. SINCE LAST SEPTEMBER. AND BLOCKING MY EFFORTS TO COOK, FOR THE PAST FOUR MONTHS.

MY LIFE, AS A PERSECUTED BLOGGER, IN CANADA.

https://www.podbean.com/eu/pb-btnrp-cb753c   Click on this link and go directly to the podcast.

THE DANGER, TO MY LIFE AND FREEDOM, IS REAL. EXPOSING THE CORRUPTION, OF CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND ITS POLICE AGAINST ME, PUTS ME IN DIRECT DANGER, FROM THEIR RETALIATORY RESPONSE.

LISTEN TO MY NEW PODCAST AND HEAR MORE TRUTHS, ABOUT CORRUPTION AND WHY IT NEED TO BE EXPOSED.

MORE CORRUPTION EXPOSED.

RECENTLY, ONE OF THE POLICE AGENT PROVOCATEURS, WHO I BELIEVE TO BE MY LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, RECENTLY, ACTED (WITH THE POLICE, I BELIEVE), TO FRAME ME UP. IT HAPPENED ON THE DAY, AFTER SHE AND I HAD A HEARING AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD AND WHERE SHE ALSO MADE SEVERAL THREATS AGAINST ME, BEFORE OTHER WITNESSES. (THE POLICE HAS THE NAME AND CONTACT INFORMATION, FOR AT LEAST ONE OF THOSE WITNESSES, BUT TOOK NO FURTHER ACTIONS, ON THE MATTER). SHE ALLEGED IN HER LEGAL DOCUMENT TO THE LTB AND TO THE POLICE, THAT I HAD DAMAGED HER WINDOW, BY RIPPING THE SCREEN, ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 8TH, SHE CLAIMED IN THE DOCUMENT TO THE BOARD, BUT TO THE POLICE, SHE CLAIMED IT WAS OCTOBER 31ST, SINCE THAT WAS THE DAY, THAT THEY SPOKE TO ME ABOUT THE ALLEGED INCIDENT . I WILL POST A VIDEO AND A STILL OF THAT VIDEO, THAT SHOWS THAT THIS WOMAN MADE A FALSE STATEMENT TO THE POLICE, SINCE HER WINDOW WAS LONG DAMAGED BEFORE THAT. UNBEKNOWNST TO HER, I HAD BEEN TAKING VIDEOS AND PICTURES OF THE SAME WINDOW, FOR ALMOST A YEAR NOW, BUT FOR A DIFFERENT REASON. I WAS SIMPLY RECORDING THE FACT, THAT SHE HAD A TENANT LIVING IN THE LAUNDRY ROOM/FURNACE ROOM. SO I WOULD REGULARLY TAKE VIDEOS OF THE WINDOW, TO PROVE THIS FACT. IT IS TWO OF THOSE VIDEOS, THAT I WILL POST HERE, DATING FROM JANUARY 29, AND 31ST OF THIS YEAR. CLEARLY VISIBLE IN THE VIDEO, IS THE HOLE IN THE WINDOW SCREEN, (THE DARK PATCH ON THE RIGHT OF THE SCREEN), THAT WAS ALREADY THERE, LONG BEFORE SHE HAD TOLD THE POLICE, THAT THE DAMAGE WAS DONE, RECENTLY, IN NOVEMBER. (I HAVE A LOT OF THOSE VIDEOS, OF THAT SAME WINDOW, WHEN IT WAS BEING OCCUPIED BY HER TENANT, LIVING IN THE LAUNDRY/FURNACE ROOM).

MY REASONS WERE THAT IF I WAS REPORTING ON THOSE TORONTO CITY OFFICIALS, I HAD TO HAVE THE PROOF TO BACK UP MY CLAIM, HENCE THE VIDEOS OF THE WINDOW, OVER THE COURSE OF ALMOST ONE YEAR. AND LOW AND BEHOLD, IT HAS NOW COME IN HANDY, AGAINST HER ACCUSATIONS.  DESPERATE TO EVICT ME, SHE  HAS NOT BEEN SUCCESSFUL AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, SO SHE AND HER "FRIENDS", IN HIGH PLACES, HAS LOOKED FOR OTHER WAYS TO DO SO.

MORE CORRUPTION EXPOSED. 

AFTER THE ATTACK ON ME BY THE TENANT OF THE LANDLORD, ANGEL STERLING, I MADE AN URGENT AN APPLICATION TO THE BOARD, BECAUSE OF THE VIOLENCE OF HER TENANT. I ALSO MADE IN WRITING A REQUEST FOR THE TIME TO BE SHORTENED, AND FOR THE MATTER TO BE HEARD SOONER. THE VICE CHAIR, RUTH CAREY, HAD THE REQUEST AND INSTEAD OF VIEWING THE MATTER AS URGENT, SHE HAD THE BOARD SEND ME A HEARING DATE FOR JANUARY 27, 2020. JUST ONE DAY, BEFORE THE LANDLORD'S OWN HEARING. SHE HAS TWO DATES, ONE FOR JANUARY 28, 2020 AND THE FOR FEBRUARY 28, 2020. SHE IS NOT HAPPY, FOR EITHER DATES.

THE CORRUPTION LIES IN THE FACT THAT THIS MEMBER, RUTH CAREY, CHOSE TO IGNORE THE URGENCY OF MY APPLICATION, INCLUDING THE FACT THAT I WAS ATTACKED BY ONE OF HER TENANT, WHO WAS FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES FOR THE ATTACK, THAT I HAVE HAD NO COOKING FACILITY, SINCE SEPTEMBER, BEING ONLY ABLE TO COOK FOR ABOUT FIVE TIMES, IN THREE MONTHS AND THAT MY WINDOW GLASS HAS BEEN BROKEN FIVE TIMES, AND THE HOSE TURNED ON IN MY RENTAL UNIT,  BY THE LANDLORD AND HER AGENTS AND NOW THAT THE WEATHER IS COLD, THE COLD AIR, IS A REAL PROBLEM COMING THROUGH THE BROKEN WINDOW, THAT SHE HAS ALSO TOLD THE POLICE THAT SHE WAS GOING TO FIX AND NEVER DID. DESPITE THESE EMERGENCIES, THE CORRUPT VICE CHAIR, GAVE ME A DATE FOR NEXT YEAR, TO ADDRESS THOSE URGENT MATTERS.

IN FACT, THE LTB DID NOT EVEN RESPOND TO MY REQUEST IN WRITING, ABOUT THE REQUEST TO SHORTEN THE TIME. I WAITED AND WAITED AND THEN DECIDED TO GO DIRECTLY TO THE LTB AND THEN I FOUND OUT THAT SHE HAD BASICALLY IGNORED THE URGENT REQUEST. I ALSO GOT A COPY OF HER ENDORSEMENT, WHERE SHE HAS STATED THAT THE MATTER SHOULD BE SCHEDULED, AT THE NEXT AVAILABLE DATE. THIS IS HIGHLY UNUSUAL FOR THE BOARD TO TO THAT, CONCERNING URGENT APPLICATION AND ONE THAT INVOLVED VIOLENCE OF A TENANT AGAINST ANOTHER TENANT. OR FOR A LACK OF A KITCHEN. (AS PART OF HER HARASSMENT, THE LANDLORD TURNS THE POWER OFF, ONLY WHEN I AM USING THE KITCHEN, BUT TURNS IT BACK ON FOR HER OTHER TENANTS, THAT I SHARE WITH). 

MORE CORRUPTION

THE POLICE AND THEIR AGENTS, LIKE TO MOCK ME AND WORSE. EACH TIME THAT I HAVE MADE A COMPLAINT TO THE POLICE, IT NEVER GETS INVESTIGATED. I WAS TOLD EACH TIME, THAT A DETECTIVE WOULD FOLLOW UP WITH ME, BUT THEY NEVER DID. IN ONE SUCH SITUATIONS BACK IN APRIL, WHEN MY DOOR WAS KICKED IN BY A FRIEND OF MY LANDLORD AND I WAS ALSO THREATENED TO BE HARMED, WITH A KNIFE BY THE ASSAILANT, THE POLICE ATTENDED AND I WAS TOLD THAT HE WOULD BE ARRESTED IF HE SHOWED UP BACK ON THE PROPERTY. THIS STRANGER DID SHOW UP MANY TIMES SINCE AND INSTEAD OF ARRESTING HIM, THE POLICE ACTED AS IF THEY WANTED TO ARREST ME, INSTEAD. THE SAME FOR OTHER COMPLAINTS. WITNESSES ON MY BEHALF ARE NEVER CONTACTED AND THE MATTER DO NOT GO ANY FURTHER WITH THE POLICE. THE RESULT OF THEIR ACTIONS, IS THAT I BECOME A TARGET OF THEM AND OF ANYONE ELSE WHO WANT TO HARM ME. THEIR MOTO TO "SERVE AND PROTECT", DO NOT APPLY TO ME. TO SAY THAT THIS IS A VIOLATION OF MY RIGHTS UNDER THE CHARTER, IS AN UNDERSTATEMENT.

JUSTICE OF THE PEACEN LYNN E. TIVEY, CORRUPTION EXPOSED: IGNORED MEDICAL REPORT AND PROCEEDED ON LESSER CHARGE, AGAINST THE ACCUSED.

 JUSTICE OF THE PEACE LYNN E. TIVEY, DID NOT ACT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND SHOULD NOT HAVE ISSUED PROCESS ON THE LESSER CHARGES, DESPITE A MEDICAL REPORT, PICTURES AND A VIDEO, OF THE ACCUSED ACTIONS. SHE DID NOT EVEN LOOK AT THE MEDICAL REPORT, SINCE SHE DID NOT INTEND TO ACT UPON IT.

 WOULD YOU SAY, THAT THIS ONTARIO JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, LYNN TIVEY, HAS ACTED IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE?. BY IGNORING THE MEDICAL REPORT, PICTURES AND VIDEOS OF THE INJURIES, SUSTAINED BY THE VICTIM AND NOT ISSUING PROCESS AGAINST THE ACCUSED, FOR MORE SERIOUS CHARGES?.AND TO CONSPIRE WITH THE POLICE, I BELIEVE, TO ISSUE CHARGES OF A LESS SERIOUS NATURE, AGAINST THE SAME ACCUSED?.

AT THE PRE-ENQUETTE HEARING ON DECEMBER 16TH, WHERE THE INFORMANT (ME), HAD LAID TWO SETS OF CHARGES, FOR ASSAULT WITH A WEAPON, RELATING TO A NOVEMBER 17TH INCIDENT, OF AN ATTACK AGAINST HER, BY THE ACCUSED PAUL WRIGHT. THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, ACTED IN THE USUAL CAPACITY, TO PERVERT JUSTICE, IN THIS CASE. A REGULAR PRACTICE OF THAT COURT, AGAINST THE INFORMANT, IN THIS CASE.

HOW THIS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, LYNN E. TIVEY,  HAS ACTED CORRUPTLY.
DESPITE THE EVIDENCE AGAINST THE ACCUSED, PAUL WRIGHT, INCLUDING, A MEDICAL REPORT, PICTURES OF THE INJURY AND A VIDEO OF HIS ATTACKS AGAINST ME. THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, LYNN TIVEY, DID NOT ISSUE PROCESS, ON THE MORE SERIOUS CHARGES, OF ASSAULT WITH A WEAPON, THE ONE RESULTING FROM THE KNIFE ATTACK, AGAINST ME, WHERE I WAS CHOKED AND THE ASSAILANT ALSO ATTEMPTED TO STAB ME WITH THE KNIFE. THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, LYNN TIVEY, ONLY ISSUED THE SUMMONS, FOR THE LESS SERIOUS OFFENCE, RELATING TO HIM ATTACKING ME WITH A FRYING PAN. SHE ALSO IGNORED A WARRANT FOR HIS ARREST, SAYING THAT THE ACCUSED AND I SHOULD, LEARN TO LIVE TOGETHER. IGNORING THE FACT, THAT THE SAME ACCUSED, HAS MADE AN ATTEMPT TO KILL ME.

I BELIEVE THAT THE POLICE AND THE COURT, CONSPIRED TOGETHER, FOR THE LESSER CHARGE, RELATING TO SAME INCIDENT, TO PROCEED AGAINST THE ACCUSED. RATHER THAN THE SAME CHARGES, BUT FOR THE MORE SERIOUS OFFENCE, SINCE IT INVOLVED A KNIFE. THIS JP SHOULD EXPLAIN HOW THE VICTIM ENDED UP WITH INJURIES TO HER NECK, ARMS AND FACE AND WHY SHE WOULD ALSO IGNORED THIS FACT, IN HER DECISION TO NOT PROCEED AGAINST THE ACCUSED, IN REGARD TO THE KNIFE ATTACK AND FOR CHOKING THE VICTIM, DURING THAT ATTACK. THIS WOULD MAKE IT EASIER FOR THE COURT TO DISMISS THOSE CHARGES LATER, AS IS ALSO THE NORMAL PRACTICE OF THE COURT, WHERE I AM CONCERNED.

CROWN ATTORNEY, ANDREW PILA, IS CORRUPT. MY LETTER OF COMPLAINT, TO THE MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, IN REGARDS TO HIS CONDUCT.

CROWN ATTORNEY, ANDREW PILA, HAS A HABIT, OF WITHDRAWING, CRIMINAL CHARGES, TO PROTECT THE ACCUSED, IN EVERY CASE THAT INVOLVES ME. I AM CONCERNED, THAT THIS TREND TO BLOCK ALL CRIMINAL CHARGES, AGAINST PERSONS, WHO HAVE COMMITTED CRIMES AGAINST ME, EVEN IN THE FACE OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, SUCH AS VIDEOS OF THE ACCUSED ACTIONS, WILL CONTINUE TO INTERFERE WITH MY RIGHTS, AND TO PERVERT JUSTICE, IN THOSE CASES. 

IF A CROWN ATTORNEY, SUCH AS ANDREW PILA, DECIDED TO BLOCK CRIMINAL CHARGES, AGAINST AN ACCUSED, WHEN THERE ARE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, OF A CRIME BEING COMMITTED, SUCH AS VIDEO EVIDENCE, THEN ON THE FACE OF IT, THAT IS OBVIOUSLY CORRUPTION. 

WE SHOULD BE ALL CONCERNED, WHEN A CROWN ATTORNEY, DOES NOT ACT, IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC, OR IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
SUCH IS THE CASE, WITH ANDREW PILA, THE HEAD CROWN ATTORNEY, AT THE 1911 EGLINGTON AVENUE EAST, COURT HOUSE IN SCARBOROUGH. AND SO PROFOUND ARE THE NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS OF HIS ACTIONS, TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND TO ME, IN PARTICULAR, AS I HAVE HAD TO DEAL WITH THIS CROWN ATTORNEY, ON MORE THAN ONE OCCASIONS, RESULTING IN A LETTER OF COMPLAINT, TO THE MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL.

I AM NOT ALONE IN MY CONCERN, REGARDING CROWN ATTORNEYS, WHO GO BEYOND, WHAT THEIR LEGAL REQUIREMENTS, DICTATES.  AND ENDS UP CONDUCTING, A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE. NO ONE CAN THEN BELIEVE IN A LEGAL SYSTEM, THAT IS FAIR AND JUST. BUT INSTEAD WE ARE FACED WITH A PROBLEM SO GRAVE, THAT IN THE FACE ON INTERNATIONAL LAWS, ON THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS, THE CANADIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS A JOKE. THE PROBLEM LIES IN THE FACT, THAT COMPLAINTS AGAINST CROWN ATTORNEYS, ARE GENERALLY NOT MADE PUBLIC. JUST LIKE COMPLAINTS AGAINST JUDGES AND JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. THERE IS A MASSIVE COVER-UP, WHEN THEY SCREW UP. THE END RESULT IS THAT LIVES ARE AFFECTED AND THEY DO NOT HAVE TO ANSWER FOR THEIR ACTIONS.



THE PRE-ENQUETTE HEARING, UNDER SECTION 504 AND 507, OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA, ALLOWS THE PUBLIC TO INITIATE PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS, WHEN THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SUCCESSFUL, IN DEALING WITH THE POLICE. THE LAW ALLOWS THE PERSON, TO PROSECUTE ANYONE WHO HAS COMMITTED, A CRIME AGAINST THEM. IT ALSO ALLOW THEM TO APPEAL THE DECISION, WHEN THERE IS EVIDENCE, THAT THERE MAY BE A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE, ON THE PART OF THE PROSECUTOR, OR THE COURT, CONCERNING THOSE CHARGES. I WILL CITE SEVERAL CASES THAT WAS HEARD BY THE ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL AND THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. SO IT IS NOT UNCOMMON FOR CROWN ATTORNEYS, OR PROSECUTORS, OR JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, WHO ARE THE ONES TO HEAR THOSE CASES. RARELY, IF EVER, IS A PRE-ENQUETTE HEARING, PRESIDED OVER BY A JUDGE. IT IS ALWAYS CONDUCTED BY JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. SOMETIMES RESULTING IN SERIOUS ERRORS OF LAW, SINCE MOST ONTARIO  JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, DO NOT EVEN HAVE A LEGAL BACKGROUND. YET THEY ARE DECIDING ON CASES, EVERYDAY.  BUT IT IS THE ISSUE INVOLVING THE CROWN ATTORNEYS, ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, THAT SHOULD BE OF CONCERN HERE. THEY HAVE A LOT OF INFLUENCE IN THE COURTROOM, RELATING TO THAT SECTION OF THE LAW. SUCH AS IF A SUMMONS OR A WARRANT, SHOULD BE ISSUED FOR THE ACCUSED, ONCE PROCESS HAS BEEN ISSUED. AND IF THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, IS UNWILLING TO DO SO, THEN THE CROWN ATTORNEY ON BEHALF OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, CAN POINT OUT IN THE LAW, WHERE THAT ACTION IS ALSO NECESSARY, TO PROTECT THE VICTIM. BUT WHEN THERE IS CORRUPTION, THEY DO NOT INTERVENE, EXCEPT TO BLOCK THE CHARGES, AS IN CASES RELATING TO ME. AND TO INTERFERE WITH THE NATURAL PRACTICE OF JUSTICE AND TO ACT CORRUPT.
THE TORONTO STAR WROTE AN ARTICLE, ON THE MINISTER OF ATTORNEY GENERAL'S LACK OF CONTROL, IN DEALING WITH THIS PROBLEM. WHAT IT OVERLOOKED IN THAT ARTICLE, IS THAT THE COURT ITSELF IS VERY CORRUPT.

* THERE SHOULD BE CAMERAS, RECORDING ALL PRE-ENQUETTE HEARINGS, TO PROTECT THE VICTIMS. AND TO EXPOSED THE WRONG DOINGS IN THE COURTROOM, OF JUDGES, JUSTICES OF THE PEACE AND CROWN ATTORNEYS.

* PRE-ENQETTE HEARINGS, ARE SUPPOSED TO BE VIDEO RECORDED AND IN CAMERA HEARINGS, BUT THIS IS NOT ENFORCED, IN ANY CANADIAN COURTS.