EXPOSING, RACISM IN CANADA.
(I AM TIRED OF MY FATE BEING DECIDED, BY A BUNCH OF RACIST WHITE JUDGES, UNJUSTIFIABLY). WHOSE JOB, IS TO PRESERVED, THE STATUS QUO.
THE CIA, MKULTRA PROGRAM, (CANADIAN VERSION), TARGETING ME.
THIS IS A MKULTRA TRAUMA PROGRAM, THAT FOCUSES ON THE TARGET, TO CARRY OUT HARMFUL ACTIONS, AGAINST THEM.
THE TORONTO POLICE AND CSIS, ARE ALSO BEHIND THE ACTIONS OF THE LANDLORD AND ITS AGENTS, TO CHANGED THE LOCK ON MY DOOR AND TO FORCE ME OUT ON THE STREET. THE POLICE ORCHESTRATED THE ENTIRE THING. THE L&T BOARD MEMBER, NANCY MORRIS AND THE JUDGES OF THE COURT, WHO HAVE HANDLED MY CASE, ARE ALSO A PART OF THIS CONSPIRACY, TO BLOCK ME FROM GETTING BACK INTO MY HOME AND TO CARRY OUT TORTURE, AGAINST ME.
THE SAID JUDGE, ALSO DENIED ME, THE EQUITABLE RELIEF, THAT I WAS SEEKING FROM THE COURT, TO REINSTATE ME, BACK INTO MY HOME, AS THE MATTER PROCEEDED, IN THE COURT. (THE ORDER WAS SERVED ON ME, RIGHT AFTER I HAD WRITTEN AN ARTICLE ON MY BLOG, ABOUT THE SAID JUDGE AND THE DIVISIONAL COURT, IN TORONTO). AND ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, IN THE CANADA.
SOMEONE MADE THE COMMENT TO ME, THAT, "THEY ARE NEVER GOING TO LET YOU BACK INTO YOUR HOME". AS PART OF THE OVERALL CONSPIRACY, TO CAUSE ME HARM AND TO DENY MY RIGHTS, UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAWS, PERTAINING TO HUMAN RIGHTS. AND MORE AND MORE, THIS HAS BECOME EVIDENT, IN THE ACTIONS OF THE JUDGES, OF THE DIVISIONAL COURT, IN TORONTO.
FOR THIS WICKED JUDGE, LIKE THE REST OF THE OTHER JUDGES, IN THE DIVISIONAL COURT, TO BELIEVE THAT I WILL NOT SUFFER ANY HARM, OR HAVE SUFFERED HARM, AS A RESULT OF NOT BEING ABLE TO LIVE IN MY HOME AND WHILE THE APPEAL, IS ALSO BEFORE THE COURT, IS A MOCKERY OF JUSTICE. THEY ALL KNEW AND HAVE ALSO MENTIONED IT, IN THEIR DECISIONS, THAT I AM HOMELESS. AND THAT THIS WAS A RESULT, OF THE LANDLORD'S ACTIONS AGAINST ME. YET, IN THEIR EYES, I ALSO DID NOT MEET THE CRITERIA, UNDER THE LAW, TO OBTAIN EQUITABLE RELIEF?. WHICH TAKES PREEMINENCE, OVER THE COMMON LAW.
I AM NOT GOING TO DO THE APPEAL, ON AN EXPEDITED BASIS, OR ANY OTHER BASIS. I AM GOING TO TAKE THE MATTER, BEFORE AN INTERNATIONAL COURT, OR TRIBUNAL, BECAUSE OF THE ABUSE OF MY HUMAN RIGHTS, IN THE CANADIAN COURT.
So why did she not considered the harm to me, in this case?.
Because her decision, I believed, was based on REPRISAL. Whenever I talked about
the court and its practices, publicly, I always felt the backlash, for doing
so, by the judges who are affected, by me discussing my case, publicly.