TORONTO DIVISIONAL COURT JUDGE, WENDY M. MATHESON, DENIED ME ACCESS TO EQUITABLE RELIEF, AND MADE AN ORDER, ONLY AFTER MY PREVIOUS ARTICLE, WAS PUBLISHED. HER ACTION IS EVIDENT, OF A REPRISAL ACT, BY HER, AGAINST ME, FOR EXPOSING HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE IN THE CANADIAN COURT.

EXPOSING, RACISM IN CANADA. 

(I AM TIRED OF MY FATE BEING DECIDED, BY A BUNCH OF RACIST WHITE JUDGES, UNJUSTIFIABLY). WHOSE JOB, IS TO PRESERVED, THE STATUS QUO. 

THE CIA, MKULTRA PROGRAM, (CANADIAN VERSION), TARGETING ME.

THIS IS A MKULTRA TRAUMA PROGRAM, THAT FOCUSES ON THE TARGET, TO CARRY OUT HARMFUL  ACTIONS, AGAINST THEM. 

THE SINISTER REASON, FOR THE ACTIONS OF THE COURT, AGAINST ME. THIS IS AN EXPERIMENT. A HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. AND ALL OF THE JUDGES IN THE DIVISIONAL COURT, ARE A PART OF THIS CONSPIRACY.

THE TORONTO POLICE AND CSIS, ARE ALSO BEHIND THE ACTIONS OF THE LANDLORD AND ITS AGENTS, TO CHANGED THE LOCK ON MY DOOR AND TO FORCE ME OUT ON THE STREET. THE POLICE ORCHESTRATED THE ENTIRE THING. THE L&T BOARD MEMBER, NANCY MORRIS AND THE JUDGES OF THE COURT, WHO HAVE HANDLED MY CASE, ARE ALSO A PART OF THIS CONSPIRACY, TO BLOCK ME FROM GETTING BACK INTO MY HOME AND TO CARRY OUT TORTURE, AGAINST ME. 

EVERY DECISION, EVERY ACTION OF THE COURT AND THE BOARD, IS CAREFULLY ORCHESTRATED, TO BRING ABOUT THE DESIRED RESULTS. WHICH IS TO BLOCK MY EFFORTS AND TO FORCE ME TO BE SUBJECTED, TO CRUEL AND UNUSUAL TREATMENT AND PUNISHMENT, CONTRARY, TO THE UN CHARTER ON HUMAN RIGHTS. 

I MUST CONTINUE WITH MY APPEAL, ON AN "EXPEDITED BASIS",  THE WICKED JUDGE WENDY MATHESON, WROTE IN HER ORDER, ON JANUARY 12, 2021, BUT WHILE STILL LIVING OUTSIDE OF MY HOME, DURING THE DEAD OF WINTER AND WITH THE COVID SITUATION, THAT MAKES IT DIFFICULT, TO RENT A PLACE, IN TORONTO, CANADA.  AS THE NUMBER OF CASES, ARE ALSO INCREASING.

THE SAID JUDGE, ALSO DENIED ME, THE EQUITABLE RELIEF, THAT I WAS SEEKING FROM THE COURT, TO REINSTATE ME, BACK INTO MY HOME, AS THE MATTER PROCEEDED, IN THE COURT.  (THE ORDER WAS SERVED ON ME, RIGHT AFTER I HAD WRITTEN AN ARTICLE ON MY BLOG, ABOUT THE SAID JUDGE AND THE DIVISIONAL COURT, IN TORONTO).  AND ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, IN THE CANADA. 

SOMEONE MADE THE COMMENT TO ME, THAT, "THEY ARE NEVER GOING TO LET YOU BACK INTO YOUR HOME".  AS PART OF THE OVERALL CONSPIRACY, TO CAUSE ME HARM AND TO DENY MY RIGHTS, UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAWS, PERTAINING TO HUMAN RIGHTS. AND MORE AND MORE, THIS HAS BECOME EVIDENT, IN THE ACTIONS OF THE JUDGES, OF THE DIVISIONAL COURT, IN TORONTO.

FOR THIS WICKED JUDGE, LIKE THE REST OF THE OTHER JUDGES, IN THE DIVISIONAL COURT, TO BELIEVE THAT I WILL NOT SUFFER ANY HARM, OR HAVE SUFFERED HARM, AS A RESULT OF NOT BEING ABLE TO LIVE IN MY HOME AND WHILE THE APPEAL, IS ALSO BEFORE THE COURT, IS A MOCKERY OF JUSTICE. THEY ALL KNEW AND HAVE ALSO MENTIONED IT, IN THEIR DECISIONS, THAT I AM HOMELESS.  AND THAT THIS WAS A RESULT, OF THE LANDLORD'S ACTIONS AGAINST ME.  YET, IN THEIR EYES, I ALSO DID NOT MEET THE CRITERIA, UNDER THE LAW, TO OBTAIN EQUITABLE RELIEF?. WHICH TAKES PREEMINENCE, OVER THE COMMON LAW. 

I AM NOT GOING TO DO THE APPEAL, ON AN EXPEDITED BASIS, OR ANY OTHER BASIS. I AM GOING TO TAKE THE MATTER, BEFORE AN INTERNATIONAL COURT, OR TRIBUNAL, BECAUSE OF THE ABUSE OF MY HUMAN RIGHTS, IN THE CANADIAN COURT. 

So why did she not considered the harm to me, in this case?. Because her decision, I believed, was based on REPRISAL. Whenever I talked about the court and its practices, publicly, I always felt the backlash, for doing so, by the judges who are affected, by me discussing my case, publicly.

Canadian Judge, Wendy M. Matheson
Divisional Court, in Toronto.
Denied me the equitable relief, that I was 
seeking, in my urgent motion, to remain in my home, while 
my appeal, was also before the court. She also mentioned in her order,
that the entire process of my appeal, could take a long time and that in the end,
that the matter will be remitted, back to the L&T Board, for another hearing. Of course, while 
all of this is taking place, I am not allowed to stay in my home, until the entire legal matter is settled.
In her order, she also prevented the landlord from re renting the apartment, until the appeal is heard. Considering the fact, that the Board's counsel, has until March 31st, to file their documents to the appeal and the landlord's counsel, sometime in March. Expedited or not, the appeal is not going to be heard, for several months.  Which makes her decision, even more difficult to understand, in terms of the law and the equitable relief, that I was seeking. Clearly, her decision is based on the common law and equitable relief is not. Moreover, it takes preeminence over the common law. Single motions judge's decisions, can be appealed to the panel of three judges, in the Divisional court.