Monday, June 29, 2020

JAMES SLOCUM, MLS, ALLOWED VAN TO BLOCK TENANT'S WINDOW, SENDING CARBON ...


JAMES SLOCUM, TOOK REPRISAL ACTION, AGAINST TENANT, WHO FILED A CIVIL LAWSUIT, AGAINST HIM FOR VICARIOUS LIABILTY, IN CAUSING ME INJURY, LAST YEAR.
JAMES SLOCUM, MADE SURE THAT JEAN PAUL NEVEAU, THE AFTER HOURS MLS SUPERVISOR, WHO HAD ADVISED ME THAT MLS OFFICERS,WOULD ATTEND THE PROPERTY, TO INVESTIGATE THE PARKING, UNDER THE CITY'S BYLAW.

THE CORRUPT CITY OF TORONTO OFFICIAL, JAMES SLOCUM, DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO ENDANGER THE SSAFETY, OF ANY TENANT. A VEHICLE BLOCKING A TENANT'S WINDOW IS A SAFETY CONCERN. HE SHOULD BE FIRED!!!!!!!!AND YES, I WILL BE FILING A LAWSUIT, TO ENFORCE MY RIGHTS, AGAINST JAMES SLOCUM AND ALL OF THOSE INVESTIGATE IN THE CONSPIRACY TO HARM ME AND TO DENY ME MY RIGHTS.

Saturday, June 27, 2020

JEAN PAUL NEDEAU, AN "ON CALL" SPERVISOR, WITH MLS. "WE DON'T DEAL WITH KNOXIOUS FUMES, EVEN IF IT IS CARBON MONOXIDE".

IT IS CLEAR FROM THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THAT THERE IS A CONSPIRACY, BY THESE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, TO CAUSE SERIOUS HARM, TO THE VICTIM IN THIS CASE. THAT BY THEIR ACTIONS, THEY HAVE DELIBERATELY EXPOSED HER, TO DANGER. IT IS HARD TO BELIEVE, THAT THEY WOULD NOT TAKE, THE APPROPRIATE STEPS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT ANY KIND OF HARM, BEING DONE.

TORONTO MUNICIPAL LICENSING STANDARDS

JOHN PAUL NEDEAU'S RESPONSE, TO THE DANGER FACED BY THE TENANT, FROM CARBON MONOXIDE COMING INTO HER HOME, WAS TO TELL  HER THAT THE TORONTO MUNICIPAL LICENSING STANDARDS, DO NOT DEAL WITH "KNOXIOUS  FUMES", SUCH AS CARBON MONOXIDE, DESPITE THE FACT THAT IT IS A HEALTH HAZARD.  HE WAS CONTACTED THIS MORNING BY 311, AND HE HAS CLAIMED THAT HE WAS WORKING SINCE 10 A.M. ON SATURDAY JUNE 27TH, BUT ONLY CONTACTED THE TENANT AFTER 8 P.M. THAT DAY, OVER SAFETY CONCERNS BY THE TENANT, REGARDING THE ILLEGAL BLOCKING OF HER WINDOW AND THE CARBON MONOXIDE DANGER, COMING FROM THE VEHICLE PARKED AT HER WINDOW. THE INFRACTIONS WOULD BE UNDER THE ZONING BY LAWS.

JOHN PAUL NEDEAU, THEN CLAIMED THAT MLS, COULD ONLY POSSIBLY DEAL, WITH THE ZONING INFRACTION, REGARDING THE PARKING, AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDING, NEAR THE WINDOW. CLAIMING THAT THE BY LAWS RELATING TO PARKING, WERE UPDATED, OR AMENDED, IN 2013. BUT THAT THE GRANDFATHER CLAUSE, MAY STILL APPLY, REFFERING TOTHE OLDER LAWS, REGARDING THE SITUATION. 

THE OTHER ISSUE IS THAT NO PERMIT WAS ISSUED, FROM THE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION, TO THE LANDLORD FOR ANY SUCH PARKING, AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.



MLS MANAGER, JAMES SLOCUM, IGNORED 311 REQUEST, ABOUT THE CARBON MONOXIDE DANGER, TO A TENANT. HE DID NOT INVESTIGATE.

JAMES SLOCUM, ACTED IN REPRISAL AGAINST THE TENANT, FOR SUING HIM FOR DAMAGES LAST YEAR. ALONG WITH OTHER CORRUPT TORONTO CITY OFFICIALS.

MLS OFFICERS, JAMES SLOCUM AND MLS OFFICERS,  KNOWINGLY ENDANGERED, THE SAFETY OF THE TENANT AND ALSO CAUSED HARM TO TENANT.


ACCORDING TO A 311 SUPERVISOR, JONATHAN, THE MUNICIPAL LICENSING STANDARDS, WAS SENT AN EMAIL, TO ESCALATE THE INVESTIGATION, INTO THE DANGER, FROM THE TENANT'S EXPOSURE, TO CARBON MONOXIDE, FROM THE LANDLORD'S VAN, THAT WAS PARKED AT HER WINDOW AND WITH THE ENGINE RUNNING PURPOSELY, BY THE LANDLORD, TO CAUSE HER SERIOUS HARM. NEITHER THE POLICE, NOR PROPERTY STANDARDS, SHOWED ANY CONCERNS, OVER THE DANGER 
NOTE: IT TURNS OUT THAT 311 AGENTS ALSO LIED, ABOUT HOW QUICKLY THEY HAD MOVED ON MY COMPLAINT. ITFU, A COORDINATOR WITH 311, LATER ADMITTED THAT, THERE WAS A "GLITCH", IN THE SYSTEM, WHEN SHE ALLEGEDLY TRIED TO SEND MY COMPLAINT TO MLS. THIS COUPLED WITH THE FACT THAT MLS, DID NOT ACT UPON THE COMPLAINT EITHER.

MLS ON CALL OFFICERS AND A MANAGER, JAMES SLOCUM, IGNORED THE TENANT'S COMPLAINT TO 311, OVER CONCERNS OF EXPOSURE, TO CARBON MONOXIDE, FROM A LANDLORD'S VEHICLE, THAT WAS PARKED ILLEGALLY, NEAR HER WINDOW. THE TENANT PUT IN A SECOND CALL, TO 311 ON SATURDAY, OVER ONGOING CONCERNS FOR HER SAFETY, AFTER THE LANDLORD ANGELA STERLING, CONTINUED TO PARKED HER VEHICLE, AT HER WINDOW. ASIDE FROM BLOCKING THE EGRESS, THE VAN ALSO TOTALLY OBSTRUCTED THE VIEW, AND ALSO THE OXYGEN FROM COMING INTO HER HOME. WORSE, IS THE CARBON MONOXIDE THAT COMES THROUGH THE BROKEN GLASS, SINCE THE LANDLORD HAS NEVER FIXED THE WINDOW, THAT SHE HAS BROKEN. EVEN AFTER CLOSING THE WINDOW, THE TENANT NOTICED THAT CARBON MONOXIDE, WAS STILL PRESENT IN HER HOME, WHENEVER THE LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, PARKED HER VEHICLE UP CLOSE TO HER WINDOW AND ALSO LEAVE THE MOTOR RUNNING, DELIBERATELY, IN ORDER TO INJURE THE TENANT FROM THE DEADLY GAS.

THE INCONVENIENCE OF HAVING THE WINDOW'S VIEW BLOCKED BY THE VAN, IS NOTHING COMPARED TO THE DANGER FROM THE CARBON MONOXIDE, AND THE FACT THAT BOTH THE POLICE AND THE MUNICIPAL LICENSING STANDARDS, IS CHOOSING TO IGNORE THIS DANGER TO THE TENANT, SHOULD ALSO POINT TO THE CORRUPTION, IN THIS MATTER. THERE IS NO QUESTION, THAT THIS IS A LEGAL ISSUE AND THAT THE HARM DONE TO THE TENANT, WAS DELIBERATE, BY THE CITY OFFICIALS AND BY THE LANDLORD. THE TENANT HAS A RIGHT TO CLAIM DAMAGES, FOR NOT ONLY PAIN AND SUFFERING, BUT FOR BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST AND FOR NOT HAVING THE RIGHT, TO BE SAFE IN HER HOME. THE OTHER LEGAL CONSEQUENCES TO THOSE TORONTO CITY OFFICIALS AND THE POLICE, INVOLVED IN THIS, IS THAT THEY ALSO FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES, AS WELL. AMONG THEM, BREACHING THE PUBLIC TRUST, CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, AMONG OTHER CHARGES.


TORONTO POLICE AND ITS PARKING ENFORCEMENT, REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE, ANGELA STERLING'S ILLEGAL PARKING, NEAR TENANT'S WINDOW. LEAVING THE MOTOR OF HER VEHICLE RUNNING AND SENDING CARBON MONOXIDE FUMES INTO HER HOME.

MUNICIPAL LICENSING STANDARDS OFFICER, TINA RIZZO, REFUSED TO HAVE THE LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, REMOVED HER VEHICLE, FROM BLOCKING TENANT'S WINDOW, WITH THE MOTOR RUNNING AND SENDING CARBON MONOXIDE GAS, INTO THE TENANT'S HOME. RIZZO WAS ON THE TELEPHONE WITH THE LANDLORD, OVER HER DISRUPTION OF THE TENANT'S ELECTRICITY, BUT WAS MADE AWARE OF THE CURRENT SITUATION, WHERE THE LANDLORD HAD BLOCKED THE TENANT'S WINDOW WITH HER VAN. MLS OFFICER TINA RIZZO, DID NOT ASK HER TO REMOVED HER VAN AND ALLOWED THE TENANT, TO SUFFER HARM, AS A RESULT OF HER INACTION.

TORONTO POLICE BY LAW OFFICER, WALKER, BADGE # 89598, ALSO REFUSED TO SEND AN OFFICER TO THE HOME, TO HAVE THE OWNER REMOVED HER VEHICLE, THAT WAS BLOCKING THE TENANT'S WINDOW, AND ALSO SENDING THE DEADLY CARBON MONOXIDE GAS, INTO HER HOME. ACCORDING TO HER AND OTHER POLICE OFFICERS, (DISPATCHERS), THEY CANNOT TELL THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, WHERE TO PARK HER VEHICLE. EVEN IF IT IS BLOCKING A TENANT'S WINDOW. IGNORING THE VERY PRESENT DANGER, FROM THE CARBON MONOXIDE GAS, THAT WAS ALSO COMING IN THROUGH THE WINDOW, OF THE ILLEGALLY PARKED VEHICLE. THE TENANT DO HAVE A RIGHT TO CALL THE ENFORCEMENT AND HAVE WHOEVER VEHICLE, IS BLOCKING HER WINDOW. LANDLORD OR NOT. THE CONSPIRACY BY THE POLICE, TO PROTECT THIS WOMAN, IN HER ILLEGAL ACTIONS, IS EVIDENT IN THE DOZENS OF INCIDENCES, INVOLVING HER, THAT THE POLICE HAS TURNED A BLIND EYE TO AND COMPLETELY IGNORED. THE REASON BEING THAT THIS LANDLORD, IS ALSO WORKING AS AN AGENT FOR THE POLICE, THE TENANT BELIEVES. AND THIS CONFLICT OF INTEREST IS A PART OF THE CORRUPTION, INVOLVING THE POLICE AND THIS LANDLORD.


WHICH LANDLORD CAN BLOCK A TENANT'S WINDOW WITH HER VEHICLE AND LEAVE THE MOTOR RUNNING, AND PURPOSELY CAUSING CARBON MONOXIDE GAS, TO ENTER THE TENANT'S HOME?. SHE WAS OBSERVED LEAVING THE ENGINE OF HER VAN RUNNING FOR MORE THAN FIVE MINUTES, WITH THE MUFFLER DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE WINDOW, CAUSING HARM TO THE TENANT. SHE ALSO BLOCKED THE WINDOW ENTIRELY, WITH HER VAN.  ANGELA STERLING'S ACTIONS ARE A REPEAT OF THE SAME ATTACK THAT SHE HAS CARRIED OUT, AGAINST THE SAME TENANT LAST YEAR.

IN ANOTHER RECENT ATTACK:

THIS LANDLORD ANGELA STERLING,  ALSO POURED HOT WATER FROM A KETTLE, FROM HER BALCONY, ON THE TENANT A FEW DAYS PRIOR, IN AN UNPROVOKED ATTACKED. SHE ALSO ATTACKED THE TENANT WITH A MACHETE, AND WET THE TENANT WITH WATER FROM A HOSE, AS SHE FED A STRAY CAT NEAR HER WINDOW.  ON OTHER OCCASIONS, SHE HAS THREATENED TO HAVE THE TENANT SHOT AND TURNED OFF THE TENANT'S ELECTRICITY, REPEATEDLY.

ANGELA STERLING, HAS THE POLICE, TO BACK UP HER ACTIONS, EVERY TIME. NOT ONLY THE POLICE, BUT ALSO OTHER CORRUPT CITY DIVISIONS. IN THIS CASE MUNICIPAL LICENSING STANDARDS, WHO HAVE NOT ACTED TO PREVENT THIS LANDLORD, FROM BLOCKING THE TENANT'S WINDOW WITH HER CAR, WHILE LEAVING THE ENGINE RUNNING AND SENDING THE DEADLY CARBON MONOXIDE GAS, INTO HER HOME.  THIS LANDLORD'S ACTIONS, SHOULD ALSO INDICATE, THAT SHE IS IN NEED OF A PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION. HER ACTIONS ARE ALSO CRIMINAL. FROM REPEATEDLY BEING  RECORDED, MAKING DEATH THREATS TO THE TENANT, TO MAKING ATTEMPTS TO CARRY OUT THOSE THREATS AND OTHER CRIMINAL ACTIONS, THAT HAVE ALL GONE UNNOTICED, BY THE POLICE. OTHER CITY DIVISIONS ARE ALSO INVOLVED, TO PROTECT HER FROM PROSECUTION, WHILE ENDANGERING THE LIFE OF THE TENANT. I AM THE TENANT, WHO HAVE BEEN ASSAULTED AND THREATENED AND MY PROPERTY DESTROYED, BY THIS WOMAN, ANGELA STERLING. AND ALL THE WHILE WITH THE POLICE KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT. AS THEY REFUSED TO PROSECUTE HER FOR HER ACTIONS.

Tuesday, June 16, 2020

Streets Of Toronto Cops Put Rocks out for Protesters

TORONTO POLICE CAUGHT RED HANDED!!!.

At one of my protests, the police sent their agent provocateur, a mentally ill woman, to informed me that I should not be protesting, in front of the courthouse and also at City Hall, next to the courthouse. They will use anyone, to disuay you. They will also try to entrap you.







Saturday, June 6, 2020

MAN BANGED ON MY WINDOW AND POLICE MAJOR CRIME UNIT SHOWED UP.

A MAN BANGED ON MY WINDOW, PROMPTING
ME TO CALL 911, AFTER THE POLICE REGULAR LINE, WAS BUSY. THE MAN IN QUESTION, HAD A HISTORY OF
VIOLENT ATTACKS AGAINST ME.
POLICE HAVE NEVER ARRESTED HIM, THOUGH HE WAS
BRIEFLY HANDCUFFED, AND THEN RELEASED AT THE SCENE, IN WHAT POLICE DESCRIBED, AS A 'MISTAKEN", IDENTITY.

THE POLICE CLAIMED, THAT THEY WERE (ALSO) ALLEGEDLY INVESTIGATING, A CALL FROM TWO DAYS AGO, FROM ANOTHER TENANT, LISA PRESAUD, ALLEGEDLY, ABOUT A MAN KICKING HER DOOR. BUT THOSE SAME POLICE OFFICERS, ALSO ATTENDED MY 911 CALL, THAT WAS MADE EARLIER.
THE OTHER TENANT'S ALLEDGE COMPLAINT, IS EERILY SIMILAR TO MINE. THE SUSPECT IN MY CASE, HAD ALSO KICKED MY DOOR IN LAST YEAR AND UNPROVOKED. HE WAS NEVER ARRESTED AND CHARGED, BY THE POLICE.

SO MY 911 CALL TO THE POLICE, OVER MY SAFETY CONCERNS, PROMPTED, THE MAJOR CRIMES UNIT, TO SHOW UP. ALLEGEDLY, BECAUSE OF MY NEIGHBOR'S CALL TO THE POLICE, TWO DAYS AGO. AND OVER A POSSIBLE BREAK AND ENTER, WHEN THE POLICE CLAIMED, THAT, A MAN HAD KICKED HER DOOR IN. 

SO THE 41 DIVISION POLICE, TOOK TWO DAYS TO RESPOND, TO 
AN ALEDGE  BREAK AND ENTER? AND WE ARE LED TO BELIEVE THAT THIS WAS THE REASON, THAT THE POLICE UNIT AT THE SCENE WAS, THE MAJOR CRIME UNIT? ALLEGEDLY, OVER A DOOR THAT SHOWED, NO VISIBLE SIGN OF DAMAGE.

ALL OF THOSE FIVE POLICE OFFICERS, WERE IN PLAIN CLOTHES CLOTHES. AND WERE ALSO FROM THE TORONTO POLICE 41 DIVISION. THEIR BADGE NUMBERS ARE, Badge # 10813, Badge # 8192, Badge # 10925, Badge # 90057, Badge # 90055. The event number is 1037293.

THE OTHER TENANT, LISA PRESAUD, WHOSE RENTAL UNIT, WAS ALLEGEDLY BROKEN INTO, WAS HOME AT THE TIME OF THE POLICE VISIT, THOUGH I DO NOT RECALLED, SEEING ANY DAMAGED, TO THE DOOR. IF THERE WERE, I COULD NOT SEE IT. OR IT WAS NOT EXTENSIVE. OR BOTH. 
I DO RECALLED THAT ONE OF THE PLAIN CLOTHES
OFFICERS, MAY HAVE MENTIONED TO ME, THAT HE WAS FROM THE DRUG UNIT. I BELIEVED THAT WAS WHAT HE SAID. AND THE BUILDING, IS ALSO BEING USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. AS I HAVE MENTIONED, IN OTHER ARTICLES. BUT ANOTHER POLICE OFFICER, STEVE COTES, CLAIMED, THAT THE UNIT THAT WAS ON THE SCENE, WAS THE MAJOR CRIMES UNIT.  AND THAT THE MALE SUSPECT, INITIALLY HANDCUFFED, BY THE POLICE, IN REGARDS TO THE ATTACK ON ME, RELATING TO MY 911 CALL TO THE POLICE, ON JUNE 5th, AND THE BREAK AND ENTER, INTO MY HOME LAST YEAR, WAS ALSO ALLEGEDLY, TAKEN AS THE SUSPECT, IN THE OTHER TENANT, LISA PRESARD'S, ALLEGED BREAK AND ENTER COMPLAINT, BY THE SAME PLAIN CLOTHES, POLICE OFFICERS, FROM 41 DIVISION. I ALSO SAW A COUPLE OF UNIFORMED POLICE OFFICERS, AT THE SCENE, RESPONDING TO MY 911 CALL AS WELL.

MY ENTIRE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE POLICE, WAS ABOUT 
THEM FAILING TO ARREST THE MAN, WHO I HAD IDENTIFIED TO THE POLICE, AS THE PERSON WHO HAD CARRIED OUT, THE ATTACKS AGAINST ME. INCLUDING A BREAK AND ENTER LAST YEAR AND WHO THE POLICE HAD ALSO LET GO, MORE THAN ONCE, ONLY TO CONTINUE TO POSED A DANGER TO ME.  IT MAY BE OF INTEREST TO SOME, THAT HE IS ALSO CLOSELY RELATED, OR ASSOCIATED, TO ANGELA STERLING, THE OWNER OF THE (ILLEGAL) BUILDING. AND THE OTHER DISTURBING FACT, IS THAT SHE IS ALSO CLOSELY ASSOCIATED, WITH THE POLICE, I BELIEVED. AND I BELIEVED, ALSO, WITH GOOD EVIDENCE TO BACK IT UP.

I AM ALSO HIGHLY REGARDED AS A BLOGGER, WHO HAS BEEN KNOWN TO REPORT AND DISSEMINATE INFORMATION, WITH THE EVIDENCE TO BACK UP MY CLAIM.  AND THIS REPORT, ABOUT THE POLICE INVESTIGATION, INTO MY COMPLAINT, IS ALSO NO EXCEPTION. THE POLICE IS AWARE, THAT I ALWAYS  RECORD MY INTERACTIONS, WITH THE POLICE AND ESPECIALLY, IN REGARDS TO MY PERSONAL SAFETY.

RECENTLY, A BLACK WOMAN HAS DIED IN POLICE PRESENCE. WHEN THE POLICE UNIT ON THE SCENE, OF AN INVESTIGATION, IS THE MAJOR CRIME UNIT, FOR A SUSPECT BANGING ON YOUR WINDOW, ONE SHOULD BE CONCERNED.

THERE ARE RECENT PROTESTS, OVER POLICE BRUTALITY, AND I HAVE LIVED IT. THIS REALITY IS ALL TOO FREQUENT TO ME. 
THERE IS A RECORDED VERSION, OF MY INTERACTION WITH THE POLICE, AS USUAL. SINCE I BELIEVE THAT IT ALSO PROTECTS MY SAFETY.  AND MAY ALSO BE OF PUBLIC INTEREST, TO PROTECT ONE'S BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS. I DID ADVISED THE POLICE, THAT THEY WERE BEING RECORDED, AS A SAFETY PRECAUTION. A RIGHT THAT I AND EVERYONE ELSE SHOULD HAVE, IN THEIR OWN HOME.     





Wednesday, June 3, 2020

LANDLORD FROM HELL, ANGELA STERLING, LLEGALLY, LOCKED OUT, DISABLED TENANT, AND PUTTING HIM OUT ON THE STREET.

LANDLORD FROM HELL, ANGELLA STERLING, ILLEGALLY, CHANGED THE LOCK ON DOOR, AND PUT A DISABLED TENANT, OUT ON THE STREET. TORONTO POLICE HAD TO INTERVENED, TO GET THE TENANT BACK INTO HIS RENTAL UNIT.

A tenant who moved into the illegal rooming in May and who do not share a kitchen, or bathroom, with the landlord, was illegally locked out of his rental unit, by the landlord, Angela Sterling, owner of the building, at 8 Medford Avenue, in Scarborough.

According to an eye witness, the disabled tenant was also deprived of electricity and heat, for almost a week after moving into the rental unit in May. He was witnessed living in the dark for about six days, before another tenant got the landlord, Angela Sterling, to turn the hydro back on, after contacting the Municipal Licensing Standards, on the disgusting landlord.

The male tenant, who was on Ontario Disability Support Program, found himself locked out of the rooming house, by his landlord. The tenant who is described as being quiet and kept to himself, somehow fell victim to this unscrupulous landlord, Angela Sterling. According to the tenant, he had offered to pay her his June rent, but she had also refused.

The man was helped by another tenant in the building, after the landlord, Angela Sterling, packed his belongings and then changed the lock, to his room and put him out on the street. He was witnessed trying to get into his rental unit, but could not after the lock to his door was changed. He then used a neighbor's telephone to call the police, who then managed to pursuade the landlord, to give him the key, to get back into his rental unit.

According to the neighbor, the landlord had changed the lock, before the tenant returned home, only to find that he was locked out and illegally evicted, by the landlord.
The incident occurred on June 3rd.

The police was heard also telling the disabled man, that he had to leave in two weeks. When they were asked why the tenant, had to vacate his room in two weeks, the police officer replied, "I don't know". As if it was the only arrangement, that they could have made with the landlord, Angela Sterling, to get the man back into his rental unit. The tenant was also heard saying, repeatedly, "I just want to go to sleep". "I just want to get in my room and sleep". Unfortunately, he had a landlord from hell, who cared very little, if the disabled man had any sleep.

The tenant, perhaps because of his disability, knew very little about his rights. That what the landlord did was illegal, because he did not share either a kitchen, or bathroom with the landlord, Angela Sterling. Who obviously, took advantage of the fact that he was incognizant of his rights, as a tenant.  The police officer also managed to tell the tenant, after he had secured the key, from the landlord, that his was a dispute that the Landlord and Tenant Board, should handle.

The question that should be on everyone's mind, is why would a landlord, such as Angela Sterling, take such a disadvantage of a disabled tenant?. How could she turned off his electricity and also allegedly, the heat to his rental unit, leaving the disabled man in the dark, for almost a week?. And then to later changed the lock on his rental unit and locking him out illegally?.

The Ontario government, has stopped all evictions, from the Landlord and Tenant Board, until further notice. With the exception of urgent matters and by way of a motion to the Board, due to the Covid-19 virus situation. And it is only through the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, upon a motion to that court, can an eviction be carried out. And a tenant facing an illegal eviction from a landlord, such as this tenant has endured, would also have the right to have their application heard by the Board, without a motion, unlike a landlord, so that they can get back into their rental unit. The government of Ontario, do not intend for people to be forced out of their homes and living on the street, during the virus pandemic, by landlords and thus worsening the situation. It wants people to maintain social distancing and not to spread the virus, by being in contact with others, outside of their immediate family.

So then why did this landlord from hell, Angela Sterling, allowed to illegally evict a disabled person, during this pandemic?. Someone who posted no danger to her, as a tenant and only according to the tenant, "wanted a place to sleep"?.



ROXANNE PARIS, A MANAGER, IN THE URGENT CIVIL INTAKE OFFICE, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, TO BE FACE A CHARGE, OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, AND BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST. IN DELIBERATELY, BLOCKING, MY URGENT MOTION, IN THE COURT.

AFTER FILING MY URGENT MOTION, AT THE COURTHOUSE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, I WAS TOLD THAT IT WENT DIRECTLY, TO THE CIVIL URGENT MO...