Tuesday, February 6, 2018

CANADIAN COURTS, LACKS TRANSPARENCY, AS IT BLOCKS RECORDINGS, IN ITS COURT PROCEEDINGS..

CANADA, HAS ONE OF THE WORST HUMAN RIGHTS RECORDS, WHEN IT COMES TO ITS JUDICIAL SYSTEM. THE WAY TO PROTECT INDIVIDUALS AND CERTAIN GROUPS, IS TO ALLOW CAMERAS AND AUDIO RECORDINGS, IN ITS COURTS. 

PROCEEDINGS IN ITS MINOR COURTS, ALL THE WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA, THE PUBLIC IS KEPT OUT OF ITS LEGAL PROCESS, AND MUST RELY ON THE SECOND HAND VERSIONS, OF RULINGS, HANDED DOWN BY CORRUPT JUDGES AND JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. BUT THE CORRUPTION, ALSO, INCLUDE ITS POLICE AND OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, SUCH AS CSIS AND THE RCMP, AND THEIR ATTACKS ON THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS OF PERSONS, WHICH WOULD HAVE CONDEMN THEIR ACTIONS.  AND ALSO CONSTITUTE, A VIOLATION, UNDER HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS.
CANADIAN LAWYERS TOO, JUST SIMPLY GO ALONG WITH IT. THEY ARE ALSO A PART OF ITS FLAWED JUDICIAL SYSTEM.  WHICH CANNOT SIMPLY CONTINUE, IT ITS CURRENT STATE. THE RIGHT TO RECORD IN ITS COURTS, SHOULD BE EVERYONE'S CONCERN.  

"Where there is no publicity there is no justice. Publicity is the very soul of justice. It is the keenest spur to exertion and the surest of all guards against improbity. It keeps the judge himself while trying under trial." - Jeremy Bentham, English Reformer.

The right to record, in any of Canada courts is, currently, non existent. I have been writing  on this blog over the years, in regards to this topic, since it also affects me personally. Many of the wrongs being done in the Canadian courts, stem from the fact that there is no transparency, as far as its legal process. Its judicial system is seriously flawed. The individual rights and freedoms that are supposed to be a part of that judicial system, do not exist for some people. That has to change. Many of my personal experiences, in regards to the Canadian legal system, exist because of the way in which my legal matters, has been handled by the corruption, that is so prevalent in its courts. I find that there is no way to get around this, unless some drastic steps are also taken, to stop this form of human rights abuse. The attacks against some Bloggers, like myself, in Canada, has so far not gotten the attention, that it deserves, by the international press. Or by any human rights groups, who should have taken such complaints, against the Canadian government’s suppression of the right to freedom of speech, more seriously. As a result, those Bloggers like myself, who has reported on that country’s human rights abuse, continues to experience the following. Police harassment and many attempts to entrap them. The denial of their rights in the Canadian courts and many covert actions taken against them, that is specifically designed, to destroy them as human beings. Especially, in destroying their credibility and to break their spirits, by its own acts of terrorism against such persons. My own personal story is nothing short of horrific. As of this date, I am still fighting to have my rights recognized, by the Canadian courts and to have the freedom to continue to report on its injustices, whether towards me, or others, through my Blog.




THIS BLOG IS, CURRENTLY, BEING CENSORED AND THIS BLOGGER, HAS FACED PERSECUTION, AS A RESULT OF, EXPOSING HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, IN CANADA.


HELP TO STOP THIS KIND OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, BY DONATING, TO THIS BLOG.


FREEDOM OF SPEECH, IS A BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS. SUPPORT BLOGGERS, AT RISK. SUPPORT THIS BLOG.

















































































































































































I have no choice as a Blogger and journalist, but to continue to advocate, for the use of both cameras and audio recordings, in the Canadian courts. This is a fight that should also be taken up by human rights organizations, to protect the rights of Bloggers and other journalists, from facing persecution from the Canadian government, when they choose to write about its human rights abuse. I have personally  been thrown to the dogs, on this one. No human rights agencies are willing to take up my cause, mainly because of that government’s influence, to sabotage my case. That has not deterred me from either seeking to get justice in my case, or to continue to expose its human rights abuse through my Blog, or any other avenues that I have chosen to do so.

The right to Blog, Article 19, UNESCO. "Blogging plays an invaluable role in the free flow of information worldwide and is a true example of the democratization of publishing in the online world". Agnes Callamard, Executive Director of Article 19, of the Convention.

" In the 21st century, many bloggers will take their place as watchdogs, alongside traditional media. The international community and individual states must develop protection for bloggers, just as they have developed protection for traditional media. Similar protection must be provided to bloggers. ARTICLE 19's policy, The Right to Blog, offers recommendations on how this should be done in practice". Agnes Callamard, Executive Director, ARTICLE 19, UNESCO, CONVENTION, ON THE DIVERSITY OF CULTURAL EXPRESSIONS.
Related comments:
Chief Justice of Canada, Beverley McLachlin" Anyone with a keyboard and access to a blog can now be a reporter. And who is to say they are not?" 
(The problem is, that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, Beverly Mclachlin, also do not put her words into practice,  in this sense. First of all, your case will not get before her, to begin with. The S.C.C. only hear a limited amount of cases, about 12 percent). Secondly, if your case is about the individual rights and freedoms, you are barking up the wrong tree. The S.C.C., will only hear, and rule on those cases, that has a broader (public) appeal. Anything that is sensational and or has a wider public interest (minus your individual rights), the Supreme Court of Canada, will hear those cases. Take its human rights record, in the judicial system?. Need I say any more?. 

It should also be noted here, that one of the three main features of the Conference, that were of concern and which came under scrutiny, is one of the following. The "mass surveillance" of governments, in censoring citizens online, which has a "chilling effect of freedom of expression online". The three main areas of concern were, 1. Increasing repressive legislation, 2. Blocking, filtering and content removal and 3. Mass Surveillance. Article 19, of the Convention addresses all of those concerns, with the focus on providing bloggers with the same means of protection, as other journalists. It is time those protections, be enforced and put into practice. This Blogger, has been and is still facing severe persecutions, as a result of her Blog, Canada Human Rights Abuse is Exposed. The Truth is Revealed. Currently, all of her efforts in any Canadian courts, Administrative Tribunal, or Boards and in any of its legal and judicial systems, are currently blocked. And efforts are continually, being made to silenced her. She intends to make those responsible, for ARTICLE 19, also acts upon it, to protect her rights in this case.

Related Articles:
Are bloggers ‘journalists’? New Zealand’s High Court says yes. If bloggers are journalists, should they all benefit from the same legal protections?. Article written by Johnathan Ah Kit. 

The New Zealand court agree, that Bloggers are a main part of the media and should be afforded the same protections. Justice Asher, said in his ruling on a case, Craig vs Slater, where a Blogger, Cameron Slater, was seeking, $16 million dollars in damages as a payout, in a defamation lawsuit, against former Conservative Party leader, Colin Craig, in a counterclaim, against the politician. The judge stated that: "The definition (i.e. of a journalist), does not impose quality requirements and does not require the dissemination of news to be in a particular format". 

This ruling is important, because of the rules of common law (which in this case, would also include the Commonwealth Evidence Act, of Australia, an Act used in the Australian federal court. Which is a commonwealth country, like Canada) and which both Canada, New Zealand and Australia, are a part of. The application of that Act, based on the (rules) of common law, in anyone of those countries, can and does, have implications in other Commonwealth countries. So, if a precedent was set in that ruling, i.e Craig, vs Slater, in the Australian court, it could also apply to any similar case in Canada. (Canadian courts are much more open to using case laws, or common laws, even from other countries and especially, commonwealth countries, in its decisions).


Links:valerieguillaume.blogspot.com/2012/01/world-view-of-corrupt-canadian-judicial.html


theconversation.com/are-bloggers-journalists-new-zealands-high-court-says-yes-31640



Thursday, February 1, 2018

TORONTO 23 DIVISION POLICE: THE FACES OF SOME OF TORONTO'S, LESS THAN FINEST.

It  has been a while since I have exposed some of Toronto’s corrupt cops. With their faces exposed in the media, they will probably think twice, about acting corruptly. Sometimes the corruption is not sensational, but could be just as simple as forgetting this little fact. That they are suppose to represent the interest of the public and not the people that they are sometimes in league with. As in a conspiracy.  These police officers has their own sets of rules, that has nothing to do with the law. This is where their human nature and their personal characters, become evident. By exposing their faces to the public, you can get a glimpse into how they conduct their duties.  




23 Division Police Constable, D. Khan.
A really disgusting excuse, for a police
officer. Immoral and not beyond acting
outside of his duties. As in acting corrupt.
Officer Khan, was a partner, along with his
fellow officer, D. Rozman, in carrying out
an illegal eviction, for a crooked landlord. The
police job is not in, illegally, evicting
anyone. But these two had no problem
in acting corruptly, in regards to that
matter.



 
23 Division Police Constable, D. Rozman. It is not
just in telling someone, that they might get AIDS, this
cop, has no problem, in "bending the rules', to fit
a particular situation. I have seen him do exactly
that, in regards to a very corrupt landlord,Gloria
 Akinsara. He basically, carried out an  illegal
eviction, for her.

 

23 Division Police Constable, Dawood.
This one's problem, is that that he has a
really bad attitude. But I am sure that,
given the right situation, he can act
just as corruptly, as the other two
police officers, mentioned here.

 

If you need something done, in the "wrong" way, you just have to get two police officers, who are already "predisposed", to acting corruptly, on your team. I cannot report what the payoff was, because I do not know. But I can report that both officers Khan and Rozman, had no problem, in helping a crooked landlord, get rid of a troublesome tenant, through an illegal eviction. What else have they done, that has not been reported?. And along with these three, Toronto 23 Division Police, are their fellow officers, A. Kahlon and A. Crawford, (I could not locate their pictures, to post it here),who also acted corruptly, by assisting (aiding and abetting), a Toronto landlord, in not rescuing, or caring for an animal, but in maliciously giving it away, as a final act, in the landlord getting rid of her tenant. Those two officers, Kahlon and Crawford, are accused of both illegally entering the tenant's home, without a warrant and also of confiscating her animal, (in a conspiracy with the landlord) and giving it away to the animal shelter. What made them believed that the owner, had abandoned the animal, in the first place?. Leaving your animal in your own home for a few hours, cannot be seriously considered, as abandoning an animal. Yet those two 23 Division police officers, A. Kahlon and A. Crawford, took it upon themselves, to assist the landlord in getting rid of the animal, who also posed no trouble to the landlord. Could their actions have been based on something else?. It most certainly did. They were simply continuing with the job of their fellow officers, in making sure that the property owner, had gotten back her place, albeit, illegally. Now, they and the Toronto 23 Division Police, are also facing a lawsuit for breaching the tenant's privacy, by their illegal action. It is very simple. The Canadian Constitution, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, is supposed to protect someone, from an illegal search, or seizure. Most often carried out by the police. The tenant is suing them, for entering her home without a warrant, in her absence and carrying out a search and seizure of her property. The tenant has claimed, that her entire home was illegally searched, not once, but twice, in 24 hours, by the police and also without a warrant. During the first search, the police did not find what they were allegedly searching for. And the second time of their illegal search, they just confiscated her animal and this was done to inflict harm on the tenant.

If you have had dealings, with these Toronto police officers and others like them, do the public a favour and expose their faces in the media.  It just may act as a deterrent, against them acting even more corruptly, in the future. Or it might not. Either way, you've done your job as a concerned citizen. Don't worry too much about how they might react, to having their faces and their names, exposed, in a not so pleasant manner. They deserved it. It is bad enough that they are milking tax payers, with their undeserving and also astronomical and salaries.  Toronto police officers get paid a lot. And for what?. A few are decent and do their jobs as they are supposed to do. Other police officers, are just simply rogue cops. They have no problem in hiding their actions, behind their badges, as it also afford them the opportunity, when called upon, to act corruptly. Or to do something illegal. And we all know what illegal means right?. Or in this case in carrying out their legal duties. It might mean that they did so in such a way, as to leave no doubt, that they have not acted in the best interest of the public. It is for this very reason, that so many of their cases also, gets thrown out of court. They often cannot resist, interfering personally, while carrying out their duties. As I said before, the police has their own sets of rules, that also come in handy, when they either do not want to do something that is right, or do not care to. Very few of them deserve to be also called, "Toronto's finest". I guess that those in the media, who are making that statement, do not know what others in this society, goes through on a regular basis, when dealing with Toronto's so called 'finest'. Or more appropriately, "not so finest" police officers.


 
 

 










ONTARIO JUDGE, RACHEL GRINBERG AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DIANE MCALEER, UPHOLDS RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.

A PUBLIC DEMAND, FOR RECORDINGS, IN CANADIAN COURTROOMS, TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS, OF VULNERABLE PERSONS, APPEARING, BEFORE THE COURT. A To...