Thursday, August 5, 2021

THE TORONTO POLICE 12 DIVISION AND THEIR CONSPIRACY, TO FORCE ME TO BECOME HOMELESS. THIS IS TIED TO, BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. ILLEGALLY CHANGING THE LOCK ON MY DOOR, CONTRARY TO SECTION 104, OF THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT.

LET'S BE CLEAR, ABOUT THE TORONTO POLICE, CONTINUED ATTACKS AGAINST ME. WHEN BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. CHANGED THE LOCK ON MY APARTMENT DOOR, ON AUGUST 4TH, AND AGAIN ON AUGUST 5TH, WITHOUT AN ORDER FROM THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. AND ALSO CONTRARY, TO THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT, SEC. 104, WHICH PROTECTS ME AS A TENANT, THE TORONTO POLICE WAS INVOLVED, AND WAS A PART OF THE CONSPIRACY, WITH BARNEY RIVERS MANAGEMENT STAFF, TO FORCE ME TO BECOME HOMELESS. 

IT WAS IN FACT, THE TORONTO POLICE 12 DIVISION, ATTEMPT TO SET ME UP AND TO HAVE ME ARRESTED.  DESPITE THE ILLEGAL ACTIONS, OF THE PEOPLE INVOLVED. THEY ALSO TOOK THE TIME TO THREATENED AND INTIMIDATED ME, AGAINST CHANGING THE LOCK BACK,  AFTER IT WAS CHANGED ILLEGALLY AND WITHOUT AN ORDER OF THE L&T BOARD, OR THE COURT. 
(I PLAN TO PROTEST THE POLICE LATEST ACTIONS, TO FORCE ME TO BECOME HOMELESS, AS THEY ARE MAINLY BEHIND THIS LATEST ATTACK). 
I ALSO PLAN TO FILE AN URGENT REQUEST FOR HELP, WITH THE UN'S OHCHR, AGAINST THOSE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, INVOLVING TORTURE AGAINST ME.


BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT STAFF, WORKING AT THE PROPERTY, EVEN GAVE AWAY MY ANIMALS, TO A TENANT IN THE BUILDING AND HIS FRIEND. WHEN THE POLICE WAS CALLED, HE DISCLOSED TO THE POLICE THAT MY CATS, WERE IN HIS APARTMENT AND THE POLICE AND I WENT TO RETRIEVED THEM. LATER THAT NIGHT, HIS FRIEND BROUGHT MY OTHER CAT BACK. 

ALL OF THIS WAS ORCHESTRATED, BY THE POLICE AND BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, I BELIEVE. EVIDENCE OF THIS CONSPIRACY, WAS SEEM IN HOW THE TORONTO POLICE 12 DIVISION, WAS NOT EVEN INTERESTED, IN INVESTIGATING, HOW MY ANIMALS WERE STOLEN FROM MY APARTMENT AND WAS GIVEN AWAY BY BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. EMPLOYEES AT THE RENTAL OFFICE, IN THE BUILDING WHERE I LIVE. THEY CLAIMED THAT I HAD ABANDONED MY CATS AND WAS GONE FOR THREE DAYS, AND MY FORMER ROOMMATE, HAD ASKED THEM TO REMOVED THE CATS. THIS WAS A BLATANT LIE. LIE. THE FORMER TENANT AND I HAVE KNOWN EACH OTHER FOR OVER 40 YEARS. AND SHE ALSO CONSIDERS ME AS A DAUGHTER. NOT ONLY WOULD SHE NOT HAVE TOLD THEM THAT, BUT SHE WAS NOT EVEN AWARE OF WHAT THEY WERE DOING. 

SO HOW COULD THEY HAVE CONCOCTED SUCH A STORY?. BECAUSE THE POLICE WANTED ME TO LOSE MY HOME AND MY ANIMALS, AS A MEANS OF PUNISHMENT. THEY WANTED TO SEE ME HOMELESS AND ALSO CONTRIVED THE PLOT TO HAVE MY ANIMALS TAKEN FROM MY APARTMENT, IN THE PROCESS. THEY WANTED TO SEE ME LOSE MY HOME, MY ANIMALS AND MY JOB AND TO BECOME HOMELESS. IT IS DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN A JOB AND TO CARE FOR YOUR ANIMALS, WHEN YOU ARE HOMELESS. THIS WAS THE POLICE INVOLVEMENT, IN THE CONSPIRACY ALONG WITH BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. EMPLOYEES, TO FORCE ME OUT OF MY HOME, ILLEGALLY. IT IS A REPEATED ACTION OF THE POLICE, FROM PAST EXPERIENCES. SO I KNOW THAT THEY WERE ALSO INVOLVED, IN HAVING THE LOCK CHANGED ON MY APARTMENT DOOR, ILLEGALLY. 

SECTION 104, OF THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT AND HOW IT PROTECTS ME AS A TENANT, CONTRARY TO THE EFFORTS OF BARNEY RIVERS INVESTMENT INC. AND ITS EMPLOYEES, WHO HAVE TRIED TO CIRCUMVENT THE ACT AND OTHER SECTIONS OF THE ACT AND OF THE LAW ITSELF, BY ILLEGALLY CHANGING THE LOCKS TWICE, ON MY APARTMENT DOOR, WITHOUT AN EVICTION ORDER FROM THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. 

Section 104 of the Residential Tenancies Act, grant the assignment of a lease, to an occupant of a rental unit after 60 days, if the landlord did not take steps to evict the tenant, or the occupant, within that time and the occupant, called an 'unauthorized occupant', up until that time, is now regarded under the law, as the tenant of the rental unit and also the lease holder. 

My roommate recently moved out of the rental apartment, at the end of June, while I have continued to stay in the apartment, and at the same time paying rent for the apartment. I have also been living in the apartment for several months, with the knowledge and consent of Barney Rivers Investment Inc, simply for the fact that they had not taken any steps to evict either me or my roommate, after learning that I was an 'unauthorized occupant'. 

On August 3, 2021, I paid Barney Rivers Investment Inc. my rent, in the amount of $1,158.00, by certified check, which they also accepted. Then they turned around 24 hours later and changed the lock on my apartment door, illegally and without an eviction order from the Landlord and Tenant Board. Which they were also required to have, in order to change the lock. 

Barney Rivers Investment Inc. had never gone to the Landlord and Tenant Board to evict me, being aware that the 60 days had passed, in which they were allowed under the law, to do so. Instead they changed the lock illegally, without an eviction order from the Board. Because under sec. 104 of the Residential Tenancies Act, I am now regarded as the tenant and the lease holder, of the rental unit. 

What Barney Rivers Investment Inc. staff did was illegal. When I came home around 6 p.m. I found that my animals were in distress, in the apartment and the rental office was closed. I also contacted the after hours emergency number and the man refused to help me. My neighbor also called the police for me, since my telephone was also locked in my apartment. Eventually, I had to call a locksmith to open the door, so that I could attend to my cats who were in distress and who were locked inside the apartment, including the six week old kittens. 

Because I was not home at the time that they had changed the locks on my door twice, I also believed that the police had assisted them, in carrying out this illegal act against me. As the tenant and the lease holder and no longer an 'unauthorized occupant', pursuant to section 104, of the Residential Tenancies Act, after Barney Rivers Investment Inc. had failed to apply to the L&T Board, to evict me, or my former roommate, after knowing that I was an occupant of the rental unit, the lease was assigned to me, after the 60 days had passed and also after my roommate had moved out of the rental unit. Barney Rivers Investment Inc. staff, was looking for another way, to circumvent the law and to avoid going to the Landlord and Tenant Board. And they did so by changing the lock on my apartment door illegally, after accepting my rent in the full amount, based on the lease that was continued, after I had taken over the rental unit. 

Barney Rivers wanted to raise the rent for the apartment and was prevented from doing so, when the lease continued, after it was assigned to me, under section 104 of the RTA. They were angry that this was the case and found another way to recover circumvent the law, by changing the lock on the door illegally. And I do not believe that they did this illegal act on their own, but with the assistance of others, as a way of continuing with the persecution of me, by abusing my rights under the law.

Related: HARASSMENT TECHNIQUES, USED AGAINST TARGETED INDIVIDUALS, BY THE POLICE.

Harassment techniques - OHCHR 

http://www.ohchr.org>harassment techniques 
at