THE REASON, THAT PETER WALLACE, THE ACTING CITY
MANAGER, FOR TORONTO, NEED TO BE REPLACED.
The Toronto City Manager, has reneged on his promise while taking office. And to act, according to his own words, with " openness, transparency and accountability". Wallace, in fact, has acted corruptly. He has not only reneged on his promise, but he has also not fulfilled his obligations, set out by Toronto City Council, on some of his other duties regarding his office.
Peter Wallace, perpetrates, the systematic racism that
exist in Canada, by also carrying out some of those actions, directly, himself.
WHAT TORONTONIANS, NEED TO KNOW, ABOUT THE NEW CITY MANAGER, PETER WALLACE:
HE PROMOTES RACISM AND INTOLERANCE, HE ACTS CORRUPT, HIMSELF. AND HE IS NOT ABOUT THE INTEGRATION OF SOCIETY, BUT THE EXCLUSION OF OTHER GROUPS, BY TREATING THEM WITH CONTEMPT. HE IS ALSO ACCUSED OF COVERING UP, THE INVESTIGATIONS, OF OTHER CORRUPT CANADIAN OFFICIALS, AT THE LOCAL LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT.
When Peter Wallace, the current Acting City Manager,
for Toronto, was competing for the position, and also for the highest administrative
job, with the city of Toronto. He also ran on a platform of making the local
municipal government, “more transparent and accountable”, according to him. In
the few months since he has taken over the position, however, Peter Wallace has
done the very opposite, of what he said that he was going to do. Which is to
act corruptly, himself.
Not only that, the city manager is also accused of
being outright racist, towards certain members of a minority group. Wallace also
refused to investigate, as he should, other corrupt members of the local
government. He and his staff are also involved in the cover-up, regarding those
investigations. And he has stalled any and all investigations, involving those persons. It was Wallace's executive assistant, Julie Scarchello, who also came on record, saying that her boss, Peter Wallace, is indeed looking into the allegations, of those other city officials. And there is absolutely no proof provided by that office, that this is the case. What has instead come to light, since she gave that interview on camera, was that both she and the City Manager, has been working with others, to undermine the very investigation. In other words to cover it up. And this also coming from someone, who also holds one of the highest positions, in government, albeit at the local level.
Toronto speaks of tolerance, multiculturalism, and all of the things that one should also expect from a government, that respects the different members, of society. The reality of course, is much different. The local government in Canada, is just as corrupt, as those in the higher levels. In fact, you might see more corrupt practices, at the local level, than you would also get to see, at the higher levels of government, in Canada.
The reason is because those government officials, at the local level, also deal with the public, one on one. So the public gets to see them in action. And it is not always positive. Sometimes, behind the facade that they like to wear, they will also show their true colors. The right circumstances, will often bring out what they are truly about. Not the image that they also present to the public, but the one which they upholds, behind closed door. Whether at City Hall, or in their private interactions with the public. This is where you will see the evidence of corruption, from them. And also evidence of their true nature, or personality. Including those harboring racist attitudes, towards other members of society.
If we are foolish enough to take the words of this corrupt civil servant, literally, when upon taking over his role as the City Manager, where he has also falsely stated, that, "We have an obligation to be transparent and
accountable”. And that he will also operate his office with “openness, transparency and accountability”.
Does he, as the City Manager, also believe that only some members of the public,
deserve to be treated in such manner , while others do not? Is that the reason
why he has acted racist, towards certain members of society, himself? We know
that these people who run the city are not what they also profess to be,
publicly. They have their own personal prejudices and bias. Which, not to the
surprise of any, also comes out on specific occasions, where they are
concerned.
