COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO, EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION. DEPUTY REGISTRAR, SANDRA THEROULDE, "JUDGE GAVE ME THE INSTRUCTIONS, TO ADJOURNED, YOUR CASE TO MARCH 5TH". WHY DID THIS JUDGE, WITH NO NAME, NOT HEAR THE CASE, THAT WAS UP THAT DAY, FOR A HEARING AND NOT ADJOURNED THE MATTER, HIMSELF?
 | |
| SANDRA THEROULDE, DEPUTY REGISTRAR |
TIME LINE OF EVENTS ON MARCH 3RD.
* At 9 a.m, Sandra Theroule, Deputy Registrar, advised me, on the telephone, that my scheduled urgent motion, for a Stay order, was going to be brought before the court, at 10:00 a.m, the time that it was to be heard.
* By late afternoon, on March 3rd, the urgent motion, was still not brought before the court, to be heard. At which time, Sandra Theroulde, deputy registrar, then informed me, that the lawyer for the defendant, Jafari Delaram, who had sent an email to the court, at 12:30 p.m, and was requesting that the urgent motion for a stay, be heard on March 5th, which would allow the eviction to be carried out on March 4th. Sandra Theroulde, agreed with the lawyer.
* The urgent motion,was not brought before the court to be heard, by the judge.
* Sandra Theroulde, then claimed that the judge, gave the court staff, the permission to adjourned the the hearing, for March 5th. Without reviewing, the urgent motion, that was up for a hearing on March 3rd, the day the Registrar adjourned it, to March 5th. And one day later, after the eviction was to be carried out, against the appellant.
SANDRA THEROULDE, THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR AND MANGER OF THE COURT JUDICIAL STAFF, AFTER SHE HAD WITHHOLD THE URGENT MOTION, UNTIL THE END OF THE DAY AND HAD NOT BROUGHT IT, BEFORE THE COURT, AS IT WAS ALREADY SCHEDULED, TO BE HEARD THAT DAY, ON MARCH 3RD, THEN CLAIMED THAT A JUDGE, THAT REMAINED UNNAMED, HAD INSTRUCTED THE COURT STAFF, TO ADJOURNED THE CASE, TO A LATER DATE, TO FRIDAY MARCH 5TH, WITHOUT THE JUDGE, EVEN LOOKING AT THE CASE.
THE MATTER WAS AN URGENT MOTION, THAT WAS BEFORE THE COURT THAT DAY. AND UNDER THE LAW, SINCE IT WAS ALREADY SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD, THE JUDGE SHOULD HAVE SEEN AND REVIEWED THE MATTER, AND THEN TO DECIDE IF IT WAS TO BE HEARD, OR ADJOURNED, AND TO MAKE THAT DECISION IN WRITING AND ALSO TO GIVE THE REASONS, FOR THE DECISION. IF WE ARE TO BELIEVE, SANDRA THEROULDE'S STATEMENT, THEN THE JUDGE, WHO ALONE CAN MAKE A DECISION, ON A CASE BEFORE THE COURT, THEN INSTRUCTED THE COURT STAFF, ALLEGEDLY, TO DO HER LEGAL DUTY, FOR HER, AS A JUDGE. ACCORDING TO SANDRA THEROULDE, DEPUTY REGISTRAR.
WE STILL DO NOT HAVE A NAME, FOR THIS JUDGE, THAT THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, SANDRA THEROULDE, WHO TOOK OVER THE DUTY OF THE JUDGE, IN THIS MATTER AND POSTPONED THE URGENT MOTION, TO A LATER DATE, WHILE KNOWING THAT BY DOING SO, THAT THE APPELLANT, WOULD SUFFER HARM. AS THIS WAS ALSO THE INTENDED MOTIVE, ON THE PART OF THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, SANDRA THEROULDE AND THE COURT, FOR DOING SO. THE DELAY OF THE HEARING, WAS DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL, ON THE PART OF THE COURT OF APPEAL'S STAFF AND THE ALLEGED JUDGE, WHO GAVE THE COURT STAFF, THE INSTRUCTIONS TO DO SO, ALLEGEDLY.
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO, EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION. DEPUTY REGISTRAR, SANDRA THEROULDE, "JUDGE GAVE ME INSTRUCTIONS, TO ADJOURNED, YOUR CASE TO MARCH 5TH". WHY DID THIS JUDGE, WITH NO NAME, NOT HEAR THE CASE, THAT WAS UP THAT DAY, FOR A HEARING AND NOT ADJOURNED THE MATTER, HIMSELF?
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO, JUDGE, WHOSE NAME WAS NOT GIVEN, BY THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, SANDRA THEROULDE, ALLEGEDLY, INSTRUCTED THE COURT STAFF, TO ADJOURNED MY URGENT MOTION, THAT WAS UP FOR A HEARING, ON MARCH 3RD, TO MARCH 5TH. SINCE ON MARCH 4TH, THE APPELLANT, WAS SCHEDULED TO BE EVICTED, BY THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE. WHILE HER OTHER MATTERS, WERE STILL BEFORE, THE COURT OF APPEAL. AND THOSE OTHER MATTERS, MAINLY, HER MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL, WAS NOT HEARD AS YET, IN THE SAME COURT.
WHICH JUDGE, WHO KNOWS THE LAW AND IS BOUND BY IT, TO ACT IN A FAIR MANNER, WOULD ADJOURNED A HEARING, WITHOUT EVEN REVIEWING THE MATTER, TO A LATER DATE, KNOWING THAT BY DOING SO, THAT IT WOULD ALSO CAUSED, THE APPELLANT IRREPARABLE HARM? AND TO ASKED THE COURT STAFF, TO DO HER LEGAL DUTY, ON BEHALF OF THE JUDGE? DEPUTY REGISTRAR, SANDRA THEROULDE, "JUDGE GAVE ORAL INSTRUCTIONS, TO THE COURT STAFF, TO ADJOURN THE MATTER"
THIS IS ALSO EVIDENCE, OF THE HARM, THAT THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT AND ITS COURTS, WITH ITS CORRUPT JUDGES AND STAFF, HAS DONE AGAINST ME, WHO IS THE VICTIM, OF THIS GROSS INJUSTICE, THAT WAS CARRIED OUT, BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.
