PARALEGAL, DAVID RUBIN, IS UNDER INVESTIGATION, BY THE LAW SOCIETY, REGARDING, WHETHER HE HAD VIOLATED THE CODE OF CONDUCT, REGARDING HIS CLIENT, SALIM MANJI'S DISHONESTY.

 PARALEGAL, DAVID RUBIN, IS JUST ONE OF THE MANY PEOPLE, THAT ARE INVOLVED, I BELIEVED, IN THE CONSPIRACY, TO INTERFERE WITH THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, REGARDING THE LANDLORD AND TENANT MATTER. 

RUBIN IS KNOWN IN HIS PRACTICE, TO REPRESENT LANDLORDS AND IT IS NOW CLEAR, BY HIS ACTIONS IN MY CASE, THAT HE IS WILLING TO ALSO IGNORE THE LAW AND THE RTA, IF IT MEANS, HELPING OUT HIS CLIENT. 

WHAT IS CLEAR, IS THAT IF DAVID RUBIN, AS COUNSEL, HAD INSTRUCTED HIS CLIENT, SALIM MANJI, OF BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. TO FOLLOW THE LAW AND THE RTA AND ITS GUIDELINES, THEN HIS CLIENT WOULD NOT HAVE CONTINUED TO DEFY THE LAW. A FORMAL COMPLAINT WAS FILED AGAINST DAVID RUBIN WITH THE LAW SOCIETY. 

SALIM MANJI'S ACTIONS, TO BE INVESTIGATED, BY THE CHAIR FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, OF THE ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM. AS A BOARD MEMBER.

THE MESSAGE IS ABUNDANTLY CLEAR, TO SALIM MANJI, PRESIDENT, OF BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. DO NOT CONTINUE, TO REPRESENT THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST, OR TO SIT ON ANY PUBLIC BOARDS, WHILE YOU CONTINUE, TO DEFY THE LAW. 

Salim Manji
His personal corruption, is evident
in how he has defied the law and continues
to prevent me from getting back into my home,
by refusing to provide me with the replacement
keys, as the RTA, states. Under a criminal charge, 
he would be facing a charge of, Disobeying an
Order of Court, under the Criminal Code of Canada.
Salim Manji's counsel, is David Rubin, and he is
also under investigation, by the Law Society, 
regarding this same matter.

I AM IN APPRECIATION, FOR THE HELP THAT I RECIEVED, FROM THE ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM, OR THE ROM, IN GETTING ACCESS TO ITS BOARD CHAIR, AND THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE, IN REGARDS TO MY COMPLAINT, ABOUT SALIM MANJI, ONE OF ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THANKS FOR BOTH THE EMAIL AND THE TELEPHONE NUMBER, THAT WAS SENT TO ME, BY A PARTICULAR STAFF, AT THE ROM. YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE. THANK YOU.  

PREAMBLE:  THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT, 2006, IS AN ACT OF PARLIAMENT. IT IS A STATUE AND LIKE ANY OTHER ACTS, THAT WAS CREATED BY THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENT, IT IS AN ORDER OF COURT.

SALIM MANJI, PRESIDENT, OF BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. OPEN DEFIANCE OF THE RTA, WHICH I HAVE EXPLAINED IN THE PREVIOUS ARTICLE, IS GROUNDS FOR ACTION, WITH BOTH THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD AND THE CRIMINAL COURT. IN THE CASE OF THE COURT, THE CHARGE WOULD BE, DISOBEYING ORDER OF COURT. 

WHEN THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT, ORDERS YOU TO DO SOMETHING, YOU HAD BETTER DO IT. TO DEFY IT, IS TO DEFY THE LAW ITSELF. SALIM MANJI, CONTINUES TO IGNORE THE ACT AND TO LOCK ME OUT OF MY HOME, DESPITE THE PROTECTION AFFORDED ME, BY THE RTA. IT IS DONE BY PURE MALICIOUSNESS AND WITH EVIL INTENTIONS. HIS ILLEGAL ACTIONS, IN DEFYING THE RTA, WHICH IS AN ACT OF PARLIAMENT, REPRESENTING THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, SHOULD NOT BE IGNORED, WHILE HE CONTINUES TO ACT AS A BOARD MEMBER AND TO REPRESENT THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST. THE ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM, DEFINITELY REPRESENT THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST AND SALIM MANJI, LACKED THE MORAL AND PERSONAL INTEGRITY, TO REPRESENT THE PUBLIC, AS A BOARD MEMBER.

SALIM MANJI, PRESIDENT OF BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. AND OTHER EMPLOYEES, OF BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. CONSPIRACY, WITH THE TORONTO POLICE 12 DIVISION, TO BLOCK ME, FROM GETTING BACK INTO MY HOME.

THE CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, INVOLVING, BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. PRESIDENT, SALIM MANJI AND OTHER EMPLOYEES OD THE COMPANY, SAMANTHA GIBSON, JENNIFER NICKEL AND SHANTELLE PANTHAKI, WORKING WITH THE TORONTO POLICE 12 DIVISION, TO BREAK THE LAW, BY ILLEGALLY LOCKING ME OUT OF MY APARTMENT AND TO KEEP ME FROM GETTING BACK INTO MY APARTMENT. 

Salim Manji, President of Barney Rivers Investment

Inc. He and others of that company, is involved, in

the conspiracy, with the T.O. Police 12 Division, to 

ignore the law, and the RTA, and have illegally,

locked me out of my apt, without an order from the

L&T Board. They have also refused to let me back into

my rental unit, and continues to ignore the law, with

the backing and the protection of the T.O police.

SALIM MANJI, IS MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, FOR A NUMBER OF PUBLIC COMPANIES AND THUS REPRESENTING THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST. IT IS MY VIEW, ALSO, THAT SALIM MANJI, SHOULD NOT BE ON ANY PUBLIC BOARDS, REPRESENTING THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST, SINCE HE HAS SO LITTLE REGARDS FOR THE LAW.

THE PERPETRATORS, HAS THE BACKING AND THE PROTECTION OF THE TORONTO POLICE 12 DIVISION. THE EXTREME MEASURES, THAT WAS TAKEN BY BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. PRESIDENT AND ITS EMPLOYEES, INVOLVED MISCHIEF, AGAINST ME. AN EXAMPLE OF THIS, IS ONE SUCH PERSON, SAMANTHA GIBSON, THE PROPERTY MANAGER, AT 1440 LAWRENCE AVENUE WEST, APARTMENT BUILDING AND THE 12 DIVISION POLICE, WORKING TOGETHER. THEY BOTH SHOWED UP, WHERE I AM NOW STAYING WITH A WOMAN, WHO OFFERED TO HELP ME, (OUTSIDE OF 12 DIVISION JURISDICTION).

 AND ACCORDING TO THAT PERSON, SAMANTHA GIBSON (WITH THE BACKING OF THE 12 DIVISION POLICE), TRIED TO TURN HER AGAINST ME.  SHE CLAIMED THAT SAMANTHA GIBSON, SHOWED UP AND ASKED TO SPEAK WITH HER.  SHE SAID THAT SHE SAW HER (GIBSON), STANDING AT THE ELEVATOR, NEAR HER APARTMENT DOOR ASKING TO SPEAK WITH HER. SAMANTHA GIBSON THEN DECIDED TO SPREAD FALSE RUMORS AND MISINFORMATION, ABOUT ME TO HER, WITH THE HOPE THAT IT WOULD INFLUENCE HER ENOUGH, TO PUT ME OUT ON THE STREET. SHE WAS TOLD THAT I WOULD PHYSICALLY HARM HER, IF SHE ALLOWED ME TO STAY IN HER HOME AND ALSO THAT MY HANDS ARE "DIRTY" AND I AM NOT THE PERSON THAT I PRETENDED TO BE.  SHE CLAIMED THAT SAMANTHA GIBSON, WANTED HER TO ACT UPON HER ALLEGATIONS AND TO SEE ME AS A BAD PERSON AND TO THROW ME OUT, ON THE STREET.  SHE ALSO CLAIMED, THAT SAMANTHA GIBSON, CONTACTED THE HUMANE SOCIETY, WHO ALSO  CAME WITH HER TO THE BUILDING, TO TAKE AWAY MY ANIMALS. SHE CLAIMED THAT SAMANTHA GIBSON, THE 12 DIVISION POLICE AND THE HUMANE SOCIETY, SHOWED UP LAST WEEK AND THAT SHE WAS TOLD TO NOT HAVE ME IN HER HOME.  SHE SAID THAT SHE WOULD BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY SAMANTHA GIBSON, AS SHE STOOD AT THE ELEVATOR NEAR HER DOOR, AS SHE CARRIED OUT HER MALICIOUS ATTACKS AGAINST ME. 

THE WOMAN SAID THAT SAMANTHA GIBSON, ALSO SPOKE WITH OTHER TENANTS, OF THE BUILDING AND TOLD THEM TO CONVINCE HER THAT I WAS A BAD PERSON, TO HAVE AROUND HER. ALL WITH THE INTENTION OF FORCING ME OUT ON THE STREET AND MAKING ME HOMELESS. AS GIBSON HAD DONE EARLIER, BY CHANGING THE LOCK, ILLEGALLY, ON MY APARTMENT DOOR.  SHE IS CONVINCED THAT SAMANTHA GIBSON, CAN BE RECOGNIZED BY THE VIDEO SURVEILLANCE IN THE BUILDING, AS WELL AS BY HER, DIRECTLY.  THE MISCHIEF (CHARGE), THAT BROUGHT SAMANTHA GIBSON, PROPERTY MANAGER, FOR BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. TO THE WOMAN'S HOME TO DO ME HARM, WAS ALSO EVIDENT TO SEVERAL OTHER WITNESSES, SOME OF WHOM SHE ALSO USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. 

JENNIFER NICKEL, MANAGER OF THE RENTAL PROPERTY, HAS STATED THAT SHE IS NOT OBLIGATED, TO CHANGE THE LOCK BACK, DESPITE WHAT THE RTA SAYS.

JENNIFER NICKEL, SAMANTHA GIBSON, SHANTELLE PANTHAKI AND SALIM MANJI, ALL HAVE IGNORED THE FACT, THAT THE 60 DAYS HAD PASSED, IN WHICH THEY WERE TO TAKE ACTIONS, WITH THE BOARD, IF THEY WANTED TO EVICT ME. BY NOT DOING SO, THEY ARE DEEMED BY THE RTA, TO AGREE, WITH THE LEASE TO BE ASSIGNED TO ME. 

SALIM MANJI, THE PRESIDENT OF BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. ALSO CONDONED THE ACTIONS OF SAMANTHA GIBSON, JENNIFER NICKEL AND SHANTELLE PANTHAKI, BY NOT TELLING THEM TO ABIDE BY THE LAW, BY GIVING ME THE REPLACEMENT KEYS AND TO WAIT FOR THE HEARING AT THE L&T BOARD, TO DECIDE ON THE MATTER. MANJI HAD HIS PARALEGAL, DAVID RUBIN CONTACTED ME, WHO ALSO FEIGNED IGNORANCE OF THE LAW AND INSTEAD OF RE ENFORCING THE ACT, WITH HIS CLIENT, HE AGREES WITH HIM. NOW I AM WAITING FOR THE POSITION, OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE CHAIRMAN, OF BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. TO SEE IF THEY WILL DO THE RIGHT THING, ABOUT BARNEY RIVERS EMPLOYEES, GOING AGAINST THE LAW, REGARDING THIS MATTER.

MY VIEW, AS ALREADY STATED, IS THAT SALIM MANJI, SHOULD NOT BE REPRESENTING, THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST, AS A BOARD MEMBER, ON ANY OF THOSE PUBLIC BOARDS, THAT HE SITS ON.  INCLUDING THE ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM (ROM), AMONG OTHERS. HE IS OBLIGATED, TO HAVE A MORAL STANDING AND TO RESPECT THE LAW. WHICH HE HAS NOT SHOWN, IN REGARDS TO THIS MATTER.

AMONG THE OTHER CO-CONSPIRATORS, IS THE PARALEGAL MICHAEL BLOTT, I BELIEVED, WHO REFUSED TO HELP ME, AND WHO WAS IN TOUCH WITH SAMANTHA GIBSON, BY MY REQUEST. HE INSTEAD WORKED AGAINST ME. HE KEPT THE ENVELOPE, CONTAINING THE DOCUMENTS AND THE RETAINER, ON HIS DESK FOR THREE DAYS, UNOPENED, AND DID NOTHING TO HELP ME, REGARDING MY MATTER, WITH BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC.

UN COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE: Valerie Guillaume v Canada. Torture, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment,

CANADA AND ITS POLICE AND POLICING (INTELLIGENCE) AGENCIES, MUST ANSWER TO THE UNITED NATIONS, COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE, FOR ITS TREATMENT OF ME. 

THE INVESTIGATION, OF CANADA'S TORTURE AND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL TREATMENT, AGAINST ME, CONTRARY TO UNITED NATION'S, CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE, UNDER ARTICLES 2, 4, 12 AND 13, OF THE UN CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE,  HAS NOT GONE UNNOTICED.  AND IT WILL FINALLY BE FORCED, TO GIVE AN ACCOUNT TO THE UNITED NATIONS, FOR CARRYING OUT, TORTURE AGAINST ME.

I will keep the public up to date, as to the progress of the matter and of the charges against Canada, before the United Nations Committee Against Torture, involving me.  Canada's violation of my human rights, under the UN's Convention Against Torture, and particularly, relating to Freedom from Torture, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment, and other forms of persecutions. 

THE TORONTO POLICE 12 DIVISION AND THEIR CONSPIRACY, TO FORCE ME TO BECOME HOMELESS. THIS IS TIED TO, BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. ILLEGALLY CHANGING THE LOCK ON MY DOOR, CONTRARY TO SECTION 104, OF THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT.

LET'S BE CLEAR, ABOUT THE TORONTO POLICE, CONTINUED ATTACKS AGAINST ME. WHEN BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. CHANGED THE LOCK ON MY APARTMENT DOOR, ON AUGUST 4TH, AND AGAIN ON AUGUST 5TH, WITHOUT AN ORDER FROM THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. AND ALSO CONTRARY, TO THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT, SEC. 104, WHICH PROTECTS ME AS A TENANT, THE TORONTO POLICE WAS INVOLVED, AND WAS A PART OF THE CONSPIRACY, WITH BARNEY RIVERS MANAGEMENT STAFF, TO FORCE ME TO BECOME HOMELESS. 

IT WAS IN FACT, THE TORONTO POLICE 12 DIVISION, ATTEMPT TO SET ME UP AND TO HAVE ME ARRESTED.  DESPITE THE ILLEGAL ACTIONS, OF THE PEOPLE INVOLVED. THEY ALSO TOOK THE TIME TO THREATENED AND INTIMIDATED ME, AGAINST CHANGING THE LOCK BACK,  AFTER IT WAS CHANGED ILLEGALLY AND WITHOUT AN ORDER OF THE L&T BOARD, OR THE COURT. 

(I PLAN TO PROTEST THE POLICE LATEST ACTIONS, TO FORCE ME TO BECOME HOMELESS, AS THEY ARE MAINLY BEHIND THIS LATEST ATTACK). 

I ALSO PLAN TO FILE AN URGENT REQUEST FOR HELP, WITH THE UN'S OHCHR, AGAINST THOSE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, INVOLVING TORTURE AGAINST ME.

BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT STAFF, WORKING AT THE PROPERTY, EVEN GAVE AWAY MY ANIMALS, TO A TENANT IN THE BUILDING AND HIS FRIEND. WHEN THE POLICE WAS CALLED, HE DISCLOSED TO THE POLICE THAT MY CATS, WERE IN HIS APARTMENT AND THE POLICE AND I WENT TO RETRIEVED THEM. LATER THAT NIGHT, HIS FRIEND BROUGHT MY OTHER CAT BACK. 

ALL OF THIS WAS ORCHESTRATED, BY THE POLICE AND BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, I BELIEVE. EVIDENCE OF THIS CONSPIRACY, WAS SEEM IN HOW THE TORONTO POLICE 12 DIVISION, WAS NOT EVEN INTERESTED, IN INVESTIGATING, HOW MY ANIMALS WERE STOLEN FROM MY APARTMENT AND WAS GIVEN AWAY BY BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. EMPLOYEES AT THE RENTAL OFFICE, IN THE BUILDING WHERE I LIVE. THEY CLAIMED THAT I HAD ABANDONED MY CATS AND WAS GONE FOR THREE DAYS, AND MY FORMER ROOMMATE, HAD ASKED THEM TO REMOVED THE CATS. THIS WAS A BLATANT LIE. LIE. THE FORMER TENANT AND I HAVE KNOWN EACH OTHER FOR OVER 40 YEARS. AND SHE ALSO CONSIDERS ME AS A DAUGHTER. NOT ONLY WOULD SHE NOT HAVE TOLD THEM THAT, BUT SHE WAS NOT EVEN AWARE OF WHAT THEY WERE DOING. 

SO HOW COULD THEY HAVE CONCOCTED SUCH A STORY?. BECAUSE THE POLICE WANTED ME TO LOSE MY HOME AND MY ANIMALS, AS A MEANS OF PUNISHMENT. THEY WANTED TO SEE ME HOMELESS AND ALSO CONTRIVED THE PLOT TO HAVE MY ANIMALS TAKEN FROM MY APARTMENT, IN THE PROCESS. THEY WANTED TO SEE ME LOSE MY HOME, MY ANIMALS AND MY JOB AND TO BECOME HOMELESS. IT IS DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN A JOB AND TO CARE FOR YOUR ANIMALS, WHEN YOU ARE HOMELESS. THIS WAS THE POLICE INVOLVEMENT, IN THE CONSPIRACY ALONG WITH BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. EMPLOYEES, TO FORCE ME OUT OF MY HOME, ILLEGALLY. IT IS A REPEATED ACTION OF THE POLICE, FROM PAST EXPERIENCES. SO I KNOW THAT THEY WERE ALSO INVOLVED, IN HAVING THE LOCK CHANGED ON MY APARTMENT DOOR, ILLEGALLY. 

SECTION 104, OF THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT AND HOW IT PROTECTS ME AS A TENANT, CONTRARY TO THE EFFORTS OF BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. AND ITS EMPLOYEES, WHO HAVE TRIED TO CIRCUMVENT THE ACT AND OTHER SECTIONS OF THE ACT AND OF THE LAW ITSELF, BY ILLEGALLY CHANGING THE LOCKS TWICE, ON MY APARTMENT DOOR, WITHOUT AN EVICTION ORDER FROM THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. 

Section 104 of the Residential Tenancies Act, grant the assignment of a lease, to an occupant of a rental unit after 60 days, if the landlord did not take steps to evict the tenant, or the occupant, within that time and the occupant, called an 'unauthorized occupant', up until that time, is now regarded under the law, as the tenant of the rental unit and also the lease holder. 

My roommate recently moved out of the rental apartment, at the end of June, while I have continued to stay in the apartment, and at the same time paying rent for the apartment. I have also been living in the apartment for several months, with the knowledge and consent of Barney Rivers Investment Inc, simply for the fact that they had not taken any steps to evict either me or my roommate, after learning that I was an 'unauthorized occupant'. 

On August 3, 2021, I paid Barney Rivers Investment Inc. my rent, in the amount of $1,158.00, by certified check, which they also accepted. Then they turned around 24 hours later and changed the lock on my apartment door, illegally and without an eviction order from the Landlord and Tenant Board. Which they were also required to have, in order to change the lock. 

Barney Rivers Investment Inc. had never gone to the Landlord and Tenant Board to evict me, being aware that the 60 days had passed, in which they were allowed under the law, to do so. Instead they changed the lock illegally, without an eviction order from the Board. Because under sec. 104 of the Residential Tenancies Act, I am now regarded as the tenant and the lease holder, of the rental unit. 

What Barney Rivers Investment Inc. staff did was illegal. When I came home around 6 p.m. I found that my animals were in distress, in the apartment and the rental office was closed. I also contacted the after hours emergency number and the man refused to help me. My neighbor also called the police for me, since my telephone was also locked in my apartment. Eventually, I had to call a locksmith to open the door, so that I could attend to my cats who were in distress and who were locked inside the apartment, including the six week old kittens. 

Because I was not home at the time that they had changed the locks on my door twice, I also believed that the police had assisted them, in carrying out this illegal act against me. As the tenant and the lease holder and no longer an 'unauthorized occupant', pursuant to section 104, of the Residential Tenancies Act, after Barney Rivers Investment Inc. had failed to apply to the L&T Board, to evict me, or my former roommate, after knowing that I was an occupant of the rental unit, the lease was assigned to me, after the 60 days had passed and also after my roommate had moved out of the rental unit. Barney Rivers Investment Inc. staff, was looking for another way, to circumvent the law and to avoid going to the Landlord and Tenant Board. And they did so by changing the lock on my apartment door illegally, after accepting my rent in the full amount, based on the lease that was continued, after I had taken over the rental unit. 

Barney Rivers wanted to raise the rent for the apartment and was prevented from doing so, when the lease continued, after it was assigned to me, under section 104 of the RTA. They were angry that this was the case and found another way to recover circumvent the law, by changing the lock on the door illegally. And I do not believe that they did this illegal act on their own, but with the assistance of others, as a way of continuing with the persecution of me, by abusing my rights under the law.

Related: HARASSMENT TECHNIQUES, USED AGAINST TARGETED INDIVIDUALS, BY THE POLICE.

Harassment techniques - OHCHR 

http://www.ohchr.org>harassment techniques 

https://www.ohchr.org › Harrassmenttechniques

https://www.ohchr.org › Harrassmenttechniques

https://www.ohchr.org › Harrassmenttechniques