Thursday, September 23, 2021

BLATANT EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION, AND SYSTEMATIC RACISM, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, 47 SHEPPARD AVENUE EAST, TORONTO. VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEERS, CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGER, MARIA AND REPS. HARIANYA, CORINA AND OTHERS.

SYSTEMATIC RACISM AND THE PERSONAL BIAS, OF LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD MEMBERS.

TENANT ILLEGALLY LOCKED OUT AND THE BOARD MEMBER, IAN SPEER'S DECISION, TO CONTINUED WITH THE ILLEGAL LOCK OUT, WHILE MAINTAINING THE TENANCY. IN OTHER WORDS, HE HAS CONDONED, WHAT THE LANDLORD DID, ILLEGALLY..AGAINST THE RTA

I WOULD HAVE BEEN TREATED DIFFERENTLY, IF I WAS WHITE. 


PROOF, THAT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, LOCATED AT THE 47 SHEPPARD AVENUE EAST, TORONTO, ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, SUCH AS HARIANYA AND CORINA, KEVIN DEHAAN, AS WELL AS THE VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEERS, ACTIONS AGAINST THE TENANT (ME), IS INTENDED TO CAUSE HER, SERIOUS HARM.

THE TENANT (ME), WAS ILLEGALLY LOCKED OUT AND THE BOARD MEMBER, IAN SPEER'S DECISION, TO CONTINUE WITH THE ILLEGAL LOCK OUT, WHILE MAINTAINING THE TENANCY. IN OTHER WORDS, HE HAS CONDONED, AGAINST THE RTA, WHAT THE LANDLORD DID, ILLEGALLY.

THE EXPEDITED HEARING, MENTIONED IN THE INTERIM ORDER, DATED SEPTEMBER 22ND, FROM VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEERS, AND THE ACTUAL DATE, PROVIDED BY THE BOARD,DATED, SEPTEMBER 23, FOR TWO MONTHS LATER, TO NOVEMBER 10TH. THE TENANT WOULD THEN BE WAITING, THREE MONTHS, FOR A HEARING AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, SINCE BEING ILLEGALLY LOCKED OUT OF HER HOME.

AN INSULT TO JUSTICE. 

THOSE INVOLVED SHOULD BE CHARGED, FOR THE CONSPIRACY INVOLVED, IN INTERFERING WITH THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE. 

ON SEPTEMBER 21, EMAILS AND TELEPHONE CALLS, FROM CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVES, AT THE SOUTHWEST OFFICE, AT 47 SHEPPARD AVENUE WEST, OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, SUGGESTED THAT THE TENANT'S APPLICATION WAS PROCESSED AND A HEARING DATE WAS READY TO BE ISSUED, ALMOST IMMEDIATELY, BY THE BOARD. THIS WAS ALSO RELAYED TO THE TENANT DIRECTLY, BY HARIANYA AND IT WAS INTENDED TO GET THE TENANT'S APPLICATION AND URGENT MOTION, TO BE SEEN BY THE SAME MEMBER, THE VICE-CHAIR, TO DEAL WITH BOTH MATTERS, AND TO MAKE A DECISION, AGAINST THE TENANT.

THE UNFAIR DECISION, OF VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEERS, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, WHO DENIED THE TENANT (ME), THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE REINSTATED IN HER HOME, WHILE SHE WAITS FOR A HEARING DATE. ACCORDING TO THE ORDER, OF THE VICE-CHAIR, HE HAD MAINTAINED HER TENANCY, IN THE INTERIM ORDER, BUT DESPITE THAT FACT, HE DID NOT SEE IT NECESSARY, TO ALLOW HER TO BE IN HER HOME, AFTER THE ILLEGAL EVICTION, BY THE LANDLORD.  IT IS INCONCEIVABLE, THAT HE WOULD NOT KNOW, THAT THE TENANT WOULD ALSO SUFFER FURTHER HARM, THAN ALREADY BEEN DONE, BY THE LANDLORD, IF SHE CONTINUES TO BE LOCKED OUT OF HER HOME, ILLEGALLY. 

TO ADD INSULT TO INJURY, THE "EXPEDITED" HEARING DATE, TO HEAR THE MATTER BEFORE THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, WAS ISSUED FOR NOVEMBER 10TH, THREE MONTHS, AFTER THE TENANT HAD FILED HER URGENT APPLICATION TO THE BOARD, REGARDING THE ILLEGAL LOCK OUT AND ALMOST TWO MONTHS, AFTER THE INTERIM ORDER WAS ISSUED, REGARDING HER URGENT MOTION. 

(See the article, below this one, for more information, relating to this article. Including a copy of the tenant's urgent motion and the order of the vice-chair, Ian Speers, at the Landlord and Tenant Board.


 


 


 
THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD'S ACTUAL RESPONSE, TO THE INTERIM 
ORDER.



 









 

Wednesday, September 22, 2021

CORRUPT BOARD MEMBER, AND VICE- CHAIR, IAN SPEERS, AT THE SOUTH WEST LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD OFFICE, MADE ORDER PRESERVING THE TENANCY OF TENANT, WHO WAS ILLEGALLY LOCKED OUT, BUT WOULD NOT REINSTATE THE TENANT, AS THE INTERIM ORDER ASKED, PENDING THE TENANT'S T2 APPLICATION, TO BE HEARD.

THE CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, DIRECTED AGAINST ME, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. 

VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEERS, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, DECISION, TO LET A TENANT (ME), REMAINED LOCKED OUT OF HER RENTAL UNIT, AND DENYING HER THE RIGHT TO REMAINED IN HER HOME, PENDING THE OUTCOME OF HER T2 APPLICATION. 

ACCORDING TO THE VICE-CHAIR'S ORDER, ISSUED ON SEPTEMBER 22ND, THE INTERIM ORDER, "PRESERVED" THE TENANCY, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME, DENIED THE TENANT, ACCESS TO HER HOME, UNTIL HER APPLICATION CAN BE HEARD. 

- THE HARM DONE TO THE TENANT, BY THE ILLEGAL LOCK OUT, WAS NEVER A PART OF HIS CONSIDERATION, WHEN MAKING THE ORDER.  OR WHEN APPLYING THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT.

- IAN SPEERS, DECIDED IN THE INTERIM ORDER, THAT HE WOULD NOT REINSTATE THE TENANT (ME), BACK INTO HER HOME, ON AN EX-PARTE BASIS, EVEN THOUGH THE LANDLORD COUNSEL, DAVID RUBIN, WAS SERVED WITH A COPY OF THE URGENT MOTION, BY THE TENANT'S  LEGAL AID LAWYER, KYLE WARWICK.  DAVID RUBIN CHOSE NOT TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION. 

REGARDING, L&T BOARD VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEERS, THIS SHOULD BE SAID, THAT, NO COMPETENT PERSON, WITH AN OUNCE OF DECENCY AND MORAL STANDING, AND DUTY TO THE PUBLIC, WOULD IN ACT IN SUCH A MANNER, AS TO MAKE AN ORDER, MAINTAINING A TENANT'S TENANCY, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME, PREVENTING HER FROM BEING IN HER HOME, UNTIL THE BOARD'S HEARING, ON THE ISSUES.  THE VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEERS ACTIONS, WAS INTENDED, TO CAUSE FURTHER HARM TO THE TENANT, WHILE SHE WAITS FOR HER APPLICATION TO BE HEARD.  HIS ORDER WAS MADE, FOR THAT PURPOSE. THE OTHER PURPOSE OF HIS ORDER, AS IS CLEARLY SHOWN IN THE ORDER, IS TO AGREE TO THE ILLEGAL EVICTION, BY THE LANDLORD. IT IS PART OF THE CONSPIRACY INVOLVED.

THE CONSPIRACY AND THE CORRUPTION, INVOLVED, LEADING UP TO THE DECISION, OF THE VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEERS.  THE UNSETTLING DETAILS, OF HOW MY MATTER, WAS DELIBERATELY, SET APART AT THE BOARD, FOR UNUSUAL TREATMENT, THAT WAS INTENDED TO HARM ME, AS A TENANT. 

LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, WHO LIED AND WHO HAVE ACTED, TO INTERFERE WITH THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, INCLUDED, HARIANYA, A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE, AT THE BOARD. THIS WOMAN'S ACTIONS, IN LYING ABOUT WHO FORWARDING THE URGENT MOTION, TO A DIFFERENT MEMBER, OTHER THAN THE VICE CHAIR, WAS BY HER ACTIONS, ATTEMPTING TO INTERFERE WITH THE ADMINISTRATION, OF JUSTICE IN MY CASE.

* ON SEPTEMBER 14TH, AN URGENT MOTION WAS FILED WITH THE L&T BOARD, SEEKING   AN INTERIM ORDER, TO RE-INSTATE ME INTO MY HOME, UNTIL I GOT A HEARING DATE,   REGARDING MY T2 APPLICATION. (URGENT MOTION, PROVIDED BELOW).

* TENANT'S URGENT MOTION, WAS NEVER VIEWED, BY A REGULAR BOARD MEMBER, AND WAS KEPT FROM BEING VIEWED, BY A BOARD MEMBER, FOR A WEEK.  

* ON SEPTEMBER 21 ST, THE TENANT LEARNED, THAT HER URGENT MOTION, THAT WAS FILED WITH THE BOARD, WAS STILL SITTING AROUND AND THAT NO BOARD MEMBER, HAD REVIEWED IT, LET ALONE MAKING A DECISION ON IT. 

* ON SEPTEMBER 21 ST, THE TENANT WAS ADVISED, BY A CUSTOMER SERVICE OFFICER, HARIANYA, THAT SHE WAS GOING TO PUT, "BOTH THE TENANT'S T2 APPLICATION AND THE URGENT MOTION", BEFORE THE VICE-CHAIR, FOR A DECISION TO BE MADE, ON BOTH MATTERS, IMMEDIATELY.  BECAUSE, SHE ALSO CLAIMED, THE TENANT'S (ME), T2 APPLICATION, WAS NOW PROCESSED AND THE VICE-CHAIR, WAS GOING TO REVIEW BOTH. NATURALLY, I PROTESTED AND ASKED HER NOT TO DO SO, SINCE THIS WOULD BE PREJUDICE TO ME, HAVING BOTH THE T2 AND THE URGENT MOTION HEARD TOGETHER, BY THE SAME PERSON. HARIANYA, THEN TOLD ME, THAT SHE WAS NOT GOING TO GO AHEAD AND DO SO, SINCE I DID NOT WANT THAT DONE,  IN THIS MANNER.  BUT SHE DID, GO AHEAD AND HAD THE VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEERS, REVIEWED MY URGENT MOTION AND I ALSO BELIEVED NOW, THE T2 APPLICATION AS WELL. THOUGH THAT IS NOT STATED IN THE ORDER.  HARIANYA, IN FACT, CALLED ME DIRECTLY, FROM HER PHONE, AT THIS TEL. NUMBER, 416 314-0354, AFTRER SPEAKING TO CORINA, ANOTHER CUSTOMER SERVICE OFFICER. THIS ONE LOCATED AT THE 47 SHEPPARD AVENUE EAST, OFFICE, ACCORDING TO KYLE WARWICK, THE LAWYER, WHO REPRESENTED, ME AT THE BOARD. KYLE WARWICK, LAWYER, HAD SAID THAT HE WOULD BE AWAY,  AND WOULD NOT RETURN UNTIL, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21ST. 

* THE REASON THAT THE BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, WANTED THE T2 AND THE URGENT MOTION, TO BE HEARD TOGETHER, AFTER SUPPRESSING THE URGENT MOTION, FROM GOING BEFORE A MEMBER, FOR A WEEK, TO BE REVIEWED, I BELIEVED, WAS TO PREVENT THE URGENT MOTION, TO REINSTATE THE TENANT (ME), FROM HAPPENING.  FIRST, NO BOARD MEMBER, GOT TO SEE THE URGENT MOTION, FOR AN ENTIRE WEEK, AFTER IT WAS FILED WITH THE BOARD, AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN, THE URGENCY, BY THE BOARD,  IN HAVING BOTH MATTERS, HEARD TOGETHER AND BY THE VICE-CHAIR, SPECIFICALLY.  AFTER SPEAKING WITH HARIANYA AND VOICING MY CONCERNS, THAT THE URGENT MOTION, AS WELL AS THE T2 (MOTION TO SHORTEN THE TIME FOR A HEARING), BE HEARD, BY A DIFFERENT BOARD MEMBER AND NOT THE VICE-CHAIR, IT WAS STILL DONE ANYWAY.  SHE IN FACT TOLD ME, THAT SHE WAS GOING TO PRESENT THE URGENT MOTION, TO THE TEAM THAT DEALS WITH URGENT MOTIONS AND FOR IT TO GO TO A REGULAR BOARD MEMBER, BUT I LATER LEARNED, THAT THIS WAS NOT DONE.  


* THE CONSPIRACY AND THE CORRUPTION, INVOLVED, BY THE BOARD AND OTHERS INVOLVED, INCLUDING, I ALSO BELIEVED, THE LANDLORD'S AGENTS AND COUNSEL, DAVID RUBIN, AS WELL AS OTHERS, WAS TO NOT HAVE THE INTERIM ORDER, SEEKING THE REINSTATEMENT, OF THE TENANT (ME), GRANTED AND THAT IS WHY THE URGENT MOTION ,WAS SITTING AROUND AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, FOR A WEEK, WITHOUT BEING VIEWED BY ANY MEMBER, UP UNTIL THE TIME, THAT THE VICE-CHAIR IAN SPEERS, MADE HIS DECISION, IN THE ORDER, NOT TO RE-INSTATE THE TENANT, BACK INTO THE RENTAL UNIT, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME, MAINTAINING HER TENANCY.  

* AND FOR THE RECORD, THERE IS NO BARBARA O'CCONOR, WHO IS A TENANT, ON MY T2 APPLICATION.  SHE WAS THE FORMER TENANT AND LEASE HOLDER, WHO HAD MOVED OUT OF THE APARTMENT, AT THE END OF JUNE 2021, WHEN I HAD TAKEN OVER THE LEASE.  AS FAR AS THE ACT IS CONCERNED, SHE IS HISTORY. AS FAR AS MY T2 APPLICATION IS CONCERNED, SHE IS A WITNESS AND NOT A TENANT. THAT WILL BE HER ROLE AT THE UPCOMING HEARING. (UPON MY REQUEST).  

* THE CRIME INVOLVED HERE, IS GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS. AND THE REMEDY FOR THAT, IS A CASE AGAINST THE INDIVIDUALS RESPONSIBLE, WHO ACTED IN THEIR PUBLIC DUTY, OR CAPACITY, TO USE THEIR POSITIONS, TO CAUSE INJURY TO THE VICTIM.  THE SOLUTION IN MY VIEW, IS A CASE WITH THE UNITED NATIONS, INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE, CITING A VIOLATION BY CANADA AND ITS PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENT  OFFICIALS, UNDER THE CONVENTION OF TORTURE, AND IN FACT OTHER TREATIES, TO VIOLATE MY HUMAN RIGHTS AND MORE SINISTER, TO CARRY OUT CRUEL AND UNUSUAL  PUNISHMENT AND DEGRADING TREATMENT, AGAINST ME. 

* THAT IS WHERE THEY ARE ALL HEADING, AS DEFENDANTS, WITH REGARDS TO MY CHARGES AGAINST THOSE INDIVIDUALS, IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURTS OF JUSTICE.

BELOW, IS THE URGENT MOTION THAT WAS FILED, WITH THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, AND ASKING FOR AN ITERIM ORDER, REINSTATING THE TENANT (ME), UNTIL THE TENANT'S T2 APPLICATION, IS HEARD. 











LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEER'S INTERIM ORDER, DATED SEPTEMBER 22ND, PREVENTING TENANT (ME), FROM BEING REINSTATED INTO HER HOME, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME, MAINTAINING HER TENANCY.  AND KNOWING FULL WELL, THAT IN DOING SO, THAT THE TENANT (ME), WOULD BE FURTHER HARMED, (WHICH WAS HIS INTENTION),
WHILE WAITING FOR HER T2 APPLICATION, TO BE HEARD.  WHOSE PURPOSE IS HE SERVING?. THE TENANT'S OR THE LANDLORD?. 
WHY IN HIS DECISION, DOES HE WANT TO HARM THE TENANT FURTHER, BY CAUSING HER NOT TO BE IN HER HOME, WHILE MAKING AN ORDER, WHICH CONTINUES TO MAINTAIN HER TENANCY?. 
AS FOR HIS REASONING, THAT THE URGENT MOTION, WAS AN EX-PARTE MOTION AND THE OTHER SIDE, SHOULD HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY, TO ARGUE THEIR SIDE OF THE CASE. WHAT WILL THEY BE ARGUING?.  THAT THEY HAD A RIGHT, TO GO AGAINST THE RTA AND TO ILLEGALLY EVICT THE TENANT, WITHOUT AN ORDER FROM THE BOARD?.  CLEARLY BY HIS DECISION, AND IN HIS CORRUPT VIEW, THE VICE CHAIR, IAN SPEERS, AGREES WITH THE ACTIONS OF THE LANDLORD. 
THAT ALONE, SHOULD HAVE HIM REMOVED, FROM BEING A VICE-CHAIR, AND FROM MAKING ANY DECISIONS, IN REGARDS TO TENANTS, AT THE BOARD.







Thursday, September 16, 2021

THE UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL PROCEDURE, TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL, AND THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON TORTURE, IS LOOKING INTO MY COMPLAINT, REGARDING HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, IN THIS LATEST SITUATION.

THE CIRCLE OF CANADIAN GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC OFFICIALS, WHO ARE NAMED IN THE REPORT, TO THE SPECIAL PROCEDURE BRANCH, OF THE UNITED NATIONS, WHO ARE DIRECTLY, OR WHO HAVE PROVIDED SUPPORTING ROLE, TO THE CONTINUANCE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, THAT I AM FACING, AS A PART OF ITS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL TREATMENT AND TORTURE REPORT, AGAINST THAT CANADA.

-MINISTRY OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS AND HOUSING, ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, CATHY TRAPANIER AND ALYSSA CATES. THE MINISTRY ITSELF AND THE MINISTER'S OFFICE, WHICH HAS DELAYED, INVESTIGATING, THOSE TWO PERSONS, IN THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, WHO DID NOTHING TO ENFORCED MY RIGHTS. 

-THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD AND THE MEMBER, ASSOCIATED WITH THE CASE AND WHOSE DELAY, IS CAUSING, FURTHER HARM TO THE TENANT.

-THE MPP'S OFFICE, OF ROBIN MARTIN, WHO HAD PROMISED, TO GET THE MINISTER'S OFFICE, TO LOOK INTO THE ACTIONS, OF CATHY TRAPANIER AND ELYSSA CATES, WHO HAVE IGNORED MY RIGHTS, UNDER THE RTA. AND HAVING SIGNED THE CONSENT FORM, FOR HER ASSISTANT, TO CONTACT THE MINISTRY OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS AND HOUSING ON MY BEHALF, I HAVE NOT HEARD BACK FROM THAT OFFICE SINCE.

-THE ROLE OF THE TORONTO 12 DIVISION POLICE AND THE PRIVATE LANDLORD AND WHETHER OR NOT, THE POLICE WAS INVOLVED, IN ASSISTING THE PROPERTY MANAGERS, WHO HAD VIOLATED MY RIGHTS, AS A TENANT.

-DOWNSVIEW COMMUNITY LEGAL CLINIC AND WHY IT TOOK THEM FIVE WEEKS, TO RESPOND TO MY CALLS, FOR LEGAL HELP, AS A LOW INCOME PERSON. THEY ONLY RESPONDED A FEW DAYS AGO, SINCE I CONTACTED THAT LEGAL AID CLINIC, BACK IN AUGUST, AFTER I WAS LOCKED OUT OF MY HOME. THE SPECIAL PROCEDURE BRANCH, IS TO LOOK INTO OTHER ISSUES, OR CONCERNS, THAT I HAVE ALSO PRESENTED, CONCERNING, THE LEGAL AID CLINIC AND ITS TREATMENT, OR CONCERNING ITS SERVICES TO ME. 

BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. AND THE ROLE IT HAS PLAYED, AS A PRIVATE LANDLORD, WHO WAS ALLOWED, BY THOSE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, TO GET AWAY, WITH IGNORING THE LAW, PERTAINING TO THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT, 2006. DUE TO THE CONSPIRACY AND THE CORRUPTION, INVOLVED.

THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, WAS SERVED, WITH AN URGENT MOTION, THAT WAS FILED BY A LAWYER, REPRESENTING THE TENANT, WHO WAS LOCKED OUT OF HER HOME ILLEGALLY. AND IT HAS DELAYED, IN MAKING A DECISION ON THE MATTER, CONCERNING THE INTERIM ORDER, THAT THE LAWYER WAS SEEKING, UNTIL THE TENANT'S APPLICATION, THAT WAS ALSO FILED EARLIER, CAN BE HEARD.  THE LEGAL AID LAWYER, FROM THE DOWNSVIEW COMMUNITY LEGAL AID CLINIC, HAS CITED ALL OF THE REASONS, BASED ON LEGAL GROUNDS, WHY THE MOTION SHOULD BE GRANTED, AS IT IS AN INTERIM ORDER, THAT HE IS SEEKING, UNTIL A HEARING DATE IS PROVIDED, BY THE L&T BOARD, WHEN THE TENANT'S T2 APPLICATION IS HEARD. WHICH WE ARE TOLD TAKES TWO MONTHS TO BE PROCESSED, FROM THE DATE OF THE APPLICATION, TO THE BOARD.  IN THE MEANTIME, THE LAWYER IS ASKING IN THE MOTION, FOR AN INTERIM ORDER, FOR THE TENANT TO BE REINSTATED, IN HER HOME, AS SHE WAITS FOR A HEARING DATE, FROM THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, OF HER T2 APPLICATION, THAT WAS FILED IN AUGUST.

THE BOARD HAS NOT RESPONDED TO THE URGENT MOTION, AND THIS HAS CAUSED FURTHER HARM TO THE TENANT. THIS PARTICULAR TENANT, ALSO HAS A MATTER BEFORE THE UN'S HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL AND THE SPECIAL PROCEDURE BRANCH, CITING IMMEDIATE HARM AND THE CONTINUED HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, DIRECTED AT HER, BY PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, OF THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT.

Thursday, September 2, 2021

ALYSSA CATES AND CATHY TREPANIER, FOR THE MINISTRY OF, MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS AND HOUSING, HAS FAILED TO CARRY OUT THEIR DUTY, TO TENANTS.

ALYSSA CATES, DIRECTOR AND CATHY TREPANIER, COORDINATOR, IS THE REASON, THAT I AM STILL LOCKED OUT OF MY RENTAL UNIT. THEY HAVE BOTH FAILED, TO TAKE ANY ACTIONS, INCLUDING, REFUSING TO CONTACT, THE LANDLORD ON MY BEHALF, IN ORDER TO REGAIN, MY APARTMENT. 

CATHY TREPANIER, COORDINATOR, IN THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, ACTED CORRUPTLY, BY NOT CONTACTING THE LANDLORD, TO ENFORCED MY RIGHTS, UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT, 2006. AS A RESULT, SALIM MANJI AND BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. CONTINUES, TO DISOBEY THE RTA, BY LOCKING ME OUT OF MY APARTMENT, ILLEGALLY. 

I HAVE BEEN LOCKED OUT OF MY APARTMENT, ILLEGALLY, FOR MORE THAN A MONTH AND DESPITE THE URGENCY OF THE SITUATION, I AM STILL WAITING FOR A HEARING DATE, FROM THE L&T BOARD. 

CATHY TREPANIER, CLAIMED THAT IN ORDER TO ACT,  THAT SHE WOULD REQUIRE, THE FORMER TENANT, TO CONTACT HER AND TO PROVIDE TO HER, HER OWN DOCUMENTATION, REGARDING THE FORMER TENANCY, WITH THE LANDLORD. NO WHERE IN THE ACT, DOES IT SAY, THAT THIS ACTION IS REQUIRED, BY THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, IN ORDER TO MAKE THE DECISION, TO TELL THE LANDLORD, TO PROVIDE THE REPLACEMENT KEYS AND TO APPLY TO THE BOARD, FOR AN EVICTION ORDER.

CATHY TREPANIER AND ALYSSA CATES, ARE ANOTHER TWO EXAMPLES, OF THE SEVERAL CANADIAN GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES, WHO ARE INVOLVED IN THE CONSPIRACY, TO HAVE ME REMAIN HOMELESS, ALONG WITH THE POLICE. AS A RESULT OF THE CONSPIRACY, THE LANDLORD AND ITS AGENTS, BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC AND SALIM MANJI, AS WELL AS JENNIFER NICKEL AND SAMANTHA GIBSON, HAS MADE NO MOVE, TO OBEY THE LAW AND TO TAKE THE MATTER, TO THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, AS THEY ARE REQUIRED UNDER THE RTA, TO DO. 

ON SEPTEMBER 1ST, THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA, COMPLAINT DIVISION, HAD CONTACTED ME, ABOUT RECEIVING MY COMPLAINT, AGAINST THE PARALEGAL, DAVID RUBIN AND HIS ROLE IN THE EFFORT, TO INTERFERE WITH THE, ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, REGARDING THIS CASE.  

SALIM MANII, PRESIDENT, OF BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. AND THE LANDLORD'S AGENT, IS ALSO UNDER INVESTIGATION, AS A BOARD MEMBER, DUE TO MY COMPLAINTS, ABOUT HIS ACTIONS IN DISREGARDING THE LAW, WHILE STILL SITTING ON THOSE PUBLIC BOARDS. 

FINALLY, THE UNITED NATIONS, SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON TORTURE, is ADDRESSING, MY URGENT REQUEST, TO INVESTIGATE THOSE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, WHO HAVE ACTED TO CAUSE ME HARM AND CONTINUES TO DO SO, WITH IMPUNITY, IN CANADA. ALL OF THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS MENTIONED, ARE THE SUBJECT OF MY COMPLAINT, TO THE UN, ON AN URGENT BASIS.  ALL OF THEM ARE TRYING THEIR BEST, TO WITHHOLD SOME OF THE BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS, SUCH AS SHELTER, FROM ME, AS A MEANS OF PUNISHMENT AND TO DELIBERATELY  CAUSE ME HARM.

ROXANNE PARIS, A MANAGER, IN THE URGENT CIVIL INTAKE OFFICE, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, TO BE FACE A CHARGE, OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, AND BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST. IN DELIBERATELY, BLOCKING, MY URGENT MOTION, IN THE COURT.

AFTER FILING MY URGENT MOTION, AT THE COURTHOUSE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, I WAS TOLD THAT IT WENT DIRECTLY, TO THE CIVIL URGENT MO...