This Blog Is Dedicated, To Anti-Corruption, Practices. And Human Rights Violations. In exposing the Canadian government's human rights abuse. And its disregard for respecting, the International Standards on Human Rights. The corruption, that is also pervasive, in its politics. The targeting of me, as an individual and a person of conscience. Focusing on its human rights abuse, such as the torture and other crimes, that are strictly forbidden, under international law.
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
SHOCKING!!!. WHITE RACISTS, EXPOSED. DEBBIE DUNN, CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIER...
DEALING WITH WHITE RACISTS, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS. THESE PUBLIC SERVANTS, HAVE USED THEIR POSITIONS, TO BLOCK MY CASE, B
Tuesday, May 7, 2024
UNBELIEVABLE!!!!. THE SHOCKING PROOF, OF THE CORRUPTION, OF CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, SUPERVISOR, RYAD ANDREWS, MANAGER, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, BRAMPTON COURTHOUSE AND DEBBIE DUNN, DIRECTOR, OF COURT OPERATIONS. ALL OF THEM, TO FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES, FOR OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST AND CONSPIRACY.
THE GROSS VIOLATION, OF MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AT THE BRAMPTION, SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, BY THE DIRECTOR OF COURT OPERATIONS, DEBBIE DUNN, CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA AND RYAD ANDREWS, AND THE JUDGES, ALSO, IN THAT COURT. THIS IS BEYOND, SYSTEMATIC RACISM, AND HAS NOW ADVANCED, TO THE PERSONAL ATTACK, AGAINST ME, THAT IS CARRIED OUT, BY THE COURT STAFF AND THE JUDGES OF THE COURT, THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, BRAMPTON REGION.
THE ABSOLUTE PROOF, OF THE PERSONAL, INTERFERENCE, BY CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEREIA, AND OTHERS IN THE COURT, IN BLOCKING MY CASE, BEFORE THE COURT.
THIS ALONE, IS SUFFICIENT PROOF, TO TAKE THOSE CORRUPT, CANADIANS, BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, WHICH IS EXACTLY, WHAT I AM DOING, CURRENTLY.
EXPOSING, CANADA'S DISGUSTING, SYSTEMATIC RACISM, IN THE COURTS.
Some facts you probably didn't know -- Canadian judicial appointments are among the most corrupt in the entire world. That's the opinion of the human rights watchdog group Global Integrity. Official Canadian mythology dictates this secrecy equals independence.
INVOLVED, RYAD ANDREWS, WHOSE SILENCE ON THE ISSUE, AS MANAGER OF COURT OPERATIONS, SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. THE SAME FOR DEBBIE DUNN, THE DIRECTOR, OF COURT OPERATIONS, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO.
THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE!!!. THE CORRUPTION, OF CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEREIRA,
SUPERVISOR, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON AND DEBBIE DUNN,
DIRECTOR, OF COURT OPERATIONS, AND RYAD ANDREWS, MANAGER, OF COURT OPERATIONS. WITH THE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE, FROM THE LATTER TWO, INSTEAD OF INVESTIGATING, THE ACTIONS OF THE SUPEVISOR, CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA.
WHAT CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, HAS DONE TO MY CASE, SO FAR. AND WHY SHE WILL BE CHARGED, FOR OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, IN MY CASE.
THE KIND OF MOTION, THAT I HAVE, RECENTLY, FILED (THAT CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, HAS ALSO ATTEMPTED TO BLOCK) IN THE COURT, WAS A MOTION, TO SET ASIDE OR VARY AN ORDER, AND IS NOT THE KIND OF MOTION, THAT SHOULD BE DELAYED. IN FACT, IT IS TO BE FILED, FORTHWITH, ACCORDING, TO THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. YET, IT MAY NEVER BE HEARD, BY A JUDGE, ANYTIME SOON, IF THE CURRENT ACTIONS, OF CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, RYAD ANDREWS AND DEBBI DUNN, HAVE THEIR WAY, IN BLOCKING IT, SINCE THE LATTER TWO PERSONS, HAVE DONE NOTHING, AGAINST THE ACTIONS, OF CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, THE SUPERVISOR, AT THE COURT.
1. CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, HAS BLOCKED AND CONTINUES, TO BLOCK, MY CASE, BEFORE THE COURT. CAUSING A DELAY, IN MY MATTER, BEFORE THE COURT, THAT HAS ALREADY CAUSED ME HARM AND WILL ALSO CAUSED ME IRREPARABLE HARM, WITH HER LATEST ACTIONS TODAY, IN HER EMAIL, TELLING ME, THAT SHE WILL NOT PROCEED, WITH FILING MY MATTER, BEFORE TEHE COURT. AND ALSO IGNORING, MY REQEST, TO EXPLAIN HER ACTIONS FURTHER.
2. SHE HAS PREVIOUSLY, BLOCKED, MY MOTION, THAT WAS SITTING ON HER DESK, FOR MORE THAN A WEEK, (A MOTION TO TRANSFER A FILE, TO THE BRAMPTON COURT) INSTEAD, OF SENDING IT, TO BE SCHEDULED, FOR A HEARING. THAT HEARING DATE, HAD TO BE VACATED, BECAUSE OF HER ACTIONS.
3. SHE HAS ALSO BEEN, OPENLY HOSTILE, TOWARDS ME. OFTEN CUTTING ME OFF, IN MID SENTENCE AND THEN WALKING AWAY, LEAVING THE ISSUE UNRESOLVED. INVOLVING, JUST A SIMPLE CASE OF FILING, A DOCUMENT IN THE COURT.
3. SHE IS CORRUPT AND SHOULD NOT REPRESENT, THE PUBLIC INTEREST, IN THE COURT.
4. SHE IS RUDE AND OBNOXIOUS AND ALLOWS THE STAFF, TO TREAT THE PUBLIC, THE SAME WAY.
THIS IS WHAT I HAVE DONE, REGARDING THE CURRENT MOTION, FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF AND TO SET ASIDE OR VARY, THE ORDER OF THE SENIOR REGIONAL JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON, REGARDING MY CIVIL MATTER, IN THAT COURT. HIS ORDER WAS MADE ON APRIL 30, 2024. SO IT WAS EXTREMELY RELEVANT, FOR MY MATTER, NOT TO BE DELAYED, BY THE COURT, ON A MOTION TO SET ASIDE OR VARY AN ORDER. BUT THIS HAS BEEN THE CASE, BECAUSE OF THE ATTACK, AGAINST ME, IN THE COURT.
I HAVE EVEN BEEN THREATENED, WITH CHARGES, IF I CONTINUE TO CONTACT THE COURT, ABOUT THE FILING OF MY DOCUMENTS, IN THE BRAMPTON COURT. (NOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND, WHY I NEED TO PROCEED, WITH MY MATTER, BEFORE THE ICC?). AS A SELF REPRESENTED PERSON, HOW CAN I NOT AVOID, CONTACTING, THE COURT'S ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, ABOUT THE FILING OF MY LEGAL DOCUMENTS, BEFORE THE COURT?.
I HAVE FILED:
1. THE MOTION RECORD, WHICH ALSO INCLUDED, THE MOTION, TO SET ASIDE OR VARY AN ORDER, AND A DOZEN OTHER
DOCUMENTS, THAT WAS RELEVANT, TO THE MOTION TO SET ASIDE.
2. THE FACTUM
3. THE AFFIDAVIT, IN SUPPORT OF
THE MOTION
4. THE AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE,
COMMISSIONED, BY THE CLERK AT THE COURT, AS PROOF OF SERVICE, ON THE RESPONDENT.
AND AFTER FILING, ALL OF THOSE
DOCUMENTS, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, BRAMPTON COURT, I STILL GOT AN EMAIL (THE SECOND ONE, CONCERNING, THE SAID FILING AND BASICALLY, SAYING THE SAME THING), FROM
CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, THAT SHE WILL NOT ACCEPT MY DOCUMENTS FOR FILING. SEE HER EMAILS POSTED BELOW.
AND FOR THE RECORD, I HAVE FILED, LITERALY, DOZENS OF MOTIONS, OVER THE YEARS AND IN VARIOUS COURTS. EVEN PRESENTLY, I HAVE FILED MOTIONS, IN A HIGHER COURT THAN THIS ONE, WHICH ALSO GETS ACCEPTED BY THE COURT. (THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO), YET THE MOTION TO SET ASIDE OR VARY THE ORDER OF THIS CORRUPT JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, IS BEING BLOCKED, BY CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA AND THE REST OF THE COURT AND THEY BELIEVED, THAT THEY SHOULD ALSO CONTINUE TO BLOCK MY EFFORTS IN THE COURT AND TO VIOLATE MY RIGHTS. NOT ON MY WATCH.
Friday, May 3, 2024
THERE IS CORRUPTION, AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO. THE CONSPIRACY, INVOLVING, THE ADMINSITRATIVE STAFF, AND THE SUPERVISOR, CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, TRING TO BLOCK MY CASE, IN THE COURT. AND HOW THIS WILL PLAY OUT, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.
THE BRAMPTON, SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IS DOING THINGS, TO PREVENT, THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, REGARDING MY MATTERS. AND NOT JUST THE ADMIN. STAFF, BUT SOME OF THE JUDGES, AS WELL.
THE MOTIVE, BEHIND THE ACTIONS, OF THE COURT STAFF, IS TO TRY TO END A LITIGATION, BEFORE IT IS ACTUALLY, FINISHED, IN THE COURT. AND TO AID THE RESPONDENT'S LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVEY, IN ACHIEVING THIS GOAL.
SORRY, BUT IT WON'T HAPPEN.
IN MY PERSONAL OPINION, THE LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, DO NOT HAVE TO PUT UP ANY FIGHT, AGAINST ME, SINCE SHE HAS THE STAFF AT THE COURT, DOING THIS FOR HER.
THEY REALLY THINK THAT I AM STUPID?.
AND LOOK WHERE IT IS GOING TO LAND THEM? IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, SINCE I CANNOT GET ANY JUSTICE, IN ANY CANADIAN COURT.
WHAT SHOULD THE PUBLIC, BELIEVED, WHEN A JUDGE, ARANGED TO MEET WITH THE OPPOSING COUNSEL, BEFORE THE HEARING?. AND NO, THIS IS NOT ALLOWED, UNDER THE LAW. HENCE, THE EXPOSURE, ON MY BLOG, OF THE JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, IN HIS ENDORSEMENT, DATED, APRIL 23, 2024, (I have posted his endorsement here, for the public to see, that I am not making this up). WHERE HE REQUESTED, TO HAVE CONTACT, WITH THE COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT, WHO IN THIS CASE, WAS THE LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, AND HOW THIS HAD ALSO IMPACTED, NEGATIVELY, REGARDING, MY HEARING. HENCE MY MOTION, TO SET ASIDE HIS DECISION AND THE ORDER MADE, FOLLOWING THAT HEARING, ON APRIL 26, THAT WAS ALSO DECIDEDLY BIAS, AGAINST ME.Senior Regional Judge
Leonard Ricchetti
Superior Court of Justice
Brampton, OntarioLawyer, Zohar Levy
AND EVER SINCE THE HEARING, THE ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, LED BY CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIVEIRA, THE SUPERVISOR, HAS BEEN BLOCKING MY EFFORTS, TO FILE MY MOTION, IN THE COURT, TO SET ASIDE THIS JUDGE'S DECISION.
FOR THE RECORD, I ALSO CAME UP AGAINST, THIS KIND OF HINDERANCE, IN THE OTHER COURTS, AS WELL. BUT NOT WHERE THE JUDGE, HAD DISCUSSED THE CASE, WITH THE LAWYER, BEFORE THE HEARING. SO IT IS A CONSPIRACY, AND THE WHOLE ROTTEN BUNCH OF THEM, SHOULD ALSO FACE THE CONSEQUENCES, FOR WHAT THEY ARE DOING, BEHND CLOSED DOORS. NOT JUST BEING EXPOSED, BUT TO ALSO FACE, THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES, FOR DARING TO ABUSE, MY PROTETED RIGHTS.
Moving forward, I then filed a motion to set aside his decision, only to find that the Supervisor, Christine Davies Oliveria and the rest of the administrative staff, have been doing their best, to block my effort, in filing my motion, to set aside the judge's decision.
What did I do?. I filed my motion to set aside the decision of the judge, Ricchetti, and because it was less than seven days, before the hearing date, it had to be filed by email. Which now, the staff is blocking, from being filed. When filing online, on Case Lines, the litigant is specifically told, to file all documents, that has a hearing date, of seven days or less, by email. So why is the court staff, blocking me, and refusing to accept for filing, my motion to set aside, the decision of the single judge?. The motion was first sent to the court for filing, on May 1, 2024 and the rest of the documents, I tried to file by email today, only for Christine Davies Oliveira, to tell me, that she will not accept my documents for filing. I know very well the reason why, so I will take the matter up on Monday, with the Ministry of the Attorney General. I had also previously, asked the Ministry to investigate, but I now have another reason, on top of the other concerns, about the Brampton court's staff, that needs to be looked into further.
Friday, April 26, 2024
THE PROBLEM, WITH THE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, IN THE CANADIAN COURT. THIS SENIOR ONTARIO JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, HAVE AN ISSUE, WITH ME PUBLICLY REPORTING, ON HIS ACTIONS, AS A JUDGE
THIS SENIOR JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, SEEM TO HAVE A PROBLEM, WITH ME TALKNG PUBLICLY, ABOUT HIS PERFORMANCE, AS A JUDGE. I FIND THAT IT IS, NECESSARY TO DO SO, IN THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC. DUE TO THE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, IN THE COURT.
AND THAT IN MY OPINION, WAS THE REASON, HE ALSO RULED AGAINST ME, TODAY, AT MY MOTIONS HEARING, FOR URGENT RELIEF, TO ALLOW ME BACK INTO THE SHELTER, AFTER I WAS ALSO EVICTED FROM IT LAST WEEK, BUT HE DECLINED. I AM STILL HOMELESS. THE JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, ACCEPTED THE STATEMENT, IN THE AFFIDAVIT, OF THE RESPONDENT, LESLEY NAGODA, THAT I WAS STAYING, AT A SHELTER, CALLED SISTERING, IN TORNTO. THAT WAS A LIE. I WAS NEVER ACCEPTED, AT THAT PLACE, WHICH IS A DROPIN AND NOT A SHELTER, FOR TWO REASONS. THE FIRST, IS THAT THEY HAD NO BEDS AND THE SECOND REASON, WAS THAT I HAD TOO MANY BAGS, WITH ME. ABOUT FOUR BAGS, PLUS A BRIEFCASE AND A HANDBAG AND THEY ONLY ACCEPT PEOPLE, WITH EXACTLY TWO BAGS, OR LESS. SO WHEN I CALLED SHIP AND TOLD THEM MY DILEMA, THE STAFF THEN CLAIMED, THAT HE WAS TOLD, OTHERWISE.
I WANTED PROOF, SO I HELD THE PHONE NEAR TO, THE SISTERING STAFF, WHO WAS TELLING ME ALL THIS, WHILE THE SHIP'S STAFF, WAS ON THE PHONE WITH ME. HER NAME WAS AFRA, OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT AND SHE CATEGORICALLY SAID, IN THE PRESENCE OF THE SHIP WORKER, THAT THEY HAD NO BEDS, NOR DID THEY ACCEPT ANYONE, INCLUDING ME, WITH MORE THAN TWO BAGS. THEY ONLY HAD CHAIRS, FOR THE DOZENS OF PEOPLE, ALREADY STAYING THERE, TO SIT ALL NIGHT ON AND SLEEP, FOR THE NIGHT. I ENDED UP TAKING MY BAGS, WITH A TAXI TO MY STORAGE, WHICH COSTS ME, FORTY FIVE DOLLARS CASH, FOR THE TAXI AND THEN WENT TO STAY AT A MOTEL. I HAVE NEVER STAYED, AT THIS DROPIN, CALLED SISTERING, WHICH SHIP ALSO CALLED, A SHELTER. EVERYONE KNOWS, THAT IT IS A DROP IN CENTER AND THE PEOPLE WHO SLEPT THERE, ON CHAIRS, ALL NIGHT, HAS TO LEAVE IN THE MORNING. THEY CAN O THIS, MAXINUM, FOR TWO DAYS, THE STAFF AT THE DROPIN SAID. IN FACT, THE STAFF AT THE DROP IN CENTER, NAME AFRA, ALSO TOLD ME, THAT SHIP WAS ONLY TRYING TO GET RID OF ME, BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE ALSO KNOWN, THAT THERE WERE NO BEDS AT THE DROP IN AND THAT THEY ALSO DID NOT TAKE ANYONE, WITH MORE THAN TWO BAGS OF LUGGAGE.
THE JUDGE DID NOT SEEM TO CARE, REGARDING MY URGENT MOTION, AND BELIEVED, THE RESPONDENT, SHIP'S DIRECTOR'S STATEMENT, IN HER AFFIDAVIT. PLUS HE ALSO HAD HIS OWN REASONS, FOR DENYING, MY URGENT MOTION, FOR A MANDATORY ORDER, TO GET BACK INTO THE SHELTER. AND IN MY OPINION, IT WAS ALSO, BASED ON REPRISAL. BASED ON MY ARTICLE, ABOUT THE SAID JUDGE, ON MY BLOG.
WHEN HE ASKED ME FOR EVIDENCE, I FORGOT TO SHOW HIM, MY MOTEL RECEIPTS, WHICH I STILL HAVE, BY THE WAY. (AND ALSO CANNOT AFFORD, AT THIS TIME). I AM STILL IN THE SAME CRISIS, THAT I WAS IN A WEEK AGO, HOMELESS, WHEN SHIP EVICTED ME, FROM THE SHELTER, WHILE THE MATTER WAS AND STILL IS, BEFORE THE COURT. AND THE SENIOR JUDGE, L. RICCHETTI, ALSO HAS NO ISSUES WITH THAT. I STILL HAVE AN ISSUE, WITH PARA [5] OF HIS ENDORSEMENT, WHICH BASICALLY, INSTIGATED SHIP, TO REPLACE ME, WITH SOMEONE ELSE, REGARDING THE OCCUPANCY, OF THE ROOM. HAD HE NOT MENTIONED IT, IN HIS ENDORSEMENT, SHIP WOULD HAVE PROBABLY NOT DONE SO, BUT THIS JUDGE GAVE THEM THE GO AHEAD, TO FILL THE VACANCY, THAT WAS LEFT WITH THEM EVICTING ME, FROM THE SHELTER, AND WHICH DOES NOT ALSO MEAN, THAT THERE WERE NO OTHER ROOM AVAILABLE, THERE AS WELL. BUT THANKS TO THE JUDGE, RICCHETTI'S STATEMENTS, SHIP WILL NOW ALWAYS SAY, THAT THEY HAVE NO SPACE, EVEN WHEN THAT IS ALSO NOT THE CASE. SHIP'S STAFF, ALSO PREVENTED ME, FROM GETTING PRIVATE HOUSING, BECAUSE OF ITS STAFF HARASSMENT. I COULD NOT FOCUS ON THE FINANCIAL ASPECT, OF MY SITUATION, BECAUSE SHIP'S STAFF, FELT THAT I SHOULD SPEND ALL OF MY TIME, LOOKING FOR THEIR KIND OF HOUSING, WHICH ALSO DID NOT FIT, MY SITUATION, PERSONALLY.
THE SITUATION CREATED BY SHIP, ALSO CRIPPLED ME, FINANCIALLY. FOR INSTANCE, DOING BOOK READINGS, OF MY CHILDREN BOOKS, HAD TO BE PUT ON HOLD, BECAUSE OF THE DEMAND OF SHIP'S STAFF, TO FOCUS ALL OF MY TIME, ON HOUSING SEARCHES. MY OTHER LEGAL MATTERS, ALSO SUFFERED, AS A RESULT, AND I DO ALL MY LEGAL MATTERS, AS A SELF REPRESENTED, LITIGANT, CURRENTLY, WITH AT LEAST SIX OUTSTANDING CASES, THAT I AM CURRENTLY, DEALING WITH, IN ALL THREE COURTS. FROM THE DIVISIONAL COURT, TO THE COURT OF APPEAL. INCLUDING, A PANEL REVIEW, REGARDING, MY JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION, NEXT MONTH, A CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION APPLICATION, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE AND TWO NOTICES OF MOTION FOR LEAVE, IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. PLUS SEVERAL CIVIL CLAIMS. SHIP IS GOING TO PAY ME DAMAGES, FOR ALL OF THESE. FOR EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, MENTAL ANGUISH AND LOST INCOME, E.T.C.
NOW BACK TO THE JUDGE. THIS JUDGE, RICCHETTI, ALSO MENTIONED, AT THE MOTIONS HEARING, TODAY, ABOUT ME, REPORTING ON MY BLOG, REGARDING THE COURT PROCEEDING. WHAT HE REALLY MEANT, WAS ABOUT ME, REPORTING, ABOUT HIM. HE HAD NO REGARD, FOR EITHER MY HUMAN RIGHTS, OR MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, UNDER THE CHARTER. WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT?. I DID NOT VIDEO OR AUDIO RECORDED THE HEARING. HE SHOULD BE GLAD, ABOUT THIS FACT. I RESPECTED THE LAW AND DID NOT DO THAT. ALTHOUGH, IT WAS ALSO NEEDED. THE LAW ACTUALLY, DO PROTECT YOU, IF YOU ARE REPORTING, THE TRUTH. WHAT I DO, IS TO EXERCISE MY RIGHT TO MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH, AND REPORTED ON MY OWN DAMN MATTERS, BEFORE THE CANADIAN COURT, AS A HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE VICTIM. MY STORY NEEDS TO BE OUT THERE, SO PEOPLE CAN KNOW, WHAT IS HAPPENING, TO SOME PEOPLE, IN THE CANADIAN COURT.
IF I HAD THE CLOUT, I WOULD ALSO PUSH FOR THE UN, TO HOLD CANADA GUILTY, FOR THIS FORM OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE. THE DESTRUCTON OF PEOPLE'S LIVES, BY THE COURTS. NOT ONLY DO I GET THE TRUTH OUT THERE, SO THAT THE PUBLIC CAN ALSO GET ACCESS TO THIS INFORMATION, BUT I ALSO BELIEVE THAT THOSE WHO ARE ENTRUSTED, WITH CERTAIN PUBLIC DUTY, SHOULD BE CARRYING OUT SUCH DUTY, THAT WILL ALSO, BENEFIT THE PUBLIC. AND ONLY THE ONES, WHO ARE DOING THINGS DIFFERENTLY, ARE SCARED, BECAUSE THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE.
ARY, TO REPORT TO THE PUBLIC, WHAT ACTUALLY TRANSPIRES, IN THE CANADIAN COURT. WITHOUT ACTUALLY, VIDEO, OR AN AUDIO RECORDING, THE HEARING, OF ITS PROCEEDINGS. WHICH THEY SAY, IS ALSO FORBIDDEN. BUT EXERCISING MY RIGHTS, TO FREE SPEECH AND ALSO, IF IT INVOLVES ME, DIRECTLY, REPORTING ON MY MATTERS BEFORE THE COURT, SINCE IT ALSO ALWAYS, INVOLVED, THE ABUSE OF MY RIGHTS, IN SOME WAY. THAT, I WILL NOT KEEP QUIET ABOUT.
IMAGINE, HOW MUCH MORE EASIER, MY JOB WOULD BE, IN EXPOSING, CORRUPTION AND OTHER SERIOUS CONCERNS, WITH THE CANADIAN COURTS, IF THIS GOVERNMENT, WHICH CLAIM TO BE A DEFENDER, OF HUMAN RIGHTS, ALSO ALLOW ITS COURT PROCEEDINGS, TO BE VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDED, TO ENSURE THAT THE PUBLIC, HAVE CONFIDENCE, IN ITS PROCEEDINGS. THEN MY JOB WOULD BE DONE. THE JUDGES AND THE JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, WOULD THINK TWICE, IN SAYING OR DOING ANYTHING, THAT IS OUTSIDE OF THE LAW. BUT WHEN NO ONE CAN SEE THEM, THEY ACT CORRUPT AND
Thursday, April 25, 2024
ANOTHER, CANADIAN JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, A SENIOR JUDGE, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, NOW INCLUDED, ON MY LIST OF CANADIANS, WHO I HAVE NOW BROUGHT BEFORE, THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT. IT'S A CONSPIRACY, TO DESTROY ME AND THEY ARE ALL INVOLVED.
I AM DONE, WITH THE INHUMANE TREATMENT, OF ME, BY THE CANADIAN JUDGES, WHO HAVE NO REGARDS, FOR MY HUMAN RIGHTS, UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAWS AND THEY MUST ALSO ANSWER, FOR THEIR ACTIONS.
LET THE WORLD WATCH, AS CANADA'S CORRUPTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, EXPOSES, ITSELF, TO THE WORLD. WATCH HOW CORRUPT, CANADIAN JUDGES, REALLY ARE.
I AM CHARGING, THIS CANADIAN JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR HIS ACTIONS, AGAINST ME.
A SENIOR JUDGE, OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN ONTARIO, LEONARD RICCHETTI, IS THE MOST RECENT JUDGE, WHO HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE LIST OF CANADIAN JUDGES, WHO I HAVE INCLUDED, AS DEFENDANTS, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR CARRYING OUT CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, AGAINST ME.
WHAT THIS SENIOR JUDGE DID, VERY OPENLY, WAS TO MOCK ME, AND MY SITUATION AND TO ALSO SHOW, NO REGARD FOR IT. HE ALSO VERY OPENLY, SYMPATHIZED, WITH THE DEFENDANT, AND EVEN ASKED THEIR OPINION, ABOUT WHETHER THE UNIT I HAD OCCUPIED, WAS TAKEN AND THE JUDGE'S OBVIOUS RELUCTANCE, IN REVERSNG THAT DECISION, SINCE IT THE DEFENDANT, WHO HAD ALSO CAUSED ME TO BE HOMELESS, BY EVICTING ME, BEFORE THE COURT COULD HEAR THE CASE ON ITS MERITS, AND BEFORE THE COURT HAD ALL OF THE EVIDENTIARY MATERIALS, IN THE MOTIONS OF BOTH MYSELF AND THE DEFENDANT, IN ORDER TO MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION. NO THIS JUDGE, WAS ALREAY SYMPATHETIC, ABOUT DISTURBING, THE SITUATION, IF THE DEFENDANT, HAD ACTED TO GIE AWAY MY SPACE, AT THE SHELTER. MORE THAN WHAT I AM NOW FACING. AND THIS WAS ALSO A DIRECT RESULT, OF THE DEFENDANT'S ACTIONS, AGAINST ME.
THE CORUPTION OF THIS CANADIAN JUDGE, IS THAT WHILE HE IS MAKING HIS DECISION AND SHOWING CONCERN FOR THE DEFENDANT, HE IS ALSO WELL AWARE OF THE SITUATION, THAT I AM PUT INTO AND SHOWED NO CONCERN, FOR ANY HARM, THAT HAS BEEN DONE TO ME, OR THAT I WOULD STILL FACE. RATHER, HE SHOWED, IN HIS ENDORSEMENT, MORE CONCERN, OVER ANYONE, WHO MAY HAVE REPLACED, MY POSITION, THAT THEY MAY LOSE IT, IF HE SHOULD CCNSIDER, THE MADATORY ORDER, TO LET ME BACK INTO THE SHELTER AND TO PREVENT ME, FROM BEING HOMELESS. WHILE HE PRETENDS, TO CARRY OUT A COURT HEARING, ON THE MATTER. NOWHERE, DID HE EVEN MENTIONED, OR TO CONSIDER, MY CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, INCLUDING, MY HUMAN RIGHTS, TO BASIC SHELTER. IF HE HAD DONE THIS, HE WOULD ALSO NOT BE CONCERNED, ABOUT WHAT THE DEFENDANT, SHIP, MAY THINK ON THE MATTER, SINCE THEY HAD ALSO GONE AGAINST, THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE COURT AND HAD EVICTED ME, WHILE THE MATTER WAS STILL NOT HEARD, OR DECIDED, BY THE COURT. AND THE SENIOR JUDGE, IS ACTING, LIKE IT WAS OKAY, FOR THEM TO DO WHAT THEY HAD DONE, WHICH WAS TO CIRCUMVENT, THE NORMAL PROCESS OF THE COURT. THIS SENIOR JUDGE, DID NOT SEEM TO HAVE A PROBLEM, WITH THEIR ACTIONS. NOR DID HE CARED, WHAT KIND OF HARDSHIP, OR OTHER HARM, THAT THEY HAD CREATED FOR ME, BECAUSE OF THEIR ACTIONS, AGAINST ME.
THEIR LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, IS PROBABLY GOING TO TELL THE COURT, THAT SHE CANNOT PARTICIPATE, AT THE HEARING TOMORROW, IN TRYING TO DELAY, THE MATTER FURTHER AND TO CAUSED ME HARM. MORE SO THAN THEY HAVE ALREADY DONE, BY EVICTING ME, WHILE THE MATTER WAS, STILL BEFORE THE COURT. AND BASED ON WHAT I HAVE SEEN SO FAR, THE JUDGE, LEONARD RICHETTI, WILL ALSO ACCEPT THEIR RESPONSE AND ALSO CAUSED ME FURTHER HARM, BY DELAYING THE MATTER, OR NOT GRANTING, THE EQUITABLE RELIEF, THAT I HAVE ALSO SOUUGHT, IN THE URGENT MOTION. OR THE LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, MAY SHOW UP AT THE HEARING. SINCE IT IS ALL A CIRCUS AND SHE ALSO KNOWS VERY WELL, WHAT THIS JUDGE IS UP TO AND WHAT THEY ARE ALL UP TO.
BUT IT IS ME, WHO WILL ALSO GET THE LAST LAUGH. SINCE I LIVE TO SEE THE DAY, WHEN THEY THEMSELVES, ARE BEFORE, THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, DEFENDING THEMSELVES, AGAINST THE CHARGES. THOSE CHARGES, UNDER THE ROME STATUTE, ARTICEL 15, CRMES AGAINST HUMANITY.
LET ME SEE, IF THEY WILL THINK, IT IS FUNNY THEN.
WHAT HE WAS TRYING TO DO, WAS TO HAVE ALL OF THE MOTIONS HEARD, AT ONE TIME. THIS IS WHAT I BELIEVED, WHICH WAS ALSO NOT ALLOWED, UNDER THE LAW. HE WAS ONLY SUPPOSED TO HEAR THE MATTER, THAT WAS BEFORE HIM, AT THAT TIME. THE LAW STATES VERY CLEARLY, THAT IT WOULD BE AGAINST NATURAL JUSTICE AND A LACK OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS, IF A JUDGE HEARS A CASE, (ESPECIALY, SINCE THE DEFENDANT, ALSO DID NOT FILE ANY RESPONDING MOTON MATERIALS), THAT WAS NOT BEFORE HIM. I WILL PROVIDE A CASE LAW: Paladin Labs Inc. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. et. al. v His Majesty the King in Right of the Province of British Columbia et. al.
" Except re a statute or court rules authorize the court to make an order on its own initiative or where the inherent jurisdiction of the court empowers it to make an order to control its own processes, it is against the principles of nature justice and procedural fairness for a judge to make an order on an application that is not before him or her..."
I HAVE POSTED THE ENDORSEMENT, OF THE JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, BELOW AND YOU CAN SEE FOR YOURSELF, WHAT HE IS UP TO. PARAGRAPH [5] IS TROUBLING TO ME, BECAUSE I HAD SERVED, THE MOTION, ON THE LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, ON APRIL 3 AND ON APRIL 11TH. THE FIRST HAD TO DO WITH THE INSTRUTIONS OF THE JUDGE, GERARD DOW, AND THE SECOND SERVICE, WAS MADE ON HER ON PRIL 11TH. ONLY MY MOST RECENT URGENT MOTION, THAT I HAD FILED ON APRIL 22ND, WAS NOT SERVED ON THE LAWYER, BECAUSE IT WAS AN EX-PARTE MOTION.
Saturday, April 20, 2024
TORONTO LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, EXPOSED!!!. HOW SHE ACTED CORRUPTLY, AND AGAINST, THE ETHICAL CODE OF CONDUCT, WITH THE LAW SOCIETY, TO CIRCUMVENT, THE COURT'S DECISION, ON A LEGAL CASE, THAT IS BEFORE THE COURT.
THIS IS NOTHING, BUT A JEWISH PLOT, AGAINST ME. TWO RACIST JEWS, WHO HAVE CONSPIRED, TO CAUSED ME HARM, BY FORCING ME, TO BE EVICTED, IN THEIR CONSPIRACY, TO DO ME HARM. ONE OF WHOM, LESLEY NAGODA, WHO THINKS, THAT I WAS SO MUCH, BENEATH HER, THE FOOL THAT SHE IS, THAT SHE HAS NEVER, ENDEAVERED, TO RETURN MY CALLS. BOY! WAS SHE EVER WRONG.
TORONTO LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY, MUST HAVE BELIEVED, THAT HER CLIENTS, SHIP AND ITS CORRUPT AND INFAMOUS DIRECTOR, LESLEY NAGODA, HAS SO MUCH MONEY, (PUBLIC MONEY, FROM BEING A REGISTERED, PUBLIC CHARITY, AND RECEIVING FUNDING, FROM ALL THREE LEVELS, OF GOVERNMENT AND ALSO FROM, PRIVATE FUNDERS), TO PAY FOR THEIR LEGAL FEES, THAT AS A, GREEDY LAWYER, SHE WAS ALSO WILLING, TO TAKE THE RISK, OF GOING AGAINST, THE LAW SOCIETY'S, ETHICAL AND MORAL, CODE OF CONDUCT, AND TO GO MISSING IN ACTION, (MIA), OR TO MAKE HERSELF, UNAVAILABLE, AFTER HER CLIENTS SHIP AND LESLEY NAGODA, DIRECTED, THOSE UNDER HER, TO CARRY OUT AN, UNLAWFUL EVICTION, THAT ZOHAR LEVY, AS THEIR LAWYER, ON RECORD, HAD ALSO INSTIGATED, I BELIEVED AND HAS ALSO BEEN SILENT ABOUT IT, EVER SINCE. ZOHAR LEVY, SHOWED, A LACK OF INTEGRITY, IN DELIBERATELY, AVOIDING, THE ISSUE, WITH ME, EVEN THOSE SHE WAS THEIR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE, OR LAWYER. ZOHAR LEVY, WAS MIA, WHEN NEEDED, TO CLARIFY, THE SITUATION,WITH THOSE WORKING, UNDER THE DIRECTIVES, OF LESLEY NAGODA, TO GO AGAINST, THE ORDER OF THE COURT. ZOHAR LEVY, WENT ALONG WITH THEIR DECISION. SHE CONVENIENTLY FORGETS, AS A LAWYER, THAT SHE IS ALSO SUPPOSE TO NOT DO ANYTHING, THAT WOULD ALSO INTERFERE, IN THE ADMINISTRATION, OF JUSTICE. WHICH ALSO INCLUDED, ACTING WITH INTEGRITY, CONCERNING HER PROFESSION AND ALSO THE LAW.
LAWYER, ZOAR LEVY, WOULD ALSO BE PAID, REALLY WELL, TO AVOID ALL FORMS OF COMMUNICATIONS WITH ME, IN ORDER, TO CLARIFY THE ISSUE. SHE KEPT SILENT, WHILE THOSE OTHERS, WHO NEITHER KNEW THE LAW, AS WELL AS SHE DID, NOR HAD TAKEN ANY OATH, TO NOT INTERFERE, WITH IS ADMINISTRATION, CARRIED OUT THE UNLAWFUL EVICTION, THAT SHE MOST ASSUREDLY, ALSO KNEW ABOUT AND ALSO, AGREED WITH.
LAWYERS SHOULD NOT GO MISSING, OR TO AVOID MEETING, THE OTHER PARTY, TO A DISPUTE, WHO WAS ALSO RELYING, ON THE LAWYER, TO CLEAR UP, ANY LEGAL ISSUES, REGARDING THEIR CLIENT'S ACTIONS, AS A LAWYER. IF THERE WAS SOME LEGAL ISSUES, THAT HER CLIENTS, DID NOT UNDERSTAND, IT WAS THE LAWYER, ZOHAR LEVY'S LEGAL DUTY, TO EXPLAIN, THE LEGAL ISSUE, TO THEM, AND THAT WOULD ALSO, NOT GO AGAINST, THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE. IN OTHER WORDS, SHE ALSO HAD A DUTY, TO THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND TO THE LAW. HER ACTIONS MUST ALSO NOT GO AGAINST THE LAW, OR AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
LAWYERS ACT, ON BEHALF OF THEIR CLIENTS, THIS IS THE NORM. SOME LAWYERS GO BEYOND THAT, TO INTERFERE, DELIBERTELY, WITH THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE. SOMETHING, THAT THEY ARE ALSO, EXPRESSLY, FORBIDDEN, TO DO SO, BY THE LAW SOCIETY. IN ZOHAR LEVY'S CASE, SHE ACTED CORRUPTLY, AND AIDED HER CLIENT, IN CAUSING AN EVICTION, OF THE TENANT, WHILE THE MATTER,WAS STILL BEFORE THE COURT AND THE COURT, HAD ALSO NOT YET HEARD, FROM BOTH PARTIES, TO THE DISPUTE. ZOHAR LEVEY'S ACTION, TO CONSPIRE WITH HER CLIENT, LESLEY NAGODA, THE DIRECTOR OF SHIP, TO CIRCUMVENT, THE COURT PROCEDURE, AND TO CAUSE A PREMATURE EVICTION OF THE TENANT, WAS WHAT SHE ALSO INTENED. SHE ACTED WITH A LACK OF INTEGRITY, BOTH PROFESSIONAL AND OTHERWISE.
SHE HAS ALSO EARNED HERSELF A COMPLAINT WITH THE LAW SOCIETY.
CANADIAN JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, IS NOT ONLY CORRUPT, BUT SHE IS ALSO WICKED AND EVIL. PERIOD. SHE IS ONE OF THE FIRST, CANADIAN JUDGES, THAT I WILL BE CHARGING, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR CARRYING OUT, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, AGAINST ME.
I WASTED MY TIME AND EFFORT, ASKING FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF, FROM THIS WICKED JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS. SHE NEVER EVEN, CONSIDERED, SUCH A REQUEST.
SHE IS JUST ANOTHER, CORRUPT, CANADIAN JUDGE, NOW BEING EXPOSED. ONTARIO JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, IS RACIST AND UNDESERVING, TO REPRESENT, THE PUBLIC, IN HER ROLE AS A JUDGE.
CANADIAN JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS, IS NOT ONLY CORRUPT, BUT SHE IS ALSO WICKED AND EVIL. PERIOD. SHE IS ONE OF THE FIRST, CANADIAN JUDGES, THAT I WILL BE CHARGING, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, FOR CARRYING OUT CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, AGAINST ME. SHE HAS NO REGARD, FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND IS ALSO A RACIST AND AFTER MY DEALINGS WITH HER, I HAVE NO RESPECT, FOR THE CANADIAN COURT.
I WASTED MY TIME AND EFFORT, ASKING FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF, FROM THIS WICKED JUDGE, RIA TZIMAS. SHE NEVER EVEN, CONSIDERED, SUCH A REQUEST. SHE ALSO NEVER EVEN CONSIDERED, THE HARM, THAT WOULD ALSO RESULT, TO ME, BY REFUSING TO GRANT ME, EQUITABLE RELIEF, WHICH UNDER CANADIAN LAW, TAKES PRECEDENCE, AND EVEN PARAMOUNTCY, OVER THE COMMON LAW. THE ONTARIO STATUTE, THE COURTS OF JUSTICE ACT. R.SO. 1990. c, C-43 STATES, UNDER SECTION 96(1) AND (2), THAT THIS RULE OF LAW, IS TO BE APPLIED, CONCURRENTLY, WITH THE COMMON LAW. AND IF THERE IS A CONFLICT, THEN THE LAW OF EQUITY, MUST ALSO PREVAILED.
Tuesday, April 9, 2024
SHOCKING!! JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, SANDRA LOPES DAMOTA. LOOK WHAT SHE HAS ...
WHEN A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, LIKE SANDRA L. DAMOTA, SAYS THAT SHE IS BUSY, WITH THE JP'S OFFICE, FULL OF EMPTY CHAIRS, THIS SHOULD ALSO BE, REGARDED, AS BRINGING, THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, TO DISREPUTE.
I HAD TO REPORT THIS FOR THE BENEFIT
OF THE PUBLIC AND TO ALSO PROVED, THAT I AM ALSO, TREATED DIFFERENTLY, IN THE
CANADIAN COURT. IT WAS MY PRIVATE INFORMATION, THAT THE JP, SANDRA
DAMOTA, DID NOT WANT TO BOTHER, ACCEPTING, AFTER HAVING ME WAITING, FOR ABOUT
HALF AN HOUR, AFTER THE INFORMATION, WAS ALSO GIVEN TO HER. AND ME ALSO BELIEVING,
THAT SHE WAS GOING TO NOW CALL ME, INTO THE PRIVATE OFFICE AND TO FIND OUT MORE,
ABOUT THE INFORMATION. INSTEAD, SHE TOLD
THE CLERK, TO TELL ME, THAT SHE WAS BUSY AND THE CLERK THEN ADVISED ME, TO COME
BACK ANOTHER DAY, TO LAY THE PRIVATE INFORMATION.
AND AS YOU CAN ALSO SEE FROM THE EMPTY CHAIRS IN THE JP'S OFFICE, SHE WAS NOT BUSY, AT ALL. SHE JUST DID NOT WANT TO BOTHER SERVING ME, AND ENDED UP, DENYING ME THE SERVICE, TO WHICH I WAS ALSO ENTITLED.
Monday, April 8, 2024
JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, SEAN MICHAEL MCKENNA, AND HIS STATEMENT, THAT HE HAD TO "ESTABLISHED THE PRIMA FACIE" EVIDENCE, BEFORE ACCEPTING, THE PRIVATE INFORMATION.
SHOCKING YES!. BUT THIS WAS ACTUALLY, THE STATEMENT, OF AN ONTARIO JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, SEAN MICHAEL MCKENNA, WHO HAD MADE THIS, DISTURBING COMMENT, WHILE HE WAS ACTING, AS A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, IN THE LAYING OF A PRIVATE INFORMATION, AT THE BRAMPTON COURTHOUSE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO.
THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, SEAN MCKENNA, WANTED TO CONDUCT, A FACT FINDING HEARING, AND SAID SO. HE SAID THAT HE HAD TO ESTABLISHED, THE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE, BEFORE ACCEPTING, THE PRIVATE INFORMATION.
WHEN HE WAS INFORMED, THAT THIS WAS THE ROLE, OF A CROWN ATTORNEY AND NOT A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, WHO WAS SITTING IN THE OFFICE, OF A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, WHOSE ROLE WAS TO ACCEPT, THE PRIVATE INFORMATION, THIS DID NOT SIT TOO WELL, WITH THE SAID, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE.
HE IS BEING EXPOSED HERE, BECAUSE THE PUBLIC, GENERALLY, DO NOT KNOW, WHAT IS BEING SAID, OR DONE, IN THE OFFICE OF, THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE. THAT SOME OF THE JPS, WHO ARE COMPETENT AT THE LAW, (MAYBE), WILL ALSO TRY TO ABUSE THAT AUTHORITY AND THAT OTHER JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, (SUCH AS SANDRA DAMOTA, ANOTHER JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, IN THE ONTARIO COURTS), MAY NOT BE SO MUCH SO. AT LEAST NOT BY JUDGING OF HER CONDUCT. BOTH OF THOSE JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, WORKED AT THE BRAMPTON JUSTICE OF THE PEACE OFFICE, ALTHOUGH, JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, ARE ALSO KNOWN TO WORK AT DIFFERENT, COURT HOUSES, IN ONTARIO. IN ROTATING SHITS, SUCH AS ONE WEEK AT THIS COURTHOUSE AND THEN MOVED TO ANOTHER COURTHOSE.
Wednesday, April 3, 2024
SERVICES AND HOUSING IN THE PROVINCE, OR SHIP, CEO LESLEY NAGADO AND CFO, THOMAS DICARLO, ARE FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES, FOR DISOBEYING AN ORDER OF THE COURT AND FOR BREACH OF TRUST AND CORRUPTION.
SHIP CEO AND BOARD MEMBER, LESLEY NAGADO, IS FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES, FOR CORRUPTION, CONSPIRACY, BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST AND FOR DISOBEYING AN ORDER OF THE COURT.
ALSO FACING THE SAME CHARGES, IS SHIP'S CFO, THOMAS DICARLO, WHO AS THE CFO, HE AND LESLEY NEGADO, HAD DECIDED, TO USE THEIR POSITIONS, TO CARRY OUT REPRISAL ACTIONS, AGAINST THE RESIDENT AND TO DISOBEY THE COURT ORDER, IN THE EVICTION OF THE RESIDENT FROM THE SHELTER, AS AN ACT OF REPRISAL, DESPITE BEING SERVED WITH THE ORDER FROM THE COURT, AND WHILE THE MATTER, WAS STILL BEFORE THE COURT AND TO BE DECIDED, BY THE COURT.
THE CEO AND BOARD MEMBER, FOR THE ORGANIZATION, SERVICES IN THE PROVINCEOR SHIP, LESLEY NAGODA AND THOMAS DICARLO, THE CFO, OF SHIP, ARE BOTH FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES, FOR CORRUPTION, BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST AND DISOBEYING, AN ORDER OF THE COURT.
THIS IS IN RELATION, TO A COURT ORDER, THAT WAS MADE LAST WEEK, ON MARCH 28, 2024, DIRECTING SERVICES UPON SHIP, THE ORGANIZATION, THAT THEY ALSO OVERSEES. THE ORDER WAS BASED ON AN EX-PARTE MOTION, THAT WAS FILED BY THE RESIDENT, TO PREVENT THEM FROM EVICTING HER FROM THE SHELTER, IN AN ACT OF REPRISAL AND FOR TAKING LEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST THEM, FOR CHARTER RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, WHEN THEY AUTHORIZED, THE ILLEGAL SEARCH, OF THE RESIDENT'S PERSONAL PROPERTY, REGULARLY, AS PART OF THEIR PRACTICES, AT THE SHELTER.
Both Lesley Nagoda and Thomas Dicarlo, decided that in giving the staff of the shelter, the directives, to evict the resident, which they have set for April 4, 2024, they can therefore act above the court, which says in the order, for them to be served with the resident's motion document, since it was an ex-parte motion, before the court would hear the resident's motion, about the impending eviction.
They will now both have the opportunity, to stand before the court and to answer for their actions, regarding the order. As well for the other charges, that have been made against them.
Also to be put on official notification, about these two persons, Lesley Nagado and Thomas Dicarlo, are the funders for SHIP. And what they also plan to do, about their corrupt actions. If they would continue to fund SHIP, with both of them managing the organization, or to cut their funding, based on their actions and also how they run the organization.
Tuesday, April 2, 2024
SYSTEMATIC RACISM, IS PRACTICED, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS. I AM EXPOSING, AN ONTARIO JUDGE, GRANT DOW, OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN TORONTO, WHO IS A CANADIAN JUDGE, THAT PRACTICES RACISM, GAINST BLACKS.
I AM DECLARING, THAT THIS TORONTO JUDGE, GRANT DOW, IS A RACIST AND PRACTICES, SYSTEMATIC RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURT, AGAINST BLACKS.
SHOCKING!!!. WHITE RACISTS, EXPOSED. DEBBIE DUNN, CHRISTINE DAVIES OLIER...
DEALING WITH WHITE RACISTS, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS. THESE PUBLIC SERVANTS, HAVE USED THEIR POSITIONS, TO BLOCK MY CASE, B EFORE THE SUPERIOR...
-
JUST IN CASE YOU'VE BEEN DOUBTING MY REPORTS ON THIS BLOG ON THE CORRUPTION OF THE TORONTO POLICE. HERE ARE A FEW MORE DOCUMENTED REPORT...
-
SHELLYANN PEREIRA, PARALEGAL SHELLY ANN PEREIRA, LEGAL SERVICES, SPEREIRA LEGAL SERVICES THE UNETHICAL CONDUCT, THAT EXIST BETWEEN SHELLY...
-
A PLOT OF THE CANADIAN POLICE AND CORRUPT CITY OFFICIALS, TO CONTINUE TO HARASS ME AND TO ATTEMPT TO FRAME ME UP AND ALSO SILENCE ME. AC...