FACING SYSTEMATIC RACISM, IN CANADA. ALONE AND PERSECUTED. HOW THE COURT AND THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, ARE ALSO INVOLVED. AND THE BLACK LEGAL CLINIC, THAT HAS WORKED ALONG WITH THEM, AGAINST ME.

LET ME START OUT BY EXPOSING BLAC. BLACK LEGAL ACTION CENTER AND ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MOYA TEKLU.  THIS CANADIAN LEGAL CLINIC, LIKE OTHERS THAT ARE FUNDED BY THE GOVERNMENT, THROUGH LEGAL AID ONTARIO, SHOULD BE EXPOSED. I AM GOING TO EXPOSED THE LIE, THAT IS PERPETUATED, BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MOYA TEKLU, ABOUT THE CLINIC'S ROLE IN, SPECIFICALLY, DEALING WITH SYSTEMATIC RACISM, AFFECTING BLACKS IN ONTARIO. 

IT IS NOT TRUE. BLAC, DO NOT HELP INDIVIDUALS, AS IT HAS CLAIMED ON ITS WEBSITE AND OTHER PLACES, WHO ARE DEALING WITH SYSTEMATIC RACISM. I HAVE CONTACTED, THE BLACK LEGAL ACTION CENTER, TO HELP ME, IN DEALING WITH THE SYSTEMATIC RACISM, THAT I AM FACING IN THE CANADIAN COURT AND TRIBUNAL  AND I DID NOT EVEN GET BACK A RESPONSE. I ALSO CONTACTED THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MOYA TEKLU, THROUGH BLAC AND SHE ALSO DID NOT RESPOND TO MY REQUEST. 

Moya Teklu
BLAC'S Executive Director
Who has denied me the opportunity 
to get legal assistance, from the legal clinic
in fighting against, the systematic racism, 
that I am facing in Canada. 
Personally, she is a "Roast Breadfruit". Black on the
outside and white inside. A typical "House Nigger". 
And a willing participant, in helping to destroy
another black person. 

THEN I WANT TO EXPOSED, HOW THE DIVISIONAL COURT AND THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, ARE NOT NECESSARILY CONCERNED, ABOUT EITHER ME, OR ABOUT MY RIGHTS. THAT SUFFERING HARM, AS PART OF ITS SYSTEMATIC RACISM, THAT IT HAS PRACTICED AGAINST ME, MATTERS LITTLE TO THEM. (I will expound on this later).

EXPOSING, MOYA TEKLU, BLACK EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND SORAYA LEMUR, WITH THE PARLIAMENTARY BLACK CAUCUS : HOW THE SYSTEM HAS USED THEM AGAINST BLACKS..

TODAY'S HOUSE NEGROES.  DIFFERENT ERA, BUT THE SAME ATTITUDES.  

Moya Teklu
Executive Director of the Black Legal Action Center
BLAC, in Toronto. 
She has also worked, with the racist system, against me. 
By denying me, the opportunity, for the Legal Clinic
to take on my case, in fighting against, the systematic racism,
that I am facing, in the court and tribunal, in Canada.

Soroya Lemur
MPP Greg Fergus staff, who is in charge
of complaints, of systematic racism, that are
directed, to the Black Caucus, in Ottawa, Canada.
She has never explained, when asked by me, who at 
BLAC, Black Legal Action Center, had told her
that they could, or would not assist  me, in fighting
against the systematic racism, that I am facing
in the Canadian court and tribunal.

WHEN YOU GO TO THE BLACK LEGAL ACTION CENTER, BLAC, THERE IS A GLOWING REPORT, OF ITS SO CALLED COMMITMENT, TO HELPING BLACK PEOPLE, IN ONTARIO AND CANADA. BUT NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH.  LIKE BLACK LIVES MATTERS, BLACK PEOPLE ARE LEFT TO DEFEND THEMSELVES, AGAINST AN UNJUST SYSTEM THAT PREYS ON THEM. THESE SO CALLED LEADERS DO NOT HELP. SOROYA LEMUR, IS MPP GREG FERGUS STAFF AND BOTH ARE MEMBERS OF THE PARLIAMENTARY BLACK CAUCUS IN CANADA.

BUT THE REALITY IS FAR DIFFERENT, FROM WHAT IT HAS PUBLICLY CLAIMED. I AM HERE TO EXPOSED IT NEW EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MOYA TEKLU AND HOW BOTH SHE AND BLACK, HAS IGNORED MY REQUEST TO LOOK INTO THE SYSTEMATIC RACISM, THAT I AM FACING. IT IS SHAMEFUL. 

WHAT BLAC, OR THE BLACK LEGAL ACTION CENTER, ACTUALLY DOES, IS TO WORK WITH THE SYSTEM, TO DESTROY SOME BLACK INDIVIDUALS' LIVES. TO "SCREW US", SO TO SPEAK. I CALL THESE HOUSE NIGGERS, "ROAST BREADFRUITS" AND "FRONTS" FOR THE OPPRESSIVE RACIST SYSTEM, THAT KEEPS US DOWN.  THEY ARE SELF CENTERED AND CARES NOTHING ABOUT THE BLACK COMMUNITY, BUT IN ADVANCING THEIR CAREERS. NARCISSISTS, WHO WILL SELL YOU OUT, TO ADVANCE THEMSELVES. IF YOU ARE BLACK, THEN YOU KNOW WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT. THESE "TOKENS", THAT WE COULD ACTUALLY DO WITHOUT, AS FAR AS THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY.  

SOMETHING STRANGE HAPPENED, AFTER THE DIVISIONAL COURT IN TORONTO AND SPECIFICALLY, JUSTICE DAVID CORBETT, WAS MADE AWARE, THAT THE BLACK  CAUCUS IN OTTAWA, CHAIRED BY MPP GREG FERGUS, WAS LOOKING INTO MY COMPLAINT, AGAINST THE SYSTEMATIC RACISM, THAT I WAS FACING IN THE COURT. MPP GREG FERGUS STAFF, BEGAN TO ACT STRANGE. PREVIOUSLY, THEY HAD ACTED COURTEOUS AND FRIENDLY, NOW THEY WERE GIVING ME THE "RUN AROUND". FOR INSTANCE, SOROYA LEMUR TOLD ME SPECIFICALLY, THAT SHE HAD "CONTACTED BLAC, OR THE BLACK LEGAL ACTION CENTER, TO ASSIST ME, BUT SHE WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL, IN GETTING BLAC TO HELP ME. WHEN I ASKED HER WHO SHE HAD SPOKEN TO AT BLAC, I DID NOT GET A RESPONSE, FROM SOROYA LEMUR. TO THIS DAY, SHE HAS NEVER ANSWERED MY QUESTION. SOMEONE AT THE DIVISIONAL COURT, I BELIEVED, HAD GOTTEN TO HER AND TOLD HER TO NOT HELP. TO "SUPPRESS" THE REQUEST.  I CANNOT HELP BUT TO WONDER, WHO AT THE DIVISIONAL COURT, IN TORONTO, HAD CONTACTED THAT ORGANIZATION, OR EVEN MPP GREG FERGUS'S OFFICE, TO BLOCK MY EFFORTS, WITH THE PARLIAMENTARY BLACK CAUCUS?

AND STRANGELY, EVEN MY EMAILS FROM THE COURT, HAS GONE MISSING. VERY STRANGE, BUT NOT ENTIRELY. BECAUSE EMAILS CAN BE DELETED, BY THE SENDER AND IT WILL ALSO BE DELETED, AT THE RECIPIENT'S END. I HAD ONE SUCH EMAILS, FROM A COURT STAFF, AT THE DIVISIONAL COURT, A FEW DAYS AGO, AT THE CASE CONFERENCE, THAT I HAD WITH THE SAME JUDGE. THE EMAIL STATED THAT THE JUDGE, DAVID CORBETT, HAD LISTENED TO THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD'S RECORDING, OF MY HEARING ON NOVEMBER 10TH. I IMMEDIATELY RESPONDED TO IT, BY SENDING IN TO THE COURT, COPIES OF MY RECORDINGS, MARKED AS, EXHIBITS  "A" AND EXHIBIT"B". THE EMAIL TOPIC CAME UP BY THE JUDGE MENTIONING IT, TO WHICH I HAD EXPLAINED TO HIM ABOUT RECEIVING THE EMAIL FROM THE COURT. HE TOLD ME TO SEND IT TO THE REGISTRAR AND WHEN I COULD NOT FIND IT, SINCE IT WENT MISSING, I CAME TO LOOK LIKE EITHER AN IDIOT, OR A LIAR. WHICH I AM NOT. AND FOR THAT MATTER, OTHER EMAILS FROM THE DIVISIONAL COURT STAFF TO ME, HAVE ALSO GONE MISSING. I LET THE JUDGE KNOW MY OPINION ON THE MATTER AND THAT IS WHERE THE MATTER HAS NOW RESTED. UNTIL NOW. 

BACK TO SEROYA AND BLAC. THE BLACK LEGAL ACTION CENTER IN TORONTO. SOROYA LEMUR, COULD NOT EXPLAIN TO ME, WHO SHE HAD SPOKEN TO AT BLAC, THAT HAD TOLD HER, THAT THE CLINIC WOULD NOT TAKE ON MY CASE. OR TO TRY AND HELP ME. PERSONALLY, I BELIEVED THAT THEY ARE ALL WORKING TOGETHER AGAINST ME. 

BUT NEVER MIND, I HAD ALSO CONTACTED, BLAC DIRECTLY AND HAD ALSO NOT GOTTEN A RESPONSE. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MOYA TEKLU, WAS ALSO CONTACTED AND SHE ALSO DID NOT RESPOND, TO MY REQUEST FOR HELP. SO IT IS A LIE, FROM BLAC ORGANIZATION, THAT IT HELPS INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE FACING, SYSTEMATIC RACISM. THAT IT HELPS THEM TO FIGHT THEIR CASES. THAT IT ALSO TAKES ON TEST CASES, DEALING WITH SUCH INDIVIDUALS.

LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD MEMBER, NANCY MORRIS, DENIED TENANT THE RIGHT, TO HAVE HER EVIDENCE HEARD, VIA AUDIO RECORDINGS, THAT CONTRADICTED, THE LANDLORD'S EVIDENCE. WHILE ALLOWING THE LANDLORD'S EVIDENCE TO BE HEARD.

LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD MEMBER,  NANCY MORRIS, HAS DENIED A TENANT THE RIGHT, TO PRESENT HER AUDIO EVIDENCE TO THE BOARD, OF THE CONFLICTING STATEMENTS, OF THE WITNESSES.  AND AT THE SAME TIME, HAVE ALLOWED THE LANDLORD'S EVIDENCE, CONSISTING OF A LETTER TO THE BOARD, THAT THE FORMER TENANT, BARBARA O'CONNOR, ALLEGEDLY, WROTE TO BE HEARD.

D&D ASSOCIATES, PARALEGALS AND THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD.

THEY LATER COUNSELED HER, TO STATE THAT SHE HAD MOVED OUT, AT THE END OF AUGUST. WHICH THE MEMBER ALSO ACCEPTED. THIS WAS DONE BY THE LANDLORD'S COUNSEL. AND ALSO BY BARNEY RIVERS EMPLOYEES, SAMANTHA GIBSON AND JENNIFER NICKELS. THEY HAD EVEN PROMISED THE FORMER TENANT, TO CANCEL THE $7,000.00 IN RENT ARREARS, THAT SHE HAD OWED TO BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENTS LTD. BEFORE SHE HAD MOVED OUT OF THE BUILDING. 

ANOTHER INCONSISTENCY, WITH THE MEMBER NANCY MORRIS'S ACTIONS, WAS TO ALLOW THE LANDLORD'S EVIDENCE, CONSISTING OF THE SOLE LETTER, THAT IS NOW A MATTER OF CONJECTURE, THAT WAS NOT SERVED ON THE VERY WITNESS, WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE WRITTEN IT. AGAIN, THIS WAS REVEALED BY THE WITNESS, IN THE AUDIO RECORDING, AND TO ALLOW THE LANDLORD'S COUNSEL, TO USE THAT SAME EVIDENCE, AT THE HEARING ON NOVEMBER 10TH. 

DAVID RUBIN AND HIS ASSOCIATES, INCLUDING MERLE STEIN, ARE ALSO COUNTING ON THE MEMBER, NANCY MORRIS, TO OVERLOOK WHAT THEY HAVE TRIED TO DO, TO SUBVERT THE LAW, AND TO ALLOW THEM AND THEIR CLIENT, TO SUCCEED.  

THE TENANT, IS ALREADY PREPARED, TO APPEAL ANY DECISION, FROM THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, THAT DOES NOT ALLOW HER TO PRESENT HER EVIDENCE, AT A HEARING. OR THAT CHALLENGES HER TENANCY, BASED ON THE RTA, REGARDING, THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE LEASE, AND THE ILLEGAL LOCKOUT. OR THAT ALLOWS THE LANDLORD TO PROCEED, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE, THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN PRESENTED, AT THE HEARING, WHEN IT IS ABUNDANTLY CLEAR, THAT THE LANDLORD'S DEFENSE WAS SHATTERED, BY THE AUDIO RECORDINGS, AND ALSO THE TESTIMONY OF THE WITNESSES. WHEN IT HAS BEEN PROVEN, THAT ONE OR MORE OF THEM, HAS LIED UNDER OATH. FOR EXAMPLE, THE WITNESS SAMANTHA GIBSON, TESTIFYING, THAT SHE WAS GIVEN THE KEYS, FROM THE OTHER WITNESS BARBARA O'CONNOR, ON JULY 28. WHEN THIS WAS NOT THE CASE, BASED ON THE SAME WITNESS TESTIMONY, OF WHAT HAS TRANSPIRED. THAT SHE HAD NOT GIVEN HER THE KEYS AT ALL. WHICH CONTRADICTED, THE EVIDENCE THAT WAS PRESENTED BY THE LANDLORD, AT THE HEARING. 

Letter, produced by Barney Rivers Investments Ltd. of the witness, Mrs Barbara O'conner, which was refuted, in the tenant's audio recording, of the witness. In which she has denied both the letter and also giving the landlord the keys for the building after she had moved out. She had in fact given her keys to me, as she has stated in the audio recording. The L&T Board on the other hand, did not allow the tenant to play the audio recordings, of the witness at the hearing, marked as Exhibits, "A" and Exhibit "B". The Board did allowed the landlord, to use the letter (posted above) as evidence, when they tried to extend the 60 days allowed under the RTA sec. 104(4). Which was a desperate move on the part of the landlord. 

THE MEMBER, NANCY MORRIS, CAN CHOSE TO IGNORE THE TENANT'S EVIDENCE, WHICH HAS SHOWN THE INCONSISTENCY, IN THE LANDLORD'S EVIDENCE AND TO DO WHAT THE LAW H AS GIVEN HER THE AUTHORITY TO DO, WHEN THERE IS A CONFLICT REGARDING, THE TESTIMONY OF THE WITNESSES, AT A HEARING AT THE BOARD. SUCH AS THE INCONSISTENCY, REGARDING THE EVIDENCE, COMING FROM THE SAME WITNESS.  

*THE WITNESS STATED AT THE HEARING WHEN ASKED BY THE MEMBER, THAT SHE KNEW THAT SHE WAS BEING RECORDED. BOTH RECORDINGS WERE SENT TO THE BOARD, AS EXHIBITS, "A" AND EXHIBIT, "B".  THE BOARD MEMBER, NANCY MORRIS,  DID NOT ALLOW THE TENANT, TO PLAY THE AUDIO RECORDINGS, OF HER EVIDENCE, WHEN SHE WAS ASKED BY THE TENANT. BUT SHE HAS ALLOWED THE LETTER, THAT WAS PRODUCED BY THE LANDLORD, OF THE SAME WITNESS, TO BE HEARD AS EVIDENCE, AT THE HEARING.

THE WITNESS AND FORMER TENANT, ALSO STATED, IN THE AUDIO RECORDING,THAT SHE DID NOT GIVE HER KEYS, AFTER MOVING OUT, TO THE LANDLORD.  SHE STATED THAT SHE GAVE HER KEYS TO ME, AFTER MOVING OUT AT THE END OF JUNE. WHICH WAS A FACT.

*SAMANTHA GIBSON, PROPERTY MANAGER AT BARNEY RIVERS, THEN TESTIFIED AT THE HEARING ON NOVEMBER 10TH, THAT THE FORMER TENANT, BARBARA O'CONNOR, GAVE THE KEYS TO HER ON JULY 29TH. AGAIN THIS WAS A LIE, AS YOU CAN TELL FROM LISTENING, TO THE AUDIO RECORDING, OF THE FORMER TENANT BARBARA O'CONNOR, WHO HAS STATED ON THE AUDIO TAPE, THAT SHE HAD GIVEN TO ME HER KEYS. NO WHERE DID SHE MENTIONED ON THE AUDIO RECORDING, ABOUT GIVING UP HER KEYS, TO THE LANDLORD'S AGENT, SAMANTHA GIBSON. SO SAMANTHA GIBSON LIED AT THE HEARING. SHE HAS LIED UNDER OATH. SHE ALSO TESTIFIED THAT I DID NOT EVEN HAVE CLOTHES IN THE APARTMENT AND THAT I HAD ABANDONED MY ANIMALS. SO FROM THAT STATEMENT, I NOW KNOW THAT SHE HAS STOLEN AND ALSO DESTROYED MY PROPERTY, CONTRARY TO THE ORDER OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, DATED SEPTEMBER 23RD, THAT THE LANDLORD, WAS TO SAFEGUARD MY PROPERTY AND ALSO NOT TO RENT OF THE APARTMENT, DURING THE ILLEGAL LOCKOUT. 

THE MOTIVE FOR THE LETTER. 

* TO ADD ON THE 60 DAYS FROM THE TIME, THAT THE FORMER TENANT, HAD MOVED OUT IN JUNE, IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THE ILLEGAL LOCKOUT, OF THE TENANT, ON AUGUST 4TH. 

* TO INCREASE THE RENT, ON THE SAME APARTMENT. WHICH THEY HAD ALSO ADVERTISED ONLINE AND ELSEWHERE, FOR ALMOST TWICE WHAT THE PRESENT TENANT WAS PAYING, BEFORE THEY HAD CHANGED THE LOCK ON THE DOOR, ILLEGALLY.

* TO WORK WITH AND OR ASSIST, THE CANADIAN AUTHORITIES, TO CONTINUE TO CARRY OUT, ITS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, AGAINST THE TENANT.

                                                                   Merle Stein

                                                                D&D Associates  

                                     A paralegal, she had provided the letter, to the L&T Board,

                                    allegedly, signed by the former tenant. The tenant then denied

                                    that she gave her such a letter. She was also acting for Barney Rivers

                                   Investments Ltd. Along with paralegal David Rubin.

                                 

                             

                                     

Paralegal David Rubin

                                         Founder of D&D Associates and an associate of Merle Stein. 

IT IS A WELL KNOWN FACT, THAT PARALEGAL DAVID RUBIN, THE FOUNDER OF D&D ASSOCIATES PARALEGAL PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, HAS A VERY DISTURBING RELATIONSHIP, WITH THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. HE IS AT THE BOARD OFTEN, REPRESENTING LANDLORDS AND IS ALSO VERY FAMILIAR, WITH THE STAFF AT THE BOARD.  AND UNUSUAL THINGS TEND TO HAPPEN, WITH CASES INVOLVING HIM, AT THE BOARD. SPEAKING FROM MY OWN EXPERIENCE, WITH DAVID RUBIN AND HIS ASSOCIATES, AT D&D ASSOCIATES, IT IS FAIR TO SAY THAT THEY HAVE AND WILL CONTINUE, TO SUBVERT THE LAW, IN THEIR ATTEMPT TO WIN THEIR CASES AT THE BOARD. I HAVE SEEN THEIR TRICKS AND CONTINUES TO SEE  IT, PLAYED OUT AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. THE WITNESS AND FORMER TENANT, BARBARA O'CONNOR, HAS PUT IT QUITE NICELY, WHEN SHE WAS ASKED THE REASON, WHY THEY HAD COME UP WITH THE LETTER, FALSELY STATING, WHEN SHE HAD MOVED, OR HAD ALLEGEDLY, GIVEN THEM BACK THE KEYS, AFTER MOVING OUT. SHE HAS STATED, "IT'S A TRICK", ON THE OTHER TAPE, (WHICH I WILL ALSO POST HERE) AND "THEY WANT MORE MONEY". AND "THEY WANT ME TO PAY TWO MORE MONTH'S RENT". NO, WHAT THEY WERE UP TO, WAS TO TRY TO GET THE 60 DAYS, FROM THE TIME THAT SHE HAD MOVED OUT, AT THE END OF JUNE, SO THAT THEY COULD NOW APPLY THE ACT, UNDER SECTION 104(4), OF THE RTA. AND THEY HAVE RESORTED TO LYING, EVEN COUNSELLING THEIR CLIENT, SUCH AS SAMANTHA GIBSON, TO LIE UNDER OATH. ALTHOUGH, SHE IS WELL CAPABLE OF DOING SO ON HER OWN, AS A DESPICABLE EXCUSE FOR A HUMAN BEING. 

DAVID RUBIN AND HIS ASSOCIATES, INCLUDING MERLE STEINE, ARE ALSO COUNTING ON THE MEMBER, TO OVERLOOK WHAT THEY HAVE TRIED TO DO, TO SUBVERT THE LAW, AND TO ALLOW THEM AND THEIR CLIENT, TO SUCCEED. 

 

 

BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT LTD AND THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD.