T.O. LAWYER JASON TAM'S PERSONAL CORRUPTION. WHAT ELSE WOULD YOU CALL IT? JASON TAM CALLED AN APPEAL, ABOUT A CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AN, "ABUSE OF PROCESS"..

 LAWYER, JASON TAM, MAKES HIMSELF TO BE, BIGGER THAN THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION,  BY TELLING THE COURT, (IN HIS SUBMISSIONS), TO THROW OUT AN APPEAL, OVER A CHARTER OF RIGHTS VIOLATION, BECAUSE IT WAS, "AN ABUSE OF PROCESS". 

TORONTO LAWYER, JASON TAM, WHO WORKS FOR, THE MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, YES! YOU HEARD THAT RIGHT, CALLED THE APPELLANT'S APPEAL, IN IT'S ENTIRETY, "AN ABUSE OF PROCESS". THE APPEAL ALSO INVOLVED, A CHARTER OF RIGHTS VIOLATION, UNDER SECTION 8, OF THE CHARTER. 

LAWYER, JASON TAM, WHO WORKS FOR THE MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, WANTS THE ACRB TO THROW OUT AN APPEAL, THAT HAS AS ITS BASIS, A CHARTER OF RIGHTS VIOLATION, UNDER SECTION 8, AGAINST AN ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE, THAT WAS CARRIED OUT, NOT ONCE, OR TWICE, BUT THREE TIMES, WITHOUT A WARRANT. 

I AM SERIOUSLY LOOKING, INTO WHETHER OR NOT, LAWYER JASON TAM, CAN BE SUED OVER THIS STATEMENT.  OR OF SOME OTHER KINDS OF LEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST HIM.  I ALSO WOULD NOT MIND, SEEING HIM REMOVED, AS A COUNSEL, FOR THE SOCIAL JUSTICE TRIBUNAL AND THE MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

LAWYER JASON TAM, WILL SAY JUST ABOUT ANYTHING, TO KEEP HIS HEFTY SALARY, AT THE MINISTRY. BUT DOES HE DESERVED SUCH A SALARY, WHEN HE IS ALSO ATTACKING, PEOPLE'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, UNDER THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS?. THOSE ARE SUPPOSEDLY, THE GUARANTEED RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS AND ALSO THE INHERENT RIGHTS, OF ALL CANADIANS. SO WHO IS THIS LAWYER, TO TAKE A VIOLATION UNDER THE, CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOM, SO LIGHTLY?. 

WHERE DOES HE GET OFF, SAYING THAT IT IS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS, IF SOMEONE'S RIGHTS HAS BEEN VIOLATED, UNDER THE CHARTER?

TORONTO LAWYER, JASON TAM, WHO WORKS FOR, THE MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, YES! YOU HEARD THAT RIGHT, CALLED THE APPELLANT'S APPEAL, IN IT'S ENTIRETY, "AN ABUSE OF PROCESS". THE APPEAL ALSO INVOLVED, A CHARTER OF RIGHTS VIOLATION, UNDER SECTION 8, OF THE CHARTER.

THE APPEAL IS ABOUT A CHARTER OF RIGHTS VIOLATION, UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE CANADIAN CHARTER  OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS., BY THE ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICE INSPECTORS, WHO HAD ILLEGALLY ENTERED INTO THE APPELLANT'S HOME, NOT ONCE, OR TWICE, BUT THREE TIMES, WITHOUT A WARRANT. UNHEARD OF RIGHT?. BUT THAT IS EXACTLY, WHAT HAS HAPPENED.  RARELY, IF AT ALL, DOES THIS CHARTER BREACH UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE CHARTER, HAPPENS TO THE SAME PERSON, MORE THAN ONCE AND BY THE SAME PERSONS. I HAVE YET TO COME ACROSS THIS KIND OF VIOLATION, IN ANY OTHER CASE LAWS, IN CANADA. THREE TIMES IN THREE DAYS, WITHOUT A WARRANT. THIS IS UNHEARD OF. WHICH MAKES THE STATEMENT OF THE LAWYER, JASON TAM, ALL THE MORE DISTURBING.  ANOTHER DISTURBING FACT, IS THAT THIS LAWYER, ALSO WORKS FOR THE VERY MINISTRY, THAT IS MANDATED TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS, OF VICTIMS. WHETHER THEY BE OF A CHARTER OF RIGHTS VIOLATION, OR NOT. CLEARLY, BY HIS STATEMENT, HE THINKS VERY LITTLE OF THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS. WHICH ARE ALSO THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, OF ALL CANADIANS. 

SHOW ME, IF YOU CAN FIND SUCH A CASE, OF A CHARTER OF RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, THAT HAS HAPPENED TO A PERSON, THREE TIMES AND IN THE THE SPACE OF TWO DAYS, BY THE SAME PERSONS, WORKING FOR THE SAME AGENCY?. AND THEN CONTACT ME HERE, ON MY BLOG, TO POST IT.

TAM MADE THIS COMMENT, IN HIS SUBMISSIONS, TO THE ACRB TRIBUNAL MEMBER, ASHLEY DEATHE'S AFTER SHE HAD REQUESTED IN HER ORDER, THAT BOTH THE APPELLANT AND THE RESPONDENT, MAKE SUBMISSIONS, AS TO WHY THE HEARING SHOULD BE ADJOURNED?. SHE ALSO MADE IT CLEAR IN THE ORDER, THAT IT WAS HER INTENTION, TO DISMISSED THE APPELLANT'S APPEALS, AS BEING ABANDONED, AND ON THE ADVISED FROM THE LAWYER, JASON TAM, WHEN THE APPELLANT WAS ALSO, FORCED TO LEAVE THE THE HEARING. 

WITHOUT MAKING THIS LAWYER'S STATEMENTS, SOUND ANYMORE INCONSEQUENTIAL, I WILL LEAVE OFF COMMENTING, ANY FURTHER ON IT.