TWO TORONTO POLICE OFFICERS, REFUSED TO HELP A DISABLED MAN, AFTER THE LANDLORD, CHANGED THE LOCK ON THE DOOR AND LOCKED HIM OUT TWICE.
T.O. 41 DIVISION CONSTABLES, P.C. DEANNA PITTMAN AND CONSTABLE PAIS, BADGE # 59671, ATTENDED A CALL, TO THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, AT 8 MEDFORD AVENUE IN SCARBOROUGH, AFTER A TENANT WAS ILLEGALLY EVICTED, A SECOND TIME, BY THE LANDLORD, WHO HAD PUT ALL OF HIS BELONGINGS OUTSIDE, IN THE RAIN AND THEN CHANGED THE LOCK, TO HIS RENTAL UNIT.
THIS WAS WITHOUT AN ORDER, FROM THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. IN FACT, SHE HAS NEVER TAKEN THE TENANT, TO THE BOARD. CHOOSING INSTEAD, TO EVICT HIM ILLEGALLY, ON HER OWN TERMS. THE TENANT, WHO IS ON ODSP AND IS CONSIDERED BY OTHER TENANTS, TO BE QUIET AND ALSO KEPT TO HIMSELF, WAS VISIBLY UPSET AND CLOSE TO TEARS, THAT HE HAD TO SLEEP ON THE STREET, BECAUSE THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. PITTMAN AND P.C. PAIS, FROM 41 DIVISION, WOULD NOT HELP HIM, AFTER SPENDING BOUT HALF AN HOUR, TALKING TO THE LANDLORD FIRST, WHILE LEAVING THE TENANT, STANDING IN THE DRIVEWAY, HOLDING HIS BLANKET, THAT HE HAD TAKEN FROM HIS BELONGINGS, AT THE BACK OF THE HOUSE. WHERE THE LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, HAD PLACED ALL OF HIS PROPERTY, OUTSIDE.
THOSE TWO OFFICERS CONDUCT, WERE IN STARK CONTRAST TO THE OTHER OFFICERS WHO HAD ATTENDED, THE PROPERTY IN JUNE AND WAS ABLE TO SECURE THE KEY FROM THE LANDLORD, AFTER SHE HAD CHANGED THE LOCK, THE FIRST TIME, SO THE TENANT COULD GET BACK INTO HIS RENTAL UNIT. NOW SHE HAS DONE IT A SECOND TIME, WITHOUT AN ORDER FROM THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. AND AFTER TRYING TO COERCE AND THREATENED THE TENANT, INTO GIVING UP HIS ROOM WILLINGLY, THE LANDLORD THEN RESORTED, TO FORCED HIM FROM HIS HOME AND UNTO THE STREETS, ILLEGALLY.
SHOCKINGLY, HER ACTIONS WERE ALSO CONDONED, BY THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. DEANNA PITTMAN AND P.C. PAIS, FROM 41 DIVISION. IT WAS ONLY A MONTH AGO, THAT THIS SAME LANDLORD, HAD POURED BOILING WATER FROM A KETTLE, ON ANOTHER TENANT, IN THE BUILDING, IN AN UNPROVOKED ATTACK, AS THE TENANT WAS MINDING HER OWN BUSINESS, WHILE SHE FED A STRAY CAT, NEAR HER WINDOW. SHE IS ALSO RECORDED, SPRAYING THE TENANT'S WINDOW DAILY, WITH A GARDEN HOSE, AS A WAY OF PROVOKING THE TENANT, SO THAT THE TENANT WILL MOVE OUT OF THE RENTAL UNIT.
THIS WAS THE SECOND TIME IN THREE MONTHS, THAT SHE HAS CHANGED THE LOCK ON THE TENANT'S DOOR. THE TENANT REPORTED THAT SHE HAD REFUSED HIS RENT, CLAIMING THAT SHE WANTED HIS ROOM, FOR HER GRANDSON, BECAUSE HE WAS GOING TO NEED IT IN SEPTEMBER, WHEN HE WENT TO SCHOOL, THIS FALL.
WHAT IS ASTONISHING, ABOUT THIS ILLEGAL EVICTION, WAS THE FACT THAT THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. PITTMAN AND P.C. PAIS, HAD ALSO SHOWED ABSOLUTELY NO INCLINATION, IN HELPING THE DISABLED MAN, TO GET BACK INTO HIS RENTAL HOME. THEY DID NOT EVEN WANT TO TALK TO THE MAN, BUT TO INSIST THAT HE WAS NOT ALLOWED ON THE PROPERTY. THEY SEEM TO BE ALLUDING TO THE FACT, THAT THE LANDLORD, HAD TOLD THEM A DIFFERENT STORY, ABOUT WHY THE TENANT WAS EVICTED. NONE OF WHICH ALSO MATTERED, SINCE THE EVICTION WAS ILLEGAL, IN THE FIRST PLACE. THE LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, WOULD ALSO BE PROVEN TO BE A LIAR, SINCE HER VERSION OF THE EVICTION, WOULD ALSO CONTRADICT, THE RECORDED VERSION, OF THE INCIDENT. WHICH SHOWS CLEARLY, THAT THE LANDLORD HAD BOTH THREATENED AND ATTEMPTED TO COERCED THE TENANT, TO GIVE UP THE ROOM, AND WHEN THAT DID NOT WORK, SHE THEN RESORTED TO FORCEFULLY EVICT HIM. THE POLICE OFFICERS AGAIN SHIFTED THEIR ATTITUDE, ONCE THEY WERE TOLD, THAT THE LANDLORD'S ACTIONS WERE RECORDED, SINCE SHE WAS DOING SOMETHING ILLEGAL AT THE TIME, AND THE EVIDENCE WERE RECORDED FOR THE BOARD AND THE COURT. AFTER THAT REVELATION, THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. DEANNA PITTMAN AND P.C. PAIS, WERE NOT INTERESTED IN HELPING THE TENANT, TO GET BACK INTO HIS RENTAL UNIT. THEY ALSO WALKED AWAY, WITHOUT GIVING THE TENANT, THEIR BADGE NUMBERS, WHEN THEY WERE ASKED FOR IT. THE TENANT WAS TOLD TO ASKED THEM TO WRITE IT DOWN FOR HIM, BUT THEY LEFT WITHOUT DOING THAT.
IT SHOULD BE A PUBLIC CONCERN, WHEN TWO CORRUPT POLICE OFFICERS, CHOSE INSTEAD, TO AID A CROOKED LANDLORD, THAN TO HELP A DISABLED MAN, WHO NEEDED THEIR HELP MORE, IN GETTING BACK INTO HIS HOME, AFTER THE LANDLORD, HAD LOCKED HIM OUT, ILLEGALLY.
THE REASON GIVEN TO THE TENANT, BY ANGELA STERLING, THE OWNER OF THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, FOR WANTING HIM EVICTED, FROM THE ROOMING HOUSE, SHOULD ALSO LAND HER IN A LOT OF TROUBLE WITH THE L & T BOARD. LANDLORDS WHO TAKE IT UPON THEMSELVES, TO ILLEGALLY EVICT A TENANT, WITHOUT AN ORDER FROM THE BOARD, WOULD FACE A FINE OF $50,000 TO $250,000. DEPENDING ON IF THE LANDLORD IS AN INDIVIDUAL, OR A CORPORATION. IN THE CASE OF ANGELA STERLING, SHE HAS EVICTED THIS TENANT, TWICE AND ILLEGALLY. SO HER FINE SHOULD BE DOUBLED. THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, IS THE TENANT'S ONLY CHOICE RIGHT NOW, IN GETTING BACK INTO HIS RENTAL UNIT AND PROTECTING HIS RIGHTS, IN SEEING THAT THE LANDLORD FACED A STIFT FINE, IN EVICTING HIM TWICE AND ILLEGALLY.
ASIDE FROM THAT FACT, THERE IS SOMETHING FISHY, BETWEEN THE 41 DIVISION POLICE AND THIS LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING. SHE HAS NEVER BEEN INVESTIGATED BY THEM, DESPITE HER CRIMINAL ACTIONS. MANY OF WHICH HAVE BEEN RECORDED, AS PROOF. IT IS NOT LIKELY, THAT THE POLICE WILL ALSO ACT ON THEIR OWN, TO ENFORCED THE LAW, AGAINST THIS WOMAN. BUT INSTEAD TO ACT AGAINST IT. THIS IS CORRUPTION AND THOSE TWO OFFICERS, MAY HAVE ALSO BEEN A PART OF IT.
WHAT IS YOUR OPINION?. AS MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, YOU SHOULD HAVE YOUR SAY.
WHEN THE DISABLED MAN, WAS PUT OUT ON THE STREET A SECOND TIME, AFTER THE LANDLORD HAS LOCKED HIM OUT, ILLEGALLY. THE MAN WAS FORCED OUT UNTO THE STREET, AFTER THE LANDLORD TOLD HIM, THAT SHE WANTED HIS ROOM, FOR HER GRANDSON, WHO WOULD BE ATTENDING, SCHOOL THIS FALL, SHE ALLEGES. THE LANDLORD ANGELA STERLING, WAS RECORDED TELLING THE TENANT, THAT SHE HAD REFUSED HIS RENT, WHICH HE HAD OFFERED TO PAY HER, BECAUSE IF SHE HAD ACCEPTED HIS RENT, SHE WOULD NOT BE ABLE, TO TELL HIM TO GIVE UP HIS ROOM, BY MAY 31 ST. WHEN THE TENANT DID NOT COMPLY AND MOVED, SHE THEN PUT HIS BELONGINGS OUTSIDE, IN THE RAIN AND THEN CHANGED THE LOCK TO HIS RENTAL UNIT.
1. WOULD YOU HAVE INSISTED, THAT THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS, ACTED IN ENSURING, THAT THE LANDLORD, DID NOT CARRY OUT THIS ILLEGAL EVICTION, RATHER THAN TO PROTECT HER, CONCERNING HER ACTIONS?
2. WOULD YOU HAVE ALSO TAKEN, A NEGATIVE APPROACH, TO THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. DEANNA PITTMAN AND P.C. PAIS, ROLE IN DIRECTLY, OR INDIRECTLY, CAUSING THIS TENANT, TO BE ILLEGALLY EVICTED, BY THIS LANDLORD. AND WAS THERE MORE TO THEIR ACTIONS, CONCERNING THE LANDLORD, THAN THEY HAVE LET ON?
3. WOULD YOU NOW INSIST, THAT THIS LANDLORD, ANGELA STERLING, BE FORCED TO CLOSED DOWN, HER ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE?
4. WOULD YOU ALSO NOW INSIST, THAT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, CHARGE HER OVER HER ILLEGAL EVICTION, OF THIS DISABLED PERSON? THAT SHE HAS ALSO EVICTED TWICE, ILLEGALLY?.
