This Blog Is Dedicated, To Anti-Corruption, Practices. And Human Rights Violations. In exposing the Canadian government's human rights abuse. And its disregard for respecting, the International Standards on Human Rights. The corruption, that is also pervasive, in its politics. The targeting of me, as an individual and a person of conscience. Focusing on its human rights abuse, such as the torture and other crimes, that are strictly forbidden, under international law.
Saturday, February 13, 2021
JUDGE MICHAEL PENNY, OF THE DIVISIONAL COURT, IN TORONTO AND CONCERNS ABOUT HIS CONDUCT.
DO YOU SEE THE CORRUPTION IN THIS CASE?
(I have contacted the Divisional Court, just to confirm whether the hearing, that was scheduled for February 15, 2021, would be adjourned, because it is a holiday, in Canada and I was told by Rina Badwal, (through email), that it will still go ahead. Why is Judge Michael Penny, conducting a hearing, on a Statutory Holiday?. He could not wait, one more day?. Courts are reopened on Tuesday, February 16th. (The Superior Court of Justice, is opened on February 15th, but not to deal with certain matters). He also made it preemptory, on the Appellant to attend the hearing and claimed, that it will not be adjourned, for any reason. All of the local media, have also reported that the courts are closed, on February 15, 2021, on Family Day.
THE CONCERNS RAISED, IS THAT JUDGE MICHAEL PENNY, MAY NOT ALLOW THIS ISSUE, TO BE RAISED, AT THE PRELIMINARY STAGE, OF THE HEARING THAT IS SCHEDULED, TO BE HEARD ON FEBRUARY 15TH AT 10.A.M. AND MAY ALLOW THE HEARING TO GO AHEAD, WITHOUT ADDRESSING, THAT VERY IMPORTANT, PRELIMINARY ISSUE FIRST. THE APPELLANT IS CONCERNED, THAT HE WILL NOT ADDRESS THAT ISSUE, AT THE PRELIMINARY STAGE, OF THE HEARING.
7 SERIOUS CONCERNS, ABOUT WHETHER, JUDGE MICHAEL PENNY, WILL ALLOW THE PRELIMINARY ISSUES TO BE RAISED, PRIOR TO THE HEARING, BEING COMMENCED, OR TO GO AHEAD WITH THE HEARING, WITHOUT ALLOWING THOSE PRELIMINARY ISSUES, TO BE RAISED, AT THE HEARING, ON FEBRUARY 15TH. AS A JUDGE, HE IS BOUND BY THE LAW, TO ALLOW THOSE PRELIMINARY ISSUES TO BE RAISED, BEFORE COMMENCING THE HEARING.
10. AND THE (b) HEARSAY EVIDENCE, IN HER AFFIDAVIT, (NOT BEING A DIRECT WITNESS, TO WHAT SHE HAS SWORN, IN HER AFFIDAVIT, BUT RELYING ON THE STATEMENTS OF HER CLIENT, THE DEFENDANT).
11.AND(c) MATTERS THAT ARE NOT, BEFORE THE COURT, IN HER AFFIDAVIT, BUT WHICH SHE INTENDED, FOR THE COURT TO ADDRESS, IN HER AFFIDAVIT EVIDENCE. OR (d) REGARDING THE OPINIONS, STATED IN HER AFFIDAVIT,THAT ARE HER OWN, AND RELYING ON HEARSAY EVIDENCE, IN HER AFFIDAVIT, AS THE COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT. (e) THE INADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE, PRESENTED, AT THE HEARING.
THESE CONCERNS ARE RAISED, BECAUSE JUDGE MICHAEL PENNY, OF THE DIVISIONAL COURT, IN TORONTO, MAY NOT HAVE FOLLOWED, THE PROCEDURES OF THE COURT, SET FORTH IN THE LAW, IN REGARDS TO THE HEARING ON FEBRUARY 11TH, CONCERNING THE WITNESSES, AT THE HEARING. THAT IS, THE DEFENDANT, WHO WAS PREPARED TO GIVE EVIDENCE, WITHOUT SWEARING IT FIRST, WHO WAS ON THE TELEPHONE AND AS THE JUDGE MENTIONED, AT THE HEARING, "WAS PREPARED TO GO". THAT IS, SHE WAS PREPARED, TO PARTICIPATE IN THE HEARING, AS A WITNESS AND JUST BY STATING HER VIEWS, OR COMMENTS, WITHOUT MAKING, A SWORN STATEMENT FIRST. OR THE OTHER WITNESS, WHO IS A PARALEGAL AND THE COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT, CURRENTLY, IN HER OTHER MATTERS AT THE BOARD, WHO HAVE SWORN AN AFFIDAVIT, ON BEHALF OF HER CLIENT, THE DEFENDANT, WHICH RAISES THE ISSUE OF A CONFLICT OF INTERESTS, IN THE PROCEEDING.
THE UNBELIEVABLE, CORRUPTION, OF THIS ONTARIO, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, JEANNIE ANAND. JP, JEANNIE ANAND, TOOK THE CHARGES (PRIVATE INFORMATION), OUT OF THE COURTROOM (JP'S OFFICE) AND WENT SOMEWHERE ELSE, IN THE COURTHOUSE. WHERE DID SHE TAKE THOSE CHARGES TO?. THE CHARGES WERE AGAINST, SOME COURT OFFICIALS, IN THE SAME COURTHOUSE. YOU GUESS IT?. I BELIEVED, THAT SHE EITHER MADE THEM AWARE, OF THE CHARGES AGAINST THEM, OR SHE ALSO MADE CONTACT, WITH THE POLICE, IN THE SAME COURTHOUSE. WHO ALSO CONSPIRED, WITH THIS JP, ANAND, TO NOT PROCEED WITH THE CHARGES, I BELIEVED, AGAINST THOSE COURT STAFF. EITHER WAY, SHE CAME BACK INTO THE COURTROOM (JP'S OFFICEE), WITH A PRESUMPTION OF BIAS, AGAINST THE COMPLAINANT, (ME), AND NOT SURPRISINGLY, DENIED HER THE RIGHT, TO COMMENCED, A PRIVATE PROSECUTION, AGAINST THOSE COURT STAFF.
THE INTERNATIONAL, HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS, SERIOUSLY, UNDERESTIMATED, THE LEVEL OF CORRUPTION, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS, AMONG ITS JUDICIARY AND ...
-
JUST IN CASE YOU'VE BEEN DOUBTING MY REPORTS ON THIS BLOG ON THE CORRUPTION OF THE TORONTO POLICE. HERE ARE A FEW MORE DOCUMENTED REPORT...
-
SHELLYANN PEREIRA, PARALEGAL SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, LEGAL SERVICES, SPEREIRA LEGAL SERVICES THE UNETHICAL CONDUCT, THAT EXIST BETWEEN SHELLY...
-
A PLOT OF THE CANADIAN POLICE AND CORRUPT CITY OFFICIALS, TO CONTINUE TO HARASS ME AND TO ATTEMPT TO FRAME ME UP AND ALSO SILENCE ME. AC...