URGENT!!!TORONTO DIVISIONAL COURT STAFF, IS BLOCKING MY EFFORTS. SAURABH BAWEJA AND TAKESHA GENTLES, HAVE IGNORED MY REQUEST, AS PART OF MY APPEAL, IN PROVIDING ME WITH A STAY, FROM THE COURT, UNTIL MY APPEAL BEFORE, THE PANEL OF JUDGES CAN BE HEARD, AGAINST THE ORDER OF, JUDGE MICHEAL PENNY'S DECISION.

THIS IS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!!!

THE ACTIONS, OF THE REGISTRAR, TAKESHA GENTLES AND THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, SAURABH BAWEJA AND OTHER STAFF, OF THE DIVISIONAL COURT, IN TORONTO, SHOULD BE REGARDED, AS AN ATTEMPT, TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, IN MY CASE. 

THE DELIBERATE, DELAY, IN PROVIDING ME WITH THE STAY, AS PART OF THE PROCEDURE, AND WHICH THE COURT KNOW THAT I NEED, AND THAT ANY DELAY IN DOING SO, WILL CAUSED ME HARM, SHOULD NOT BE OVERLOOKED, AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS AN ATTEMPT TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND TO INTERFERE WITH THE NATURAL COURSE OF JUSTICE.

AS PART OF THE DELAY, MY EMAILS HAVE BEEN IGNORED, BY THE COURT, IN THE MATTER.  DUE TO THE COVID-19 SITUATION AND THE EMERGENCY ORDER, IN PLACE, COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE COURT, IS DONE ELECTRONICALLY, AS THE COURT IS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC. 

I WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED, IF THE JUDGE IS ALSO NOT INVOLVED, IN THIS CONSPIRACY, I BELIEVE, TO CAUSE ME TO BE EVICTED. IF THAT HAPPENS, I HAVE EXPOSED THEIR ACTION HERE, NOW ON MY BLOG. THERE IS NO OTHER LOGICAL REASON FOR THE DELAY, BY THE COURT STAFF, IN THIS MATTER. 

THE ORDER THAT WAS ISSUED, BY JUDGE MICHAEL PENNY, ON FEBRUARY 22, 2021, WHICH ALSO HAVE ERRORS IN IT, BECAUSE HE HAS MADE PROVISIONS IN THE ORDER, THAT WAS NOT IN THE MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT. ERRORS, WHICH THE COURT HAS NOW RECOGNIZED AND IS NOW ASKING THE DEFENDANT'S LAWYER, JAFARI DELARAM TO AMEND, BY DRAFTING UP A NEW ORDER AND FOR THE JUDGE, MICHAEL PENNY, TO MAKE THE NECESSARY CHANGES, TO THE NEW ORDER. 

AND WHILE THE DIVISIONAL COURT, IS IGNORING MY REQUEST, IT IS ON THE OTHER HAND, WORKING IN AN EXPEDITIOUS MANNER, IN GRANTING THE REQUEST OF THE DEFENDANT'S LAWYER, JAFARI DELARAM. WHOSE HEARSAY MOTION TO QUASH MY APPEAL, WAS GRANTED BY THE JUDGE MICHAEL PENNY AND THEREBY LIFTING THE STAY, REGARDING MY APPEAL. THE EVICTION ITSELF IS EXPEDITED, SO THE DELAY BY THE COURT, TO DEAL WITH MY MATTER FOR A STAY, IS OBVIOUSLY INTENDED, TO CAUSE ME HARM.

WHILE THE APPEAL OF MY MOTON, TO THE PANEL OF JUDGES, IS PROCEEDING, THROUGH THE COURT. THE COURT IS ALSO SUPPOSE TO PROVIDE ME WITH THE STAY, UNTIL THE MATTER IS HEARD, BY THE COURT. UPON  FILING A MOTION AND REQUESTING A STAY, UNTIL THE CASE IS REVIEWED BY THE PANEL OF JUDGES, HAVE BEEN IGNORED, FOR SOME REASON.  SINCE I HAVE FILED MY DOCUMENTS WITH THE COURT, YESTERDAY, ON FEBRUARY 22ND, AFTER THE ORDER WAS MADE, THEIR DELIBERATE DELAY, BY IGNORING, THE MOTION FOR A STAY, IS SO THAT I CAN BE EVICTED. 

JUDGE MICHEAL PENNY, OF THE DIVISIONAL COURT, AND THE COURT STAFF, HAS BEEN DOING EVERYTHING, IN THEIR POWER, TO ASSIST THE DEFENDANT, THROUGH HER LAWYER, JAFARI DELARAM, AGAINST MY APPEAL.

THE NATURAL PROCESS OF JUSTICE, DO NOT SEEM TO APPLY, IN MY CASE, WHEN MY EFFORTS ARE BEING BLOCKED, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS, AS PART OF THE PERSECUTION, THAT I AM FACING.

MY MATTER IS URGENT, OTHERWISE MY RIGHTS, WILL BE ABUSED BY THE COURT AND I WILL SUFFER IRREVOCABLE HARM.

MY RIGHTS WERE ALREADY ABUSED, BY THE JUDGE MICHAEL PENNY, YESTERDAY, WHO UPHELD A HEARSAY MOTION, THAT WAS FILED TO DISMISS MY APPEAL AND TO LIFT THE STAY, PENDING MY APPEAL. THE MOTION ITSELF, WAS INADMISSIBLE AND LACKED ANY MERIT. AND THE EVIDENCE IN IT, WHICH IT HAS RELIED UPON, WAS PROVIDED, NOT BY THE DEFENDANT, BUT BY HER COUNSEL, WHO WAS A THIRD PARTY AND THE ONLY DEPONENT, IN THE MOTION. MAKING IT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND DISQUALIFYING IT TO BE HEARD, MUCH LESS GRANTED BY THE JUDGE MICHAEL PENNY, WHO HAVE IGNORED ALL OF THIS, IN HIS DECISION TO GRANT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION, TO DISMISS MY APPEAL.  THIS IS PART OF THEIR CONSPIRACY TO HAVE ME EVICTED AND TO BECOME HOMELESS. THE DELAY OF THE COURT IS CAUSING ME HARM AND THIS KIND OF CORRUPTION SHOULD NOT BE TOLERATED.

NOTE: I HAVE SINCE ABANDONED MY APPEAL, IN THE DIVISIONAL COURT AND HAS NOW FILED AN APPEAL IN THE HIGHER COURT, THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. THE COURT WAS SERVED WITH MY NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT AND MY CASE IN THE DIVISIONAL COURT IS FINISHED, AS OF NOW.