Saturday, June 6, 2020

MAN BANGED ON MY WINDOW AND POLICE MAJOR CRIME UNIT SHOWED UP.

A MAN BANGED ON MY WINDOW, PROMPTING
ME TO CALL 911, AFTER THE POLICE REGULAR LINE, WAS BUSY. THE MAN IN QUESTION, HAD A HISTORY OF
VIOLENT ATTACKS AGAINST ME.
POLICE HAVE NEVER ARRESTED HIM, THOUGH HE WAS
BRIEFLY HANDCUFFED, AND THEN RELEASED AT THE SCENE, IN WHAT POLICE DESCRIBED, AS A 'MISTAKEN", IDENTITY.

THE POLICE CLAIMED, THAT THEY WERE (ALSO) ALLEGEDLY INVESTIGATING, A CALL FROM TWO DAYS AGO, FROM ANOTHER TENANT, LISA PRESAUD, ALLEGEDLY, ABOUT A MAN KICKING HER DOOR. BUT THOSE SAME POLICE OFFICERS, ALSO ATTENDED MY 911 CALL, THAT WAS MADE EARLIER.
THE OTHER TENANT'S ALLEDGE COMPLAINT, IS EERILY SIMILAR TO MINE. THE SUSPECT IN MY CASE, HAD ALSO KICKED MY DOOR IN LAST YEAR AND UNPROVOKED. HE WAS NEVER ARRESTED AND CHARGED, BY THE POLICE.

SO MY 911 CALL TO THE POLICE, OVER MY SAFETY CONCERNS, PROMPTED, THE MAJOR CRIMES UNIT, TO SHOW UP. ALLEGEDLY, BECAUSE OF MY NEIGHBOR'S CALL TO THE POLICE, TWO DAYS AGO. AND OVER A POSSIBLE BREAK AND ENTER, WHEN THE POLICE CLAIMED, THAT, A MAN HAD KICKED HER DOOR IN. 

SO THE 41 DIVISION POLICE, TOOK TWO DAYS TO RESPOND, TO 
AN ALEDGE  BREAK AND ENTER? AND WE ARE LED TO BELIEVE THAT THIS WAS THE REASON, THAT THE POLICE UNIT AT THE SCENE WAS, THE MAJOR CRIME UNIT? ALLEGEDLY, OVER A DOOR THAT SHOWED, NO VISIBLE SIGN OF DAMAGE.

ALL OF THOSE FIVE POLICE OFFICERS, WERE IN PLAIN CLOTHES CLOTHES. AND WERE ALSO FROM THE TORONTO POLICE 41 DIVISION. THEIR BADGE NUMBERS ARE, Badge # 10813, Badge # 8192, Badge # 10925, Badge # 90057, Badge # 90055. The event number is 1037293.

THE OTHER TENANT, LISA PRESAUD, WHOSE RENTAL UNIT, WAS ALLEGEDLY BROKEN INTO, WAS HOME AT THE TIME OF THE POLICE VISIT, THOUGH I DO NOT RECALLED, SEEING ANY DAMAGED, TO THE DOOR. IF THERE WERE, I COULD NOT SEE IT. OR IT WAS NOT EXTENSIVE. OR BOTH. 
I DO RECALLED THAT ONE OF THE PLAIN CLOTHES
OFFICERS, MAY HAVE MENTIONED TO ME, THAT HE WAS FROM THE DRUG UNIT. I BELIEVED THAT WAS WHAT HE SAID. AND THE BUILDING, IS ALSO BEING USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. AS I HAVE MENTIONED, IN OTHER ARTICLES. BUT ANOTHER POLICE OFFICER, STEVE COTES, CLAIMED, THAT THE UNIT THAT WAS ON THE SCENE, WAS THE MAJOR CRIMES UNIT.  AND THAT THE MALE SUSPECT, INITIALLY HANDCUFFED, BY THE POLICE, IN REGARDS TO THE ATTACK ON ME, RELATING TO MY 911 CALL TO THE POLICE, ON JUNE 5th, AND THE BREAK AND ENTER, INTO MY HOME LAST YEAR, WAS ALSO ALLEGEDLY, TAKEN AS THE SUSPECT, IN THE OTHER TENANT, LISA PRESARD'S, ALLEGED BREAK AND ENTER COMPLAINT, BY THE SAME PLAIN CLOTHES, POLICE OFFICERS, FROM 41 DIVISION. I ALSO SAW A COUPLE OF UNIFORMED POLICE OFFICERS, AT THE SCENE, RESPONDING TO MY 911 CALL AS WELL.

MY ENTIRE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE POLICE, WAS ABOUT 
THEM FAILING TO ARREST THE MAN, WHO I HAD IDENTIFIED TO THE POLICE, AS THE PERSON WHO HAD CARRIED OUT, THE ATTACKS AGAINST ME. INCLUDING A BREAK AND ENTER LAST YEAR AND WHO THE POLICE HAD ALSO LET GO, MORE THAN ONCE, ONLY TO CONTINUE TO POSED A DANGER TO ME.  IT MAY BE OF INTEREST TO SOME, THAT HE IS ALSO CLOSELY RELATED, OR ASSOCIATED, TO ANGELA STERLING, THE OWNER OF THE (ILLEGAL) BUILDING. AND THE OTHER DISTURBING FACT, IS THAT SHE IS ALSO CLOSELY ASSOCIATED, WITH THE POLICE, I BELIEVED. AND I BELIEVED, ALSO, WITH GOOD EVIDENCE TO BACK IT UP.

I AM ALSO HIGHLY REGARDED AS A BLOGGER, WHO HAS BEEN KNOWN TO REPORT AND DISSEMINATE INFORMATION, WITH THE EVIDENCE TO BACK UP MY CLAIM.  AND THIS REPORT, ABOUT THE POLICE INVESTIGATION, INTO MY COMPLAINT, IS ALSO NO EXCEPTION. THE POLICE IS AWARE, THAT I ALWAYS  RECORD MY INTERACTIONS, WITH THE POLICE AND ESPECIALLY, IN REGARDS TO MY PERSONAL SAFETY.

RECENTLY, A BLACK WOMAN HAS DIED IN POLICE PRESENCE. WHEN THE POLICE UNIT ON THE SCENE, OF AN INVESTIGATION, IS THE MAJOR CRIME UNIT, FOR A SUSPECT BANGING ON YOUR WINDOW, ONE SHOULD BE CONCERNED.

THERE ARE RECENT PROTESTS, OVER POLICE BRUTALITY, AND I HAVE LIVED IT. THIS REALITY IS ALL TOO FREQUENT TO ME. 
THERE IS A RECORDED VERSION, OF MY INTERACTION WITH THE POLICE, AS USUAL. SINCE I BELIEVE THAT IT ALSO PROTECTS MY SAFETY.  AND MAY ALSO BE OF PUBLIC INTEREST, TO PROTECT ONE'S BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS. I DID ADVISED THE POLICE, THAT THEY WERE BEING RECORDED, AS A SAFETY PRECAUTION. A RIGHT THAT I AND EVERYONE ELSE SHOULD HAVE, IN THEIR OWN HOME.     





THE PROBLEM, WITH THE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, IN THE CANADIAN COURT. THIS SENIOR ONTARIO JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, HAVE AN ISSUE, WITH ME PUBLICLY REPORTING, ON HIS ACTIONS, AS A JUDGE

THIS SENIOR JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, SEEM TO HAVE A PROBLEM, WITH ME TALKNG PUBLICL...