Thursday, September 27, 2012

CROWN WITHDREW CHARGES, AGAINST THE ACCUSED, IDHOLO HUGUES.

THE CONSPIRACY, SURROUNDING THE CROWN'S, WITDRAWAL, OF THE CHARGES, AGAINST THE ACCUSED.


On Tuesday, September 25, the accused, Idholo Hugues aka Hugues Idholo Yala, was in court at the Old
City Hall courthouse, inToronto, where he was also facing the criminal charge, of threatening, pertaining to the animal, whose life, he had threatened and also tried to kill back in July.  The charge against him, was also withdrawn by the court, upon the recommendation of the crown.  A few days earlier, on September 20, the same court, had also not proceeded, with the private charges, that were also laid against the accused, by the victim, in this case.
This has happened, also, despite the fact that the crown attorney's office and also the police officer, who was in charge of the case, Robert Monteiro, of the 14 Division precinct, were earlier informed by Patricia Wilson, the manager, of the Victim Witness Programme, on behalf of the victim in this case, regarding the questionable identity, of the accused, which should have also been investigated by them, and also addressed, by the court.  This also did not happen in this case. The police also had direct knowledge, of the accused, using different names, as his legal name, but also did nothing about it. 

Then there is also the 911 tape, and what both the crown attorney's office and also the police, also did with that piece of evidence. Where the accused could also be heard, in the background, making his threats to kill the animal, as the victim also called the police. The most damaging piece of evidence, however, was the accused, Idholo Hugues, own self incriminating statements to the police, directly, as he was being arrested
on July 9th, regarding his intentions. "I'm going to kill it, I don't care", he was heard to tell the police. He had also challenged, the owner of the animal earlier, by saying, "bring it, i.e cat, into the kitchen, I am going to kill it right now", as he also took up a knife and advanced towards the victim.  Two other witnesses were also present, as the accused had attacked the victim and also tried to kill her animal and had continued to ranted on about his intentions. What had led up to the attack, was the accused not wanting the animal, on the premises and was also incited, when the victim had washed her cat in the kitchen sink earlier. The victim was talking to the landlord, over the matter, when the accused also attacked her and also attempted to carry out his threats to kill her animal. His chilling words were disregarded by the police, when they also put him back into the same house, as the victims, in this case.

Still the police wanted to be convinced, about the accused actions, so they called in, to listen to the 911 tape at the scene and afterwards they took the accused into custody. They also told the victim after listening to the 911 tape, that it was unlikely that the accused, would be let back into the residence, after his arrest. That also changed at the police station, after they "had a discussion" and the accused was released on his own recognizance, with no undertakings by the police, including the fact that the accused was also free, to continue to have contact with the victim, in this case and to continue to live on the same premesis.

The Toronto police officer, Robert Monteiro, and other officers from the 14 division precinct, also, later fabricated their version, of the events, in their report to the court. Another police officer, from 14 division, Steven Correia, who also told the lie, that he was the staff sergeant, when he was asked to put a call through to the staff sergeant on duty, was also just convicted, in June of 2012, for his role as an undercover officer, with the drug squad, and where he was also charged and convicted, with the following charges of , assault, theft, perjury, conspiracy to obstruct justice and extortion. One of the charge that he had also faced, for perjury, was for falsifying his notes and then lying about it later, at a preliminary hearing.  He was also previously charged with fraud. So it should also surprised no one, that their old habits, should also resurfaced, with the Idholo Hugues, aka Hugues Idholo case. That is what I was up against, and the fact that they have been able to work with both the crown attorney's office and also the court, in having the charge withdrawn, against the accused, is also a testimony to this fact. It is also clear that the accused, Idholo Hugues, aka Hugues Idholo Yala, has some "special" relationship, with the police and for which they're also willing, to go all out to protect him. I, of course, knows what that relationship is, since he has been able to avoid being prosecuted, for what amounts to be a crime against the public, including for what appears to be fraud, in regards to his different identities. I am trying to get my hands on the 911 tape, as well as other court documents, that should also be available to the public, to also prove my point, about him and also about this case. This case is also not going to go away anytime soon. After the full evidence has also come out, about the accused, then the public can also decide on how they have acted corruptly, in this case.


Friday, September 7, 2012

T.O. POLICE, 14 DIVISION, CONTROVERSIAL DECISION, IN THE HUGUES IDHOLO CASE, CAUGHT ON TAPE.

PATRICIA WILSON, OF THE VICTIM WITNESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, COMMENTS, RE: 14 DIVISION POLICE. THE COMMENTS ARE BASED, ON THE SCANDALOUS ACTIONS, OF THE POLICE, IN THE ARREST OF THE ACCUSED, HUGUES IDHOLO, AKA IDHOLO HUGUES, IN THE JULY 9th, INCIDENT AND ALSO THREATENING CHARGE, AGAINST HIM. THE ACCUSED, HAD ALSO UTTERED, DEATH THREATS, IN THIS CASE.

THE ACCUSED, HUGUES IDHOLO, AKA IDHOLO HUGUES.


In this video, the police, has left it up to a civilian, in this case, the landlord of the accused, to put any restrictions, on him.

The accused is also suspected of committing identity fraud.
Among the different Canadian government agencies, that he has used the name of 'Hugues Idholo', includes, Ministry of Social Services (Toronto), or welfare, the CIBC bank (Toronto), Canada Revenue Agency, the company KELLY services, PLAN and others. Who has the more compelling information about him? I chose to believe the other government agencies and the bank, over the police, at this time. The police also has more than enough reason, to lie, regarding the accused and in fact, has lied, in their court documents, regarding the case. This is corruption and has also led to charges, against the police themselves, in this case. Human Rights protection, means that the police, should have protected, the safety of the public first, and not put their own interest first. Those documented evidence, has also refuted the police claim, about the name of the accused, being 'Idholo Hugues'. The court, of course, cannot ignore such evidence, as the police also did, in this case. Basically, in the case of the accused, regarding the aliases, he has used, which has also included, using different names, for the same address, and with those other government agencies and private companies, or the bank, besides the one he has been charged under. What else could this be more than fraud?. This is a person, who is also new in the country and has already established himself, in the most violent way. And the police is also trying, to prevent him, from being penalized for it.