SYSTEMATIC RACISM AND THE PERSONAL BIAS, OF LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD MEMBERS.
TENANT ILLEGALLY LOCKED OUT AND THE BOARD MEMBER, IAN SPEER'S DECISION, TO CONTINUED WITH THE ILLEGAL LOCK OUT, WHILE MAINTAINING THE TENANCY. IN OTHER WORDS, HE HAS CONDONED, WHAT THE LANDLORD DID, ILLEGALLY..AGAINST THE RTA
I WOULD HAVE BEEN TREATED DIFFERENTLY, IF I WAS WHITE.
PROOF, THAT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, LOCATED AT THE 47 SHEPPARD AVENUE EAST, TORONTO, ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, SUCH AS HARIANYA AND CORINA, KEVIN DEHAAN, AS WELL AS THE VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEERS, ACTIONS AGAINST THE TENANT (ME), IS INTENDED TO CAUSE HER, SERIOUS HARM.
THE TENANT (ME), WAS ILLEGALLY LOCKED OUT AND THE BOARD MEMBER, IAN SPEER'S DECISION, TO CONTINUE WITH THE ILLEGAL LOCK OUT, WHILE MAINTAINING THE TENANCY. IN OTHER WORDS, HE HAS CONDONED, AGAINST THE RTA, WHAT THE LANDLORD DID, ILLEGALLY.
THE EXPEDITED HEARING, MENTIONED IN THE INTERIM ORDER, DATED SEPTEMBER 22ND, FROM VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEERS, AND THE ACTUAL DATE, PROVIDED BY THE BOARD,DATED, SEPTEMBER 23, FOR TWO MONTHS LATER, TO NOVEMBER 10TH. THE TENANT WOULD THEN BE WAITING, THREE MONTHS, FOR A HEARING AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, SINCE BEING ILLEGALLY LOCKED OUT OF HER HOME.
AN INSULT TO JUSTICE.
THOSE INVOLVED SHOULD BE CHARGED, FOR THE CONSPIRACY INVOLVED, IN INTERFERING WITH THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
ON SEPTEMBER 21, EMAILS AND TELEPHONE CALLS, FROM CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVES, AT THE SOUTHWEST OFFICE, AT 47 SHEPPARD AVENUE WEST, OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, SUGGESTED THAT THE TENANT'S APPLICATION WAS PROCESSED AND A HEARING DATE WAS READY TO BE ISSUED, ALMOST IMMEDIATELY, BY THE BOARD. THIS WAS ALSO RELAYED TO THE TENANT DIRECTLY, BY HARIANYA AND IT WAS INTENDED TO GET THE TENANT'S APPLICATION AND URGENT MOTION, TO BE SEEN BY THE SAME MEMBER, THE VICE-CHAIR, TO DEAL WITH BOTH MATTERS, AND TO MAKE A DECISION, AGAINST THE TENANT.
THE UNFAIR DECISION, OF VICE-CHAIR, IAN SPEERS, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, WHO DENIED THE TENANT (ME), THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE REINSTATED IN HER HOME, WHILE SHE WAITS FOR A HEARING DATE. ACCORDING TO THE ORDER, OF THE VICE-CHAIR, HE HAD MAINTAINED HER TENANCY, IN THE INTERIM ORDER, BUT DESPITE THAT FACT, HE DID NOT SEE IT NECESSARY, TO ALLOW HER TO BE IN HER HOME, AFTER THE ILLEGAL EVICTION, BY THE LANDLORD. IT IS INCONCEIVABLE, THAT HE WOULD NOT KNOW, THAT THE TENANT WOULD ALSO SUFFER FURTHER HARM, THAN ALREADY BEEN DONE, BY THE LANDLORD, IF SHE CONTINUES TO BE LOCKED OUT OF HER HOME, ILLEGALLY.
TO ADD INSULT TO INJURY, THE "EXPEDITED" HEARING DATE, TO HEAR THE MATTER BEFORE THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, WAS ISSUED FOR NOVEMBER 10TH, THREE MONTHS, AFTER THE TENANT HAD FILED HER URGENT APPLICATION TO THE BOARD, REGARDING THE ILLEGAL LOCK OUT AND ALMOST TWO MONTHS, AFTER THE INTERIM ORDER WAS ISSUED, REGARDING HER URGENT MOTION.
(See the article, below this one, for more information, relating to this article. Including a copy of the tenant's urgent motion and the order of the vice-chair, Ian Speers, at the Landlord and Tenant Board.
