HUGES IDHOLO, THE MAN WHO WAS CHARGED, ON JULY 9, BY THE POLICE, FOR "THREATENING AN ANIMAL".
THE MAN HAD TRIED, TO MURDER, THE ANIMAL AND ALSO TOLD THE POLICE, OF HIS INTENTION, TO KILL THE ANIMAL.
THE TORONTO POLICE, 14 DIVISION, ALSO DID NOT COMPLY, WITH THE LAW, REGARDING HIS RELEASE.
He was released immediately and without any undertaking, by the police.
The police also knew that his actions involved violence, or threats of violence, including direct statement madet to the police by the accused, of his intentions, to commit a violent act, in this case.
IDHOLO HUGUES, OR HUGUES IDHOLO?
According to the police report, Idholo Hugues, is the right name for this man, who had almost brutally, murdered my animal, on July 9, 2012. I was contesting the name of this man, by the police, from the moment, they had arrested him, on July 9th and one of the arresting officers, also commented, that, "its not what you tell us his name is, it's what he tell us his name is". He is known to use both names, interchangeably.
From the beginning, the police, has also tried to protect him and they are also, proceeding, with their charges against him for threatening to kill an animal, my cat, with the fictitious name of Idholo Hugues, in order to protect this criminal. The man was also in court, at Old City Hall courthouse, in Toronto, on August 21, 2012 and since then, I've been waiting to get his bail conditions, which for some reason, also, the court cannot find. It has been missing from his file in the court.
I also spoke with these managers, at both the Old City Hall courthouse and College Park court, Susan Nhiem and Pat Mckinnon and they all claimed to be "looking for his bail conditions" and will get back to me about it. When I also reminded them, that, they are also, endangering my safety, and also the safety of the public, by also not providing that document, they've responded, that, they are aware of this and will also try to get that document to me. In a letter from the victim witness program, at Old City Hall, to me, on August 15, also has the accused, Hugues Idholo's name, written as Idholo Hugues. I also share the same address, with this man and also know him, by different names, including Alphonzo and Hugues Idholo Yala.
I have also been able to get the following information about him:
1. He is African national and also from the Repulic of the Congo.
2. He has been living in Canada for 3 years.
3. He has no family, or relatives, living in Canada,
4. He is a single male, 34 years old.
5. He has previously been on welfare, and also under the name, of Hugues Idholo Yala
6. He also currently works as a labourer.
7. He has also been known, to receive, government documents, at his present address, with the name of Hugues Idholo and not Idholo Hugues, as the Toronto police, 14 division, in their corruption, regarding this case, has also claimed.
8. His landlord, also, allegedly, claimed that the room that he has rented, since
November of 2011, he has also done so, using a different name, and in fact, she
did not recognized him, as Hugues Idholo, either.
I will also post a copy, of my letter, from the court, which also shows, his name, on court documents, as Idholo Hugues and not Hugues Idholo. And this may also be, why his bail release document, with the same name, is also "missing" from the court file, currently. One of the managers of that court, Old City Hall courthouse, has also told me, that, she is not sure if the police, had in fact, forwarded, his release conditions, to the court. It turns out that the police had also not entered into any undertakings with the accuses, despite the charge, which also involved violence. The charge that the police laid against the accused is for "threatening an animal' and one would also think that the very act of threatening also involved violence, not withstanding that the accused was also heard on the 911 tape, telling of his intention also to kill the animal. The police also violated the criminal code by also not entering into an undertaking, with the accused, and this is also contrary, to the law. The 14 division police had also released him on a form 10, which is just a promise to appear, in court, and also backed on to the same property, where I also lived, with my animal, that he also tried to kill and also threatened to kill, on July 9, 2012. The fact that the man was also in court, on August 21, also seemed unlikely that the court, also did not have that document, as well.
The Toronto police has claimed, on July 9, that, they also had to hear, the 911 tape first, in which the man, Hugues Idholo, could also be heard, threatening to kill my animal, before they also arrested him. After they had listened to the 911 tape, in their police cruisers, they then took the man, to the police station and released him shortly after wards. I was also told by the police, 14 division, that they had a "discussion" at the station and then decided to release him. Keep in mind that this incident, also involved, a weapon, a knife and the police claimed that they made the right decision, to release the man, Hugues Idholo, in this case. They also disregarded the fact, that, he had also told them directly, that he also intended to kill the animal, both on the 911 tape and also when they were arresting him. The police also release the man, into the same property, as the victims, after his release. His bail conditions is also "missing" from the court file, as well. And also endangering further, the victims safety, in this case.
I believe that both the police and the court, are also working, together, to protect the accused, and also to prevent justice, in this case.
THE MAN HAD TRIED, TO MURDER, THE ANIMAL AND ALSO TOLD THE POLICE, OF HIS INTENTION, TO KILL THE ANIMAL.
THE TORONTO POLICE, 14 DIVISION, ALSO DID NOT COMPLY, WITH THE LAW, REGARDING HIS RELEASE.
He was released immediately and without any undertaking, by the police.
The police also knew that his actions involved violence, or threats of violence, including direct statement madet to the police by the accused, of his intentions, to commit a violent act, in this case.
IDHOLO HUGUES, OR HUGUES IDHOLO?
According to the police report, Idholo Hugues, is the right name for this man, who had almost brutally, murdered my animal, on July 9, 2012. I was contesting the name of this man, by the police, from the moment, they had arrested him, on July 9th and one of the arresting officers, also commented, that, "its not what you tell us his name is, it's what he tell us his name is". He is known to use both names, interchangeably.
From the beginning, the police, has also tried to protect him and they are also, proceeding, with their charges against him for threatening to kill an animal, my cat, with the fictitious name of Idholo Hugues, in order to protect this criminal. The man was also in court, at Old City Hall courthouse, in Toronto, on August 21, 2012 and since then, I've been waiting to get his bail conditions, which for some reason, also, the court cannot find. It has been missing from his file in the court.
I also spoke with these managers, at both the Old City Hall courthouse and College Park court, Susan Nhiem and Pat Mckinnon and they all claimed to be "looking for his bail conditions" and will get back to me about it. When I also reminded them, that, they are also, endangering my safety, and also the safety of the public, by also not providing that document, they've responded, that, they are aware of this and will also try to get that document to me. In a letter from the victim witness program, at Old City Hall, to me, on August 15, also has the accused, Hugues Idholo's name, written as Idholo Hugues. I also share the same address, with this man and also know him, by different names, including Alphonzo and Hugues Idholo Yala.
I have also been able to get the following information about him:
1. He is African national and also from the Repulic of the Congo.
2. He has been living in Canada for 3 years.
3. He has no family, or relatives, living in Canada,
4. He is a single male, 34 years old.
5. He has previously been on welfare, and also under the name, of Hugues Idholo Yala
6. He also currently works as a labourer.
7. He has also been known, to receive, government documents, at his present address, with the name of Hugues Idholo and not Idholo Hugues, as the Toronto police, 14 division, in their corruption, regarding this case, has also claimed.
8. His landlord, also, allegedly, claimed that the room that he has rented, since
November of 2011, he has also done so, using a different name, and in fact, she
did not recognized him, as Hugues Idholo, either.
I will also post a copy, of my letter, from the court, which also shows, his name, on court documents, as Idholo Hugues and not Hugues Idholo. And this may also be, why his bail release document, with the same name, is also "missing" from the court file, currently. One of the managers of that court, Old City Hall courthouse, has also told me, that, she is not sure if the police, had in fact, forwarded, his release conditions, to the court. It turns out that the police had also not entered into any undertakings with the accuses, despite the charge, which also involved violence. The charge that the police laid against the accused is for "threatening an animal' and one would also think that the very act of threatening also involved violence, not withstanding that the accused was also heard on the 911 tape, telling of his intention also to kill the animal. The police also violated the criminal code by also not entering into an undertaking, with the accused, and this is also contrary, to the law. The 14 division police had also released him on a form 10, which is just a promise to appear, in court, and also backed on to the same property, where I also lived, with my animal, that he also tried to kill and also threatened to kill, on July 9, 2012. The fact that the man was also in court, on August 21, also seemed unlikely that the court, also did not have that document, as well.
The Toronto police has claimed, on July 9, that, they also had to hear, the 911 tape first, in which the man, Hugues Idholo, could also be heard, threatening to kill my animal, before they also arrested him. After they had listened to the 911 tape, in their police cruisers, they then took the man, to the police station and released him shortly after wards. I was also told by the police, 14 division, that they had a "discussion" at the station and then decided to release him. Keep in mind that this incident, also involved, a weapon, a knife and the police claimed that they made the right decision, to release the man, Hugues Idholo, in this case. They also disregarded the fact, that, he had also told them directly, that he also intended to kill the animal, both on the 911 tape and also when they were arresting him. The police also release the man, into the same property, as the victims, after his release. His bail conditions is also "missing" from the court file, as well. And also endangering further, the victims safety, in this case.
I believe that both the police and the court, are also working, together, to protect the accused, and also to prevent justice, in this case.
