CROWN ATTORNEY, ANDREW PILA, HAS A HABIT, OF WITHDRAWING, CRIMINAL CHARGES, TO PROTECT THE ACCUSED, IN EVERY CASE THAT INVOLVES ME. I AM CONCERNED, THAT THIS TREND TO BLOCK ALL CRIMINAL CHARGES, AGAINST PERSONS, WHO HAVE COMMITTED CRIMES AGAINST ME, EVEN IN THE FACE OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, SUCH AS VIDEOS OF THE ACCUSED ACTIONS, WILL CONTINUE TO INTERFERE WITH MY RIGHTS, AND TO PERVERT JUSTICE, IN THOSE CASES.
IF A CROWN ATTORNEY, SUCH AS ANDREW PILA, DECIDED TO BLOCK CRIMINAL CHARGES, AGAINST AN ACCUSED, WHEN THERE ARE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, OF A CRIME BEING COMMITTED, SUCH AS VIDEO EVIDENCE, THEN ON THE FACE OF IT, THAT IS OBVIOUSLY CORRUPTION.
WE SHOULD BE ALL CONCERNED, WHEN A CROWN ATTORNEY, DOES NOT ACT, IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC, OR IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
SUCH IS THE CASE, WITH ANDREW PILA, THE HEAD CROWN ATTORNEY, AT THE 1911 EGLINGTON AVENUE EAST, COURT HOUSE IN SCARBOROUGH. AND SO PROFOUND ARE THE NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS OF HIS ACTIONS, TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND TO ME, IN PARTICULAR, AS I HAVE HAD TO DEAL WITH THIS CROWN ATTORNEY, ON MORE THAN ONE OCCASIONS, RESULTING IN A LETTER OF COMPLAINT, TO THE MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL.
I AM NOT ALONE IN MY CONCERN, REGARDING CROWN ATTORNEYS, WHO GO BEYOND, WHAT THEIR LEGAL REQUIREMENTS, DICTATES. AND ENDS UP CONDUCTING, A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE. NO ONE CAN THEN BELIEVE IN A LEGAL SYSTEM, THAT IS FAIR AND JUST. BUT INSTEAD WE ARE FACED WITH A PROBLEM SO GRAVE, THAT IN THE FACE ON INTERNATIONAL LAWS, ON THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS, THE CANADIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS A JOKE. THE PROBLEM LIES IN THE FACT, THAT COMPLAINTS AGAINST CROWN ATTORNEYS, ARE GENERALLY NOT MADE PUBLIC. JUST LIKE COMPLAINTS AGAINST JUDGES AND JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. THERE IS A MASSIVE COVER-UP, WHEN THEY SCREW UP. THE END RESULT IS THAT LIVES ARE AFFECTED AND THEY DO NOT HAVE TO ANSWER FOR THEIR ACTIONS.
THE PRE-ENQUETTE HEARING, UNDER SECTION 504 AND 507, OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA, ALLOWS THE PUBLIC TO INITIATE PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS, WHEN THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SUCCESSFUL, IN DEALING WITH THE POLICE. THE LAW ALLOWS THE PERSON, TO PROSECUTE ANYONE WHO HAS COMMITTED, A CRIME AGAINST THEM. IT ALSO ALLOW THEM TO APPEAL THE DECISION, WHEN THERE IS EVIDENCE, THAT THERE MAY BE A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE, ON THE PART OF THE PROSECUTOR, OR THE COURT, CONCERNING THOSE CHARGES. I WILL CITE SEVERAL CASES THAT WAS HEARD BY THE ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL AND THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. SO IT IS NOT UNCOMMON FOR CROWN ATTORNEYS, OR PROSECUTORS, OR JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, WHO ARE THE ONES TO HEAR THOSE CASES. RARELY, IF EVER, IS A PRE-ENQUETTE HEARING, PRESIDED OVER BY A JUDGE. IT IS ALWAYS CONDUCTED BY JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. SOMETIMES RESULTING IN SERIOUS ERRORS OF LAW, SINCE MOST ONTARIO JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, DO NOT EVEN HAVE A LEGAL BACKGROUND. YET THEY ARE DECIDING ON CASES, EVERYDAY. BUT IT IS THE ISSUE INVOLVING THE CROWN ATTORNEYS, ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, THAT SHOULD BE OF CONCERN HERE. THEY HAVE A LOT OF INFLUENCE IN THE COURTROOM, RELATING TO THAT SECTION OF THE LAW. SUCH AS IF A SUMMONS OR A WARRANT, SHOULD BE ISSUED FOR THE ACCUSED, ONCE PROCESS HAS BEEN ISSUED. AND IF THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, IS UNWILLING TO DO SO, THEN THE CROWN ATTORNEY ON BEHALF OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, CAN POINT OUT IN THE LAW, WHERE THAT ACTION IS ALSO NECESSARY, TO PROTECT THE VICTIM. BUT WHEN THERE IS CORRUPTION, THEY DO NOT INTERVENE, EXCEPT TO BLOCK THE CHARGES, AS IN CASES RELATING TO ME. AND TO INTERFERE WITH THE NATURAL PRACTICE OF JUSTICE AND TO ACT CORRUPT.
THE TORONTO STAR WROTE AN ARTICLE, ON THE MINISTER OF ATTORNEY GENERAL'S LACK OF CONTROL, IN DEALING WITH THIS PROBLEM. WHAT IT OVERLOOKED IN THAT ARTICLE, IS THAT THE COURT ITSELF IS VERY CORRUPT.
* THERE SHOULD BE CAMERAS, RECORDING ALL PRE-ENQUETTE HEARINGS, TO PROTECT THE VICTIMS. AND TO EXPOSED THE WRONG DOINGS IN THE COURTROOM, OF JUDGES, JUSTICES OF THE PEACE AND CROWN ATTORNEYS.
* PRE-ENQETTE HEARINGS, ARE SUPPOSED TO BE VIDEO RECORDED AND IN CAMERA HEARINGS, BUT THIS IS NOT ENFORCED, IN ANY CANADIAN COURTS.
