THE BLACK CANADIAN EXPERIENCE: UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE (WILL) FALL. WHY SOME BLACK LEADERS, SUCH AS NICHOLAS MARCUS THOMPSON, DO NOT HELP OTHER BLACKS, FACING PERSECUTION, IN CANADA.

NICHOLAS MARCUS THOMPSON, THE CURRENT BLACK CANDADIAN, WHOSE METEORIC RISE IN THE MEDIA, HAS MORE TO DO WITH HIS OWN SELFISH AMBITION, THAN IN REPRESENTING THE BLACK COMMUNITY. WE SEE THIS TOO OFTEN. 

Black Union Leader, Nicholas Marcus Thompson (left) and Al Sharpton.

              on the right, who is a known FBI agent and who is known for selling out his own people, and Nicholas Marcus Thompson, whose own selfish ambition is also apparent, in his public attention grabbing, for every photo opportunity that he can get, to advance his own agenda. These two black men are SELL OUTS and will step on the backs of other blacks, to get ahead. They will also not help other deserving blacks, if it means that they will get in trouble, with the oppressors.

When I say that Black Union leader, Nicholas Marcus Thompson, is a selfish and ambitious man, I speak from personal experience. Having contacted him to assist me, through the lawyer who have acted on his class action case with the UN, the Black Class Action lawsuit, against the Federal Government of Canada. Citing discrimination and racism, as the cause of that action, against Canadian black federal employees. And my own case with the UN, citing the same thing, as well as human rights abuse. I had to exposed Nicholas Marcus Thompson, as the hypocrite that he is, since who he is privately, is not the same as who he has professed to be publicly. That is, as a champion for the black cause. No, Thompson is not unlike other blacks in Canada, who are in some position of authority and who would like to keep their positions at all costs. This means stepping on other blacks, or overlooking them, if they will be an impediment, to their personal advancement. He has failed to realized, that if we have the same issues, as blacks living in Canada, such as facing racism and discrimination, then we owe it to ourselves and to our community, to support each other. He has failed to realized that despite his position, as a union leader, to the racist and discriminatory system, that we are all facing in Canada, that the same system, views him no differently, than it views me. 

Nicholas Marcus Thompson, has ambition that goes far beyond, the current case before the UN and the Canadian courts, regarding his discrimination case. He wants to be in the limelight and he wants to be looked favorably upon. In other words, he wants to make a name for himself. And to be remembered. But remembered for what?. When he turns his back on helping a single black person, or a group of them, because it would interfere with his own private agenda, then he is a SELL OUT. He would betray another black person, for advancing his own agenda, that is a SELL OUT. He should be remembered for that. If he is going to be in the media, then the public should get to see, both sides of this man. I have seen his kind way too often and it disgust me. I cannot tell you how many of these so called black leaders, like Nicholas Marcus Thompson, have sold me out, to the very same system that oppresses us both, as black people in Canada. Unlike him, I am not favoured in the media, (nor do I care). I am blacklisted and he is not. No Canadian media, will ever touch my story, of human rights abuse against Canada and its police, (because this is in fact a police state), but that is okay, as I am more than capable of telling my own story, or writing about it, in my own version of an alternative media, via my blog, or internet radio. I am more interested in exposing the truth, of what blacks are facing in Canada, than in becoming a media darling, at the cost of misrepresenting myself and the community, that I am talking about. 

I have a simple question, for Nicholas Marcus Thompson and other black leaders in Canada like him. How are we to get ahead, when we keep holding each other back?. How do you do that, you might asked?. (As if you don't already know).  By holding back other blacks, in the same position as yourself, in order to advance your own selfish agenda. Don't blame the system, when it attacks and destroys us as a community. By your own actions, you have given it permission to do so. Yes, the saying is true, that united we stand and divided we fall. Why haven't you got that yet?.

THE HYPOCRISY OF THESE SO CALLED BLACK LEADERS IN CANADA, WHO FOR THE MOST PART, ARE IN THE MEDIA AND PROFESSING TO ADVOCATE, ON BEHALF OF OTHER BLACK CANADIANS, BUT WHO ARE REALLY TOKENS, OR PUPPETS, OR WORST. WHEN THEIR MOTIVE IS THEIR OWN SELFISH AMBITION. 

Nicholas Thompson, ran for office in 2019, as an NDP candidate for Don Valley East, in the east end of the City of Toronto. He also lost that election. He is supposed to be a social justice advocate, but I can tell you, that he does not really represent that either.  Human rights abuse, such as the kind that I am facing, does not interest him. What interest him, is being recognized in the media and doing photo op. Which he never misses an opportunity to do. 

He is also a member of the, Racially Visible Action Committee, and for what purpose?. An organization that is a part of the Public Service Alliance of Canada. 

TENANT IS SUING THE CITY OF MARKHAM POLICE AND BY LAW OFFICER, PETER NICKOLAIDIS AND HER LANDLORD, FOR THE POLICE ACTIONS, TO AID THE LANDLORD, SHE BELIEVED, IN ATTEMPTING TO EVICT THE TENANT, ILLEGALLY. THE VIDEO POSTED, HAS PROVEN THE FALSE ALLEGATION, OF AN ASSAULT, MADE UP AGAINST THE TENANT, BY THE LANDLORD AND THOSE OTHERS, SHE ALSO BELIEVED, ACTED IN THE CONSPIRACY. THE TENANT ACTUALLY HELPED THE LANDLORD, AS SHOWN IN THE VIDEO PROVIDED.

IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE POLICE, TO ASSIST A LANDLORD, IN EVICTING A TENANT, WITHOUT AN EVICTION ORDER, OR AN ORDER FOR A WRIT OF POSSESSION. WHICH ONLY THE SHERIFF, CAN ENFORCED. 

TENANT:  THE ATTEMPT TO DESTROY MY LIFE, BY INSINUATING A LIE, AGAINST THE TENANT, AS A MEANS OF HELPING A LANDLORD, TO ILLEGALLY EVICT THE TENANT, WILL NOT BE IGNORED. THE TENANT HAD WISELY RECORDED, THE ALLEGED INCIDENT, WHEN SHE WAS ASKED FOR HELP, BY THE LANDLORD. THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE VIDEO, WAS NOT KNOWN BY THE POLICE, WHO LATER ACCUSED THE TENANT, OF ALLEGEDLY, ASSAULTING THE LANDLORD, DURING THAT INCIDENT, UNTIL THE TENANT PRODUCED THE VIDEO TO THE POLICE, WHO THEN DID NOT BOTHER WITH ARRESTING HER, FOR THE ALLEGED INCIDENT. SHE WAS TOLD BY THE POLICE, THAT THE ALLEGED ASSAULT, TOOK PLACE ON SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 19TH, THE DATE OF THE VIDEO AND OF THE TENANT RECORDING THAT INCIDENT, OF ASSISTING HER LANDLORD, WHO HAD FALLEN FROM HER WHEEL CHAIR, WHICH SHOWS THAT NO ASSAULT TOOK PLACE. 

NOTE:  (For reference to this article, see the video in the previous article, posted below this one).

BUT THE TENANT WANT TO SEND THE MESSAGE TO THE POLICE AND TO ANY LANDLORD, WHO WOULD RESORT TO SUCH A TACTIC, TO EVICT A TENANT, THAT THE ACTIONS OF THE LANDLORD, THE POLICE AND THOSE OTHERS INVOLVED IN THIS CONSPIRACY, WHICH CAUSED THE TENANT HARM, WILL BE RESPONDED TO, WITH A CIVIL ACTION, FOR DAMAGES, BY THE TENANT.  THE INCIDENT, WAS TRAUMATIC AND DISTRESSING, FOR THE TENANT, TO BE ACCUSED OF HARMING SOMEONE, THAT SHE WAS IN FACT HELPING, AT THE TIME AND WHO HAD THANKED HER, FOR HER HELP, AT THE END OF THE VIDEO.  

THERE IS ALSO RACISM INVOLVED, IN THEIR ACTIONS. THAT IS DIRECTED AT TARGETING AND ALSO USING OTHER MEANS, TO ATTEMPT TO DESTROY THE INDIVIDUAL. AN ABUSE OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL AND ALSO HUMAN RIGHTS. 

IT IS ALSO ALARMING, THAT THOSE PERSONS IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY, WOULD ABUSE THEIR POWER AND OFFICE AND TO TRY TO USE IT, TO TRY TO DESTROY ANYONE, THAT THEY VIEW, AS AN IMPEDIMENT, TO THEIR CORRUPT WAYS,  OF DOING THINGS.  AS I HAVE BEEN DOING, IN EXPOSING THE CITY OF MARKHAM, BY-LAW OFFICIALS, REGARDING THE INVESTIGATION, OF THE PROPERTY OF THE LANDLORD. HOW THEY TOOK UP, A PERSONAL INTEREST, IN THE MATTER AND HAVE USED THEIR POSITIONS, TO TRY AND TO ADVANCE THE CAUSE OF THE OWNER, OR TO STOP THE TENANT, FROM EXPOSING THEIR ACTIONS. BY-LAW OFFICERS, PETER NICKOLAIDIS AND FIRE INSPECTOR, ALEX FREEMAN, ARE AT THE CENTER, OF THIS INVESTIGATION AND BOTH ARE IN FACT, DEFENDANTS ALREADY, IN A CIVIL ACTION, THAT WAS TAKEN BY THE TENANT, AGAINST THEM AND THE CITY OF MARKHAM, ONTARIO. 

THE TENANT BELIEVED, THAT THOSE BY-LAW OFFICERS, ESPECIALLY PETER NICKOLAIDIS, MAY HAVE CONSPIRED, WITH THE LANDLORD AND OTHERS, WITH THE FALSE ALLEGATIONS, OF AN ASSAULT, JUST SO THAT THEY COULD GET THE TENANT TO MOVE OUT SOONER, WHICH WOULD ALSO BENEFIT THE LANDLORD.  

FOR INSTANCE, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21ST, (THE SAME DAY, THAT SHE WAS ACCUSED BY THE POLICE, OF AN ALLEGED ASSAULT, AGAINST THE LANDLORD, DATED AT THE TIME OF THE VIDEO, ON SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 19TH AND FOR WHICH THE POLICE LATER DID NOT PROCEED WITH, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE OF THE VIDEO), THE TENANT HAD SPENT SOME TIME, ON THE TELEPHONE, WITH BY-LAW OFFICER, PETER NICKOLAIDIS, OVER HIS ACTIONS, REGARDING THE LANDLORD. FOR INSTANCE, WHAT HE DID, OR OMMITED TO DO, REGARDING THE INVESTIGATION, OF THE LANDLORD'S PROPERTY. HE ALLEGES, THAT HE HAD PROVIDED THE COURT WITH DOCUMENTS, IN THE PROSECUTION OF THE LANDLORD, REGARDING THE VIOLATIONS, OF THE OWNER, PUI YI WONG, AKA FANNY WONG, WITH THE CROWN ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, YET NO RECORD OF THIS COULD BE FOUND WITH THE COURT.  UNLIKE THE COURT'S RECORD, OF THE CITY OF MARKHAM FIRE SERVICES, PROSECUTION OF THE LANDLORD, FOR VIOLATIONS UNDER THE ONTARIO FIRE CODE. WHICH IS COMING UP FOR A HEARING, ON DECEMBER 19TH, AT 9.A.M. AT THE COURTHOUSE.

THE TENANT BELIEVED, THAT PETER NICKOLAIDIS, WAS INVOLVED IN THE FALSE ALLEGATIONS, MADE AGAINST HER, BY THE LANDLORD, AS PART OF THE CONSPIRACY, AGAINST THE TENANT.  PETER NIKOLAIDIS, WAS ALSO NOT AWARE OF THE VIDEO'S EXISTENCE, EITHER. 

AND AS THE TENANT HAD MADE MENTIONED TO THE POLICE, THAT THERE WAS A PROCESS INVOLVED, WITH REGARDS TO THE LANDLORD, WHEN IT COMES TO EVICTING A TENANT.  AND THAT SHE MUST ALSO FOLLOW THAT LEGAL PROCESS.

VIDEO PROVING THE FALSE ACCUSATION OF AN ALLEGED ASSAULT, BY LANDLORD, WHICH THE POLICE TRIED TO USE, TO EVICT THE TENANT. THE VIDEO POSTED, SHOWS OTHERWISE.

YORK REGIONAL POLICE HARASSMENT. ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE, WITHOUT A WARRANT. THE POLICE CARS THAT ARE INVOLVED, LICENSE PLATES # CHRM 414 AND CJMN 266.

 THE YORK REGIONAL POLICE, HAS DECIDED TO CARRY OUT ITS HARASSMENT, BY ITS ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE OF ME, WITHOUT A WARRANT. 

 TWO POLICE VANS AND A PLAIN CAR, WAS PARKED AT THE ROUTE THAT I USUSALLY TAKE, CARRYING OUT THE ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE OF ME. 

ONE OF THE YORK POLICE VEHICLE, LICENSE PLATE NUMBER IS CHRM 414 AND THE OTHER IS CJMN 266.  BOTH VEHICLES DROVE OFF, IMMEDIATELY, WHICH SUGGESTED THAT THE ACTIVITY, THAT THEY WERE CARRYING OUT, WAS ILLEGAL.

THE POLICE REQUIRES A WARRANT, FROM THE COURT, TO CARRY OUT THE SURVEILLANCE, OF AN INDIVIDUAL. AND MUST HAVE A JUSTIFIABLE REASON TO DO SO. IN THE ABSENCE OF THIS WARRANT, THEY ARE VIOLATING SECTION 8 OF THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, AND ARE LIABLE.

AS SOON AS I BEGAN TO RECORD THEIR ACTIVITY, THEY DROVE OFF.  NOW, I HAVE A LANDLORD, WHO THEY SEEM TO BE WORKING WITH THE POLICE, AND WHO WHO WANTS TO EVICT ME, ILLEGALLY.  AND AS WE CAN SEE FROM THE CASE OF CARR VS THE OTTAWA POLICE, AS WELL AS THE LAW ITSELF, THE POLICE IS NOT SUPPOSE TO BE ASSISTING A LANDLORD, TO EVICT ANY RENT PAYING TENANT. THE JUDGE, SYLVIA CORTHORN, RULED THAT THE VICTIM, "HAD EVERY RIGHT TO BE AT THE HOME, AS A RENT PAYOR".  

MY MATTER IS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, WHICH DEALS WITH ALL OTHER  TENANCIES, THAT ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE RTA, AND INSTEAD OF GOING TO THE COURT, TO OBTAIN A WRIT OF POSSESSION, THIS WOMAN IS TRYING TO FIND OTHER WAYS TO EVICT ME. SHE HAS ONLY TURNED THE HEAT ON, SINCE NOVEMBER 1ST AND SHE HAS TURNED THE WATER OFF, FOR MONTHS NOW, IN THE KITCHEN AND AND HAS ALSO TURNED THE WATER OFF IN THE BATHRROM. WHICH MEANS THAT YOU CANNOT USE THE TOILET. 

TWO WEEKS AGO, SHE CONTACTED THE POLICE AND TOLD THEM THAT I HAD STUFFED A PLASTIC BAG DOWN THE TOILET AND HAD BLOCKED UP HER TOILET. BUT HERE IS WHAT SHE ALSO SAID TO THE POLICE, "THAT SHE WAS NOT AT HOME AT THE TIME, BUT IT MUST BE ME, BECAUSE I WAS HOME ALL DAY".  NOW SHE IS SAYING THAT SOMEONE SAW ME FLUSHED THE PLASTIC BAG, DOWN THE TOILET, WHICH IS HEARSAY. AND WHO THE HELL, AS A STRANGER, WOULD BE INVITED INSIDE A BATHROOM, WHEN YOU ARE USING IT?. BOTH LIES ON HER PART. SHE ALSO CHANGED THE LOCK ON THE DOOR AND DID NOT GIVE ME THE REPLACEMENT KEYS, WHERE I HAD TO BE CALLING THE POLICE TO ASSIST ME, IN GETTING BACK INSIDE MY HOME.  

THE LANDLORDS, PUI YI WONG AKA FANNY WONG AND SUET WAN WONG, AKA KEN WONG, HAS BEEN OPERATING THEIR PROPERTY ILLEGALLY FOR 13 YEARS. AND THEY DID WHATEVER THEY WANTED TO THE TENANTS. LAST WEEK, WHEN THE GARBAGE TRUCK DID NOT TAKE UP THE GARBAGE, SHE THREATENED TO DUMP IT IN MY RENTAL UNIT. SHE IS ALSO FACING A CIVIL ACTION BY ME, FOR DAMAGES. ALONG WITH SOME CORRUPT CITY OF MARKHAM, OFFICIALS. ONCE OF WHOM, A FIRE INSPECTOR, BY THE NAME OF ALEX FREEMAN,  RECENTLY MAKE AN INSPECTION OF THE PROPERTY (AGAIN) AND ORDERE HER TO REMOVED THE BEDS FROM ALL OF THE ROOMS, THAT SHE HAD TOLD THE BY-LAW OFFICERS, WERE EMPTY AND THAT THE TENANTS HAD MOVED OUT.  THE INSPECTORS WANTED PROOF OF THIS AND ORDERED HER TO REMOVED THE LOCKS ON THE DOORS FROM THOSE ROOMS, (TWO ON THE SECOND FLOOR AND ONE ON THE MAIN FLOOR), AS WELL AS THE BEDS, IN THOSE ROOMS. BUT SHE HAS CONTINUED TO IGNORE THE ORDER AND HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH IT. ONE OF THE TENANTS, A MALE, WHOSE ROOM WAS ORDERED TO BE CLOSED DOWN PERMANENTLY, HAS CONTINUED TO LIVE THERE, DESPITE THE ORDER MADE AGAINST HIM.  THE SAD THING IS THAT THOSE SAME OFFICIALS ARE AWARE THAT SHE HAS VIOLATED THE ORDER AND HAS DONE NOTHING ABOUT IT. THIS IS THE CORRUPTION THAT IS INVOLVED.  ONLY TWO TENANTS WERE ALLOWED TO STAY AT THE BUILDING AS RENTERS, DURING THE INSPECTION. MYSELF AND ANOTHER TENANT NAME MICHELLE, AS BOTH OF OUR RENTAL UNITS WERE OCCUPIED AND LIVED IN, WERE ALLOWED TO STAY, WHILE ALL OF THE OTHERS TENANTS HAD TO GO. THE ORDER WAS ALSO POSTED ON THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING, BY KATHY ROACH, A BUILDING INSPECTOR.  I WAS HOME AT THE TIME OF THE INSPECTION, SO I KNOW WHAT WAS SAID AND  DONE, BY THE BYLAW OFFICERS. IT ALL FELL OF DEAF EARS, AS FAR AS THE LANDLORDS, WERE CONCERNED. THEY HAVE NEVER COMPLIED WITH THAT ORDER.

 NOW THE LANDLORDS ARE FACING SEVERAL CRIMINAL CHARGES, INCLUDING DISOBEYING AN ORDER OF THE COURT,  BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION, MONG OTHERS. 

HERE IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE, REGARDING A LANDLORD'S SELF HELP METHOD, OF EVICTING A TENANT AND HOW THE COURT ACTUALLY VIEWS IT.

Divitcos v. CompCorp Life,[1997] O.J. No. 186 at paragraph 53

53.  If the solicitor counselled or countenanced these clearly illegal acts of his clients his own conduct was outrageous, and well below the standard which the court is entitled to expect from any solicitor licenced to practice as such in Ontario. The policy against self-help - against the recovery of possession of residential premises except under the authority of a writ of possession - is too well established to allow for an exculpatory plea of ignorance of the law from a solicitor purporting to act in this area of the law. The provision prohibiting the changing of locks is very clear - and may be seen as part of the larger policy against self-help. I am convinced that instances of self-help with respect to residential tenancies have a significant potential for begetting violence. A majority of the persons in Metropolitan Toronto live in rented accommodation. The public interest in avoiding self-help remedies is obvious and the public policy is clearly reflected in the legislation. It is not tolerable that solicitors, or other representatives of landlords or tenants, whether through ignorance or defiance, countenance, counsel or assist with illegal activities such as those carried out in this case by Diane and Steve Divitcos.

WAITING ALMOST SIX MONTHS, TO HAVE MY URGENT MOTIONS HEARD, AT THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO, IS A BIT TOO MUCH TO HANDLE. A DELAY THAT HAVE CAUSED ME IRREVOCABLE HARM. I AM FILING A COMPLAINT WITHT HE UNITED NATIONS AND POSSIBLY FILING CHARGES, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, THAT CANADIAN PERSONS IN THE COURT AND GOVERNMENT, HAS CARRIED OUT AGAINST ME.

MY MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO AND ANOTHER URGENT MOTION THAT WAS FILED, ALONG WITH THAT MOTION, IS STILL BEING DELAYED AND HAS NOT BEEN HEARD BY THE COA, SINCE IT WAS FILED IN APRIL, OF 2022. THIS IS ALMOST A SIX MONTH DELAY.

 

A SIX MONTH DELAY, TO HAVE AN URGENT MOTION HEARD, IS ALSO A VIOLATION UNDER THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, TO BE TREATED EQUALLY AND FAIRLY, BY THE COURT. THE BLAME IN THIS CASE IS TO BE PUT ON THE REGISTRAR, OF T HE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO AND THE COURT STAFF NARZANA BHUJWALLA.  

Actions will be taken, to protect my rights under international law, against such a discrimination, that was carried out against me, by the Canadian court.

CORRUPT ONTARIO SENIOR JUDGE, HARRIET SACHS AND THE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE OF SYSTEMATIC RACISM, AGAINST BLACKS IN THE CANADIAN COURT.

HOW AND WHY JUDGES IN THE DIVISION COURT, WILL FACE AN INVESTIGATION, WITH THE UN AND OTHERS, FOR CARRYING OUT CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, AGAINST ME. AND IT IS EASY TO SEE HOW?. SINCE THERE IS ALSO A LONG PAPER TRAIL, TO BE USED AS EVIDENCE, AGAINST THEM. 

THE FIRST ACTION OF THE JUDGE, HARRIET SACHS, AT THE APPEAL HEARING, ON APRIL 13, 2022, WAS TO BAN ALL RECORDINGS OF THE HEARING. IT WAS ALSO INTENDED FOR ME, AS SHE HAD ADVISED THE CLERK TO READ OUT LOUD, THE SECTIONS OF THE LAW, FORBIDDING THE RECORDING OF THE HEARING, AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF BREACHING THAT ORDER. I GOT IT. BUT SHE FORGOT THAT I COULD ALSO WRITE. I DO NOT NEED TO RECORD THE HEARING, ELECTRONICALLY, TO BE ABLE TO STATE TO THE PUBLIC, WHAT HAD TRANSPIRED AT THE APPEAL HEARING. AND THERE IT IS. ONE OF YOUR MOST COMPELLING EVIDENCE, FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE. A CLOSED DOOR HEARING. CLOSED DOOR HEARINGS, REGARDING SOME INDIVIDUALS, THAT SUITS THEIR PURPOSE. ALTHOUGH IT IS ALSO A GENERAL LAW IN CANADA, FORBIDDING THE RECORDINGS OF ITS COURT PROCEDURES. BUT IN MY CASE, ESPECIALLY. WHY?. BECAUSE THE JUDGES INVOLVED, DO NOT WANT THEIR ACTIONS EXPOSED. NO ONE MUST SEE OR HEAR, WHAT WAS SAID, OR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE. OR SO THEY BELIEVED.

 THE ONLY TIME, THAT I WILL REMAIN SILENT, IS WHEN I AM DEAD. I WILL CONTINUE TO EXPOSE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE AND SYSTEMATIC RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS, UNTIL I AM PHYSICALLY NOT ABLE TO DO SO. 

Ontario Regional Senior Judge Harriet Sachs
 and Divisional Court Judge, in Toronto, acted corruptly
at the hearing of the Appeal. She made a decision, siding 
with the L&T Board member, Nancy Morris, that her decision
not to allow a crucial evidence (audio recording statements of a witness, 
stating unequivocally, that she had not given the landlord, Barney Rivers 
Investments Inc, any letter (which was also used as evidence, at the hearing, by
the landlord and its agent and also counsel, at the Board). The said evidence
(audio recordings) was already filed with the L&T Board, but the tenant (whom the 
Board member also did not consider as a tenant, for the purpose of the hearing)
was not allowed to play her evidence. When she had asked the L&T Board member
Nancy Morris, at the hearing of her T2 application, to have her evidence heard, at the hearing,
the member Nancy Morris, said emphatically, "NO!".She then later filed an appeal at the
Div. Ct. citing a lack of procedural fairness. The Divisional court judge, Harriet Sachs, took
 the position at the appeal hearing, (which she seemed to have presided over solely, even though it was to be a hearing before a panel of three judges, (None of whom made themselves present at the appeal hearing, except for the judge Harriet Sachs.). How unusual, for a panel of three judges, not to have 
commented at all, or interjected, at the hearing of the appeal?. Aside from their names given to
the Appellant, who had asked judge Sachs for the names of the judges, who would be hearing the
appeal, that was all that was heard of them. Complete silence on their part, and if you are like me and 
did not believed, that they could have actually been present at an appeal hearing and made any comments at all. My personal opinion, is that judge Harriet Sachs, was the only judge at the hearing of the appeal, because the appeal hearing itself, was a farce. It was not to be conducted like a regular appeal under the law, including a lack of procedural fairness on her part and also respecting the rights of the Appellant (Me) in this case.  

WHY BLOCKING MY EFFORTS WITH THE UN, TO INVESTIGATE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE AGAINST ME IN CANADA, WILL NOT WORK THIS TIME.

AND IT ALSO DID NOT HELP MY CASE, TODAY, THAT I HAD PREVIOUSLY, WRITTEN AN UN UNFAVORABLY, AGAINST THE SAME JUDGE, HARRIET SACHS, SOME YEARS AGO, CONCERNING ANOTHER LANDLORD AND TENANT MATTER, THAT SHE HAD ALSO HEARD AT THE DIV. COURT, AND ALSO ACTED IN THE SAME PREJUDICED MANNER AGAINST ME.

I WILL BE APPEALING THE JUDGE HARRIET SACHS AND THE DIVISIONAL COURT'S DECISION, AT THE COURT OF APPEAL. 

DIVISIONAL COURT STAFF, IN TORONTO, ATTEMPTS TO INTERFERE, WITH MY MATTER, THAT IS BEFORE THE COURT. CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE PENDING. MY APPEAL T0 THE PANEL OF JUDGES, IS BEING IGNORED, BY THE CLERKS AND REGISTRAR, TAKESHAH GENTLES. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.

WARNING!!!.  NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.

THIS IS NOT A GAME. IT IS A LEGAL MATTER AND IT IS VERY SERIOUS. DIVISIONAL COURT STAFF AND JUDGES, MUST STAY CLEAR, OF ANY SUGGESTIONS, THAT THERE ARE ATTEMPTS, TO INFLUENCED, THE OUTCOME OF MY CASE, BEFORE THE COURT. 

APPEALING THE DECISION, OF THE SINGLE MOTIONS JUDGE, WENDY M. MATHESON'S ORDER, ON JANUARY 12, 2022, GOT A SURPRISING RESPONSE, FROM THE COURT'S STAFF AND THE REGISTRAR. THE RESPONSE?. NONE.  STILL WAITING ON THE COURT, TO FILE MY DOCUMENTS, THAT WERE SENT TO THE COURT, FOR FILING. 

THE COURT STAFF, HAS YET TO ACKNOWLEDGED AND FILED, WITH THE COURT, THE URGENT MOTION AND TO SET A DATE, FOR IT TO BE HEARD, BEFORE THE PANEL. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED, FOR FILING ON JANUARY 13, 2022, IS STILL BEING IGNORED, BY THE CLERKS.  

COURT STAFF, LISTENED TO THE JUDGES, MORE THAN THEY REGARD THE LAW.

WHAT IS ACCEPTABLE AND WHAT IS NOT, LEGALLY.  THERE IS NO WAIVER OF MY RIGHTS, THAT I AM WILLING TO PUT UP WITH, IF THOSE RIGHTS ARE BEING INTERFERED WITH, BY ANYONE. EVEN COURT STAFF AND JUDGES. INTERNATIONAL LAWS, PREVENTS SUCH A THING FROM HAPPENING. AND WHEN IT DOES,THERE ARE ALSO REMEDIES, THAT ARE AVAILABLE, TO RIGHT THE WRONG AND TO DEAL WITH THE PERPETRATORS. 

THE COURT STAFF, WERE NOT HAPPY, THAT I HAD APPEALED THE DECISIION, OF THE SINGLE MOTIONS JUDGE, BEFORE THE PANEL OF JUDGES.  A HEARING FOR THE APPEAL, IS SET FOR APRIL 13, 2022. EXACTLY THREE MONTHS, FROM THE DATE OF THE ORDER AND OF MY APPEAL, TO THE PANEL OF THREE JUDGES. 

MY APPEAL TO THE PANEL OF THREE JUDGES, IN THE DIVISIONAL COURT, IN TORONTO, ON JANUARY 13, 2022, HAS RECEIVED NO RESPONSE, FROM THE COURT'S ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, AFTER SERVING AND FILING THE DOCUMENTS (URGENT MOTION), AND MOTION RECORD,  AND THE D2 SCHEDULING FORM, WITH THE COURT, A WEEK AGO.  MY APPEAL, TO THE PANEL OF JUDGES, IN THE DIVISIONAL COURT, HAS YET TO BE ACKNOWLEDGED AND FILED BY THE COURT CLERKS AND THE REGISTRAR, TAKESHAH GENTLES. 

THE REGISTRAR, TASHEKAH GENTLES AND THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, SAURABH, SHOWS A GENERAL DISREGARD, FOR THE LAW AND A DISRESPECT, TOWARDS ME, PERSONALLY. PROMPTING, MY REACTION, TO HAVE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT AND HIS ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, LOOK INTO THEIR ACTIONS.

THE MOST LIKELY OUTCOME, AGAINST THE REGISTRAR AND DEPUTY REGISTRAR,TASHEKAH GENTLES AND SAURABH BAWEJA, CONCERNING MY CASE BEFORE THE COURT, IS TO LAY CHARGES AGAINST THEM AND THE REST OF THE COURT STAFF, WHO HAVE CLEARLY NOT ACTED APPROPRIATELY, CONCERNING THIS LEGAL MATTER. 

 

TORONTO DIVISIONAL COURT JUDGE, WENDY M. MATHESON, DENIED ME ACCESS TO EQUITABLE RELIEF, AND MADE AN ORDER, ONLY AFTER MY PREVIOUS ARTICLE, WAS PUBLISHED. HER ACTION IS EVIDENT, OF A REPRISAL ACT, BY HER, AGAINST ME, FOR EXPOSING HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE IN THE CANADIAN COURT.

EXPOSING, RACISM IN CANADA. 

(I AM TIRED OF MY FATE BEING DECIDED, BY A BUNCH OF RACIST WHITE JUDGES, UNJUSTIFIABLY). WHOSE JOB, IS TO PRESERVED, THE STATUS QUO. 

THE CIA, MKULTRA PROGRAM, (CANADIAN VERSION), TARGETING ME.

THIS IS A MKULTRA TRAUMA PROGRAM, THAT FOCUSES ON THE TARGET, TO CARRY OUT HARMFUL  ACTIONS, AGAINST THEM. 

THE SINISTER REASON, FOR THE ACTIONS OF THE COURT, AGAINST ME. THIS IS AN EXPERIMENT. A HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. AND ALL OF THE JUDGES IN THE DIVISIONAL COURT, ARE A PART OF THIS CONSPIRACY.

THE TORONTO POLICE AND CSIS, ARE ALSO BEHIND THE ACTIONS OF THE LANDLORD AND ITS AGENTS, TO CHANGED THE LOCK ON MY DOOR AND TO FORCE ME OUT ON THE STREET. THE POLICE ORCHESTRATED THE ENTIRE THING. THE L&T BOARD MEMBER, NANCY MORRIS AND THE JUDGES OF THE COURT, WHO HAVE HANDLED MY CASE, ARE ALSO A PART OF THIS CONSPIRACY, TO BLOCK ME FROM GETTING BACK INTO MY HOME AND TO CARRY OUT TORTURE, AGAINST ME. 

EVERY DECISION, EVERY ACTION OF THE COURT AND THE BOARD, IS CAREFULLY ORCHESTRATED, TO BRING ABOUT THE DESIRED RESULTS. WHICH IS TO BLOCK MY EFFORTS AND TO FORCE ME TO BE SUBJECTED, TO CRUEL AND UNUSUAL TREATMENT AND PUNISHMENT, CONTRARY, TO THE UN CHARTER ON HUMAN RIGHTS. 

I MUST CONTINUE WITH MY APPEAL, ON AN "EXPEDITED BASIS",  THE WICKED JUDGE WENDY MATHESON, WROTE IN HER ORDER, ON JANUARY 12, 2021, BUT WHILE STILL LIVING OUTSIDE OF MY HOME, DURING THE DEAD OF WINTER AND WITH THE COVID SITUATION, THAT MAKES IT DIFFICULT, TO RENT A PLACE, IN TORONTO, CANADA.  AS THE NUMBER OF CASES, ARE ALSO INCREASING.

THE SAID JUDGE, ALSO DENIED ME, THE EQUITABLE RELIEF, THAT I WAS SEEKING FROM THE COURT, TO REINSTATE ME, BACK INTO MY HOME, AS THE MATTER PROCEEDED, IN THE COURT.  (THE ORDER WAS SERVED ON ME, RIGHT AFTER I HAD WRITTEN AN ARTICLE ON MY BLOG, ABOUT THE SAID JUDGE AND THE DIVISIONAL COURT, IN TORONTO).  AND ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, IN THE CANADA. 

SOMEONE MADE THE COMMENT TO ME, THAT, "THEY ARE NEVER GOING TO LET YOU BACK INTO YOUR HOME".  AS PART OF THE OVERALL CONSPIRACY, TO CAUSE ME HARM AND TO DENY MY RIGHTS, UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAWS, PERTAINING TO HUMAN RIGHTS. AND MORE AND MORE, THIS HAS BECOME EVIDENT, IN THE ACTIONS OF THE JUDGES, OF THE DIVISIONAL COURT, IN TORONTO.

FOR THIS WICKED JUDGE, LIKE THE REST OF THE OTHER JUDGES, IN THE DIVISIONAL COURT, TO BELIEVE THAT I WILL NOT SUFFER ANY HARM, OR HAVE SUFFERED HARM, AS A RESULT OF NOT BEING ABLE TO LIVE IN MY HOME AND WHILE THE APPEAL, IS ALSO BEFORE THE COURT, IS A MOCKERY OF JUSTICE. THEY ALL KNEW AND HAVE ALSO MENTIONED IT, IN THEIR DECISIONS, THAT I AM HOMELESS.  AND THAT THIS WAS A RESULT, OF THE LANDLORD'S ACTIONS AGAINST ME.  YET, IN THEIR EYES, I ALSO DID NOT MEET THE CRITERIA, UNDER THE LAW, TO OBTAIN EQUITABLE RELIEF?. WHICH TAKES PREEMINENCE, OVER THE COMMON LAW. 

I AM NOT GOING TO DO THE APPEAL, ON AN EXPEDITED BASIS, OR ANY OTHER BASIS. I AM GOING TO TAKE THE MATTER, BEFORE AN INTERNATIONAL COURT, OR TRIBUNAL, BECAUSE OF THE ABUSE OF MY HUMAN RIGHTS, IN THE CANADIAN COURT. 

So why did she not considered the harm to me, in this case?. Because her decision, I believed, was based on REPRISAL. Whenever I talked about the court and its practices, publicly, I always felt the backlash, for doing so, by the judges who are affected, by me discussing my case, publicly.

Canadian Judge, Wendy M. Matheson
Divisional Court, in Toronto.
Denied me the equitable relief, that I was 
seeking, in my urgent motion, to remain in my home, while 
my appeal, was also before the court. She also mentioned in her order,
that the entire process of my appeal, could take a long time and that in the end,
that the matter will be remitted, back to the L&T Board, for another hearing. Of course, while 
all of this is taking place, I am not allowed to stay in my home, until the entire legal matter is settled.
In her order, she also prevented the landlord from re renting the apartment, until the appeal is heard. Considering the fact, that the Board's counsel, has until March 31st, to file their documents to the appeal and the landlord's counsel, sometime in March. Expedited or not, the appeal is not going to be heard, for several months.  Which makes her decision, even more difficult to understand, in terms of the law and the equitable relief, that I was seeking. Clearly, her decision is based on the common law and equitable relief is not. Moreover, it takes preeminence over the common law. Single motions judge's decisions, can be appealed to the panel of three judges, in the Divisional court.

TORONTO DIVISIONAL COURT JUDGE, WENDY M. MATHESON, HEARD MOTION ON JANUARY 11, 2021, FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF, FROM THE APPELLANT. STILL WAITING FOR HER DECISION, VIA AN ORDER, TO REINSTATE ME BACK INTO MY HOME, WHILE MY APPEAL IS STILL, BEFORE THE DIVISIONAL COURT.

SECTION 136, OF THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT, WAS THE FIRST THING, THAT WAS ADDRESSED BY THE COURT, AT THE HEARING. IT PROHIBITS THE RECORDING, OF THE COURT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. IT WAS READ OUT LOUD, BY THE CLERK AND I WONDERED WHY THAT WAS ALSO STRESSED, AT MY HEARING?. A QUESTION TO WHICH, I ALREADY KNEW THE ANSWER, AS A HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGER.

THIS IS HOW CANADA'S HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, IS PERPETRATED, IN THE COURTS, AGAINST AN INDIVIDUAL, OR GROUP, WHEN THE PROCEEDINGS, ARE NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, TO VIEW THE ACTUAL HEARINGS, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS. TRANSPARENCY? I THINK NOT. HOW IS CANADA DIFFERENT FROM CHINA AND THOSE OTHER COUNTRIES, THAT OPENLY AND SECRETLY, CARRY OUT HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE?. IT IS THE SAME AS THOSE OTHER COUNTRIES, DESPITE WHAT IT SAYS, ABOUT ITS PUBLIC STANCE, ON HUMAN RIGHTS. 

THE HEARING, ON MONDAY, JANUARY 11, 2022, VIA ZOOM VIDEO HEARING, THE SAID JUDGE, MENTIONED, THAT SHE WOULD RESPOND, IN A TIMELY MANNER, REGARDING HER ORDER, WHICH SHE ALSO SAID, THE COURT WOULD SEND TO THE PARTIES, BY EMAIL. I WAS LEFT TO UNDERSTAND, THAT IT WOULD BE DEALT WITH, EXPEDITIOUSLY, AND THAT AN ORDER, WOULD EVEN POSSIBLY BE MADE, THE SAME DAY, OF THE HEARING. YET, I AM STILL WAITING, FOR THE DECISION OF THE COURT, REGARDING THE EQUITABLE RELIEF SOUGHT, IN THE MOTION, AS WELL AS FOR A STAY OF THE L&T BOARD ORDER, BY THE MEMBER NANCY MORRIS, ON NOVEMBER 10, 2021. 

AT NO TIME AT ALL, DID THE COURT AND THE BOARD, EVER SHOWED ANY CONCERNS, FOR WHATEVER HARM, HAS BEEN DONE TO ME ALREADY, (AND CONTINUES TO BE DONE), BY THE ACTIONS OF THE LANDLORD AND ITS AGENTS, BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENTS LTD. WHEN THE LOCK WAS CHANGED, ON MY APARTMENT DOOR, ON AUGUST 4TH, WITHOUT AN ORDER FROM THE BOARD. I HAVE ALSO BEEN HOMELESS, FOR MORE THAN FIVE MONTHS SINCE AND WAITING TO GET BACK INTO MY HOME, WHILE ALL OF THE LEGAL WRANGLINGS, IS GOING ON IN THE COURT, REGARDING THIS MATTER.  

* NO RESPONSE FROM THE COURT'S STAFF AND THE REGISTRAR, REGARDING THE ORDER OF THE JUDGE, WENDY M MATHESON, OR WHEN IT WILL BE FORTHCOMING?.  

* I STRONGLY BELIEVED, THAT THERE HAVE BEEN ACTS OF REPRISALS, AGAINST ME, BY THE COURT, INCLUDING, THE JUDGES OF THE DIVISIONAL COURT, FOR DISCUSSING THE CASE PUBLICLY, IN ORDER TO PROTECT MY RIGHTS. AND THAT UNLESS THERE IS ALSO, INTERNATIONAL INTERVENTION, IT WILL ALSO CONTINUE.  MY FOCUS IS TO UTILIZED, THE INTERNATIONAL LAWS, IN ORDER TO PROTECT MY HUMAN RIGHTS, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS. 

*IT IS A LONG PROCESS, BUT EVENTUALLY, I WILL WIN. 

* I WILL ALSO CONTINUE, TO EXPOSED, THE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE AND CORRUPTION, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.  

STOP TORTURE IN CANADA. CANADA'S DIRTY SECRET, IS BEING EXPOSED. HUMAN RIGHTS BLOGGER, FACING TORTURE IN CANADA.

CANADA CARRIES OUT TORTURE, AGAINST ME. 
SHELTER, LIKE FOOD, IS A BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS. STOP BLOCKING  ME, FROM GETTING BACK INTO MY HOME. 

FORCED HOMELESSNESS, AND BLOCKED FROM GETTING BACK INTO HER HOME. 

BLOCKED  FROM  GETTING INTO A SHELTER. FORCED OUT IN THE COLD.

COURT DOCUMENTS, REMOVED FROM FILE, TO STOP HEARING.

CSIS AND POLICE, 24 HOUR S ILLEGAL SURVEILLANCE

PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE AND PHYSICAL TORTURE

CHARACTER ASSASSINATION. BLACKLISTED AND TARGETED, BY THE POLICE  AND THE

CANADIAN GOVERNMENT.  

CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT, FOR BEING A HUMAN RIGHTS, BLOGGER.