SHELLYANN PEREIRA, PARALEGAL
SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, LEGAL SERVICES, SPEREIRA LEGAL SERVICES
THE UNETHICAL CONDUCT, THAT EXIST BETWEEN SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, AND L & T BOARD MEMBER, LORRAINE MATHERS. BOTH HAVE SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE, THAT WAS REQUIRED AT A HEARING, ON DECEMBER 18TH. THE EVIDENCE ITSELF, WAS A MEDICAL DOCUMENT, DETAILING THE TENANT'S ILLNESS AND THE REASON THAT SHE WAS UNABLE, TO ATTEND THE HEARING. ACCORDING, TO THE MEMBER, HEARING THE MATTER, ON THAT DATE, THE MEDICAL DOCUMENT, WAS NOT PROVIDED, AT THE HEARING, BY EITHER THE BOARD, OR BY SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, THE LANDLORD'S COUNSEL. BOTH THE BOARD AND MEMBER LORRAINE MATHERS, AND ALSO SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, SUPPRESSED THAT EVIDENCE, FROM THE MEMBER, IN ORDER TO INFULENCE, THE OUTCOME OF T HE HEARING, IN FAVOR OF THE LANDLORD.
SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, THE LANDLORD'S PARALEGAL, AT THE L&T BOARD AND THE BOARD MEMBER, LORRAINE MATTERS, ALSO A PARALEGAL, WHOSE RELATIONSHIP, WITH SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, IS TO BE INVESTIGATED FURTHER, IN REGARDS TO THEIR ATTEMPTS TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, IN THE MATTER. STILL UNCERTAIN, AND WHO HAD DECIDED, TO MOVE THE LANDLORD'S APPLICATION, AHEAD OF THE TENANT'S APPLICATION, DESPITE THE FACT, THAT BOTH APPLICATIONS, WERE ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED, TO BE HEARD TOGETHER. WAS SHE DOING A FAVOR, FOR ANOTHER PARALEGAL, AS A MEMBER OF THE L&T BOARD? AND EVEN MORE DISTURBING, WAS THERE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, IN HER DECISION, TO FAVOR THE LANDLORD, OVER THE TENANT, BY SEPARATING, THE APPLICATIONS AND MOVING THE LANDLORD'S APPLICATION FORWARD, TO BE HEARD SOONER AND ON ITS OWN, BECAUSE OF SHELLY ANN PEREIRA?
THIS
PARALEGAL, IS UNETHICAL, IN HER CONDUCT, AND SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED, BY
THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA, FOR SERIOUS VIOLATIONS, REGARDING HER
PRACTICE. COMPLAINTS AGAINST HER.
THEY INCLUDED, WITHHOLDING INFORMATION, IN A LEGAL PROCEEDING, THAT MAY GO AGAINST HER CLIENT, HARASSMENT, SUCH AS UNSOLICITED EMAILS, WITH UNSUBSTANTIATED, INFORMATION, THAT SHE HAS CLAIMED TO BE FACTUAL, JUST BECAUSE SHE HAD, ALLEGEDLY, RECEIVED IT FROM HER CLIENT, AND ATTEMPTS, TO UNLAWFULLY INTERFERE, IN A LEGAL PROCEEDING.
SHELLYANN PEREIRA, DOES LANDLORD AND TENANT MATTERS, AS A PARALEGAL.
ShellyAnn Pereira, whose discreditable conduct, included, lies, harassment and withholding evidence, such as witnessing, the physical assault, by her client, upon the tenant, in front of witnesses, at the L&T Board, when her client, spat at the tenant, repeatedly. Receiving documents, from the L&T Board, directly, that were to to be sent to the Board, directly, from another L&T Board location. And then claiming, that she had forwarded, the documents, to the intended office, of the L&T Board. And providing no proof, of such an action. This may not seem as much, but it it really mattered, since sending the documents, directly, to ShellyAnn Pereira, it caused a delay, in the Board having the information, than if it was transferred directly, to the L&T Board, from one location, to another. Corresponding, to L&T Board staff, and others related to the L&T Board, by email,where she took the opportunity, to discuss the litigation, in length. And they in turn responded, by making decisions, about the matter, outside of being a member of the Board. Those persons, included, Jide Oladejo, Barrister & Solicitor, at 1111 Finch Avenue West, in Toronto, who is not on record, as the landlord's counsel. But interfered in the matter, nonetheless. As shown in her correspondence (emails), with ShellyAnn Pereira, (tenant had to ask the Board, if this was allowed?. And was told by the Board, that it was not allowed), which ShellyAnn Pereira, sent a long diatride, about the tenant. Again, unsubstantiated, evidence, that she had claimed, to have received from the landlord, about the tenant. It would have been better, if the Board had gotten the opportunity, to sort out the evidence, itself and not those persons, who were not adjudicating the matter. Aside from those facts mentioned, there is also the additional questions, concerning Shelly Ann Pereira's relationship, with the Landlord &Tenant Board Member, Lorraine Mathers, who is also a paralegal, and whose bias decision, to favor the her client, the landlord, that not only shows procedural unfairness, but may also go deeper than that.
There is more to report, regarding Shelly Ann Pereira and this case. And more reports to be made, regrading her other complaints, that are registered against her, with the Law Society of Upper Canada.
