This Blog Is Dedicated, To Anti-Corruption, Practices. And Human Rights Violations. In exposing the Canadian government's human rights abuse. And its disregard for respecting, the International Standards on Human Rights. The corruption, that is also pervasive, in its politics. The targeting of me, as an individual and a person of conscience. Focusing on its human rights abuse, such as the torture and other crimes, that are strictly forbidden, under international law.
Wednesday, March 27, 2024
ROXANNE PARIS, A MANAGER, IN THE URGENT CIVIL INTAKE OFFICE, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, TO BE FACE A CHARGE, OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, AND BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST. IN DELIBERATELY, BLOCKING, MY URGENT MOTION, IN THE COURT.
Wednesday, March 20, 2024
ANOTHER SHELTER, IN PEEL REGION, COMES UNDER FIRE, FOR ABUSING, THE RESIDENTS' RIGHTS. THIS TIME, FOR THE GROSS CHARTER RIGHTS, BREACHES. THE UNLAWFUL SEARCH, OF THE MOSTLY, MENTALLY ILL, RESIDENTS', PERSONAL PROPERTY, THAT ARE ARBITRARILY, SEARCHED, DAILY, BY THE STAFF, LOOKING FOR WEAPONS, AND DRUGS, AND WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT.
SHOCKING! CHARTER RIGHTS, VIOLATIONS, THAT ARE CARRIED OUT, BY A SHLETER, IN MISSISSAUGA, PEEL REGION, THAT HAS, PREDOMINANTLY, RESIDENTS, WHO SUFFERS FROM A, MENTAL DISABILITY.
THE VULNERABLE RESIDENTS, MOSTLY YOUTHS, AND YOUNG ADULTS, (MALES), BUT ALSO SOME REGULAR ADULTS, SOME OF WHOM WERE, ALSO INVOLVED, IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, ARE SUBJECTED, TO THE ARBITRARY SEARCHES, OF THEIR PERSONAL PROPERTY, THAT ARE LEFT IN THE ROOMS, BY THE STAFF AND HAVE ALSO BEEN TOLD BY THE STAFF, THAT THE SEARCH OF THEIR PERSONAL BELONGINGS, ARE ALSO A PART, OF THE DAILY ROOM CHECKS. THEY ARE ALSO NOT ALLOWED, TO RESIST THE ILLEGAL SEARCHES, AND HAVE ALSO BEEN TOLD, THAT THEY MUST ALSO COMPLY, WITH THE SEARCH.
GROSS ABUSE OF POWER, BY LESLEY NAGODA.
AND ALSO BY THE SHELTER SUPERVOR, JOHN EYIAH, WHO WORKS AT THE DUNDAS STREET WEST, LOCATION, IN MISSISSAUGA, IN PEEL REGION. A LOT OF THE IGNORANCE, ON HIS PART, CONCERNING, THE CHARTER VIOLATIONS, OF THE SHELTER RESIDENTS, ARE COMING FROM HIM, DIRECTLY. HE HAS ALSO TRIED, TO PROTECT HIMSELF, BY STATNG, THAT, HE AND THE STAFF, ONLY CARRY OUT SUCH ILLEGAL SEARCHES, OF THE RESIDENTS, PERSONAL PROPERTY, IN "HEIGHTENED SITUATIONS", (WHATEVER THAT MEANS TO THEM). THEY ALSO FAILED, TO REALIZED, THAT NONE OF THE SEARCHES, ARE ALSO JUSTIFIED, UNDER THE LAW. THAT THEY ARE A BLATANT VIOLATION, OF THE RESIDENTS PRIVACY, UNDER THE CHARTER AND OF THE SECURITY OF THEIR PERSONS, UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.
( LESLEY NAGODA, DESERVING, TO BE FIRED, FROM THE BOARD, GOVERNING, THE SHIP PROGRAM, AND THE OTHER PROGRAMS, UNDER THAT UMBRELLA). SHE IS ALSO PERSONALLY, LIABLE, UNDER THE LAW, FOR THOSE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, BREACHES. AS WELL AS FACING SOME SERIOUS, LEGAL CONSEQUENCES, UNDER THE CANADA BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT AND THE ONTARIO BUSINESS CORPORATION'S ACT. THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS AND A PLETHORA OF OTHER LAWS, RELATING TO HER GOVERNANCE, AS THE CEO, OF THE CORPORATION, BETTER KNOWN AS SHIP.
THE STAFF, ALSO CLAIMED, THAT THEY HAVE ALSO, RECOVERED, WEAPONS AND DRUGS, DURING THOSE SEARCHES. ONE OF THE STAFF, AT THE SHELTER, NAME SHANNON, ALSO CLAIMED, THAT THE RESIDENTS, IN THE PAST, HAD ALSO RESISTED AND COMPLAINED, OF THE ILLEGAL SEARCH, OF THEIR PERSONAL PROPERTY, SO THE STAFF THEN RESORTED, TO CONDUCTING THOSE SEARCHES, WHILE THE RESIDENTS, WERE OUT OF THE ROOMS.
THIS STILL DID NOT MAKE THE SEARCHES, LEGAL AND WAS A GROSS VIOLATION, OF THE RESIDENTS' CHARTER RIGHTS, UNDER, CANADA'S CONSTITUTION, WHICH ALSO INCLUDED, THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS. THE FOCUS HERE, IS ON SECTION 7 AND SECTION 8, OF THE CHARTER, MAINLY. THE RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE SECURITY OF PERSON AND ALSO THE RIGHT AGAINST, AN UNLAWFUL SEARCH AND SEIZURE. BOTH OF WHICH WERE CARRIED OUT, BY THE SHELTER STAFF, DAILY. AND ALSO, DIRECTLY UNDER, THE DIRECTIVES, OF LESLEY LAGODA, CEO AND BOARD MEMBER, THAT OPERATES THE SHELTER.
Thursday, March 14, 2024
THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO, CLERKS, WHO HAVE ACTED BIAS, AGAINST SELF REPRESENTED, LITIGANTS. AND EVEN TAKING ON THE ROLE, OF A JUDGE, WHEN REVIEWING THE CASES, THAT ARE BEFORE THE COA. RATHER THAN STAYING WITH, THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE DUTY, THEY ARE NOW MAKING DECISIONS, OUTSIDE OF THEIR JURISDICTION. KEEPING IN MIND, THAT THE COA DEALS, WITH MOTIONS AND APPEALS.
THE CONSPIRACY, I BELIEVED, WAS TO BLOCK MY MATTERS, IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO, AND THIS WAS ALSO DONE, BY THE COURT'S STAFF.
ONE SUCH STAFF, NAJMA, SENT ME AN EMAIL, AS A CARBON COPY, AFTER SENDING THE SAME EMAIL, TO THE REGISTRAR, TASHEKAH GENTLES, OF THE DIVISIONAL COURT, DISCUSING MY MATTER, IN THE COURT OF APPEAL. BASICALLY, ASKING THE REGISTRAR, TASHEKAH GENTLES, ON HOW TO PROCEED, WITH MY MATTER IN THE COA, THE HIGHTER COURT. SHE THEN LATER, SOMEWHAT, APOLOGIZED AND ALSO CLAIMED, THAT THE EMAIL, WAS INTENDED, FOR HER SUPERIOR.
THE COURT OF APPEAL STAFF, REGULARLY, BLOCKED MY MATTERS, FROM MOVING FORWARD, IN THE COURT OF APPEAL. AND I USUALLY, HAVE TO WAIT MANY MONTHS, FOR THE DOCUMENTS, TO BE FILED IN THE COA, AFTER SENDING IT TO THE COURT FOR FILING. NOR ARE THEY EVEN SET DOWN, TO BE HEARD, BY THE SINGLE JUDGE, OR PANEL OF THE COA. (SO FAR, MY MOTIONS FOR LEAVE, HAS NOT GONE TO THE PAEL, BUT TO A SINGLE JUDGE). THIS WAS ALL THE DOINGS, OF THE CLERKS, SUCH AS SANDY, NOAH, CHRIS, OR NAJAMA, IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO.
THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO, STAFF, BLOCKING ACCESS, TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE, THE HONORABLE, MICHAEL TULLOCH, REGARDING A COMPLAINT, AGAINST THEM. LIKEWISE, THE SECRETARY, LISA HO, TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE, ALSO BLOCKED MY LETTER OF COMPLAINT, TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT OF APPEAL.
The Court of Appeal for Ontario, clerks, not only reviews your documents for filing, they are also now, making decisions on your documents, that only a judge should also make. In my case, the staff at the COA, blocked a motion for leave to appeal, the decision of a single judge, of the Divisional court, some months ago, telling me that it must be heard by the panel first. At the same time, it also allowed another motion for leave, of a another single judge of the Divisional court's decision, to be filed in the COA and also assigned a file number to that document. Why the discrepancy, since both decisions, were made by single motions judges, of the Divisional court?. When you look deeper into the situation, you get to see, that the clerks, were actually trying to personally, interfere. in the cases before the COA, by deciding which case gets through and which ones do not. (I will be expanding, on this article, soon).
THE PROBLEM, WITH THE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, IN THE CANADIAN COURT. THIS SENIOR ONTARIO JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, HAVE AN ISSUE, WITH ME PUBLICLY REPORTING, ON HIS ACTIONS, AS A JUDGE
THIS SENIOR JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, SEEM TO HAVE A PROBLEM, WITH ME TALKNG PUBLICL...
-
JUST IN CASE YOU'VE BEEN DOUBTING MY REPORTS ON THIS BLOG ON THE CORRUPTION OF THE TORONTO POLICE. HERE ARE A FEW MORE DOCUMENTED REPORT...
-
SHELLYANN PEREIRA, PARALEGAL SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, LEGAL SERVICES, SPEREIRA LEGAL SERVICES THE UNETHICAL CONDUCT, THAT EXIST BETWEEN SHELLY...
-
A PLOT OF THE CANADIAN POLICE AND CORRUPT CITY OFFICIALS, TO CONTINUE TO HARASS ME AND TO ATTEMPT TO FRAME ME UP AND ALSO SILENCE ME. AC...