THE SHOCKING PROOF, OF HOW CANADA'S LAWS, ARE ACTUALLY TREATED, BY THE ADJUDICATORS, AT TRIBUNALS. ABSOLUTELY, NO REGARD, FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, OR THE LAW. OR FOR PEOPLE'S RIGHTS, UNDER THE CHARTER.
THIS LAWYER, ASHLEY DEATHE'S ACTIONS, BROUGHT A DISREPUTE TO THE, ADMINISTRATIONOF JUSTICE, NOT TO MENTIONED, A DISREGARD,FOR THE CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS, OF THE APPELLANT, WHEN SHE ALSO IGNORED THE CHARTER RIGHT VIOLATIONS, IN HER APPEAL.
The Charter Rights Violations, with the illegal entry into my home, on two occasions and also in the space of two days, by Animal Welfare Services inspectors, including, inspectors Ryan Withrow and Bailey Wintermute, included, those rights under section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and under section 24(2), of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The latter violation of my Charter rights, involving the evidence taken, including electronic evidence, such as photographs or videos, with their cell phones or cameras), during their illegal entry into my home on those two occasions, without a warrant. This ACRB Member and lawyer, Ashley Deathe saw
nothing wrong with their actions and disregarded my appeal at the ACRB,
regarding the violations of my Charter rights, by those inspectors.
I WILL BE REQUESTING, A JUDICIAL REVIEW, FROM THE DIVISIONAL COURT, REGARDING ANY DECISIONS, THAT SHE MAKES REGARDING, MY CHARTER RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.
HERE ARE SOME OF THE THINGS, THAT THIS LAWYER AND ACRB BOARD MEMBER, ASHLEY DEATHE, HAS DONE AT THE HEARING, OF THE CHARTER RIGHTS APPEAL.
LAWYER, ASHLEY DEATHE
1. NO RECORDING, OF HER HEARINGS, AT THE ACRB, including, no audio recording, or court reporter, transcribing the hearing, ONLY, note taking, by her. When she was asked by the Appellant, if the hearing was being recorded, she said, "NO".
Yet, the hearing, was to addressed, Constitutional issues, around the Charter of Rights violations, under section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and also under section 24(2) of the charter.
2. She also denied the Appellant, the request to adjourned, the hearing of her appeals, on April 6th, so that her Charter of Rights application, could be heard first, at the ACRB, (A voir dire hearing), so that the evidence that was obtained, by the illegal entry into her home, without a warrant, TWICE, (in 48 hours), or twice in two days, by Animal Welfare Services, inspectors and also by the police (who accompanied them the first time, on February 4th. Neither the police, nor the animal services inspectors, did not even bother to get a telewarrant, much less the usual warrants) in her absence, could be heard separately from her appeal hearings, she said NO and went ahead with the hearing, despite what that would mean, regarding the Appellant's rights, under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. ACRB Member, Ashley Deathe, did not view their actions, as an issue regarding my appeal, nor as a violation under the Charter, hence the reason why she went ahead,with the hearing of the appeal, without giving the Appellant the right to challenged their actions at the Board, or to seek a remedy from the Board, for those Charter violations. Encouraging her decision, was the corrupt government lawyer, Jason Tam. Toronto Lawyer Jason Tam, makes more than a quarter million dollars a year, working for the government, yet he still showed absolutely no regards and even contempt, for Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the very Constitution, that he is suppose to protect.
3. Loud noises of children (apparently the Member, Ashley Deathe's own children), playing in the room, (it was a video conference hearing), at the time of the appeal hearing on April 5th, and also disrupting the hearing. Frequently shouting, yelling, crying or laughing, as the hearing took place. The Member, Ashley Deathe, HERSELF, adjourned the hearing, citing that she had an emergency, which may have also included her noisy children, playing in the background and apparently, at a hearing that was being conducted in her home. That is how "seriously", this member took a hearing of an appeal, that involved Constitutional issues, such as a Charter of Rights and Freedoms, violation, under sections 8 and 24 (2) of the Charter.
4. When the issue was brought up by the Appellant, at the hearing on April 5th, regarding having her Charter rights violations, addressed by the ACRB Tribunal or Board, including, for a remedy, the Member Ashley Deathe, said that she was not aware that the Board, had the jurisdiction to hear her appeal, regarding her Charter rights. I, the Appellant, told her then and there, that a Tribunal was considered as a "court of competent jurisdiction" to hear my appeals. She responded that she had to verify this and that was another reason for her adjourning the hearing, until April 6th. On April 6th, after her conduct at the hearing, in insisting that the hearing continue, WITHOUT being recorded, I decided to look up this Member, Ashley Deathe online (and for the purpose of writing this article, also) and was shocked to learn that she was a lawyer. She was so against the issues raised, about my Charter rights, INCLUDING, having a hearing about those Charter rights violations, that was NOT being recorded, no audio, or transcribing of the hearing, much less a video (video recordings are not allowed, in any Canadian courts, the public can only rely on an audio recordings, of a hearing or trial) and also insisting that the hearing continue, without being recorded, either by audio, or by transcription, where no evidence of what was said and done at the hearing, would ever be heard, outside of that hearing room, or court.
This lawyer and ACRB Tribunal Member, Ashley Deathe, should know the importance of the so called ( I say so called, and it is such until proven otherwise, because of how some people, are robbed of the protection, of those very same guaranteed rights and freedoms. People like this writer and blogger), and guaranteed rights and freedoms, provided under the Canadian Constitution. How did this lawyer, Ashley Deathe, who is mandated by the Law Society of Upper Canada, to act in a manner, that would not interfered, with the administration of justice, then go ahead and acted to disregard it at the hearings that she presided over and to perverted the administration of justice, by her conduct?. Do you think that it was reasonable, for her to have a hearing that involved a Charter of Rights violations, especially under sections 8 and 24(2) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and to NOT have that hearing itself recorded?. And to say so to that fact?. Is that not a further violation, under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to have a hearing that is not fair?. How could it be a fair hearing, involving Charter issues, when all that the Appellant has, are the notes of the Member, or to write down her own notes of the hearing, which would not hold up in court. Neither her notes, nor the Member's notes of the hearing, should an appeal court wanted to hear, what was said and done at such a hearing, would also be accepted, by the court. It is not evidence gathering, that I am talking here, but a part of the procedure.
Read more about this matter in my next article, which I will also give more details about.
I will also be exposing the corrupt lawyer and counsel for the Ministry of the Attorney General, and the Animal Welfare Services, Jason Tam, a lawyer whose salary is almost three hundred thousand dollars, per year and I will show you how undeserving he is of even working as counsel, on behalf of the government, since he has NO REGARDS, for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, himself. Or of the Constitution of Canada, which governs those rights. You can look at it as his own personal corruption, or as a representative, of the Canadian government, which does not enforced its own laws, that are a part of its own Constitution.
