COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO, SANDRA THEROULDE, DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ONCE AGAIN, HAS BLOCKED MY URGENT MONTION, FROM GOING BEFORE THE COURT, TODAY, MARCH 5TH.

SANDRA THEROULDE, TO BE CHARGED, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, AMONG OTHER CANADIAN, GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, FOR  CARRYING CRIMES, AGAINST ME, UNDER THE ROME STATUTE.

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO:  SANDRA THEROULDE, DEPUTY REGISTRAR'S ACTIONS, TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, IN REGARDS TO MY CASE, BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEAL. 

MY URGENT MOTION FOR A STAY, THAT WAS FILED ON MARCH 5TH, BEFORE THE PANEL OF JUDGES, WAS BLOCKED, BY SANDRA THEROULDE, WHO ONCE AGAIN, HAD  PREVENTED THE COURT, FROM REVIEWING THE URGENT MOTION, CLAIMING, THAT THE MOTION MUST BE FILED, IN ITS USUAL MANNER, WITH A DATE TO BE SET BY THE REGISTRAR OF THE COURT. AS IF IT WAS A NORMAL SITUATION. SHE ALSO KNEW THE HARM, THAT THIS WOULD CAUSE TO ME, REGARDING THE EVICTION. AND THIS WAS PRECISELY, THE REASON WHY SHE HAS BLOCKED, THE URGENT MOTION. THE OTHER REASON, THAT IS RELATED TO THE FIRST, WAS TO AID THE DEFENDANT'S LAWYER, JAFARI DELARAM, WHICH SHE AND THE COA STAFF, HAD BEEN DOING, OPENLY, AGAINST MY CASE, IN THE COURT OF APPEAL.

THE LAW DOES NOT SAY THAT, WHEN IT COMES TO URGENT MOTIONS, THAT ARE BEFORE, THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO, THAT A REGISTRAR CAN DELAY IT, BY NOT FILING IT AND REQUESTING THE MOVING PARTY, TO SERVE AND FILE OTHER DOCUMENTS, SUCH AS A FACTUM AND MOTION RECORD, BEFORE AN URGENT MOTION CAN BE HEARD. THE URGENCY OF THE MATTER, PROVIDES AN EXCEPTION, IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES.  WHAT THE LAW DOES SAY IS THIS: (given in the practice directions, as well as the rules directly):

Practice Direction Concerning Civil Appeals at the Court of Appeal for Ontario

 Jump to Motions before Three Judges — 7.2. Except in cases of urgency, panel motions will not be scheduled for hearing until the moving party has filed the motion record, factum and transcript, if any. 2. The oral argument for panel motions shall be limited to 15 minutes for the moving party, 10 minutes for the responding party, and 5 minutes for reply.

There is clearly an exception to the rule, when it comes to urgent motions, that are before the Court of Appeal for Ontario. Yet this woman, Sandra Theroulde, as the deputy registrar, keep on interfering with my rights, under the law. She has instructed the judicial staff, not to file this urgent motion for a stay order and also for reviewing the order of the judge, Harvison Young, that was made on March 5th, dismissing that motion, for a stay, while my matter is still pending, before the Court of Appeal for Ontario. If that is not evidence, of a lack of procedural fairness, then all of the laws pertaining to that, should be rewritten. 

Sandra Theroulde, deputy registrar, now has blocked the urgent motion, for filing and is now requesting, that it be filed, as a regular motion, with service upon the defendant, through her lawyer, Jafari Delaram. As well as to provide a factum and motion record and all of the other actions, that goes with a regular filing of of a motion. She has no jurisdiction to do what she did, regarding my matter, that is presently, before the Court of Appeal for Ontario. 

TANASHA ADAMS, MOTIONS CLERK, AT THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO, TO BE CHARGED WITH, CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, IN A LEGAL PROCEEDING. (This charge was the result of her numerous actions, on behalf of the defandant's lawyer, Jafari Delaram, to aid her in having an advantage, in the legal matter, that is before the COA).

Below is an email from Tanasha Adams, who works under the deputy registrar, Sandra Theroulde, and was advised by her, to informed me, about the status of my urgent motion. Of which a direct copy, was sent to also, to the email of Sandra Theroulde. 

Email from Tanasha Adams, on the instructions of, Sandra Theroulde, 

regarding the urgent motion.