IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THE POLICE, TO ASSIST A LANDLORD, IN EVICTING A TENANT, WITHOUT AN EVICTION ORDER, OR AN ORDER FOR A WRIT OF POSSESSION. WHICH ONLY THE SHERIFF, CAN ENFORCED.
TENANT: THE ATTEMPT TO DESTROY MY LIFE, BY INSINUATING A LIE, AGAINST THE TENANT, AS A MEANS OF HELPING A LANDLORD, TO ILLEGALLY EVICT THE TENANT, WILL NOT BE IGNORED. THE TENANT HAD WISELY RECORDED, THE ALLEGED INCIDENT, WHEN SHE WAS ASKED FOR HELP, BY THE LANDLORD. THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE VIDEO, WAS NOT KNOWN BY THE POLICE, WHO LATER ACCUSED THE TENANT, OF ALLEGEDLY, ASSAULTING THE LANDLORD, DURING THAT INCIDENT, UNTIL THE TENANT PRODUCED THE VIDEO TO THE POLICE, WHO THEN DID NOT BOTHER WITH ARRESTING HER, FOR THE ALLEGED INCIDENT. SHE WAS TOLD BY THE POLICE, THAT THE ALLEGED ASSAULT, TOOK PLACE ON SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 19TH, THE DATE OF THE VIDEO AND OF THE TENANT RECORDING THAT INCIDENT, OF ASSISTING HER LANDLORD, WHO HAD FALLEN FROM HER WHEEL CHAIR, WHICH SHOWS THAT NO ASSAULT TOOK PLACE.
NOTE: (For reference to this article, see the video in the previous article, posted below this one).
BUT THE TENANT WANT TO SEND THE MESSAGE TO THE POLICE AND TO ANY LANDLORD, WHO WOULD RESORT TO SUCH A TACTIC, TO EVICT A TENANT, THAT THE ACTIONS OF THE LANDLORD, THE POLICE AND THOSE OTHERS INVOLVED IN THIS CONSPIRACY, WHICH CAUSED THE TENANT HARM, WILL BE RESPONDED TO, WITH A CIVIL ACTION, FOR DAMAGES, BY THE TENANT. THE INCIDENT, WAS TRAUMATIC AND DISTRESSING, FOR THE TENANT, TO BE ACCUSED OF HARMING SOMEONE, THAT SHE WAS IN FACT HELPING, AT THE TIME AND WHO HAD THANKED HER, FOR HER HELP, AT THE END OF THE VIDEO.
THERE IS ALSO RACISM INVOLVED, IN THEIR ACTIONS. THAT IS DIRECTED AT TARGETING AND ALSO USING OTHER MEANS, TO ATTEMPT TO DESTROY THE INDIVIDUAL. AN ABUSE OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL AND ALSO HUMAN RIGHTS.
IT IS ALSO ALARMING, THAT THOSE PERSONS IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY, WOULD ABUSE THEIR POWER AND OFFICE AND TO TRY TO USE IT, TO TRY TO DESTROY ANYONE, THAT THEY VIEW, AS AN IMPEDIMENT, TO THEIR CORRUPT WAYS, OF DOING THINGS. AS I HAVE BEEN DOING, IN EXPOSING THE CITY OF MARKHAM, BY-LAW OFFICIALS, REGARDING THE INVESTIGATION, OF THE PROPERTY OF THE LANDLORD. HOW THEY TOOK UP, A PERSONAL INTEREST, IN THE MATTER AND HAVE USED THEIR POSITIONS, TO TRY AND TO ADVANCE THE CAUSE OF THE OWNER, OR TO STOP THE TENANT, FROM EXPOSING THEIR ACTIONS. BY-LAW OFFICERS, PETER NICKOLAIDIS AND FIRE INSPECTOR, ALEX FREEMAN, ARE AT THE CENTER, OF THIS INVESTIGATION AND BOTH ARE IN FACT, DEFENDANTS ALREADY, IN A CIVIL ACTION, THAT WAS TAKEN BY THE TENANT, AGAINST THEM AND THE CITY OF MARKHAM, ONTARIO.
THE TENANT BELIEVED, THAT THOSE BY-LAW OFFICERS, ESPECIALLY PETER NICKOLAIDIS, MAY HAVE CONSPIRED, WITH THE LANDLORD AND OTHERS, WITH THE FALSE ALLEGATIONS, OF AN ASSAULT, JUST SO THAT THEY COULD GET THE TENANT TO MOVE OUT SOONER, WHICH WOULD ALSO BENEFIT THE LANDLORD.
FOR INSTANCE, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21ST, (THE SAME DAY, THAT SHE WAS ACCUSED BY THE POLICE, OF AN ALLEGED ASSAULT, AGAINST THE LANDLORD, DATED AT THE TIME OF THE VIDEO, ON SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 19TH AND FOR WHICH THE POLICE LATER DID NOT PROCEED WITH, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE OF THE VIDEO), THE TENANT HAD SPENT SOME TIME, ON THE TELEPHONE, WITH BY-LAW OFFICER, PETER NICKOLAIDIS, OVER HIS ACTIONS, REGARDING THE LANDLORD. FOR INSTANCE, WHAT HE DID, OR OMMITED TO DO, REGARDING THE INVESTIGATION, OF THE LANDLORD'S PROPERTY. HE ALLEGES, THAT HE HAD PROVIDED THE COURT WITH DOCUMENTS, IN THE PROSECUTION OF THE LANDLORD, REGARDING THE VIOLATIONS, OF THE OWNER, PUI YI WONG, AKA FANNY WONG, WITH THE CROWN ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, YET NO RECORD OF THIS COULD BE FOUND WITH THE COURT. UNLIKE THE COURT'S RECORD, OF THE CITY OF MARKHAM FIRE SERVICES, PROSECUTION OF THE LANDLORD, FOR VIOLATIONS UNDER THE ONTARIO FIRE CODE. WHICH IS COMING UP FOR A HEARING, ON DECEMBER 19TH, AT 9.A.M. AT THE COURTHOUSE.
THE TENANT BELIEVED, THAT PETER NICKOLAIDIS, WAS INVOLVED IN THE FALSE ALLEGATIONS, MADE AGAINST HER, BY THE LANDLORD, AS PART OF THE CONSPIRACY, AGAINST THE TENANT. PETER NIKOLAIDIS, WAS ALSO NOT AWARE OF THE VIDEO'S EXISTENCE, EITHER.
AND AS THE TENANT HAD MADE MENTIONED TO THE POLICE, THAT THERE WAS A PROCESS INVOLVED, WITH REGARDS TO THE LANDLORD, WHEN IT COMES TO EVICTING A TENANT. AND THAT SHE MUST ALSO FOLLOW THAT LEGAL PROCESS.
