Monday, September 14, 2020

TORONTO POLICE 41 DIVISION CORRUPTION:

SEPTEMBER 14, 2020

URGENT APPEAL FOR PROTECTION  GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE.

WHY I AM CONCERNED, FOR MY SAFETY, FROM THE TORONTO POLICE. 

TORONTO POLICE 41 DIVISION, ALLOWED SUSPECT, WHO BROKE INTO MY HOME, TO REMAIN AT LARGE, AFTER HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY, TO ARREST HIM.

THE SUSPECT HAS THREATENED MY SAFETY, ON AT LEAST THREE DIFFERENT OCCASSIONS. THE SUSPECT HAD EVEN TOLD THE POLICE, DIRECTLY, THAT I SHOULD BE DEAD. AFTER THEY WERE CALLED, TO INVESTIGATE MY COMPLAINT, WHEN HE HAD COME TO MY WINDOW AND TALKED OF SHOOTING. THE SUSPECT ALSO, REPEATEDLY, BANGED ON MY WINDOW AND CAUSING ME TO FEAR FOR MY SAFETY.

CURRENTLY, THE SUSPECT HAS BEEN, LIVING ON THE SAME PREMISES, BECAUSE OF THE CORRUPTION OF THE 41 DIVISION POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. MACKRELL AND P.C. WAGNER, WHO ARE INVOLVED IN THE CASE AND HAS REFUSED TO ARREST HIM. CONTRARY, TO THEIR ORIGINAL STATEMENT, WHICH IS THAT THE SUSPECT, WOULD BE ARRESTED. RECENTLY, A 41 DIVISION DETECTIVE, STEVE CASE, FURTHER BLOCKED THE SUSPECT FROM BEING INVESTIGATED AND CHARGED. IT WAS HE WHO HAVE CLAIMED TO KNOW THE SUSPECT AND WHERE HE LIVED. SUGGESTING THAT THERE MAY BE, A PERSONAL INTERFERENCE ON HIS PART, CONCERNING THE SUSPECT AND HIS BREAK AND ENTER, INVESTIGATION AGAINST HIM.

BELOW ARE PICTURES TAKEN OF THE MAN, AFTER HE HAD BROKEN INTO MY HOME, BY KICKING MY DOOR IN AND ALSO THREATENING TO STAB ME.


THE CASE OF THE MISSING FILES AND COMPLAINTS, TO 41 DIVISION POLICE. TWENTY SEVEN COMPLAINTS ARE MISSING, FROM THE POLICE DATA BASE, AT ITS LOCAL 41 POLICE DIVISION.

THE THIRTY OR MORE COMPLAINTS, THAT WERE MADE BY ME TO THE 41 DIVISION POLICE IN 2019, HAS GONE MISSING.  THE TORONTO POLICE 41 DIVISION HAS ONLY THREE OF THOSE COMPLAINTS, IN ITS DATA BASE. THE OTHER TWENTY SEVEN COMPLAINTS ARE MISSING. LAST DECEMBER, THOSE THIRTY COMPLAINTS WERE IN THE POSSESSION OF MR. NASCIEMENTO, AT TORONTO POLICE HEAD QUARTER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION DIVISION, INCLUDING THE POLICE OFFICERS NOTES, WHICH I HAD ALSO REQUESTED. SEVERAL MONTHS LATER, IN SEPTEMBER OF 2020, ALL OF THOSE COMPLAINTS WENT MISSING, FROM THE LOCAL 41 DIVISION POLICE FILES, WHEN I WAS TOLD BY OFFICER KEEFIER, THAT THE POLICE ONLY HAD COMPLAINTS FOR JULY, SEPTEMBER AND ANOTHER DATE, IN 2019. CONSPICIOUSLY MISSING, FROM 41 DIVISION POLICE DATA BASE, WAS THE COMPLAINT THAT WAS FILED WITH THAT DIVISION, FOR THE BREAK AND ENTER, ON APRIL 19, 2019. THOUGH THEY NOW SAY THAT IT IS MISSING TODAY, IT WAS ALSO ONE OF THE REPORTS THAT WERE COLLECTED, BY THE NASCIMENTO, AT POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. I KNOWS THIS TO BE A FACT, BECAUSE NASCIMENTO AND I HAD GONE OVER WHAT INFORMATION HE HAD COLLECTED FROM 41 DIVISION, UPON MY REQUEST AND THE ONLY OUTSTANDING ISSUE, WAS THE COST OF GETTING THE RECORDS, WHICH WE HAD NOT BEEN ABLE TO CONCLUDE. AFTER THE REQUEST WERE MADE, THOSE FILES WENT MISSING FROM 41 DIVISION POLICE DATA BASE. MANY OF THOSE COMPLAINTS INVOLVED ANGELA STERLING, INCLUDING ASSAULTS, DEATH THREATS AND OTHER SERIOUS OFFENCES, COMMITTED AGAINST ME, OVER A PERIOD OF ALMOST TWO YEARS. 

THE 41 DIVISION POLICE ALSO WANTED TO SAY THAT THE COMPLAINT THAT WAS MADE TO THE POLICE, IN REGARDS TO THE BREAK AND ENTER, BY THE SUSPECT ON APRIL 19, 2019 DID NOT EXIST. YET THEY ALSO CONTRADICTED THEMSELVES, AFTER I WAS TOLD ON SEPTEMBER 13TH, BY DETECTIVE STEVE CATES, THAT HE HAD READ THE ACTUAL REPORT.  BUT PREVIOUSLY ON SEPTEMBER 3RD, P.C. KEEFER SAID THAT HE COULD FIND NO SUCH REPORT. THIS ALSO CONTRADICTED THE FACT, THAT NASCIEMENTO, DOWN AT POLICE HQ, ALSO HAD THAT VERY REPORT LAST YEAR, INCLUDING THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS NOTES. COLLECTED UPON REQUEST BY ME, UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT.

 THE MAN IN THE BREAK AND ENTER INCIDENT, WAS ARRESTED AND HANDCUFFED BY DETECTIVE STEVE CATES IN JUNE, AFTER A CALL TO THE POLICE THAT HE WAS BANGING ON THE VICTIM'S WINDOW. THE MAN WAS ALSO SEEN ARGUING WITH A NEIGHBOR, WHO ACTUALLY HELPED THE POLICE, IN ARRESTING HIM. TELLING THE NEIGHBOR, THAT HE WAS A "BAD MAN". A JAMAICAN SLANG.

DET. STEVE CASE, LATER RELEASED HIM OUT OF THE HANDCUFFS AND LATER MENTIONED TO  THE VICTIM, THAT HE KNEW THE SUSPECT AND WHERE HE LIVES. THE MAN WAS ARRESTED ON THE STREET, IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING AND WITH THE NEIGHBORS WATCHING. POLICE OFFICER STEVE CATES, THEN ALMOST IMMEDIATELY RELEASED HIM OUT OF THE HANDCUFFS, AFTER RECOGNIZING WHO HE WAS.

THE BREAK AND ENTER, TO THE VICTIM'S HOME, BY THE SUSPECT IN 2019 AND THE FALSE CLAIM, BY THE TWO POLICE OFFICERS FROM 41 DIVISION, THAT HE WOULD BE ARRESTED.

AT THE TIME OF THE INCIDENT, THE POLICE WERE CALLED AND TWO POLICE OFFICERS, FROM 41 DIVISION, CONSTABLE WAGNER, BADGE NUMBER 11049 AND CONSTABLE MACKRELL, BADGE NUMBER 90626, ATTENDED THE CALL. AFTER TAKING A WRITTEN STATEMENT, FROM ME AT THE SCENE, I WAS TOLD BY THE OFFICERS, THAT THE SUSPECT WOULD BE ARRESTED AND TO CALL THE POLICE, IF I SEE HIM AGAIN. INCLUDING, ON THE SAME PREMISES. THAT NEVER HAPPENED BECAUSE OF THE POLICE CORRUPTION, IN THE CASE. 

POLICE OFFICER, STEVE CATES, BADGE # 8192, WHO IS ALSO A DETECTIVE AT 41, DIVISION, REFUSED TO DISPATCHED A CAR, OR OTHER OFFICERS TO INVESTIGATE THE SUSPECT, ON SEPTEMBER 13TH, AFTER THE MAN WAS SEEN ON THE PREMISES AND CLAIMED TO WANT TO SPEAK WITH ME, THE VICTIM, OVER THE TELEPHONE INSTEAD. HE HAS CLAIMED ALSO, THAT HE HAS READ THE REPORT OF THE TWO OFFICERS, FROM LAST YEAR . WHICH HE ALSO CLAIMED DID NOT WARRANT AN ARREST.  A DECISION THAT HE HAS MADE, ASIDE FROM THE ORIGINAL OFFICERS, INVESTIGATION OF THE SUSPECT.


AT LEAST FOUR TELEPHONE CALLS HAVE BEEN MADEBY ME TO THE POLICE, IN THE LAST FEW DAYS AND AFTER THE MAN WAS SEEN ON THE PROPERTY, AS IT APPEARS THAT THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING, ANGELA STERLING, HAD RENTED HIM A ROOM, THAT SHE HAS ALSO ILLEGALLY EVICTED, THE PREVIOUS TENANT FROM, IN ORDER FOR THE SUSPECT TO MOVE INTO THAT ROOM. NOW THE SUSPECT APPEARS TO BE LIVING, AT THE SAME ADDRESS AND THE POLICE HAS SO FAR REFUSED TO ARREST HIM. ON SEPTEMBER 9TH, TWO POLICE OFFICERS, (BADGE NUMBERS, 11771 AND 99972), SHOWED UP TO INVESTIGATE, THE SUSPECT BEING ON THE PREMISES. THE SUSPECT HAD LEFT BY THEN, SO THE TWO OFFICERS TOLD ME TO CALL BACK THE POLICE, IF HE SHOWED UP AGAIN. SEVERAL TIMES AFTER THAT, I HAVE CALLED THE POLICE, INCLUDING ON SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 13TH. A POLICE SUPERVISOR, WITH 41 DIVISION, STEVE CATES, BADGE NUMBER 8192 THEN DIVERTED THE CALL, WHEN IT WAS TRANSFERRED TO 41 DIVISION, BY THE DISPATCHER. HE WAS THE SAME OFFICER, WHO ATTENDED BACK IN JUNE, WHEN I HAD CALLED 911, AFTER THE SUSPECT WAS BANGING ON MY WINDOW AND ALSO APPEARED TO BE DRUNK. NOW ON SEPTEMBER 13TH, HE HAS ALLOWED THE SUSPECT TO REMAIN ON THE PREMISES, BY NOT ARRESTING HIM, AND ONLY SPOKE WITH ME, OVER THE TELEPHONE, RATHER THAN TO DISPATCHED A CAR, TO INVESTIGATE MY COMPLAINT, IN REGARDS TO THE SUSPECT, WHO APPEARS TO BE NOW LIVING, IN THE SAME BUILDING, AS I AM.

1. WHAT IS ANGELA STERLING'S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE POLICE, IN REGARDS TO THE SUSPECT? 

2. WHY DID ANGELA STERLING, WHO HAS MADE MORE THAN ONE DEATH THREAT AGAINST ME, PUT THE SUSPECT, IN THE RENTAL UNIT, AFTER ILLEGALLY FORCING, THE LEGITIMATE TENANT OUT? AND HOW THE POLICE HAS HELPED HER TO DO THIS, BY REFUSING TO ASSIST, THE FORMER TENANT, WHO WAS ILLEGALLY LOCKED OUT.   IN ORDER TO PROVIDE ACCOMMODATION, FOR THE SUSPECT IN THIS CASE.

3. AND THE REASON FOR DOING SO, WAS TO PROVIDE THE SUSPECT WITH THE OPPORTUNITY, TO HARM ME, BOTH IN REGARDS TO HIS THREATS, AS WELL AS HERS. SHE WANTED THE SUSPECT TO HAVE CLOSE PROXIMITY TO ME, IN ORDER TO CARRY OUT HER THREATS, AGAINST ME. PARTICULARLY, HER DEATH THREATS.



THE PROBLEM, WITH THE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, IN THE CANADIAN COURT. THIS SENIOR ONTARIO JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, HAVE AN ISSUE, WITH ME PUBLICLY REPORTING, ON HIS ACTIONS, AS A JUDGE

THIS SENIOR JUDGE, LEONARD RICCHETTI, OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE, IN BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, SEEM TO HAVE A PROBLEM, WITH ME TALKNG PUBLICL...