ANOTHER, CANADIAN JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, A SENIOR JUDGE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, NOW INCLUDED, ON MY LIST OF CANADIANS, WHO I HAVE NOW BROUGHT BEFORE, THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT. IT'S A CONSPIRACY, TO DESTROY ME AND THEY ARE ALL INVOLVED.

I AM DONE, WITH THE INHUMANE TREATMENT, OF ME, BY THE CANADIAN JUDGES, WHO HAVE NO REGARDS, FOR MY HUMAN RIGHTS, UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAWS AND THEY MUST ALSO ANSWER, FOR THEIR ACTIONS.

LET THE WORLD WATCH, AS CANADA'S CORRUPTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE,  EXPOSES, ITSELF, TO THE WORLD. WATCH HOW CORRUPT, CANADIAN JUDGES, REALLY ARE.

I AM CHARGING, THIS CANADIAN JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR HIS ACTIONS, AGAINST ME. 

A SENIOR JUDGE, OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN ONTARIO, LEONARD RICCHETTI, IS  THE MOST RECENT JUDGE, WHO HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE LIST OF CANADIAN JUDGES, WHO I HAVE INCLUDED, AS DEFENDANTS, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR CARRYING OUT CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, AGAINST ME. 

WHAT THIS SENIOR JUDGE DID, VERY OPENLY, WAS TO MOCK ME, AND MY SITUATION AND TO ALSO SHOW, NO REGARD FOR IT.  HE ALSO VERY OPENLY, SYMPATHIZED, WITH THE DEFENDANT, AND EVEN ASKED THEIR OPINION, ABOUT WHETHER THE UNIT I HAD OCCUPIED, WAS TAKEN AND THE JUDGE'S OBVIOUS RELUCTANCE, IN REVERSNG THAT DECISION, SINCE IT THE DEFENDANT, WHO HAD ALSO CAUSED ME TO BE HOMELESS, BY EVICTING ME, BEFORE THE COURT COULD HEAR THE CASE ON ITS MERITS, AND BEFORE THE COURT HAD ALL OF THE EVIDENTIARY MATERIALS, IN THE MOTIONS OF BOTH MYSELF AND THE DEFENDANT, IN ORDER TO MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION.  NO THIS JUDGE, WAS ALREAY SYMPATHETIC, ABOUT DISTURBING, THE SITUATION, IF THE DEFENDANT, HAD ACTED TO GIE AWAY MY SPACE, AT THE SHELTER. MORE THAN WHAT I AM NOW FACING. AND THIS WAS ALSO A DIRECT RESULT, OF THE DEFENDANT'S ACTIONS, AGAINST ME.

THE CORUPTION OF THIS CANADIAN JUDGE, IS THAT WHILE HE IS MAKING HIS DECISION AND SHOWING CONCERN FOR THE DEFENDANT, HE IS ALSO WELL AWARE OF THE SITUATION, THAT I AM PUT INTO AND SHOWED NO CONCERN, FOR ANY HARM, THAT HAS BEEN DONE TO ME, OR THAT I WOULD STILL FACE. RATHER, HE SHOWED, IN HIS ENDORSEMENT, MORE CONCERN, OVER ANYONE, WHO MAY HAVE REPLACED, MY POSITION, THAT THEY MAY LOSE IT,  IF HE SHOULD CCNSIDER, THE MADATORY ORDER, TO LET ME BACK INTO THE SHELTER AND TO PREVENT ME, FROM BEING HOMELESS. WHILE HE PRETENDS, TO CARRY OUT A COURT HEARING, ON THE MATTER.  NOWHERE, DID HE EVEN MENTIONED, OR TO CONSIDER, MY CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, INCLUDING, MY HUMAN RIGHTS, TO BASIC SHELTER.  IF HE HAD DONE THIS, HE WOULD ALSO NOT BE CONCERNED, ABOUT WHAT THE DEFENDANT, SHIP, MAY THINK ON THE MATTER, SINCE THEY HAD ALSO GONE AGAINST, THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE COURT AND HAD EVICTED ME, WHILE THE MATTER WAS STILL NOT HEARD, OR DECIDED, BY THE COURT.  AND THE SENIOR JUDGE, IS ACTING, LIKE IT WAS OKAY, FOR THEM TO DO WHAT THEY HAD DONE, WHICH WAS TO CIRCUMVENT, THE NORMAL PROCESS OF THE COURT. THIS SENIOR JUDGE, DID NOT SEEM TO HAVE A PROBLEM, WITH THEIR ACTIONS. NOR DID HE CARED, WHAT KIND OF HARDSHIP, OR OTHER HARM, THAT THEY HAD CREATED FOR ME, BECAUSE OF THEIR ACTIONS, AGAINST ME.

THEIR LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, IS PROBABLY GOING TO TELL THE COURT, THAT SHE CANNOT PARTICIPATE, AT THE HEARING TOMORROW, IN TRYING TO DELAY, THE MATTER FURTHER AND TO CAUSED ME HARM.  MORE SO THAN THEY HAVE ALREADY DONE, BY EVICTING ME, WHILE THE MATTER WAS, STILL BEFORE THE COURT. AND BASED ON WHAT I HAVE SEEN SO FAR, THE JUDGE, LEONARD RICHETTI, WILL ALSO ACCEPT THEIR RESPONSE AND ALSO CAUSED ME FURTHER HARM, BY DELAYING THE MATTER, OR NOT GRANTING, THE EQUITABLE RELIEF, THAT I HAVE ALSO SOUUGHT, IN THE URGENT MOTION.  OR THE LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, MAY SHOW UP AT THE HEARING.  SINCE IT IS ALL  A CIRCUS AND SHE ALSO KNOWS VERY WELL, WHAT THIS JUDGE IS UP TO AND WHAT THEY ARE ALL UP TO.

BUT IT IS ME, WHO WILL ALSO GET THE LAST LAUGH. SINCE I LIVE TO SEE THE DAY, WHEN THEY THEMSELVES, ARE BEFORE, THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, DEFENDING THEMSELVES, AGAINST THE CHARGES. THOSE CHARGES, UNDER THE ROME STATUTE, ARTICEL 15, CRMES AGAINST HUMANITY.

LET ME SEE, IF THEY WILL THINK, IT IS FUNNY THEN. 

WHAT HE WAS TRYING TO DO, WAS TO HAVE ALL OF THE MOTIONS HEARD, AT ONE TIME. THIS IS WHAT I BELIEVED, WHICH WAS ALSO NOT ALLOWED, UNDER THE LAW. HE WAS ONLY SUPPOSED TO HEAR THE MATTER, THAT WAS BEFORE HIM, AT THAT TIME. THE LAW STATES VERY CLEARLY, THAT IT WOULD BE  AGAINST NATURAL JUSTICE AND A LACK OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS, IF A JUDGE HEARS A CASE, (ESPECIALY, SINCE THE DEFENDANT, ALSO DID NOT FILE ANY RESPONDING MOTON MATERIALS), THAT WAS NOT BEFORE HIM. I WILL PROVIDE A CASE LAW: Paladin Labs Inc. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. et. al. v His Majesty the King in Right of the Province of British Columbia et. al. 

" Except re a statute or court rules authorize the court to make an order on its own initiative or where the inherent jurisdiction of the court empowers it to make an order to control its own processes, it is against the principles of nature justice and procedural fairness for a judge to make an order on an application that is not before him or her..."

I HAVE POSTED THE ENDORSEMENT, OF THE JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, BELOW AND YOU CAN SEE FOR YOURSELF, WHAT HE IS UP TO. PARAGRAPH [5] IS TROUBLING TO ME, BECAUSE I HAD SERVED, THE MOTION, ON THE LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, ON APRIL 3 AND ON APRIL 11TH. THE FIRST HAD TO DO WITH THE INSTRUTIONS OF THE JUDGE, GERARD DOW, AND THE SECOND SERVICE, WAS MADE ON HER ON PRIL 11TH. ONLY MY MOST RECENT URGENT MOTION, THAT I HAD FILED ON APRIL 22ND, WAS NOT SERVED ON THE LAWYER, BECAUSE IT WAS AN EX-PARTE MOTION. 

HERE IS PROOF, THAT I HAD SERVED, THE DEFENDANT, WITH MY MOTION MATERIALS, ON APRIL 3RD. PLUS, I HAD ALSO SERVED THEM, WITH MY MOTION, TO TRANSFER THE FILE TO BRAMPTON, AS WELL. THAT ONE THE LAWYER, HAS CONSENTED ON AND THE JUDGE ORERED (SEE PARA. [4], IN HIS ENDORSEMENT). 

THE FIRST THING, THAT WAS READ OUT IN THE COURT, WAS TO FORBADE THE RECORDING, OF THE HEARING.  HERE, I HAVE EXPRESSED, MY RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND OF MY OPINION.  I AM ALSO REPORTING, ON THE TRUTH AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC. CANADA, SHOULD NEVER BE REGARDED, AS TELLING THE TRUTH, ABOUT ITS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES, UNTIL IT HAS AN OPEN COURTROOM, THAT ALLOWS, A HEARING, TO BE BOTH VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDED AND TO ALSO BE TRANSPARENT, IN THAT WAY, SO THAT THE PUBLIC AND THE WHOLE WORLD, GETS TO SEE, WHAT IS HAPPENING, FOR THEMSELVES.  IN THE MEANTIME, I WILL KEEP ON REPORTING, WHAT I HAVE BOTH SEEN AND HEARD, AND IN MY CASE, AS EVIDENCE, IN REGARDS TO HOW I AM BEING TREATED, BY THE CANADIAN COURTS. UNLESS, YOU HAD SEEN IT FOR YOURSELF, IT WOULD NOT BELIEVED. IT IS STILL UNBELIEVABLE, AND THIS IS THE REASON WHY, IT SHOULD ALSO BE EXPOSED. THIS KIND OF TREATMENT, IS AGAINST, THE VERY FUNDAMENTAL, HUMAN RIGHTS, THAT IS ALSO UNIVERSAL. AND WHEN THEY ABUSE MINE, I WILL NOT BE QUIET ABOUT IT.