TORONTO LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING'S "SON", GETS SPECIAL TREATMENT, FROM THE POLICE.

IT IS GETTING KIND OF TIRING AND REPETITIVE, REPORTING ON THIS LANDLORD'S UNUSUAL RELATIONSHIP, WITH THE POLICE. IN THIS CASE THE LENIENCY, OF THE POLICE TOWARDS HER SON, MAKES YOU SIT UP AND TAKE NOTICE. 

MICHAEL ERROL GREEN, AKA MICHAEL HAMILTON, AKA OTTIS WOODS, HAS CAUSED THE OTHER TENANTS OF THE BUILDING, TO FEAR FOR THEIR SAFETY.

AFTER BANGING ON HIS NEIGHBORS DOORS AND WINDOWS ALL NIGHT, AND EVEN PUNCHING A HOLE IN ONE OF HIS NEIGHBOR'S DOOR, IN A DRUNKEN RAGE AND STUPOR, ALL THAT HE MANAGED TO GET FROM THE POLICE, WAS A TICKET. NO CHARGES FOR HARASSMENT, OR FOR DISTURBING THE PEACE, OR FOR THE MISCHIEF, THAT HE HAS CAUSED, TO HIS NEIGHBOR'S DOOR. POLICE WERE CALLED AT LEAST THREE TIMES AND BY MORE THAN ONE NEIGHBOR OF THE MAN, WHO GOES BY DIFFERENT NAMES. HE IS KNOWN TO THE POLICE, AS MICHAEL ERROL GREEN, MICHAEL HAMILTON, OR HIS OTHER ALIAS, OTTIS WOOD. 

MR WOODS, OR MICHAEL GREEN, AS HE IS USUALLY KNOWN, DID NOT TAKE HEED TO THE POLICE WARNING THE FIRST TIME, OR THE SECOND TIME. IN FACT HE DID NOT TAKE HEED, TO THE WARNINGS AT ALL. RIGHT AFTER THE POLICE LEFT ON THEIR SECOND VISIT, ON THE NIGHT OF DECEMBER 30TH, THE MAN WENT UPSTAIRS TO HIS NEIGHBOR'S HOME AND BANGED REPEATEDLY ON HER WINDOW, DOOR AND WALLS, PROMPTING THE NEIGHBOR TO CALL THE POLICE, A SECOND TIME ON HIM FOR THE NIGHT. THE SAME NEIGHBOR CLAIMED, ALSO, THAT THE POLICE HAD TOLD HER, AFTER CALLING HER BACK THAT NIGHT, THAT THEY HAD TOLD MR GREEN, THAT THEY DID NOT WANT TO COME BACK THERE THAT NIGHT. WELL THEY DID AND HE WAS GIVEN A TICKET, OR A FINE. WHEN REALLY HIS BEHAVIOUR WARRANTED A CRIMINAL CHARGE, SINCE HE KEPT THE NEIGHBORS UP ALL NIGHT, WITH HIS HARASSMENT. HE HAS EVEN MADE THREATS THAT HE WOULD KILL SOMEONE, ALTHOUGH HE DID NOT SPECIFY WHO. THE POLICE CLAIMED IT WAS A "GENERAL THREAT". AND ALSO THAT BY GIVING HIM A TICKET, IT WAS LIKE TAKING BABY STEPS. REALLY?. WHY DID THEY NOT JUST ARREST HIM?. AS THEY WOULD HAVE DONE IN OTHER SITUATIONS?. THE POLICE ALSO SAID THAT BECAUSE HIS MOTHER OWNED THE HOUSE, THAT HE COULD NOT REALLY BE CHARGED FOR MISCHIEF, IN DAMAGING HIS NEIGHBOR'S DOOR. 

THE MAN ALSO CLAIMED, THAT SOMEONE BROKE INTO HIS HOME AND LEFT A GLOVE, O.J. SIMPSON STYLE, AND THAT HE ALSO WANTED THE POLICE, TO DO A DNA AND FINGERPRINT ON THE GLOVE, TO FIND OUT WHO BROKE INTO HIS HOME, WHILE HE WAS AWAY. HE CALLED THE ALLEGED PERPETRATOR, A "DUPPY". I.E A GHOST. 

THE TENANTS COMPLAINED, THAT HE ACTS LIKE THAT, WHENEVER HE DRINKS ALCOHOL. THAT HE USES THE OPPORTUNITY, TO TERRORIZE HIS NEIGHBORS AND TO EMPHASIZED TO THEM, THAT HIS MOTHER OWNS THE HOUSE, THAT THEY ARE LIVING IN, SO BASICALLY HE CAN DO WHATEVER HE WANTS. IT HAS ALSO NOW BECOME APPARENT, THAT HE HAS USED ALCOHOL AND ALLEGEDLY DRUGS, TO HARASS THE TENANTS OF THE BUILDING, AND GETS AWAY WITH HIS ACTIONS, EVERY TIME. HE ALSO LIKES TO REMIND THEM, THAT HE IS A "BAD MAN", OR GANGSTER AND HAS EVEN MENTIONED HIS ASSOCIATION, WITH THE "SHOWER POSSE", A TORONTO GANG. SO THE TENANTS ARE VERY MUCH WARRANTED, IN FEARING FOR THEIR SAFETY FROM HIM. 

BUT HOW OFTEN DOES THE POLICE ISSUE  A TICKET, FOR CAUSING A DISTURBANCE, OTHER THAN NOISE?. SHOULD THAT INCLUDE THE ACTIONS, OF BANGING ON PEOPLE'S DOORS AND WINDOWS ALL NIGHT? DOES THAT KIND OF ACTION NOT WARRANT A CRIMINAL CHARGE?. ESPECIALLY, IF IT COMES FROM MORE THAN ONE WITNESSES?. SO WHY DID THEY LET THIS LANDLORD'S SON GET OFF SO EASY?. ESPECIALLY, WHEN THE POLICE KEEP GETTING, REPEATED CALLS ABOUT HIS BEHAVIOUR?. WHEN WILL THEY STOP BEING CORRUPT AND SERVE AND PROTECT EVERYONE?. THIS SPECIAL FAVOR TO THIS LANDLORD, WHICH EXTENDS TO HER SON AND TO HER PROPERTY, BY THE POLICE AND OTHER CITY OFFICIALS, WHILST DOING THEIR LEGAL DUTY, AND FAILING TO CARRY THROUGH ON IT, IS CALLED BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION. IT IS THAT PLAIN AND SIMPLE. SOMETHING THAT I AM PERSONALLY GETTING TIRED, OF REPORTING ABOUT THE TORONTO POLICE.

SHELLYANN PEREIRA, PARALEGAL, UNETHICAL CONDUCT. LIES, HARASSMENT AND USING HERESAY, AS CREDIBLE EVIDENCE.

SHELLYANN PEREIRA, PARALEGAL

SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, LEGAL SERVICES, SPEREIRA LEGAL SERVICES   

THE UNETHICAL CONDUCT, THAT EXIST BETWEEN SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, AND L & T BOARD MEMBER, LORRAINE MATHERS. BOTH HAVE SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE, THAT WAS REQUIRED AT A HEARING, ON DECEMBER 18TH. THE EVIDENCE ITSELF, WAS A MEDICAL DOCUMENT, DETAILING THE TENANT'S ILLNESS AND THE REASON THAT SHE WAS UNABLE, TO ATTEND THE HEARING.  ACCORDING, TO THE MEMBER, HEARING THE MATTER, ON THAT DATE, THE MEDICAL DOCUMENT, WAS NOT PROVIDED, AT THE HEARING, BY EITHER THE BOARD, OR BY SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, THE LANDLORD'S COUNSEL. BOTH THE BOARD AND MEMBER LORRAINE MATHERS, AND ALSO SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, SUPPRESSED THAT EVIDENCE, FROM THE MEMBER, IN ORDER TO INFULENCE, THE OUTCOME OF T HE HEARING, IN FAVOR OF THE LANDLORD. 

SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, THE LANDLORD'S PARALEGAL, AT THE L&T BOARD AND THE BOARD MEMBER, LORRAINE MATTERS, ALSO A PARALEGAL, WHOSE RELATIONSHIP, WITH SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, IS TO BE INVESTIGATED FURTHER, IN REGARDS TO THEIR ATTEMPTS TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, IN THE MATTER. STILL UNCERTAIN, AND WHO HAD DECIDED, TO MOVE THE LANDLORD'S APPLICATION, AHEAD OF THE TENANT'S APPLICATION, DESPITE THE FACT, THAT BOTH APPLICATIONS, WERE ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED, TO BE HEARD TOGETHER. WAS SHE DOING A FAVOR, FOR ANOTHER PARALEGAL, AS A MEMBER OF THE L&T BOARD? AND EVEN MORE DISTURBING, WAS THERE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, IN HER DECISION, TO FAVOR THE LANDLORD, OVER THE TENANT, BY SEPARATING, THE APPLICATIONS AND MOVING THE LANDLORD'S APPLICATION FORWARD, TO BE HEARD SOONER AND ON ITS OWN, BECAUSE OF SHELLY ANN PEREIRA?

THIS PARALEGAL, IS UNETHICAL, IN HER CONDUCT, AND SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED, BY THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA, FOR SERIOUS VIOLATIONS, REGARDING HER PRACTICE. COMPLAINTS AGAINST HER.

THEY INCLUDED, WITHHOLDING INFORMATION, IN A LEGAL PROCEEDING, THAT MAY GO AGAINST HER CLIENT, HARASSMENT, SUCH AS UNSOLICITED EMAILS, WITH UNSUBSTANTIATED, INFORMATION, THAT SHE HAS CLAIMED TO BE FACTUAL, JUST BECAUSE SHE HAD, ALLEGEDLY, RECEIVED IT FROM HER CLIENT, AND ATTEMPTS, TO UNLAWFULLY INTERFERE, IN A LEGAL PROCEEDING. 

SHELLYANN PEREIRA, DOES LANDLORD AND TENANT MATTERS, AS A PARALEGAL. 

ShellyAnn Pereira, whose discreditable conduct, included, lies, harassment and withholding evidence, such as witnessing, the physical assault, by her client, upon the tenant, in front of witnesses, at the L&T Board, when her client, spat at the tenant, repeatedly. Receiving documents, from the L&T Board, directly, that were to to be sent to the Board, directly, from another L&T Board location. And then claiming, that she had forwarded, the documents, to the intended office, of the L&T Board. And providing no proof, of such an action.  This may not seem as much, but it it really mattered, since sending the documents, directly, to ShellyAnn Pereira, it caused a delay, in the Board having the information, than if it was transferred directly, to the L&T Board, from one location, to another. Corresponding, to  L&T Board staff, and others related to the L&T Board, by email,where she took the opportunity, to discuss the litigation, in length.  And they in turn responded, by making decisions, about the matter, outside of being a member of the Board.  Those persons, included, Jide Oladejo, Barrister & Solicitor, at 1111 Finch Avenue West, in Toronto, who is not on record, as the landlord's counsel.  But interfered in the matter, nonetheless. As shown in her correspondence (emails), with ShellyAnn Pereira, (tenant had to ask the Board, if this was allowed?. And was told by the Board, that it was not allowed), which ShellyAnn Pereira, sent a long diatride, about the tenant. Again, unsubstantiated, evidence, that she had claimed, to have received from the landlord, about the tenant. It would have been better, if the Board had gotten the opportunity, to sort out the evidence, itself and not those persons, who were not adjudicating the matter. Aside from those facts mentioned, there is also the additional questions, concerning Shelly Ann Pereira's relationship, with the Landlord &Tenant Board Member, Lorraine Mathers, who is also a paralegal, and whose bias decision, to favor the her client, the landlord, that not only shows procedural unfairness, but may also go deeper than that. 

There is more to report, regarding Shelly Ann Pereira and this case. And more reports to be made, regrading her other complaints, that are registered against her, with the Law Society of Upper Canada.

LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD MEMBER, LORRAINE MATHERS, A PARALEGAL, DENIED TENANT, ON MEDICAL LEAVE, AND UNDER A DOCTOR'S CARE, THE RIGHT TO RESCHEDULED A HEARING.

    CORRUPTION AT THE L&T BOARD

A PARALEGAL, WHO REPRESENTS LANDLORDS, IN HER PRACTICE AND IS NOW A MEMBER, OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, SHOWED, JUST HOW PREJUDICE, SHE IS TOWARDS TENANTS, AT THE L&T BOARD. 

 
LORRAINE MATHERS, THE CORRUPT MEMBER, OF THE ONTARIO LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, IGNORED THE MEDICAL REPORT, SENT TO THE BOARD, TO RESCHEDULED, A HEARING, DUE TO THE ILLNESS, OF THE TENANT. 

SHE DENIED THE TENANT THE RIGHT, TO RESCHEDULED, THE HEARING, EVEN THOUGH THE TENANT, IS PHYSICALLY NOT ABLE TO ATTEND, THE HEARING, FOR MEDICAL REASONS. IGNORING THE MEDICAL DOCUMENT,THAT WAS ALSO PROVIDED, TO THE L&T BOARD.

SHE ALSO SHOWED, SPECIAL FAVOR, TO THE LANDLORD, BY SEPARATING, HER APPLICATION, FROM THE TENANT'S APPLICATION, WHICH WERE SCHEDULED, TO BE HEARD TOGETHER, AND MOVED IT FORWARD, TO BE HEARD ON ITS OWN, THE NEXT DAY, WHILE THE TENANT'S APPLICATION, WAS LEFT IN LIMBO, AND IGNORED. 

BOTH APPLICATIONS, WERE ORIGINALLY LINKED TOGETHER, BY ANOTHER MEMBER, SHELBY WHITTICK, IN ORDER TO BALANCE, THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES, OF THE LANDLORD AND TO PROTECT THE TENANT'S RIGHTS.

EVIDENCE SHOWED, THAT THERE MAY BE, MORE CORRUPTION, INVOLVED, LINKING THIS L&T BOARD MEMEBR, TO THE LANDLORD'S OWN COUNSEL, ANOTHER PARALEGAL, SHELLYANN PEREIRA, WHO HAS ACTED, WITH A LACK OF INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONALISM, REGARDING HER CLIENT.

THE TENANT, WHO IS ON MEDICAL LEAVE, UNTIL AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2020, HAD INFORMED THE BOARD, AND HAD ASKED FOR A RESCHEDULING OF THE MATTERS, TO BE HEARD, ON DECEMBER 18, 2020. THE MEMBER DECIDED, ON DECEMBER 17, TO DENY THE TENANT'S REQUEST AND TO PROCEED WITH A HEARING, THAT THE TENANT IS UNABLE TO ATTEND, FOR MEDICAL REASONS. 

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: VALERIE HENRY GUILLAUME, TENANT AND ANGELA STERLING, LANDLORD. 

THIS LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, MEMBER, LORRAINE MATHERS, ALSO SEPARATED, THE THREE MATTERS, THAT WERE SCHEDULED, TO BE HEARD TOGETHER, FAILING TO COMMENT, ON TWO OF THOSE MATTERS, AS SHE PROCEEDED, WITH ONLY THE ONE MATTER, INVOLVING, THE LANDLORD'S APPLICATION.

NO CONCERN WAS SHOWN, BY THIS MEMBER, OR BY THE L&T BOARD, CONCERNING THE TENANT'S APPLICATION, THAT WAS IGNORED, IN THE PROCESS.

THE MEMBER, LORRAINE MATHERS, IN HER DECISION, ALSO DID NOT PROVIDE, IN WRITING, ANY REASONS, FOR HER DECISION. THERE WAS NO ORDER, OR ENDORSENMENT, OF HER DECISION, TO DENY THE TENANT'S REQUEST, TO RESCHEDULED THE MATTERS, AT THE BOARD. ONLY HER COMMENTS, WERE REGISTERD, ON FILE WITH THE BOARD AND WERE READ TO THE TENANT. 

THE MEMBER,  LORRAINE MATHERS, DID NOT PROVIDE, A WRITTEN REASON, FOR HER DECISION, IN NOT PROCEEDING, WITH THE TENANT'S APPLICATION, AS SHE IS REQUIRED TO DO, UNDER THE LAW. SUCH A REASON, IS USUALLY PROVIDED, IN THE FORM OF A WRITTEN AND SIGNED ENDORSEMENT, OR AN ORDER, BY THE MEMBER. BUT NOT IN THIS CASE.

LORRAINE MATHERS, AS A MEMBER OF THE L&T BOARD, HAS VIOLATED, THE TENANT'S RIGHTS, IN MORE THAN ONE WAYS. IGNORING HER MEDICAL CONDITION, AND REFUSING TO GIVE A WRITTEN REASON, FOR HER DECISION, TO DENY THE REQUEST, TO RESCHEDULED, THE HEARING, FOR MEDICAL REASONS. AS WELL AS TO, LEAVE THE TENANT'S APPLICATION, WITHOUT A NEW HEARING DATE, AS IT WAS TOTALLY IGNORED, BY THE MEMBER AND THE BOARD.

No where under the law, does it require someone, to physically attend a hearing, who is unable to do so, for medical reasons. If someone is physically, not able to attend a hearing, how is it that this Member, Lorraine Mathers, of the Landlord and Tenant Board, command her to do so otherwise?. 

If the L&T Board, Tribunal, proceeds with a hearing, on December 18, 2020, or makes a ruling, against the tenant, at the intended hearing, knowing that the tenant, is unable to attend the hearing, the matter will be appealed, to the court.  The Member, Lorraine Mathers, will also be investigated, by the Social Justice Tribunal.

A POSSIBLE UNETHICAL CONDUCT, MAY EXIST, BETWEEN SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, THE LANDLORD'S PARALEGAL, AT THE L&T BOARD AND THE BOARD MEMBER, LORRAINE MATTERS, ALSO A PARALEGAL, WHOSE RELATIONSHIP, WITH SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, IS STILL UNCERTAIN, AND WHO HAD DECIDED, TO MOVE THE LANDLORD'S APPLICATION, AHEAD OF THE TENANT'S APPLICATION, DESPITE THE FACT, THAT BOTH APPLICATIONS, WERE ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED, TO BE HEARD TOGETHER.

Why do the Landlord and Tenant Board, has such a member, who acts against the law?. A lack of procedural fairness, is cause for such a member, to get removed from the Board. Permanently. Why?. For many reasons, but also because it interferes, with the Constitutional rights, under the Charter, of the tenant, as well. Suing the L&T Board, and its Members, is also an option, presented to the tenant.

Overall, it is called corruption. Exposing the personal corruption, of the Member, Lorraine Mathers, at the Landlord and Tenant Board, East Office, at 2275 Midland Avenue, Scarborough, Ontario.

 

TORONTO POLICE 41 DIVISION, SERGEANT HO. I WAITED FOR FOUR HOURS, AND HIS POLICE DID NOT RESPONDED TO MY CALL..

TORONTO POLICE, SERGEANT HO, AND THE TORONTO 41 DIVISION, POLICE CORRUPTION. RACISM AND THE POLICE TARGETING, OF BLACKS IN CANADA. 

I BELIEVED, THAT THE TORONTO POLICE, HAS TRIED ON SEVERAL OCCASSIONS, TO SET ME UP TO BE KILLED, OR SERIOUSLY HARMED. THIS IS WHY THE 41 DIVISION POLICE, HAS REFUSED, TO COME TO MY AID AND TO ENDANGER MY SAFETY, FROM THOSE WHO MIGHT HARM ME. ESPECIALLY, SINCE SOME OF THOSE PERSONS, ARE ALSO KNOWN TO THE POLICE.

HOW CORRUPT, CAN THIS COUNTRY'S POLICE AND THIS GOVERNMENT BE?

THIS IS WHAT CORRUPTION, LOOKS LIKE IN CANADA. SO WHY IS IT STILL BEING IGNORED, BY THE REST OF THE WORLD?

EXPOSING THE TORONTO POLICE CORRUPTION AND HOW THEY HAVE IGNORED MY CALLS, WHEN I CALL THEM FOR ASSISTANCE. THIS IS TYPICAL BEHAVIOUR, OF THE 41 DIVISION POLICE. TONIGHT I HAD CALLED THEM, BECAUSE I WAS CONCERNED FOR MY SAFETY, FROM A NEIGHBOR. AND TYPICALLY, THE POLICE HAVE ME WAITING NOW, FOR FOUR HOURS AND STILL HAVE NOT RESPONDED. STAFF SERGEANT HO, IS ON DUTY AT THAT STATION.  AS USUAL I HAVE VIDEO TAPED THE INCIDENT, BUT NO POLICE HAS SHOWED UP, SINCE THE CALL WAS MADE, SEVERAL HOURS AGO. THAT IS HOW I AM USUALLY TREATED, BY THE TORONTO POLICE. I AM TOLD THAT NO CARS ARE AVAILABLE, FOR GOING ON FOUR HOURS NOW.

A FEW DAYS AGO I ALSO CALLED THEM, WHEN ANOTHER NEIGHBOR WAS SEXUALLY HARASSING ME, BY MAKING LEWD COMMENTS AND GESTURES. AGAIN I WAITED SEVERAL HOURS AND THE 41 DIVISION POLICE, WAS NOT INTERESTED IN SHOWING UP. TONIGHT, IT WAS STAFF SERGEANT HO, WHO WAS ON DUTY AT THE STATION. I CALLED THE STATION DIRECTLY AND ASKED WHEN THE INSPECTOR, WILL BE IN TOMORROW MORNING. IT WAS AN INSPECTOR'S INTERVENTION THE LAST TIME, THAT GOT THE 41 DIVISION POLICE TO SHOW UP IN THE MORNING AND INVESTIGATE MY COMPLAINT. 

WHEN I HAD CALLED THE POLICE BACK, AFTER WAITING FOR A FEW HOURS, I WAS ASKED IF I WANTED TO CANCEL THE CALL. THIS IS WHAT I HAVE HAD TO DO, A FEW DAYS AGO AND AT OTHER TIMES, AFTER WAITING FOR HOURS, FOR THE TORONTO 41 DIVISION POLICE, TO SHOW UP. EVEN WHEN IT ENDANGERS MY SAFETY. SO THE QUESTION POSED TO ME TONIGHT, BY THE DISPATCHER, IF I WANTED TO CANCEL THE CALL, OR TO CONTINUE TO WAIT FOR THE POLICE TO SHOW UP, WHICH NOW SEEM TO BE AN ALL NIGHT WAIT, WAS NOT UNUSUAL FOR THEM TO ASK ME. THIS MAKES IT CLEAR WHY THE POLICE, HAS TAKEN SO LONG TO RESPOND TO MY CALL. THEY WANT ME TO CANCEL IT, AS I HAVE BEEN FORCED TO DO IN THE PAST, OR STAY UP ALL NIGHT AND WAIT FOR THEM TO SHOW UP. IS THIS WHAT THE STAFF SERGEANT HO, FROM THE TORONTO 41 DIVISION POLICE, IS GETTING PAID TO DO?. THAT ENTIRE TORONTO POLICE DIVISION, HAS BEEN TARGETING ME AND CAUSED ME TO FEAR FOR MY SAFETY, AND ALSO FROM THE POLICE ITSELF.  AS A HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGER, WHO HAS SPENT YEARS EXPOSING, THE CANADIAN POLICE CORRUPTION, THIS IS HOW I AM TREATED BY THE POLICE. THIS IS THE PRICE THAT I HAVE TO PAY, FOR LETTING THE WORLD KNOW, THAT THERE IS ALSO POLICE TARGETING OF BLACKS IN CANADA, IN THE FORM OF RACISM AND POLICE BRUTALITY. AS RECENTLY AS TWO WEEKS AGO, ANOTHER  BLACK WOMAN, HAS DIED, WHILE IN THE POLICE CUSTODY, IN TORONTO. THE POLICE ALSO ALLEGED, THAT SHE WAS MENTALLY ILL. SHE WAS IN FACT A TRANSGENDER, AND WAS WELL KNOWN, IN THAT COMMUNITY.  SHE WAS DEAD UPON ARRIVAL, TO THE HOSPITAL, AFTER THE POLICE WAS CALLED AND ATTENDED HER HOME. BLACKS IN CANADA ARE FOUR TIMES MORE LIKELY THAN WHITES, TO BE KILLED BY THE POLICE. AND THE POLICE WATCHDOG, THE SIU, OR THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT, HAS THE FIGURE EVEN HIGHER. ACCORDING TO IT, SEVEN OUT OF TEN DEATHS, BY THE TORONTO POLICE, INVOLVES A BLACK PERSON.  IT IS OPEN SEASON FOR BLACKS, BY THE POLICE IN CANADA.  RACISM, POLICE TARGETING AND POLICE BRUTALITY, AND THE MURDER OF BLACK PEOPLE, BY THE TORONTO POLICE, IS NOW AN ALL TOO COMMON PRACTICE, BY THE TORONTO POLICE, IN CANADA. 

THE TARGETING OF ME, BY THE TORONTO POLICE, WHICH INCLUDE SUCH PRACTICES, AS ENDANGERING MY SAFETY AND REFUSING TO INVESTIGATE MY COMPLAINTS, WHEN IT COMES TO SERVING AND PROTECTING ME, AS AN INDIVIDUAL, IS ALSO NON EXISTENT, IN MY CASE.

THIS IS A BLATANT VIOLATION OF MY RIGHTS AND A FORM OF POLICE BRUTALITY. IT IS RACIST AND SHOWS THAT IT IS OPEN SEASON, AGAINST BLACKS IN TORONTO, BY THE POLICE. FOR ME PERSONALLY, IT IS VERY UPSETTING TO KNOW, THAT THE TORONTO POLICE ACTIONS, HAVE ENDANGERED MY SAFETY.  IT IS NOT UNUSUAL FOR THE TORONTO POLICE, TO HAVE ME WAITING FOR UP TO SIX HOURS, TO SHOW UP AND INVESTIGATE MY COMPLAINTS.  WHERE IS THE BLACK LIVES MATTER, WHEN IT COMES TO THIS FORM OF POLICE RACISM AND POLICE BRUTALITY?.  WHY ARE SOME BLACKS LIKE MYSELF, WHO IS A TARGET OF THE CANADIAN POLICE, ALSO IGNORED, BY THE TORONTO CHAPTER, OF BLACK LIVES MATTERS?. THIS IS BEYOND COMPLAINING TO AN INSPECTOR, AS THE WHOLE FORCE IS AGAINST BLACKS IN CANADA. WHERE IS THEIR DUTY TO SERVE AND PROTECT, IN MY CASE?. TO PROTECT MY SAFETY SOMEWHAT, I VIRTUALLY HAVE TO HAVE A RECORDING DEVICE, ON ME AT ALL TIMES.  BUT BECAUSE OF THE TORONTO POLICE,  UNWILLINGNESS, TO PROTECT MY SAFETY AND IN FACT TO ACT TO ENDANGER IT FURTHER, I HAVE ALSO BECOME THE TARGET, OF OTHERS.  SOME OF WHOM I ALSO BELIEVE, THE POLICE HAVE EVEN USED AGAINST ME, AS PART OF ITS TARGETING OF ME. I KNOW THIS TO BE TRUE, BECAUSE THE POLICE HAS BEEN UNWILLING, TO INVESTIGATE THEM, AND THIS FACT IS ALSO KNOWN, TO THE PERPETRATORS THEMSELVES.  AND IT DOES NOT MATTER, WHAT CITY I LIVE IN, IN CANADA, THE POLICE TREATMENT, IS ALWAYS THE SAME.  

MY JOB AS A HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGER, IS TO CONTINUE TO EXPOSE, THIS FORM OF POLICE CORRUPTION. WHILE AT THE SAME TIME, TRYING TO KEEP SAFE WHILE DOING SO. THE TORONTO POLICE ACTIONS TONIGHT, IN IGNORING MY CALL TO THE POLICE FOR HELP, IS A ALSO REMINDER TO ME, THAT THE POLICE CONTINUES TO VIEW MY ACTIONS, TO EXPOSE ITS CORRUPTION, AS A DIRECT THREAT TO THE POLICE.  I PLAN TO CONTACT THE IACHR, TO HELP ME TO PROTECT MY SAFETY, FROM THE CANADIAN POLICE. THIS WOULD BE MY THIRD PETITION, TO THAT HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION, WITHIN THE LAST TEN YEARS. 

 

PRIVATE CHARGES ARE BLOCKED IN CANADA. AND WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOUR SAFETY.

MORE THREATS AGAINST ME, BY MAN WHO USE TO BE WANTED, BY THE POLICE. T.O...

TORONTO CITY OFFICIALS, WHO AIDED ANGELA STERLING, IN BREAKING THE LAW, OVER THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, WILL BE FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES..

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION, INVOLVING, SEVERAL HIGH LEVEL CITY OFFICIALS.

THE OWNER OF THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE IN SCARBOROUGH, ANGELA STERLING, IS YET TO FACE ANY CHARGES, FOR OPERATING A BUILDING, THAT IS UNSAFE AND THAT IS IN VIOLATION, OF THE CITY'S BY-LAWS.

UNLIKE OTHER LANDLORDS, IN SCARBOROUGH, WHO HAVE BEEN CHARGED, FOR ILLEGALLY OPERATING, A BUILDING, THAT IS AGAINST THE CITY'S BY LAWS, THIS LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, HAS CITY OFFICIALS, IN HER POCKET. THE EVIDENCE SHOWS, THAT THERE IS ALSO BRIBERY INVOLVED, CONCERNING THOSE CITY OFFICIALS, AS WELL AS CONSPIRACY AND BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST.

THOSE WHO ARE UNFAMILIAR WITH THE LAW, MAY ASK THE QUESTION, HOW BRIBERY IS INCLUDED, IN THE CHARGES AGAINST THEM?. AND THEY TAKE THIS TO MEAN THAT MONEY WAS INVOLVED. BUT BRIBERY UNDER THE CRIMINAL CODE, ALSO MEANS GIVING SPECIAL CONSIDERATION, TO SOMEONE  BY THOSE WHO ARE IN PUBLIC OFFICE, AND THEY CAN DO THIS DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY.  AS LONG AS THE INTENT, WAS TO INTERFERE, WITH THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, AND TO PROCURE, OR FACILITATE, THE COMMISSION OF AN OFFENSE, IN THE PROCESS. 

IT IS CLEAR, THAT THOSE TORONTO CITY OFFICIALS WHO ARE INVOLVED, IN THE INVESTIGATION OF THE LANDLORD AND HER ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, HAS ASSISTED HER, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN CONTINUING, TO BREAK THE LAW, CONCERNING THE PROPERTY AND TO AID HER IN OTHER WAYS, IN BREAKING THE LAW. FOR A LONG TIME, THE TORONTO FIRE CHIEF, MATT PEGG AND THE DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF, JIM JESSOP, TURNED A BLIND EYE, WHEN THIS GREEDY LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, RENTED OUT HER FURNACE ROOM, TO ONE OF HER TENANTS. UNSAFE FOR LIVING PURPOSES, THE TENANT WAS ALLOWED TO COOK AND TO RESIDE, IN FURNACE ROOM, DESPITE THE FACT THAT, THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, WAS UNSAFE AND THE LANDLORD WAS GIVEN A NOTICE TO BRING THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM UP TO STANDARDS, BY THE ELECTRICAL SAFETY AUTHORITY. SOMETHING, THAT SHE HAS YET, TO COMPLY WITH. AND ALL THE WHILE, CONTINUING TO RUN THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, AT MAXIMUM CAPACITY. AND AT NO TIME AT ALL, HAVING LESS THAN EIGHT TENANTS, CONTRARY TO THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE, FIRE CODE AND THE MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING THE ZONING BY-LAW. 

SO WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO GET AROUND, TO SHUTTING THIS ILLEGAL BUILDING DOWN?. OR ARE THEY GOING TO CONTINUE, TO ACT CORRUPT IN THE MATTER AND TO ALLOW THIS LANDLORD, TO DO WHAT OTHER LANDLORDS, CANNOT DO. THAT IS TO CONTINUE TO OPERATE A BUILDING, THAT POSE A DANGER TO THE TENANTS, AND TO PUBLIC SAFETY. AND ON TOP OF THE OTHER CONCERNS, THE BUILDING IS ALSO A DRUG HOUSE, WITH MORE THAN ONE TENANT LIVING THERE, WHO ARE OPENLY SELLING ILLEGAL DRUGS, 24/7. IT IS A COMMON SIGHT, TO SEE THE CLIENTS OF THESE DRUG DEALERS, COMING TO THE BUILDING, AT ALL HOURS OF THE DAY. NIGHT TIME, BEING NO EXCEPTION. THE NEIGBOURS ARE ALSO CONCERNED, THAT SUCH A BUILDING, IS BEING ALLOWED, BY CITY OFFICIALS, TO OPERATE IN THEIR QUIET RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD AND MANY OF THEM HAS ALREADY SIGNED A PETITION, TO HAVE IT CLOSED DOWN.  BUT THE CORRUPT CITY OFFICIALS, WHO ARE INVOLVED, IN THEIR ILLICIT RELATIONSHIP, WITH THIS LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, HAVE CONTINUED, TO ALLOW HER TO OPERATE THE BUILDING, ILLEGLLY. 

LAST YEAR, WITH PUBLIC PRESSURE MOUNTING, THE LANDLORD, CLAIMED TO HAVE GIVEN HER TENANTS, THE SIXTY DAYS NOTICE, TO VACATE THE BUILDING. BUT THANKS, TO THE CITY OFFICIALS, WHO HAVE AIDED HER IN HER ILLEGAL ACTIVITY, NONE OF THE TENANTS, WERE MADE TO LEAVE. AND SHE HAS IN FACT CONTINUED, TO RENT OUT THE ROOMS, TO NEW TENANTS, DESPITE HAVING A NOTICE TO CLOSE IT DOWN. 

A LANDLORD, WHO IGNORES A NOTICE, GIVEN BY A PUBLIC OFFICER, WHO HAS THE LEGAL AUTHORITY, TO ENFORCE THAT NOTICE, CAN ALSO BE CHARGED WITH, DISOBEYING AN ORDER OF THE COURT. WHICH IS ALSO A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.  IT IS ALSO A CRIMINAL OFFENSE, TO KNOWING ACCEPT A BRIBE, FROM A PUBLIC OFFICER, AS IS ALSO EVIDENT, IN THIS CASE. ANGELA STERLING, THE OWNER OF THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, HAS UNDOUBTEDLY RECEIVED, VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, FROM THOSE TORONTO CITY OFFICIALS, CONCERNING THE ILLEGAL BUILDING. THESE CORRUPT CITY OFFICIALS, HAVE ATTEMPTED, TO INTERFERE IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, CONCERNING HER ACTIONS. SHE HAS FACED NO LEGAL CONSEQUENCES, FOR HER ACTIONS, REGARDING THE ILLEGAL BUILDING. OTHER LANDLORDS, IN THE SAME SITUATION, HAVE NOT FARED SO WELL, AS ANGELA STERLING. THEY WERE CHARGED AND FINED AND HAD THEIR ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSES, CLOSED DOWN. 

BUT THIS IS NOT A CONCERN, FOR ANGELA STERLING, OR FOR THE MANY TORONTO CITY OFFICIALS, WHO HAVE AIDED HER, IN CONTINUING TO BREAK THE LAW.

IN THEIR VIEW, THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW. THEY BELIEVED THAT THEY ARE IMMUNE TO PROSECUTION AND THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE LAW.  AND ALL THE WHILE THESE CORRUPT CITY OFFICIALS, CONTINUE TO ADVANCE THEMSELVES, IN THE AREA OF PUBLIC DUTY, WHILE STILL ACTING CORRUPT.

WELCOME TO CANADA AND ITS CORRUPTION. THIS IS THE WAY THAT THINGS ARE DONE, IN THAT COUNTRY.  THERE IS NO TRANSPARENCY, IN GOVERNMENT. LOCAL, OR OTHEWISE. AND WHEN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, ACTS CORRUPT, THEY ADVANCE IN THEIR PUBLIC CAREERS. 

THIS IS ONE OF THOSE PROBLEMS, THAT NEED TO BE EXPOSED. 

WE SEE THIS HAPPENING, IN OTHER COUNTRIES, AND MANY DO NOT BELIEVE THAT CORRUPTION, IS A MAJOR PROBLEM, IN CANADA.  FROM MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION, TO DEALING WITH CORRUPTION, IN OTHER AREAS OF GOVERNMENT, IT IS A FACT, THAT IT IS THE WAY, THAT THIS COUNTRY GOVERNS. 

THIS ARTICLE ONLY MENTIONED, JUST ONE INCIDENT, INVOLVING, TORONTO CITY OFFICIALS. BUT THERE ARE MANY OTHER SIMILAR SITUATIONS, INVOLVING CORRUPTION, AT THE LOCAL LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT. THE ARTICLE SHOULD HAVE BEEN CALLED, NORMALIZING CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR, BY CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS. 

IN THEIR EYES, IT IS NORMAL FOR THEM TO ACT CORRUPT AND TO BE IMMUNE, FROM FACING ANY PENALTY, FOR THEIR ACTIONS.  NO WONDER, THAT CORRUPTION IS VIEWED, AS A SECRET CRIME. THEY PUT AS MUCH EFFORT, IN COVERING UP THEIR ACTIONS, AS THEY DO IN CARRYING IT OUT. WHILE ALL THE WHILE, KEEPING UP A PUBLIC PERSONA, THAT BELIES, THEIR TRUE INTENTIONS. A REAL PUBLIC FARCE. 

YOU HAVE TO SEE THOSE PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN ACTION, TO BELIEVE IT YOURSELF. 

As a witness to the situation, that I have just written about, I will be more than happy, to give evidence in a court of law, against those Toronto officials, that I have exposed in this article. If only for fact, that their actions, or omission, has caused me injury, concerning that landlord, Angela Sterling, and her illegal property. Many of the complaints were put in to them by me, as a resident of the building. Only to see them neglect their legal duty and to show a disregard for the tenants of the building. Choosing instead, to give preferential treatment, to a landlord who was breaking the law. And compared to what other landlords, have also faced, from those same city officials, in other similar situations, you get to see very clearly, that something was amiss, concerning their actions and the investigation of the building. And the woman who owned it, Angela Sterling. If the law is the same for everyone, then they should be made to answer, for what they have done, or have not done, concerning that building and its owner, as part of their legal duty. Even delaying (unreasonably), the carrying out of their legal duty, to protect the owner, is a cause for legal actions, against them. Personally, I believe that they have no intention, of carrying out their legal duty, concerning that building and its owner. And that is based on their actions so far.  Which is that they have been complicit, in that regards and may also be culpable, in any injuries to the tenant, by the landlord, or by them.  For instance, those actions of theirs, that would be considered, as reckless and dangerous under the law, involving their acts, or omissions, in the carrying out of their legal duty. And that also resulted in physical harm, to the tenant. And that should be the grounds, for any legal actions, against them. 

41 Division Police Sergeant Love Blocked My 911 Calls And Refused To Sen...

1. THE NUMBER ONE REASON, IS THAT THE POLICE ITSELF POSE A DANGER TO PUBLIC  SAFETY. OFTEN BECAUSE OF CORRUPTION.

2. REASON NUMBER TWO, IS INEQUALITY IN THE SERVICE, THAT THE POLICE IS SUPPOSE TO PROVIDE TO THE PUBLIC. THIS INEQUALITY, IS FUELED BY RACISM AND THE TARGETING, OF CERTAIN GROUPS, SUCH AS BLACKS AND OTHER VISIBLE MINORITIES.

3. REASON NUMBER THREE, THE FUNDING OF THE POLICE IS EXCESSIVE AND THEIR IS NO ACCOUNTABILITY, AS TO HOW THIS MONEY IS SPENT. THE FUNDS SHOULD BE USED FOR OTHER SERVICES IN THE COMMUNITY, THAT WILL HELP TO DEAL WITH OTHER ISSUES, AND WHERE THE IT COULD BE PUT TO BETTER USE. WE DO NOT NEED TO CONTRIBUTE TO A POLICE SALARY, THAT IS EXCESSIVE AND WHERE THEY ARE ENDANGERING PUBLIC SAFETY, IN THE PROCESS. 

* WHEN YOU HAVE THE POLICE, BLOCKING 911 CALLS FOR HELP AND LEAVING  THE VICTIMS WITHOUT ASSISTANCE, BECAUSE OF THEIR CORRUPTION, THEN IT'S TIME TO DEFUND THE POLICE. 

* WHEN THE POLICE ROLE NOW, IS TO HARM, OR TO CAUSE HARM, RATHER THAN TO PROTECT, THEN IT IS TIME TO DEFUND THE POLICE. 

THE MONEY CAN BE PUT TO BETTER USE.

EMERGENCY PUBLIC NOTICE: 41 DIVISION POLICE SERGEANT LOVE, HAS BLOCKED MY 911 CALLS TONIGHT, AND REFUSED TO SEND THE POLICE TO ATTEND MY CALL.

STOP THE TORONTO POLICE BRUTALITY AGAINST ME. 

THIS IS AN EMERGENCY REQUEST FOR THE PUBLIC'S ASSISTANCE, BECAUSE THE 41 DIVISION POLICE, AND POLICE SERGEANT LOVE, HAS BLOCKED MY CALLS TO 911, TONIGHT. AND HAS REFUSED, TO DISPATCH THE POLICE TO ASSIST ME. 

I HAVE CALLED 911 FIVE TIMES AND NO POLICE HAS SHOWED UP, BECAUSE ACCORDING TO THE 911 DISPATCHER, SERGEANT LOVE, FROM 41 DIVISION, HAS DECIDED NOT TO DISPATCH THE POLICE TO HELP ME. I AM EXTREMELY CONCERNED FOR MY SAFETY, FROM BOTH THE POLICE AND ALSO FROM THE NEIGHBOR, WHO HAS ATTACKED ME TONIGHT. 

I ALSO CALLED CP 24 NEWS AND THEY TOLD ME TO KEEP CALLING 911, UNTIL THE POLICE SHOWS UP. 

THE NEWS MEDIA, HAS NEVER HEARD OF SUCH A SITUATION, I WAS TOLD. I WAS TOLD TO TRY TO STAY SAFE, UNTIL I CAN GET THE POLICE TO ATTEND. 

THE PERPETRATOR HAS KICKED MY DOOR IN, IN THE PAST AND ALSO THREATENED MY LIFE. AND THE POLICE HAS NOT ARRESTED HIM FOR THAT INCIDENT, AFTER SAYING THAT THEY WOULD DO THAT. NOW THEY ARE REFUSING, TO ATTEND MY CALLS, AND ENDANGERING MY SAFETY. IN REGARDS TO THE INCIDENT LAST NIGHT, SO THAT THE MAN COULD CARRY OUT HIS THREATS TO HARM ME. 

POLICE SERGEANT LOVE, FROM 41 DIVISION POLICE, HAS MADE THAT DECISION TONIGHT, TO NOT ASSIST ME. HE HAS BLOCKED ALL OF MY 911 CALLS, TO THE POLICE LAST NIGHT. AS WELL AS MY CALLS TO THE NON EMERGENCY NUMBER.

AT ONE POINT, THE 911 DISPATCHER, HAS SAID TO ME, THAT THE POLICE WAS PARKED OUTSIDE MY HOME, IN THE CRUISER, WHICH THEY WERE NOT. I THEN RISKED MY SAFETY AND WENT OUTSIDE AND THERE WAS NO POLICE CAR, TO BE SEEN. THEY NEVER SHOWED UP.

WHILE I WAS ON THE TELEPHONE WITH A FRIEND, LETTING HER KNOW OF MY DIRE SITUATION AND TO KEEP A RECORD OF THE EVENTS, THAT WAS UNFOLDING, A SECOND CALL CAME IN. IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN FROM THE POLICE, BUT THEY WERE CERTAINLY, NO WHERE NEAR MY HOME AND DID NOT ATTEND TO THE CALLS, BECAUSE SERGEANT LOVE, FROM 41 DIVISION, HAS BLOCKED, ALL CALLS COMING FROM ME, IN REGARDS TO THE SUSPECT. AND HAVE EXPOSED ME TO REAL DANGER, FROM THIS MAN.

I DO NOT DOUBT, THAT THE POLICE AND ANGELA STERLING, THE LANDLORD, HAD SOMETHING TO DO, WITH THE MAN'S BEHAVIOUR, AGAINST ME, TONIGHT. 

NOT ONLY WAS HE THREATENING MY SAFETY, HE SEEMED TO BE DOING IT, WITH THE POLICE PERMISSION, SINCE THEY CHOSE NOT TO ATTEND AND ASSIST ME, WHEN I HAD CALLED.

I HAVE BEEN CALLING THE POLICE FOR THE PAST SEVERAL HOURS AND THEY DID NOT ATTEND. I CALLED BOTH THE REGULAR NUMBER AND THE EMERGENCY 911 NUMBER. THE POLICE DID NOT SHOW UP. MY LAST CALL TO 911 WAS ABOUT 15 MINUTES AGO, WHERE I WAS TOLD BY THE 911 DISPATCHER, THAT SERGEANT LOVE FROM 41 DIVISION, HAS SAID THAT HE WILL NOT BE SENDING THE POLICE TO ATTEND TO MY CALL, AFTER THIS MAN HAS BEEN HARASSING AND THREATENING ME, FOR HOURS NOW. I AM CONCERNED FOR MY SAFETY, AFTER HE HAS THROWN AND PILED UP GARBAGE, IN FRONT OF MY DOOR AND HAS BLOCKED MY DOOR WITH A REFRIGERATOR.  AND ALSO THREATENED MY SAFETY, IN OTHER WAYS.

NOT ONLY IS THIS MAN, NOT SUPPOSE TO BE ON THE PROPERTY, BUT HE IS BEING ALLOWED, BY THE 41 DIVISION POLICE, TO CONTINUE CARRY OUT HIS VIOLENCE, AGAINST ME, STILL.

I AM EXTREMELY CONCERNED FOR MY SAFETY, BECAUSE OF THE POLICE CORRUPTION, HAS REFUSED TO HELP ME. I HOPE THAT I AM IN ONE PIECE TOMORROW, TO ATTEND TO THE COURT, IN REGARDS TO THIS SITUATION. 

ASK YOURSELF THIS AS MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, SINCE WHEN DO THE POLICE HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENDANGER PUBLIC SAFETY? AND TO BLOCK FIVE CALLS TO 911, SO THAT THE VICTIM WILL HAVE NO ACCESS TO HELP?.

I REALIZED THAT THIS MAY BE A POLICE OPERATION AND THAT THE MAN IN QUESTION MAY ALSO BE A POLICE AGENT PROVOCATEUR, WHO HAS BEEN USED TO TRY TO ENTRAP ME AND TO ENDANGER MY SAFETY, OR TO INJURE ME.

JOIN ME IN A PROTEST THIS WEEK, AGAINST TORONTO POLICE BRUTALITY. THEY HAVE NO RIGHT TO ENDANGER PUBLIC SAFETY AND TO ACT CORRUPT. I AM GOING TO CHARGE THE POLICE SERGEANT LOVE, WHO IS INVOLVED IN THIS CORRUPTION, WITH A BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST, BRIBERY, CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, FOR FAILING TO CARRY OUT HIS LEGAL DUTY, IN REGARDS TO THIS SITUATION. HE AND OTHER POLICE OFFICERS AT 41 DIVISION, HAVE NOW MADE IT ABUNDANTLY CLEAR, THAT THEY WILL NOT ACT TO PROTECT MY SAFETY, INCLUDING NOT RESPONDING TO MY CALLS TO THE POLICE. WE ARE ADVISED BY THE COURT, TO CALL THE POLICE WHEN THERE IS A DANGER, TO OUR SAFETY. THE POLICE HAS NOW MADE THE DECISION, THAT THIS DO NOT APPLY TO ME. VIOLATING MY RIGHTS AND EXPOSING ME TO DANGER. THEY DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO DO THAT. 

CONTACT ME AT 437 375-0145 

 

 

TORONTO 41 DIVISION POLICE CORRUPTION:

TORONTO POLICE 41 DIVISION CORRUPTION:

SEPTEMBER 14, 2020

URGENT APPEAL FOR PROTECTION  GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE.

WHY I AM CONCERNED, FOR MY SAFETY, FROM THE TORONTO POLICE. 

TORONTO POLICE 41 DIVISION, ALLOWED SUSPECT, WHO BROKE INTO MY HOME, TO REMAIN AT LARGE, AFTER HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY, TO ARREST HIM.

THE SUSPECT HAS THREATENED MY SAFETY, ON AT LEAST THREE DIFFERENT OCCASSIONS. THE SUSPECT HAD EVEN TOLD THE POLICE, DIRECTLY, THAT I SHOULD BE DEAD. AFTER THEY WERE CALLED, TO INVESTIGATE MY COMPLAINT, WHEN HE HAD COME TO MY WINDOW AND TALKED OF SHOOTING. THE SUSPECT ALSO, REPEATEDLY, BANGED ON MY WINDOW AND CAUSING ME TO FEAR FOR MY SAFETY.

CURRENTLY, THE SUSPECT HAS BEEN, LIVING ON THE SAME PREMISES, BECAUSE OF THE CORRUPTION OF THE 41 DIVISION POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. MACKRELL AND P.C. WAGNER, WHO ARE INVOLVED IN THE CASE AND HAS REFUSED TO ARREST HIM. CONTRARY, TO THEIR ORIGINAL STATEMENT, WHICH IS THAT THE SUSPECT, WOULD BE ARRESTED. RECENTLY, A 41 DIVISION DETECTIVE, STEVE CASE, FURTHER BLOCKED THE SUSPECT FROM BEING INVESTIGATED AND CHARGED. IT WAS HE WHO HAVE CLAIMED TO KNOW THE SUSPECT AND WHERE HE LIVED. SUGGESTING THAT THERE MAY BE, A PERSONAL INTERFERENCE ON HIS PART, CONCERNING THE SUSPECT AND HIS BREAK AND ENTER, INVESTIGATION AGAINST HIM.

BELOW ARE PICTURES TAKEN OF THE MAN, AFTER HE HAD BROKEN INTO MY HOME, BY KICKING MY DOOR IN AND ALSO THREATENING TO STAB ME.

THE CASE OF THE MISSING FILES AND COMPLAINTS, TO 41 DIVISION POLICE. TWENTY SEVEN COMPLAINTS ARE MISSING, FROM THE POLICE DATA BASE, AT ITS LOCAL 41 POLICE DIVISION.

THE THIRTY OR MORE COMPLAINTS, THAT WERE MADE BY ME TO THE 41 DIVISION POLICE IN 2019, HAS GONE MISSING.  THE TORONTO POLICE 41 DIVISION HAS ONLY THREE OF THOSE COMPLAINTS, IN ITS DATA BASE. THE OTHER TWENTY SEVEN COMPLAINTS ARE MISSING. LAST DECEMBER, THOSE THIRTY COMPLAINTS WERE IN THE POSSESSION OF MR. NASCIEMENTO, AT TORONTO POLICE HEAD QUARTER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION DIVISION, INCLUDING THE POLICE OFFICERS NOTES, WHICH I HAD ALSO REQUESTED. SEVERAL MONTHS LATER, IN SEPTEMBER OF 2020, ALL OF THOSE COMPLAINTS WENT MISSING, FROM THE LOCAL 41 DIVISION POLICE FILES, WHEN I WAS TOLD BY OFFICER KEEFIER, THAT THE POLICE ONLY HAD COMPLAINTS FOR JULY, SEPTEMBER AND ANOTHER DATE, IN 2019. CONSPICIOUSLY MISSING, FROM 41 DIVISION POLICE DATA BASE, WAS THE COMPLAINT THAT WAS FILED WITH THAT DIVISION, FOR THE BREAK AND ENTER, ON APRIL 19, 2019. THOUGH THEY NOW SAY THAT IT IS MISSING TODAY, IT WAS ALSO ONE OF THE REPORTS THAT WERE COLLECTED, BY THE NASCIMENTO, AT POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. I KNOWS THIS TO BE A FACT, BECAUSE NASCIMENTO AND I HAD GONE OVER WHAT INFORMATION HE HAD COLLECTED FROM 41 DIVISION, UPON MY REQUEST AND THE ONLY OUTSTANDING ISSUE, WAS THE COST OF GETTING THE RECORDS, WHICH WE HAD NOT BEEN ABLE TO CONCLUDE. AFTER THE REQUEST WERE MADE, THOSE FILES WENT MISSING FROM 41 DIVISION POLICE DATA BASE. MANY OF THOSE COMPLAINTS INVOLVED ANGELA STERLING, INCLUDING ASSAULTS, DEATH THREATS AND OTHER SERIOUS OFFENCES, COMMITTED AGAINST ME, OVER A PERIOD OF ALMOST TWO YEARS. 

THE 41 DIVISION POLICE ALSO WANTED TO SAY THAT THE COMPLAINT THAT WAS MADE TO THE POLICE, IN REGARDS TO THE BREAK AND ENTER, BY THE SUSPECT ON APRIL 19, 2019 DID NOT EXIST. YET THEY ALSO CONTRADICTED THEMSELVES, AFTER I WAS TOLD ON SEPTEMBER 13TH, BY DETECTIVE STEVE CATES, THAT HE HAD READ THE ACTUAL REPORT.  BUT PREVIOUSLY ON SEPTEMBER 3RD, P.C. KEEFER SAID THAT HE COULD FIND NO SUCH REPORT. THIS ALSO CONTRADICTED THE FACT, THAT NASCIEMENTO, DOWN AT POLICE HQ, ALSO HAD THAT VERY REPORT LAST YEAR, INCLUDING THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS NOTES. COLLECTED UPON REQUEST BY ME, UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT.

 THE MAN IN THE BREAK AND ENTER INCIDENT, WAS ARRESTED AND HANDCUFFED BY DETECTIVE STEVE CATES IN JUNE, AFTER A CALL TO THE POLICE THAT HE WAS BANGING ON THE VICTIM'S WINDOW. THE MAN WAS ALSO SEEN ARGUING WITH A NEIGHBOR, WHO ACTUALLY HELPED THE POLICE, IN ARRESTING HIM. TELLING THE NEIGHBOR, THAT HE WAS A "BAD MAN". A JAMAICAN SLANG.

DET. STEVE CASE, LATER RELEASED HIM OUT OF THE HANDCUFFS AND LATER MENTIONED TO  THE VICTIM, THAT HE KNEW THE SUSPECT AND WHERE HE LIVES. THE MAN WAS ARRESTED ON THE STREET, IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING AND WITH THE NEIGHBORS WATCHING. POLICE OFFICER STEVE CATES, THEN ALMOST IMMEDIATELY RELEASED HIM OUT OF THE HANDCUFFS, AFTER RECOGNIZING WHO HE WAS.

THE BREAK AND ENTER, TO THE VICTIM'S HOME, BY THE SUSPECT IN 2019 AND THE FALSE CLAIM, BY THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS FROM 41 DIVISION, THAT HE WOULD BE ARRESTED.

AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT, THE POLICE WERE CALLED AND TWO POLICE OFFICERS, FROM 41 DIVISION, CONSTABLE WAGNER, BADGE NUMBER 11049 AND CONSTABLE MACKRELL, BADGE NUMBER 90626, ATTENDED THE CALL. AFTER TAKING A WRITTEN STATEMENT, FROM ME AT THE SCENE, I WAS TOLD BY THE OFFICERS, THAT THE SUSPECT WOULD BE ARRESTED AND TO CALL THE POLICE, IF I SEE HIM AGAIN. INCLUDING, ON THE SAME PREMISES. THAT NEVER HAPPENED BECAUSE OF THE POLICE CORRUPTION, IN THE CASE. 

POLICE OFFICER, STEVE CATES, BADGE # 8192, WHO IS ALSO A DETECTIVE AT 41, DIVISION, REFUSED TO DISPATCHED A CAR, OR OTHER OFFICERS TO INVESTIGATE THE SUSPECT, ON SEPTEMBER 13TH, AFTER THE MAN WAS SEEN ON THE PREMISES AND CLAIMED TO WANT TO SPEAK WITH ME, THE VICTIM, OVER THE TELEPHONE INSTEAD. HE HAS CLAIMED ALSO, THAT HE HAS READ THE REPORT OF THE TWO OFFICERS, FROM LAST YEAR . WHICH HE ALSO CLAIMED DID NOT WARRANT AN ARREST.  A DECISION THAT HE HAS MADE, ASIDE FROM THE ORIGINAL OFFICERS, INVESTIGATION OF THE SUSPECT.

AT LEAST FOUR TELEPHONE CALLS HAVE BEEN MADEBY ME TO THE POLICE, IN THE LAST FEW DAYS AND AFTER THE MAN WAS SEEN ON THE PROPERTY, AS IT APPEARS THAT THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING, ANGELA STERLING, HAD RENTED HIM A ROOM, THAT SHE HAS ALSO ILLEGALLY EVICTED, THE PREVIOUS TENANT FROM, IN ORDER FOR THE SUSPECT TO MOVE INTO THAT ROOM. NOW THE SUSPECT APPEARS TO BE LIVING, AT THE SAME ADDRESS AND THE POLICE HAS SO FAR REFUSED TO ARREST HIM. ON SEPTEMBER 9TH, TWO POLICE OFFICERS, (BADGE NUMBERS, 11771 AND 99972), SHOWED UP TO INVESTIGATE, THE SUSPECT BEING ON THE PREMISES. THE SUSPECT HAD LEFT BY THEN, SO THE TWO OFFICERS TOLD ME TO CALL BACK THE POLICE, IF HE SHOWED UP AGAIN. SEVERAL TIMES AFTER THAT, I HAVE CALLED THE POLICE, INCLUDING ON SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 13TH. A POLICE SUPERVISOR, WITH 41 DIVISION, STEVE CATES, BADGE NUMBER 8192 THEN DIVERTED THE CALL, WHEN IT WAS TRANSFERRED TO 41 DIVISION, BY THE DISPATCHER. HE WAS THE SAME OFFICER, WHO ATTENDED BACK IN JUNE, WHEN I HAD CALLED 911, AFTER THE SUSPECT WAS BANGING ON MY WINDOW AND ALSO APPEARED TO BE DRUNK. NOW ON SEPTEMBER 13TH, HE HAS ALLOWED THE SUSPECT TO REMAIN ON THE PREMISES, BY NOT ARRESTING HIM, AND ONLY SPOKE WITH ME, OVER THE TELEPHONE, RATHER THAN TO DISPATCHED A CAR, TO INVESTIGATE MY COMPLAINT, IN REGARDS TO THE SUSPECT, WHO APPEARS TO BE NOW LIVING, IN THE SAME BUILDING, AS I AM.

1. WHAT IS ANGELA STERLING'S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE POLICE, IN REGARDS TO THE SUSPECT? 

2. WHY DID ANGELA STERLING, WHO HAS MADE MORE THAN ONE DEATH THREAT AGAINST ME, PUT THE SUSPECT, IN THE RENTAL UNIT, AFTER ILLEGALLY FORCING, THE LEGITIMATE TENANT OUT? AND HOW THE POLICE HAS HELPED HER TO DO THIS, BY REFUSING TO ASSIST, THE FORMER TENANT, WHO WAS ILLEGALLY LOCKED OUT.   IN ORDER TO PROVIDE ACCOMMODATION, FOR THE SUSPECT IN THIS CASE.

3. AND THE REASON FOR DOING SO, WAS TO PROVIDE THE SUSPECT WITH THE OPPORTUNITY, TO HARM ME, BOTH IN REGARDS TO HIS THREATS, AS WELL AS HERS. SHE WANTED THE SUSPECT TO HAVE CLOSE PROXIMITY TO ME, IN ORDER TO CARRY OUT HER THREATS, AGAINST ME. PARTICULARLY, HER DEATH THREATS.

TORONTO LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, PUT DISABLED MAN, OUT ON THE STREET, A SECOND TIME, ILLEGALLY..

TWO TORONTO POLICE OFFICERS, REFUSED TO HELP A DISABLED MAN, AFTER THE LANDLORD, CHANGED THE LOCK ON THE DOOR AND LOCKED HIM OUT TWICE. 

T.O. 41 DIVISION CONSTABLES, P.C. DEANNA PITTMAN AND CONSTABLE PAIS, BADGE # 59671, ATTENDED A CALL, TO THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, AT 8 MEDFORD AVENUE IN SCARBOROUGH, AFTER A TENANT WAS ILLEGALLY EVICTED, A SECOND TIME, BY THE LANDLORD, WHO HAD PUT ALL OF HIS BELONGINGS OUTSIDE, IN THE RAIN AND THEN CHANGED THE LOCK, TO HIS RENTAL UNIT. 

THIS WAS WITHOUT AN ORDER, FROM THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. IN FACT, SHE HAS NEVER TAKEN THE TENANT, TO THE BOARD. CHOOSING INSTEAD, TO EVICT HIM ILLEGALLY, ON HER OWN TERMS. THE TENANT, WHO IS ON ODSP AND IS CONSIDERED BY OTHER TENANTS, TO BE QUIET AND ALSO KEPT TO HIMSELF, WAS VISIBLY UPSET AND CLOSE TO TEARS, THAT HE HAD TO SLEEP ON THE STREET, BECAUSE THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. PITTMAN AND P.C. PAIS, FROM 41 DIVISION, WOULD NOT HELP HIM, AFTER SPENDING BOUT HALF AN HOUR, TALKING TO THE LANDLORD FIRST, WHILE LEAVING THE TENANT, STANDING IN THE DRIVEWAY, HOLDING HIS BLANKET, THAT HE HAD TAKEN FROM HIS BELONGINGS, AT THE BACK OF THE HOUSE. WHERE THE LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, HAD PLACED ALL OF HIS PROPERTY, OUTSIDE. 

                                                                 

THOSE TWO OFFICERS CONDUCT, WERE IN STARK CONTRAST TO THE OTHER OFFICERS WHO HAD ATTENDED, THE PROPERTY IN JUNE AND WAS ABLE TO SECURE THE KEY FROM THE LANDLORD, AFTER SHE HAD CHANGED THE LOCK, THE FIRST TIME, SO THE TENANT COULD GET BACK INTO HIS RENTAL UNIT. NOW SHE HAS DONE IT A SECOND TIME, WITHOUT AN ORDER FROM THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. AND AFTER TRYING TO COERCE AND THREATENED THE TENANT, INTO GIVING UP HIS ROOM WILLINGLY, THE LANDLORD THEN RESORTED, TO FORCED HIM FROM HIS HOME AND UNTO THE STREETS, ILLEGALLY.

SHOCKINGLY, HER ACTIONS WERE ALSO CONDONED, BY THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. DEANNA PITTMAN AND P.C. PAIS, FROM 41 DIVISION. IT WAS ONLY A MONTH AGO, THAT THIS SAME LANDLORD, HAD POURED BOILING WATER FROM A KETTLE, ON ANOTHER TENANT, IN THE BUILDING, IN AN UNPROVOKED ATTACK, AS THE TENANT WAS MINDING HER OWN BUSINESS, WHILE SHE FED A STRAY CAT, NEAR HER WINDOW. SHE IS ALSO RECORDED, SPRAYING THE TENANT'S WINDOW DAILY, WITH A GARDEN HOSE, AS A WAY OF PROVOKING THE TENANT, SO THAT THE TENANT WILL MOVE OUT OF THE RENTAL UNIT.   

THIS WAS THE SECOND TIME IN THREE MONTHS, THAT SHE HAS CHANGED THE LOCK ON THE TENANT'S DOOR. THE TENANT REPORTED THAT SHE HAD REFUSED HIS RENT, CLAIMING THAT SHE WANTED HIS ROOM, FOR HER GRANDSON, BECAUSE HE WAS GOING TO NEED IT IN SEPTEMBER, WHEN HE WENT TO SCHOOL, THIS FALL.

WHAT IS ASTONISHING, ABOUT THIS ILLEGAL EVICTION, WAS THE FACT THAT THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. PITTMAN AND P.C. PAIS, HAD ALSO SHOWED ABSOLUTELY NO INCLINATION, IN HELPING THE DISABLED MAN, TO GET BACK INTO HIS RENTAL HOME. THEY DID NOT EVEN WANT TO TALK TO THE MAN, BUT TO INSIST THAT HE WAS NOT ALLOWED ON THE PROPERTY. THEY SEEM TO BE ALLUDING TO THE FACT, THAT THE LANDLORD, HAD TOLD THEM A DIFFERENT STORY, ABOUT WHY THE TENANT WAS EVICTED. NONE OF WHICH ALSO MATTERED, SINCE THE EVICTION WAS ILLEGAL, IN THE FIRST PLACE. THE LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, WOULD ALSO BE PROVEN TO BE A LIAR, SINCE HER VERSION OF THE EVICTION, WOULD ALSO CONTRADICT, THE RECORDED VERSION, OF THE INCIDENT. WHICH SHOWS CLEARLY, THAT THE LANDLORD HAD BOTH THREATENED AND ATTEMPTED TO COERCED THE TENANT, TO GIVE UP THE ROOM, AND WHEN THAT DID NOT WORK, SHE THEN RESORTED TO FORCEFULLY EVICT HIM.  THE POLICE OFFICERS AGAIN SHIFTED THEIR ATTITUDE, ONCE THEY WERE TOLD, THAT THE LANDLORD'S ACTIONS WERE RECORDED, SINCE SHE WAS DOING SOMETHING ILLEGAL AT THE TIME, AND THE EVIDENCE WERE RECORDED FOR THE BOARD AND THE COURT. AFTER THAT REVELATION, THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. DEANNA PITTMAN AND P.C. PAIS, WERE NOT INTERESTED IN HELPING THE TENANT, TO GET BACK INTO HIS RENTAL UNIT. THEY ALSO WALKED AWAY, WITHOUT GIVING THE TENANT, THEIR BADGE NUMBERS, WHEN THEY WERE ASKED FOR IT. THE TENANT WAS TOLD TO ASKED THEM TO WRITE IT DOWN FOR HIM, BUT THEY LEFT WITHOUT DOING THAT. 

IT SHOULD BE A PUBLIC CONCERN, WHEN TWO CORRUPT POLICE OFFICERS, CHOSE INSTEAD, TO AID A CROOKED LANDLORD, THAN TO HELP A DISABLED MAN, WHO NEEDED THEIR HELP MORE, IN GETTING BACK INTO HIS HOME, AFTER THE LANDLORD, HAD LOCKED HIM OUT, ILLEGALLY. 

THE REASON GIVEN TO THE TENANT, BY ANGELA STERLING, THE OWNER OF THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, FOR WANTING HIM EVICTED, FROM THE ROOMING HOUSE, SHOULD ALSO LAND HER IN A LOT OF TROUBLE WITH THE L & T BOARD.  LANDLORDS WHO TAKE IT UPON THEMSELVES, TO ILLEGALLY EVICT A TENANT, WITHOUT AN  ORDER FROM THE BOARD, WOULD FACE A FINE OF $50,000 TO $250,000. DEPENDING ON IF THE LANDLORD IS AN INDIVIDUAL, OR A CORPORATION. IN THE CASE OF ANGELA STERLING, SHE HAS EVICTED THIS TENANT, TWICE AND ILLEGALLY. SO HER FINE SHOULD BE DOUBLED. THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, IS THE TENANT'S ONLY CHOICE RIGHT NOW, IN GETTING BACK INTO HIS RENTAL UNIT AND PROTECTING HIS RIGHTS, IN SEEING THAT THE LANDLORD FACED A STIFT FINE, IN EVICTING HIM TWICE AND ILLEGALLY.

ASIDE FROM THAT FACT, THERE IS SOMETHING FISHY, BETWEEN THE 41 DIVISION POLICE AND THIS LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING. SHE HAS NEVER BEEN INVESTIGATED BY THEM, DESPITE HER CRIMINAL ACTIONS. MANY OF WHICH HAVE BEEN RECORDED, AS PROOF. IT IS NOT LIKELY, THAT THE POLICE WILL ALSO ACT ON THEIR OWN, TO ENFORCED THE LAW, AGAINST THIS WOMAN. BUT INSTEAD TO ACT AGAINST IT. THIS IS CORRUPTION AND THOSE TWO OFFICERS, MAY HAVE ALSO BEEN A PART OF IT.

 

WHAT IS YOUR OPINION?.  AS MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, YOU SHOULD HAVE YOUR SAY. 

WHEN THE DISABLED MAN, WAS PUT OUT ON THE STREET A SECOND TIME, AFTER THE LANDLORD HAS LOCKED HIM OUT, ILLEGALLY. THE MAN WAS FORCED OUT UNTO THE STREET, AFTER THE LANDLORD TOLD HIM, THAT SHE WANTED HIS ROOM, FOR HER GRANDSON, WHO WOULD BE ATTENDING, SCHOOL THIS FALL, SHE ALLEGES. THE LANDLORD ANGELA STERLING, WAS RECORDED TELLING THE TENANT, THAT SHE HAD REFUSED HIS RENT, WHICH HE HAD OFFERED TO PAY HER, BECAUSE IF SHE HAD ACCEPTED HIS RENT, SHE WOULD NOT BE ABLE, TO TELL HIM TO GIVE UP HIS ROOM, BY MAY 31 ST. WHEN THE TENANT DID NOT COMPLY AND MOVED, SHE THEN PUT HIS BELONGINGS OUTSIDE, IN THE RAIN AND THEN CHANGED THE LOCK TO HIS RENTAL UNIT.

 1. WOULD YOU HAVE INSISTED, THAT THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS, ACTED IN ENSURING, THAT THE LANDLORD, DID NOT CARRY OUT THIS ILLEGAL EVICTION, RATHER THAN TO PROTECT HER, CONCERNING HER ACTIONS?

 2. WOULD YOU HAVE ALSO TAKEN, A NEGATIVE APPROACH, TO THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. DEANNA PITTMAN AND P.C. PAIS, ROLE IN DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, CAUSING THIS TENANT, TO BE ILLEGALLY EVICTED, BY THIS LANDLORD. AND WAS THERE MORE TO THEIR ACTIONS, CONCERNING THE LANDLORD, THAN THEY HAVE LET ON?

 3. WOULD YOU NOW INSIST, THAT THIS LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, BE FORCED TO CLOSED DOWN, HER ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE?

4. WOULD YOU ALSO NOW INSIST, THAT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, CHARGE HER OVER HER ILLEGAL EVICTION, OF THIS DISABLED PERSON? THAT SHE HAS ALSO EVICTED TWICE, ILLEGALLY?.