Friday, July 21, 2017

CANADA'S HIGHEST COURT, RULED ON BESTIALITY: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA, DID NOT REGARD MAN, WHO COMMITTED BESTIALITY, AS A CRIME.

CANADIAN JUDGES SHOULD JOIN THE HALL OF SHAME. SHAME, SHAME, ON YOU.

CANADIAN LAW HAS FAILED TO PROTECT ANIMALS,WHO HAVE SUFFERED BESTIALITY, FROM HUMANS. IN A RECENT SUPREME COURT OF CANADA RULING, BACK IN 2016,  THE S.C.C.  HAS NARROWED THE SCOPE OF THE LAW,
CONCERNING ZOOPHILLIA AND BESTIALITY. IT REFUSED TO CHANGED THE OUTDATED LAW, TO INCLUDE OTHER ACTS, OTHER THAN FULL SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH AN ANIMAL. ORAL SEX IS OKAY WITH AN ANIMAL, THE S.C.C. SAYS. ANIMALS ARE ALSO IN NEED OF PROTECTION TOO, AGAINST SEXUAL PREDATORS, UNDER THE LAW.




BLAME THIS SUPREME COURT JUDGE, JUSTICE THOMAS CROMWELL, FOR UPHELDING, THE CRUEL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, IN THIS CASE FOR BESTIALITY, AFTER NOT RECOGNIZING, THAT FORCING AN ANIMAL TO ENGAGE, IN ANY KIND OF SEXUAL CONDUCT, IS A CRIME AGAINST THAT ANIMAL. WHO CANNOT GIVE ITS CONSENT AND ARE IN FACT ABUSED BY ITS OWNER, AND BY OTHERS PERPETRATING THOSE ACTS.


Former Supreme Court of Canada Judge, Thomas Cromwell,
now a lawyer again, with BLG, Bordon, Ladner and Gervais
law firm, made a legal blunder, in not recognizing the scope of
zoophillia, and specifically, bestiality, in a ruling last year, when he
ruled that oral sex with a dog (or any animal for that matter), was
not bestiality.
B.C. Supreme Court Judge, Arne Silverman, gave a
suspended sentence, to Brian Anthony Cutteridge,
  a notorious zoophilic monster, of having sex with his dogs.
The man had taken videos of himself, having sex with his dogs.
He got no jail time, from Judge Silverman.







  (Picture is Missing) Calgary, Ablerta,
Judge Gordon Wong, acquitted a man of the charge of bestiality. The man was accused of having sex, as well as forcing his stepson to have sex with animals. Including, a calf and a bull. The man had sex with the bull and then forced his stepson to have oral sex with a calf. The Canadian judge, acquitted the man at trial, to the outrage of the family and the public.




CROMWELL'S RULING THAT FORCING A DOG TO ENGAGE IN A SEXUAL ACT IN CANADA, IS NOT BESTIALITY, IF IT DOES NOT INCLUDE PENETRATION. AND YOU WONDER WHY HE "CHOSE" EARLY RETIREMENT FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. CROMWELL IS NOW BACK TO BEING A REGULAR LAWYER, (SO THE EXCUSE OF AN EARLY RESIGNATION FROM THE SUPREME COURT WAS A FARCE. A LANGUAGE USED BY THOSE IN THE PUBLIC, WHEN THEY KNOW THAT THEIR DISMISSAL IS ALSO IMMINENT.
Perhaps he has performed bestiality on his own dog and so does not regard it as a crime and a cruel act against the poor and defenseless animal. This would also de sensitized him, further, on making any ruling on that subject, as he later did. 

Cromwell' infamous words in ruling on the case, "It is not court to expand the criminal liability for this (ancient) offence". His full statement in his ruling on bestiality, Cromwell said, "The term bestiality has a well established legal meaning and refers to sexual intercourse between a human and an animal". " Penetration has always been an essential element of bestiality", says the former Supreme Court of Canada judge. And with that decision the S.C.C. upheld the acquittal, of the man (who cannot be identified, in order to protect his stepdaughters) convicted and then acquitted, of the bestiality charge against his dogs.


CROMWELL WAS HARPER'S CHOICE, TO BE APPOINTED TO THE SURPREME COURT AND THE REST OF THE PROTOCOL FOLLOWED SMOOTHLY, AFTER THAT. AND JUST AS THE FORMER P.M. WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN HAVING CROMWELL APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR GENERAL, SO TOO THE NEW P.M. JUSTIN TRUDEAU WAS ALSO INSTRUMENTAL, IN BRINGING ABOUT HIS EARLY RETIRMENT AND OR RESIGNATION FROM THE SUPREME COURT. CROMWELL SERVED 8 YEAR ON THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.

TRUDEAU'S COMMONS SENSE APPROACHED HAS CONTINUED, WHEN LAST AUGUST HE PROPOSED SOME NEW CHANGES TO CANADA'S HIGHEST COURT.  The new process will permit any lawyer or judge who fits a specified criteria to apply for a seat on the Supreme Court of Canada, through the Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs.

The more common sense approach by Supreme Court Judge Rosalie Abella ,showed a humane answer to the question of bestiality, as she took a different view from her peers. "“I do not see the absence of a requirement of penetration as broadening the scope of bestiality,” she wrote in her dissenting opinion. “I see it more as a reflection of Parliament’s common sense assumption that, since penetration is physically impossible with most animals and for half the population, requiring it as an element of the offence eliminates from censure most physically exploitative conduct with animals.”

Zoophilia is the more legal term and covers a much broader spectrum concerning humans engaging in sexual acts with animal and includes among those acts, bestiality. Unfortunately, in Canada oral sex with an animal in not considered as bestiality, or as a crime for that matter. Since the SCC made that absolutely clear in its ruling. Satanists and pedophiles are rampant in the courts, social agencies.  And they are also protected by their fraternity as freemasons, which most of them are. All that we can do is to exposed the ones that are caught making decisions that lead us to believe that they are not acting on behalf of the public in regards to their decisions, but "something else". Certainly human rights was far from this judge's mind as well as animal cruelty. He was as unapologetic about his decision, as were all of the other 7 Supreme Court judges who also agreed with him, over what is bestiality, and what is not.
With Justice Rosalie Abella, dissenting on the matter. I wonder if they also owned animal, or would like their animals to be abused in that way?


Former judge, Thomas Cromwell, now a
practicing lawyer. Most lawyers aspire to be
on the Supreme Court. He's had his tenure and now
he is back to being a lawyer, again. You'd think that
he would have been more wise in his decisions,
and to stick around longer. I can't help thinking that
some of his decisions, as a former Supreme Court
judge, also provided his hasty retreat, from Canada's
highest court.


























THE UNFORGIVABLE BLUNDER, OF THIS SUPREME COURT JUDGE, MAY HAVE LED TO HIS EARLY RESIGNATION, FROM CANADA'S HIGHEST COURT. TRUDEAU REPLACED HIM LAST YEAR AND NO DOUBT IT MAY HAVE HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH SOME OF HIS EARLIER CONTROVERSIAL RULINGS. THE ONE THAT STANDS OUT THE MOST HERE, IS CROMWELL'S ACCENTING TO KEEPING THE BEASTIALITY LAWS, FROM INCLUDING ORAL SEX WITH AN ANIMAL, ALONG WITH PENETRATION.  CROMWELL RULED IN 2016, THAT A B.C. MAN DID NOT COMMIT BEASTIALITY UPON HIS DOG, BECAUSE THERE WAS NO PENETRATION AND ONLY ORAL SEX. HE ALSO FORCED THE DOG TO PERFORM A SEXUAL ACT UPON A SIXTEEN YEAR OLD AND THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE, also JUDGED WRONG AND DID NOT SEE IT AS AN ABOMINABLE ACT, PERFOMED ON THE ANIMAL.

NO WONDER THAT, THE FORMER SUPREME COURT JUDGE, IS BACK TO BEING A LAWYER AGAIN, AFTER HIS "EARLY RETIREMENT" I.E EXIT FROM THE SUPREME COURT, BY THE NEW P. M. JUSTIN TRUDEAU. (at least he can tell his new clients that he was a former judge on the supreme court of Canada, but he will also left out the part on some of his more controversial rulings, that got him to make an earlier exist, than the norm).



BLAME THIS SUPREME COURT JUDGE, JUSTICE THOMAS CROMWELL, FOR UPHELDING, THE CRUEL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, IN THIS CASE FOR BESTIALITY.  AFTER NOT RECOGNIZING, THAT FORCING AN ANIMAL TO ENGAGE, IN ANY KIND OF SEXUAL CONDUCT, IS A CRIME AGAINST THAT ANIMAL. WHO CANNOT GIVE ITS CONSENT AND ARE IN FACT ABUSED BY ITS OWNER.

The Supreme Court of Canada Judges.
This should have been an outdated picture, but it is not.
What the f--k are they smiling about?

Take a look at this picture and tell me if there isn't something (fundamentally) wrong with it and also with the legal process in Canada?.
Don't you think that it is time the Supreme Court of Canada changed it's own image from that
of  being snow white and add some diversity to its judges, who are all white? Not one black, or any other minority are represented on Canada's highest court. And if you think that those white judges on the supreme court of Canada, are any different from those at the trial level, you are sadly mistaken. They ruled to uphold the status quo and that is why there are no real changes to any kind of equality, or to any real progress in this country.









Tuesday, June 13, 2017

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, HAS ACKNOWLEDGED, COMPLAINT FROM BLOGGER, TO INVESTIGATE CANADIAN AUTHORITIES, ACCUSED OF COMMITTING CRIMES, UNDER THE ROME STATUTE.

THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, WITH THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, HAS ACKNOWLEDGED, THE COMPLAINTS FROM BLOGGER, VALERIE GUILLAUME, INVOLVING, THOSE CANADIAN AUTHORITIES, WHO ARE NAMED AS ACCUSED PERSONS, BY THE BLOGGER, BEFORE THE I.C.C. 

Loretta Chandler
Municipal Level, Government
Official. And an accused, before
the International Criminal Court.

Sylvia Watson, a former
local politician, and an
Adjudicator, with the
L&T Board, is facing
criminal charges, in the
I.C.C
Matt Pegg, T.O Fire Chief,
is, also an accused, facing
criminal charges, in the
International Criminal Court

Toronto Deputy Fire Chief
Jim Jessop, is facing criminal
charges, in the International
Criminal Court,
Toronto Fire Captain, Rob Patten,
is facing criminal charges, in the
International Criminal Court
 

A partial list of some Canadian officials, who are currently facing criminal charges, in the International Criminal Court, under Article 7, of the Rome Statute.


AN UPDATE: CANADIAN AUTHORITIES, WHO ARE NOW FACING CHARGES, BEFORE THE I.C.C. SHOULD NOW HAVE MORE TO WORRY ABOUT, OVER THEIR ACTIONS, AS THE OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, IS ALSO NOW INVOLVED, IN INVESTIGATING, THE CHARGES AGAINST THEM.


Blogger, Valerie Guillaume, has received an official acknowledgement, from the International Criminal Court, and from the Office of the Prosecutor, recently, involving her claim against several Canadian Authorities, for committing Crimes Against Humanity, against her. The Blogger's request, to the Office of the Prosecutor, to begin a proprio motu case, with the I.C.C, on behalf of the Blogger, citing a violation by the State, Canada, in committing human rights abuses against her, has now officially begun. The Office of the Prosecutor, now has the legal obligation to investigate the claims, against the State, Canada.


This Blogger, has also requested from the I.C.C. to participate in the proceedings against Canada. It is also a legal entitlement, of all victims appearing before the International Criminal Court. That request, of course, will be dealt with by the Judges' Chamber of the International Criminal Court, and it is also independent of the Office of the Prosecutor. As both organs of the court, has different functions and operates, independently from one another.


It is now in my best interest to gather, as much evidence against those government officials, who were all acting on behalf of the State and to present those evidence against them, in the International Criminal Court, as I want them to face the penalties, for their crimes against me.


My next move, is to petitioned the United nations, into taking actions on behalf of human rights and have Canada be mandated, to demonstrate more transparency, in its legal proceedings and to allow the televising of its legal proceedings, in order to protect those appearing before its courts.
I will argue, here, that there will be a significant reduction in human rights abuse, that are carried out by Canadian courts and by corrupt judges, justices of the peace and adjudicators, who act corruptly. And because those proceedings are not recorded and thus their actions are also hidden from the public. With cameras in the courtrooms, or hearing rooms, recording their actions, it is unlikely that the rate of human rights abuse, would go up, rather than to go down.

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD'S CORRUPTION.


EGYA SANGMUAH, CAUGHT IN THE ACT, ACTING CORRUPT, AT HEARING.

THE HEARING, BEFORE THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD'S, VICE CHAIR, EGYA SANGMUAH, ON JUNE 5TH, HAS TURNED OUT TO BE, ONE OF THE MOST INCRIMINATING PIECE OF EVIDENCE, AGAINST HIS CORRUPTION, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD.


Egya Sangmuah, conduct was anything but professional, with this tenant. He first did a number of things which also gave an indication, of how the review hearing, was going to end up with him, concerning the tenant, (and this Blogger). First, he did the usual thing that Canadian officials, in legal proceedings regarding this Blogger, are apt to do. Egya Sangmuah, first cleared the hearing room of all other persons, as to have no other witnesses to his corrupt actions later on. Or so he thought, since the tenant did get evidence of him acting corruptly. By leaving the tenant's review for the last, Sangmuah then felt assured, that he could introduced all manner of illegal practices, concerning the hearing. Including the following evidence against him:


1. Egya Sangmuah, brought previous files of the tenant's former landlords and former addresses, into the hearing room, (and holding those files up as he speak, at the hearing), telling the tenant that her review has been denied, because "She did the same thing (not attend a hearing), regarding her former landlords. Those previous files, of course, has no bearing on the tenant's present matter before the Board, in which she was asking for a review, of a hearing that was dismissed, by Sylvia Watson, on May 15th. The tenant had also informed the Board, before the hearing that she was unable to attend the hearing, due to medical reasons.(This was also the first review of the tenant, in 2017, before the Board and it was also denied by the Vice Chair, Egya Sangmuah).


2. Egya Sangmuah kept rolling his eyes and looking at the ceiling, each time that the tenant spoke, at the hearing. He also did other gesture, that was intended to insult the tenant. All of which will be brought to his Superior, Michael Gottheil, who is the Executive Chair, at the Social Justice Tribunal, which the Landlord and Tenant Board, is also a part of.


3. Sangmuah was in fact openly mocking the tenant and also the proceeding. He came predisposed to act bias against the tenant. The tenant also recorded the hearing, (being a participant of the hearing directly), by taking notes and audio recording his very words. This will be made available, in order to provide the proof, of this Member's actions, for several reasons. Including, in any other legal proceedings against him. (Which there is at this time). The other reason is for the tenant's own record, to show that there are crimes being committed against her at these legal proceedings, by Canadian government officials. Who all intended for their actions to remain secret. Without this proof, to substantiate her claims, against them, this Blogger, may not be believed. 













Friday, May 19, 2017

EGYA NDAYINANSE SANGMUAH, VICE CHAIR, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD.

CORRUPTION AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. THE VICE CHAIR, EGYA SANGMUAH, AND A NUMBER OF ADJUDICATORS, INCLUDING, SYLVIA WATSON, LOUISE HORTON AND RUTH CAREY, SHOULD ALL BE RELINQUISHED, FROM THEIR DUTIES. AS WELL AS TO FACE CHARGES, OVER THEIR PERSONAL CORRUPTION, IN THE ADJUDICATING, OF SOME CASES, BEFORE THE BOARD.



I INTEND TO CONTACT THE PREMIER OF ONTARIO, KATHLEEN WIN, OVER THE RE-APPOINTMENT, IN JANUARY OF 2017, OF THE VICE CHAIR OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, EGYA SANGMUAH. IN MY OPINION, HIS PERSONAL CORRUPTION, AS THE VICE CHAIR, OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, MAKES HIM UNFIT TO HOLD THAT POSITION. THERE IS NO TRANSPARENCY, AT THE BOARD. NOR IS THERE ANY TRANSPARENCY ABOUT HIS ACTIONS. HE COVERS UP FOR MEMBERS, LIKE SYLVIA WATSON, WHOSE ACTIONS ARE SO ADVERSE, TO THE AMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, AND FOR DISREGARDING THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF SOME TENANTS, BOTH UNDER THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT, AS WELL AS UNDER THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOM. THE LATTER, IN REGARDS TO THE RIGHT TO HAVE A FAIR HEARING. AMONG OTHER PROTECTIONS, UNDER THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION. A FAIR HEARING IS ALSO IMPOSSIBLE, WHEN THERE IS ALSO A PRESUMPTION OF BIAS, IN REGARDS TO TH OSE ADMINISTERING JUSTICE. LIKE THOSE ADJUDICATORS AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD.


BECAUSE SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD HAS ACTED EXTREMELY CORRUPTED, IN REGARDS TO MY MATTERS, BEFORE THE BOARD, THEY WILL ALSO HAVE TO FACE THE CONSEQUENSES, FOR THEIR ACTIONS. ONE OF THOSE CONSEQUENCES IS THAT THEY CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO DISREGARD THE LAW, AND ALSO THE TENANT'S RIGHTS, WHEN THEY ADJUDICATE THOSE MATTERS, BEFORE THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. THE OTHER CONSEQUENCES, ARE THAT THOSE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD MEMBERS, SHOULD ALSO FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES, FOR ACTING CORRUPTLY AND FOR INJURING THOSE APPEARING BEFORE THE BOARD, BY THEIR ACTIONS.


Here are some of their actions, which are blatantly a mockery of justice.


* Egya Sangmuach, Vice Chair, at the North Office of the Landlord and Tenant Board, has (in my case) taken more than the 24-48 hours that are usually required, to respond to my reviews. In the last instance, he and the Board, took three weeks to respond. That review, of Member Sylvia Watson's decision, to dismiss my application, because I could not attend a hearing on May 15th. The Vice Chair Egya Sangmuah, had the review request from me, as of May 17th, yet as the Vice Chair, his response was to bring the matter over to June 5th, so that I could have a review hearing, (and I am sure that they also plan to deny the review of that Member's decision, on May 15th), if I also do not do something drastic, about it.  That Member, Sylvia Watson, also denied my right as a tenant, to have summons issued, whereby witnesses (city officials) could be forced to give evidence at the hearing of the tenant's application. (And why the Landlord and Tenant Board, saw it fit, only in my case and not other cases involving those city officials, to allow my tenancy to end, because those city officials wanted it to be so).


* Egya Sangmuah, as the Vice Chair, of the Landlord and Tenant Board, also saw nothing wrong
with a Member, like Sylvia Watson, denying a tenant the right to have witnesses, at a hearing. Yet granting this same privilege to the landlord.  Adjudicator Sylvia Watson, also did not sign the order she made, about that decision. That document was also missing from the tenant's file, along with other documents. The tenant feared that the Vice Chair and those Members, also believed that the documents would be made public, or be a part of other legal proceedings against them. In which they are also right, in that assumption. I wonder what the Vice Chair, Egya Sangmuah, has done with all of my documents, that has gone missing from my file, at the Landlord and Tenant Board, over the last few weeks. Yesterday, a clerk at the Board, had the time of her life, running around and trying to find them. She wasn't pleased, either, that I had insisted on obtaining those documents, from my file and also insisting that they should also be in my file. Her explanation, is that those documents, "could be sitting on anyone's desk". I wonder why that is the case?. When they should also be kept in the file, where they also belong.


* Denying me the right to a fair hearing. Including, making decisions without giving any reasons, for those decisions. And also not signing their signatures to the documents. As Adjudicator Sylvia Watson, is also apt do to, in my matters.


* Logging documents received by the Board, much later in their system than when they had received it, and then later ruling against it, by pretending those documents did not exist at the time. Again, this was done by Sylvia Watson.


BEING A WRITER, REQUIRES A BALANCING ACT. I CAN DISLIKE SOMEONE, PERSONALLY, BUT STILL BE ABLE TO PRESENT THE FACTS, ABOUT THEM. SUCH IS THE CASE WITH EGYA SANGMUAH. I CAN BE THOROUGHLY OBJECTIVE, IN PRESENTING MY CASE, ABOUT HIM. AND/OR AGAINT HIM. I AM A BLOGGER, TOO AND THAT MEANS THAT I ALSO GIVE MY PERSONAL OPINION, ABOUT ANYTHING, OR ABOUT ANYONE. A BLOG, IS NOT YOUR STANDARD FORM OF JOURNALISM, OR REPORTING. AS LONG AS MY STATEMENTS ARE ACCURATE, THEN I DON'T WORRY ABOUT THE FORMAT USED, TO CONVEY THIS INFORMATION, TO THE PUBLIC. SO JUST BECAUSE I DON'T LIKE THIS GUY AND ALL THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE VERY CORRUPT LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, DOES NOT MEAN THAT I ALSO CANNOT BE OBJECTIVE, IN MY REPORTING, ON THEIR ACTIONS. I CAN DO BOTH.





Egya Sangmuah, Vice-Chair, of the Landlord
and Tenant Board. And former member of
the Immigration and Refugee Board. Who
has also shown no real human emotions, nor
any respect for human dignity, in dealing
with those cases, that come before him
and requiring such a response. As for the
law, he is clueless. (Though he holds
a Master's degree in Law). How come he
could not deduce this simple fact? That his
actions, could also lead to criminal charges
against him?. Or that someone, without a
law degree, could also challenge him, legally,
in a court of law?. And that is why he
is also be facing charges, for Committing
Crimes Against Humanity, in the
International Criminal Court. Where he has
also, conspired, to harm this Blogger. The
allegations against him, by this Blogger, is
also grounds for criminal charges against him
in the International Criminal Court, that
also exist, to protect human dignity and to
uphold justice, for crimes committed by the State.
Or by persons, acting, on behalf of the State,
including, those like Egya Sangmuah, 
 Which in this case, is Canada.



I, PERSONALLY, DISLIKE THIS MAN, EGYA SANGMUAH.  HE IS THE KIND OF NIGGER, WHO WILL DO ACCORDING TO WHAT HE IS TOLD. ( I DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE NUMBER OF DEGREES, THAT HE ALSO POSSESSED. THE MAN IS DISPICTABLE AND LACKS A CONSICENCE. HE IS ONE OF THOSE BLACKS WHOSE PERSONAL AMBITION, SUPERCEDES, HIS PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT. MEANING, THAT IF HE FINDS THAT HE IS TO ACT, OR MAKE A RULING, BASED ON "SOME OTHER CRITERIA", HE WILL ALSO DO IT. DESPITE THE DEVASTATING EFFECT, THAT MAY ALSO HAVE ON THE CASE. (AND WHETHER THOSE CASES, ARE BASED ONT THE LAW, OR JUST SOUND JUDGMENT). HE HAS NO BUSINESS IN DEALING WITH CASES, THAT ALSO INVOLVE SOCIAL JUSTICE, OR THOSE INVOLVING, HUMANITARIAN GROUNDS.

SUCH AS THOSE REFUGEE CASES WITH THE IMMIGRATION BOARD, BECAUSE HE ALSO LACKS PERSONAL EMPATHY. NOR DOES HE MAKE HIS RULINGS, BASED ON THE LAW, EITHER. I FOUND HIS DECISIONS, AS A MEMBER OF THE IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE BOARD, OVER THOSE PALESTINIANS, SEEKING ASYLUM IN CANADA, REPREHENSIBLE. THOUGH THE STATELESS AND PERSECUTED, THOSE PALESTINIANS, HAD ALSO TAKEN REFUGE IN A CANADIAN CHURCH BASEMENT, EGYA SANGMUAH, AS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD, STILL FOUND TIME TO FIND THOSE PALESTINIANS, INADMISSIBLE, TO LIVE IN CANADA, BASED ON MEDICAL GROUNDS!
(See the link below, to the article on Egya Sangmuah's decision, by the Globe and Mail https://sec.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/stateless-family-can.../article4167147/). And then also tell me, if this man would do a better job, at the Landlord and Tenant Board?. Which like all legal proceedings, require a delicate balance of administering the law, hopefully, with someone who is also morally upstanding. But at the very minimum, to conduct a fair hearing.  Egya Sangmuah was perfectly at ease, in finding those five disabled Palestinian refugee seekers in Canada, all inadmissible, based on their disability. He ruled that they would be a burden on the Canadian medical system.  I can also tell you that other disabled persons, has also been granted refugee status in Canada, BECAUSE OF THEIR DISABILITY. But not with EGYA SANGMUACH, WHO IS A MEMBER OF THE CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE BOARD. AS WELL AS BEING, THE VICE CHAIR, OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. ( The Palestinian family, was later allowed to stay in Canada, based on Humanitarian and Compassionate grounds. I for one, also believed, that they went through all of this rejection, from the Canadian government, with their initial applications for refugee status, because they were Palestinians).You see, these very ambitious individuals, like Egya Sangmuah, and others who apply to the Office of the Secretariat, which falls under the Premier's office, for those public positions, also seek to advance their own career. And because Canada is also a corrupt government, they also fit right in. In fact, the more corrupt and wicked and evil they are, the better are their chances of getting those appointments. from the government.


EGYA SANGMUAH, IS YET ANOTHER NAME OF AN ACCUSED PERSON, BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.  AND IN REGARDS TO MY MATTER.BEFORE THAT COURT, INVOLVING, HIS PERSONAL CORRUPTION, IN CARRYING OUT THE ABUSE OF MY HUMAN RIGHTS. WHICH HAS ALSO INVOLVED, THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, AND HIS ACTIONS DIRECTLY. ALONG WITH ANOTHER BOARD MEMBER, SYLVIA WATSON, HAS NOW LANDED HIM AS AN ACCUSED PERSON, BEFORE THE ICC. ACCUSED, OF COMMITTING ACTS OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, IN REGARDS TO ME. HE ALONG WITH SEVERAL OTHER CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, AND THOSE IN THE COURT AND OR TRIBUNAL/BOARDS, WHO ARE FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES IN THAT COURT FOR THEIR DIRECT ACTIONS, IN CARRYING OUT TORTURE AGAINST ME.









(I intend to rewrite this column and include the pictures of those persons here).
There are some things, that I did not know about the Vice Chair, until today. For one thing, that he was Black, and originally an African national. (Grounds which should also make him more lenient towards other immigrants, or those of his own race. Or of any other marginalized groups, for that matter, living in Canada. For instance, one would not be able to tell this from his actions, as part of the Immigration and Refugee Board, concerning his decisions concerning those people, that he also has so much in common with, individually. He seemed to have acquired the White Canadian's racist views, on some people. An unforgivable sin (or blunder), on his part. That means, of a necessity, also imposing those views, via his decisions, on those same people. Even though he has more in common with them, than with those White racist Canadians, whose views he actually, represents and upholds, as best as he can, as a member of those various Boards, that he sits on. Including, his current position, as the Vice Chair, of the Landlord and Tenant Board. Well, guess what?.


Some of us are not impressed, with your many degrees. What we see based on your actions, is someone acting capriciously, taking advantage of his position and using it to cause harm to others. I would also not have known that Egya Sangmuah had any legal background, based on the kind of stuff, that he allows to happen, at the Landlord and Tenant Board. Take the very basis legal premise, of a fair hearing. I am not the only tenant at the Landlord and Tenant Board, that will tell you, that this also does not exist, by the Members and also under the guidance of the Vice Chair, Egya Sangmuah. The reason being that most tenants will also settle for their rights being abused, by Board members. They will not take the matter, any further, than the Landlord and Tenant Board. Which makes it all the more easier for Members to act corrupt and to disregard their rights. My accusations against the Vice Chair, Egya Sangmuah and against those members, like Sylvia Watson, Louise Horton and others at the Landlord and Tenant Board, is that they all conspired to harm me, by dealing corruptly with my matter that is before the Board. That is also grounds for further legal actions against all of them. Including, laying criminal charges against them. In doing so they have also violated my rights under international laws, particularly, those that are designed to protect my dignity, as a human being. Their actions against me, were all calculated to cause me maximum injury.


What they wanted to do was to break my spirit and to destroy me. And that is also why in their decisions involving my case, they also veered so much from the law. Especially, in the case of Adjudicator Sylvia Watson, who as a former lawyer and politician, should be well familiar with the protection offered to the public, via the Constitution and who has also deliberately ignored this fact, and acted corrupt. As a former lawyer, and now Adjudicator with the Landlord and Tenant Board, Sylvia Watson, also knew that I had a right to have witnesses at my hearing, whose testimony were also necessary to established certain facts. She has denied me the three summons that I had requested, requiring those three government officials to attend the hearing. She also believed that one of those witnesses evidence would be sufficient (as she and the Board, has allowed the landlord to have one of those same government officials, summoned, by the Landlord and Tenant Board and to give evidence, on his behalf. What was the evidence to which the Board also granted him the summons?. That the government official (from the fire department),provide the proof that he could no longer rent out the unit. All the landlord had to do, was to bring those same written notices to the Board, instead of requiring a summons for the government official to attend the hearing. He got the summons in less than 48 hours from the Board and the government official, ( T.O. fire inspector, Mark Spedaliere) also showed up at the hearing, because he wanted to assist the landlord, (who had broken the law by the way, and hence the notices against him, by the fire department), to have the upper hand at the hearing, and for the tenant, me, not to be allowed to get back into my home.


The tenant, me, actually had two means of egress. A door and a window, although the dutiful fire inspector, only focused on one exist, during his testimony. The secondary exit (window), also leads directly to the backyard and directly from the tenant's bedroom, should there be a fire.  In fact, the tenant's window is so large, it also covers one third of the room. It could easily provide a means of exist and escape, should there be a fire.  This evidence was also hidden by the T.O. fire officials, in their reports. The law only requires one exist and the tenant had two such exists. The egress from the tenant's window, was also excluded from the testimony of the corrupt fire official, because he wanted THAT tenant, meaning me, not to be able to remain in her home.  At the same time this corrupt T.O. fire officials also allowed the landlord to continue to overcrowd the rental house, allowing him to still have double the occupancy load, than what the Ontario Fire Code allows. Once he was given the two notices by the T.O Fire Services over the overcrowding and lack of working fire systems, the owner, had also decided that it was not profitable to keep the rental property.


He told the tenants that he planned to sell the house in April. That did not happen, because since he was also never charged over his actions and more corruptly, since he was also allowed to keep his other tenants, despite the overcrowding and the continued breaking of the fire code, not to mention knowingly putting the lives of the tenant in danger, he no longer wanted to sell the rental property. We are now into May and the landlord has also continued, just has he had done before. With maintaining a building that was unsafe for all of the tenants, not just the one tenant that they wanted to get out of the building, for complaining about the landlord's illegal actions. And for which the tenant was rewarded by being evicted, illegally. Both by the Fire Services and by the Board, via the Vice Chair, Egya Sangmuah, who has stated that "even if the Board could reinstate the tenant, it would not, because the fire services deem it unsafe". As far as the law is concerned, the Board has also overturned other cases, where the Fire Services, had taken it upon itself, to evict a tenant, without the Board having a saying in the mater. In those precedents set by the Landlord and Tenant Board, the Board has unequivocally stated, that it is only the Landlord and Tenant Board, which has the right to evict those tenants. And not the Toronto Fire Services. The tenants were also reinstated in their homes and the landlords were also fined heavily by the Board, for those violations. None of that has happened in my case, due to the corruption involved. The question then is, why are those Canadian government officials, including those at the Board, surprised that I am taking this action further?. That they can't just act corrupt and not answer for their actions. Since they had all conspired to destroy me, in that way. AND had also hope to get away scotch free, with their actions. Actually, they had hoped that their deeds would never see the light of day, much less for them to answer in a court of law and facing charges over their actions.













Tuesday, May 9, 2017

THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD MEMBER, SYLVIA WATSON'S, PERSONAL CORRUPTION, AS AN ADJUDICATOR.

THE EVIDENCE, FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, CHARGES, AGAINST THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT, IS MOUNTING. AND IN REGARDS, TO THE RELENTLESS PERSECUTION, OF BLOGGER, VALERIE GUILLAUME.

A FORMER TORONTO LAWYER AND POLITICIAN, SYLVIA WATSON, WHO SHOULD KNOW THE LAW, CONCERNING A FAIR LEGAL PROCESS AND ABOUT GIVING EVIDENCE, HAS BLOCKED A TENANT, (THIS BLOGGER), FROM HAVING WITNESSES AT A LANDLORD AND TENANT HEARING, THAT WOULD SHED LIGHT ON THE FACTS, INVOLVING, THE TENANT'S ILLEGAL EVICTION, CARRIED OUT BY THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES, AND ALSO AGAINST THE RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES ACT, WHICH SHOULD HAVE ALSO PROTECTED THE TENANT, UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES.


THE LATEST INCIDENT, INVOLVING, THE CORRUPTION OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD MEMBER, SYLVIA WATSON'S DECISION, TO DENY THE TENANT (BLOGGER, VALERIE GUILLAUME), THE SAME RIGHTS AS THE LANDLORD, TO HAVE SUMMONS ISSUED TO WITNESSES, WHOSE TESTIMONY IS NECESSARY, FOR ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FACTS, IN REGARDS TO THE LANDLORD'S ACTIONS, OVER FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS, WHICH ALSO LED TO THE TENANT, LOSING HER HOME IN MARCH.  SYLVIA WATSON, HAS PREVIOUSLY ACTED CORRUPTED, IN THE MATTER AND HAS BEEN ALLOWED BY THE BOARD, TO CONTINUE TO DO SO.

WHAT IS LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD MEMBER, SYLVIA WATSON, AFRAID OF, IN REGARDS TO THE EVIDENCE, THAT SHE HAS BLOCKED FROM THE THREE WITNESSES, BY NOT ALLOWING THEM TO TESTIFY, AT THE HEARING OF THE TENANT'S APPLICATION, AT THE BOARD, AGAINST THE LANDLORD?

ADJUDICATOR, SYLVIA WATSON, HAS CONTINUED TO BLOCKED THE TENANT'S REQUEST, TO COMPEL THREE WITNESSES TO TESTIFY, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT HEARING, SCHEDULED FOR MAY 15TH. SHE HAS DENIED THE TENANT'S REQUEST, TO ISSUE SUMMONS, TO THE THREE TORONTO SERVICES FIRE OFFICERS.  DISTRICT CHIEF, WENDY ROME, CAPTAIN ROB PATTEN AND INSPECTOR MARK SPEDALIERE, WHO HAD CARRIED OUT THE ILLEGAL EVICTION OF THE TENANT, ON MARCH 31ST, CITING AN IMMEDIATE DANGER TO LIFE. THE REAL REASON WAS TO DESTABLIZED THE TEMANT, AS PART OF THE ONGOING PERSECUTION, THAT SHE HAS FACED FROM THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT.

THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, HAS DENIED THE REQUEST OF THE TENANT (AND BLOGGER), TO ISSUE SUMMONS,TO THREE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES OFFICERS, TO ATTEND A HEARING ON MONDAY, MAY 15TH. THE SAME BOARD MEMBER, SYLVIA WATSON, HAD ALSO ISSUED A SUMMONS, WITHIN 48 HOURS, THAT WAS REQUESTED BY THE LANDLORD, BACK IN MARCH FOR THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES OFFICERS, TO ATTEND A HEARING ON MARCH 30TH. THE REQUEST BY THE LANDLORD, WAS ALSO GRANTED IMMEDIATELY, BY THE BOARD MEMBER, SYLVIA WATSON. DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE WAS THE O NE, THAT WAS ALSO UNDER INVESTIGATION, BY THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES.  AND OVER FIRE CODE VIOLATION, THAT WAS ALSO REPORTED, BY THE TENANT, TO THE T.O. FIRE SERVICES.

AT THAT HEARING ON MARCH 30TH, THE TENANT WAS ALSO NOT ABLE TO FINISH CROSS EXAMINING, THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES OFFICER, MARK SPEDALIERE AND THE HEARING WAS ALSO ADJOURNED. THE TENANT HAD EXPECTED TO CONTINUE WITH THE CROSS EXAMINATION OF THE OFFICER, AS WELL AS REQUESTING THAT THE OTHER TWO OFFICERS THAT WERE THERE, ALSO GIVE EVIDENCE AT THE NEXT HEARING, ON MAY 15TH. (THE TENANT'S REQUEST FOR AN EARLIER HEARING DATE, WAS ALSO DENIED AND THE BOARD THEN SET THE DATE FOR MAY 15TH, THOUGH THE TENANT WAS ALSO TOLD, FROM BACK IN MARCH THAT THERE WERE EARLIER DATES, FOR MAY 2, 3, 4 AND 5TH.

THE BOARD ALSO PUSHED BACK THE HEARING DATE, TO MAY 15TH, WHICH WAS EXTREMELY PREJUDICED TO THE TENANT, SEEING THAT SHE WAS LEFT HOMELESS AND WITHOUT THE BOARD MEMBER, SYLVIA WATSON, MAKING ANY KINDS OF RECOMMENDATIONS, FOR HER RIGHTS AS A TENANT, TO CONTINUE TO BE PROTECTED, IN THE MEANTIME, SUCH AS ANY COMPENSATION TO THE TENANT AND ALSO INCLUDING, BOTH THE LANDLORD AND THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICE RESPONSIBILITY, TO HOUSE THE TENANT, SINCE HER RENTAL UNIT WAS DEEMED UNSAFE, BY THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES. THE BOARD MEMBER SYLVIA WATSON, ON MARCH 31ST, ALSO BLOCKED THE TENANT FROM GETTING BACK INTO HER HOME AND ON APRIL 6, 2016, THE VICE CHAIR OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, ALSO ISSUED AN ORDER BLOCKING THE TENANT FROM GETTING BACK INTO HER HOME, THOUGH HE ALSO WORDED THE ORDER AS SAYING. "EVEN IF THE TENANT HAS A (LEGAL) RIGHT, TO GET BACK INTO HER HOME... IT WOULD NOT BE FEASIBLE, SINCE THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES DEEM IT AS UNSAFE"..

THE PUBLIC SHOULD KNOW THAT IT IS THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD,WHICH HAS THE LEGAL RIGHT, TO EVICT TENANTS AND NOT THE TORONTO FIRE SERIVES. AND THAT OTHER DECISIONS OF THE BOARD, OVERTURNING THE DECISIONS OF THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES, IN ILLEGALLY EVICTING TENANTS, HAS ALSO BEEN OVERTURNED, BY THE SAME LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. BUT ACCORDING TO THE VICE CHAIR, THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD WAS NOT GOING TO DO THAT IN MY CASE.

THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD HAS NOW FURTHER BLOCKED MY EFFORTS TO HAVE A FAIR HEARING, BY DENYING THE SUMMONS TO HAVE THE KEY WITNESSES ATTEND THE HEARING ON MAY 15TH, AT THE NORTH OFFICE, IN TORONTO. ONE OF THE REASONS FOR THAT, IS ALSO TO COVER UP THE ACTIONS OF THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES OFFICERS, WHO ARE INVOLVED IN THE COVER-UP, CONCERNING THE LANDLORD'S ACTIONS, OVER THE FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS.  WHICH THOSE SAME FIRE CODE OFFICERS, HAS ALSO ALLOWED TO CONTINUE, AS OF THIS DATE.  ONE OF THE OFFICERS, HAD EARLIER GIVEN A CONFLICTING TESTIMONY, AT THE HEARING ON MARCH 30TH. (THERE WAS REALLY NO HEARING, AS BOTH THE TENANT AND ALSO THE LANDLORD, WERE NOT GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY, BY THE BOARD, TO GIVE ANY EVIDENCE. EVIDENCE WAS ONLY HEARD FROM THE ONE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES OFFICER, MARK SPEDALIERE, WHO TESTIFIED EARLIER, ("SO THAT HE COULD LEAVE THE HEARING, AND CARRY OUT HIS DUTY, AS A FIRE INSPECTOR" ACCORDING TO THE ADJUDICATOR, SYLVIA WATSON), BEFORE THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, HAS ACTUALLY HAD A FULL HEARING OF THE MATTER.

SYLVIA WATSON AND THE VICE CHAIR, WILL BOTH BE FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES, INCLUDING CORRUPTION AND CONSPIRACY, TO CARRY OUT THOSE RACIST AND HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, AGAINST THIS BLOGGER, IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT. IT IS AN UNDERSTATEMENT, TO SAY THAT THEIR ACTIONS HAS ALSO CAUSED SIGNIFICANT HARM, TO THE VICTIM IN THIS CASE.

Thursday, May 4, 2017

FILING MY CASE, BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, AGAINST CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.

PUTTING A STOP TO BEING A TARGETED AND PERSECUTED INDIVIDUAL. AND MAKING A PUBLIC STATEMENT, TO A GOVERNMENT, THAT IS BENT ON DESTROYING ME, THROUGH ITS SECRET BLACK OPERATION PROGRAMS. 

THE CONTINUATION OF SECRET GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS, SUCH AS THOSE EMPLOYED BY THE FORMER NAZI GOVERNMENT, STACI AND THE CIA, AND NOW WHICH ARE ALSO EMPLOYED BY CANADA, AGAINST PERSECUTED PERSONS.

It is about taking back the power that you already owned.

THE CANADIAN CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE, DOES NOT INVESTIGATE ITS OWN COUNTRY, FOR CARRYING OUT TORTURE AND OTHER ACTS OF, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.

It should not matter, that Canada has helped to set up the ICC, nor should it matter, that its influence is still far reaching, as far as that international human rights body. What does matter is seeing justice served, and in all cases involving a State, such as Canada, that is also answerable to that court.  Regardless of its influence peddling.

If I were my enemies, those Canadian government officials, who has carried out certain human rights abuse against me, recently, I would also be very nervous. After all, who wants to exposed in their wrong doing?. Or to be charged in the International Criminal Court?.  And over crimes, which they have also assured themselves, would remained secret forever. Well, this is most likely going to be the fate of those criminal and corrupt persons, that have committed crimes against me, disguised as just a "normal part of their duties". That is, until you have collected all of the evidence involved and make a full picture of their actions and also a clear case against them. 

I have been very busy, recently.  Busy, gathering evidence and getting information, on how to go about charging those, who has committed crimes against me, under international human rights laws. Particularly, those under the Rome Statute, of the International Criminal Court. The first thing that I wanted to do, was to exercise my right to participate in the proceedings, against those who has caused me injury. The very Canadian government officials, who are already named on my Blog and in my videos, exposing their actions. Others who will also face legal consequences for allowing them to carry out attacks against me, are also going to be charged over their actions as well. The inhumane and degrading treatment that I have received, such as torture, including both physical and psychological torture, due to the actions of the accused persons, will not go unpunished. Not if I have my day in court, against them. Yet they are also arrogant enough to believe, that they will also get away with their crimes.  But that is not what the International Criminal Court was set up to do.

The Process is surprisingly easy.  First of all, once you have familiarized yourself, with your rights under that statue, including, your rights to participate and to have legal counsel to represent you before the ICC, then everything else falls into place.  If you are a targeted individual and facing persecution, like myself, and in which case no lawyer will also touch your case, at the moment, don't despair. The ICC court will have to appoint you with a counsel, once the ball gets rolling. 

The first thing that you must do, as an individual, who is wishing to proceed in the International Criminal Court, against your attackers, are two main things.  The first is to contact the Office of the Prosecutor, for the ICC and to request that the Prosecutor starts an investigation, into your case, as a proprio motu factor. What that basically means, is that the Prosecutor of the ICC,  will start an investigation on her own, with the International Criminal Court, outside of the State involved, (or anybody else), requesting her to do so.  The second thing to do, is to file an application to participate in the proceedings, and it is also a good idea to do both, simultaneously.  Even though one request goes to the Office of the Prosecutor, for the ICC and the other request, via the Application to Participate, as an Individual, goes to the Registry and or to the Judges chamber, for a review of your request. At this point I would recommend that if you are an individual, that you also get some human rights organization to come on board with you at this time, if you do not have a lawyer. They can help you to fill the documents out properly, as most of those organizations, have either a lawyer, or a legal team, that they work with.  But if you are like me, who has to do the initial work on your own, then don't be intimidated by it, because it can be done.  The point is that if you have to start the process on your own, then do it. In the end you want to get justice for yourself and for your property, if they also caused injury to not just you, but also to your property as well.  The property which I am most concerned about, is of course my animal, who has suffered alongside with me, through their attacks against me. My case is unique, of course, because I am not claiming that they took away any so called "real property", such as houses and businesses and the like.  I am claiming that they nearly took away my life and the life of a small helpless animal, who could not fight back. By inflicting upon us, such physical, psychological and mental suffering, that has caused us injury and to the point of destroying our lives. Now I want to rebuild those lives, mine included, that they had hoped to destroy completely. 

Under Article 7, of the Rome Statute, under Crimes Against Humanity, for which those acts of torture and other  inhumane and degrading treatments were carried out against me, I hope to see justice take place and that the International Criminal Court, also accepts my case and investigate and prosecute those criminals involved. Who also think that they are above the law, due to their personal corruption and the corruption of that State, Canada, in general.  I want to make the statement to all other persecuted persons, that it can be done.  Take hope and learn from my example, to fight back.


Friday, March 31, 2017

TORONTO FIRE SERVICES DEPUTY CHIEF, JIM JESSOP, FAILED TO ASSIST THE TENANTS, WHO WERE DISPLACED, BY THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES, LAST WEEK.

THE CORRUPT ACTIONS, OF TORONTO'S DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF, JIM JESSOP, IN DIRECTLY CARRYING OUT, REPRISAL ACTIONS, AGAINST A TENANT  WHO  HAS COMPLAINED, AGAINST A LANDLORD'S ILLEGAL ACTIONS, UNDER THE FIRE CODE.

TORONTO'S DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF, JIM JESSOP, HAS FAILED TO ASSIST, IN THE RELOCATION OF THE TENANTS, HE HAS CAUSED TO BE DISPLACED, OVER FIRE SAFETY CONCERN, CONTRARY TO THE CITY'S MANDATE



The city of Toronto has an emergency plan, that was put in place by city council, specifically, dealing with rooming houses. The Rooming House Emergency Response Plan, is supposed to be a coordinated effort, by various agencies and the Toronto Fire Services, to help assist those tenants of rooming houses, who are displaced due to a fire, or a threat from a fire. Or some other emergency situations, that would make the building unsafe. The Toronto Fire Services, is also one of the primary response team, who is also mandated to help find temporary housing, for the tenants it has displaced, when rendering a building unsafe, due to dangers from a fire.  So what has the Deputy Fire Chief, Jim Jessop done, in this case?. Nothing. It is questionable also whose side he is on, whether the landlord of the rooming house, or the tenants that he has also displaced with his notice, about the unsafe and also illegal rooming house, at 27 Four Winds Drive, in North York.  One of the more questionable actions, of the Deputy Fire Chief, is why no charges has been laid against the owner of the rooming house?. In fact, rather than to prosecute the landlord, over his illegal actions, in regards to the rooming house, Toronto Fire Services, Deputy Chief, Jim Jessop, his Captains and Inspectors, have all aided him.  One fire inspector, Mark Spedaliere, even  showed up at a hearing, to testify on the criminal landlord's behalf!. And in the process also lied to protect him! This Blogger has always been thorough in her reporting, to also have the evidence, to back up about what she has reported on, over the years. And this case is also no exception.  As I have also said in the previous articles on this story, that one of the biggest problems that exist, regarding the actions of those Toronto Fire Services, personel, is the evidence of the Toronto Fire Captain, Rob Patten and Inspector Mark Spedaliere's actions, in lying about the number of tenants, living in the rooming house at the time, and thereby,also, minimizing the dangers to those tenants, just so that they could also protect the very criminal landlord who had put their lives at risk, in the first place.


THE CORRUPTION, THAT IS NOW EMERGING, ABOUT THE TOROTO FIRE SERVICES, HIGH LEVEL OFFICERS AND LOWER RANKED OFFICERS, IS ALSO VERY DISTURBING. THEY ARE THERE TO SAVE LIVES, BUT DO NOT ALWAYS DO SO.  THERE ARE NOW MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS, OVER THE CONDUCT, OF THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES AND THE LANDLORD OF THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE.  ALL OF WHICH COULD, ALSO, LEAD TO CRIMINAL CHARGES,
AGAINST THOSE OFFICIALS, INVOLVED. 
Toronto's Deputy Fire Chief, Jim Jessop
The Deputy Fire Chief, is involved in
the cover-up, involving, a landlord
and the Deputy Fire Chief, is
accused of failing to protect
the public's interest
in the matter.

The deputy Fire Chief, Jim Jessop, was also personally, involved, in carrying out reprisal actions against the tenant, who has complained to the Toronto Fire Services, over the landlord's illegal actions, under the fire code regulation. No members of the public should be punished, by any corrupt city officials, like Deputy Fire Chief, Jim Jessop, for doing what they are also legally required to do. It is the legal duty of a tenant, under the Residential Tenancies Act, to report to the landlord and also to the fire services, about any non working smoke detectors, or carbon monoxide detectors. This corrupt, Toronto Deputy Fire Chief, Jim Jessop, along with Captains, Rob Patten, Captain Paul Fortuna, Inspector Mark Spedaliere and District Chief, Jim Stoop and other members of the Toronto
Fire Services, acted in such a criminal manner, in regards to their investigation, that I am also predicting that they will also face criminal prosecution, over their actions. There are too many corrupt Toronto city officials, but these ones also takes it up a notch, further, when they also endangers the lives of the public.








Toronto Fire Services Inspector, Mark Spedaliere
who is also an Assistant to the Fire Marshal, has
lied at a hearing about the number of tenants
 living in the building and reduced the
number from 12 to 9 tenants. Just so
that he did not have to shut the
rooming house down. But in the
process, has also endangeres the
lives of the other remaining
tenants, under the
fire code.






























THE RESIDENTS OF AN ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, WHO WERE DISPLACED BY THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES, CLAIMING AN "IMMEDIATE DANGER" TO THEIR LIVES, HAS NOT BEEN TEMPORARILY HOUSED. THIS IS CONTRARY TO THE CITY OF TORONTO'S MANDATE, THAT THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES, AFTER ISSUING NOTICES TO THE TENANTS, DUE TO A SUPPOSED "LIFE THREATENING SITUATION", RELATING TO A FIRE, ALSO HAS THE DUTY, TO HELP IN RELOCATING THOSE RESIDENTS, WHO WERE AFFECTED, BY THE NOTICE, TO REMOVE THE TENANTS FROM THE BUILDING. THE DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF, JIM JESSOP, HAS SOMEHOW AVOIDED HIS DUTY IN THIS CASE, IN ASSISTING TO RELOCATE THE TENANTS THAT HE AND CAPTAIN ROB PATTEN, WHO WAS DIRECTLY IN CHARGED OF THE INVESTIGATION, INVOLVING THE ILLEGALLY CONSTRUCTED ROOMING HOUSE, HAS YET TO HELP TO RELOCATED ALL OF THE DISPLACED, TENANTS. There is much more to this story and it involved not only those corrupt Toronto Fire Services officers, putting the lives of the public at risk, but also involved their own individual corruption, for which they should be prosecuted.





















Toronto Fire Captain Rob Patten



































































Thursday, March 23, 2017

THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES, HAS LAID NO CHARGES, AGAINST A LANDLORD IN HIS VIOLATION, OF THE ONTARIO FIRE CODE, REGARING AN ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE AND NO WORKING SMOKE DETECTORS.

TORONTO FIRE CAPTAIN, ROB PATTEN'S, RECKLESS ACTIONS AND HIS PERSONAL CORRUPTION, ENDANGERS PUBLIC SAFETY.

A TORONTO FIRE CAPTAIN, ROB PATTEN, HAS CLEARLY BREACHED THE PUBLIC TRUST AND ENDANGERS THE SAFETY OF THE TENANTS, IN AN ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, IN NORTH YORK, BY REDUCING THE NUMBER OF TENANTS OF THE ROOMING HOUSE, FROM 12 TENANTS TO 9 TENANTS, IN ORDER TO AVOID SHUTTING DOWN THE ROOMING HOUSE. AND ALSO IMPLICATED, ALONG WITH CAPTAIN ROB PATTEN, ARE THE FOLLOWING TORONTO FIRE SERVICES, OFFICERS: JIM JESSOP, DEPUTY CHIEF OF FIRE PREVENTION, JIM STOOPS, DIVISIONAL CHIEF, WENDY ROME, DISTRICT CHIEF, CRAIG WEBER, DISTRICT CHIEF AND PAUL FORTUNA, A FIRE CAPTAIN, OF WARD 8, WHERE THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, IS LOCATED.  IN FACT THE CORRUPTION MAY ALSO GO AS HIGH, AS THE TACTING TORONTO FIRE CHIEF, MATT PEG.  WHO MAY, OR MAY NOT, BE AWARE OF THE SITUATION, INVOLVING SOME OF HIS OFFICERS', PERSONAL CORRUPTION, IN THE MATTER.
ALL OF THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES OFFICERS MENTIONED, HAS ALSO CONSPIRED, TO PROTECT THE LANDLORD OF THE ROOMING HOUSE, THAT WAS HOUSING 12 TENANTS, OR POSSIBLY MORE. NO IMMEDIATE CHARGES WERE LAID, THOUGH THIS IS ALSO A  DIVERSION FROM THE STANDARD PROCEDURE, UNDER THE PRACTICE OF THE ONTARIO FIRE CODE ACT. SINCE THIS IS ALSO ONE OF THE MORE SEVERE CASES, INVOLVING, THE DANGER TO A DOZEN LIVES, DUE TO THEIR CORRUPTION.

Also relating to the topic of corruption, among the Toronto Fire Services officers and other ranking personnel, is the article below:
Toronto firefighter charged in fire station robberies | CP24.com
www.cp24.com/.../toronto-firefighter-charged-in-fire-station-robberies-1.3238658 12 Jan 2017 ... Police have laid six charges against a Toronto firefighter they allege lured people
out of fire stations so he could rob them
.


THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION , AT 27 FOUR WINDS DRIVE IN NORTH YORK, IS LOCATED IN AN AREA OF TH E CITY, THAT IS ALREADY PRONED TO FIRE, DUE TO THE ABUNDANCE OF ILLEGALLY MAINTAINED ROOMING HOUSES. THIS IN AN AREA LOCATED NEAR THE YORK UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, IN NORTH TORONTO, WHERE THERE HAS ALSO BEEN A DISPROPORTIONATE, AMOUNT OF FIRES AND FIRE RELATED DEATHS, IN THE NORTH COMMAND REGION, WHERE HE IS ALSO THE CAPATIN.

The Toronto Fire Captain, Rob Patten, lied in a notice under section 15(1) under the Ontario Fire Prevention and Protection Act, that he also issued to the landlord of the illegal rooming house, on March 21, 2017, in order not to removed the tenants that are on the 2nd floor, of the illegal rooming house. The Toronto fire captain stated in the notice that he issued, that only 9 tenants were occupying the illegal rooming house, instead of 12 tenants. This was a deliberately misstated fact, by the Toronto fire captain, and he did so in order to avoid removing the other 8 remaining tenants, who are also living in the rooming house. There are confirmed reports (including, from other officers in regards to the number of occupants of the illegal rooming house, being 12 tenants), that Captain Rob Patten, was told that 12 tenants currently occupies the illegal rooming house, including, a statement from the landlord, directly. It was recorded that the landlord had stated to the fire captain, Rob Patten, that he has, currently, 12 tenants.  And that 9 of those tenants were "permanent" tenants and that 3 of the other remaining tenants were "temporary"tenants, who according to the owner, were supposed to move out of the rental units, by June 1st.
That means that all twelve tenants were occupying units in the rental property, when he stated in a notice that he has issued on March 21, 2017, under sec. 15(1), to "remove persons..." under the Act, that only 9 tenants were living in the rooming house. He then incorrectly and deliberately, listed in the notice, that 4 tenants (and not the 7 tenants), were living on the second floor, 2 tenants on the main floor and the remaining three tenants in the basement, of the rooming house.  Captain Rob Patten, also knew of this fact regarding the 12 occupants of the building, that all of the tenants were also currently living there, when he also issued the notice under sec.15(1), which stated that only nine tenants were occupying the illegal rooming house. This Blogger, was actually told by an officer who was with Captain Rob Patten, on March 21, 2017 and who has also personally inspected the property, along with the captain, that 4 of the 7 tenants, who were living on the second floor of the rooming house, were also going to be removed. The officer has told this Blogger, that those four tenants, were those tenants on the 2nd floor, who were also occupying the double rooms. And that only the other 3 tenants, that were allowed under the Ontario fire code, would be allowed to stay. This Blogger, has new information that this did not occur. Keep in mind that the Toronto Fire Services, also deemed the property on March 21st, as being unsafe and also an "immediate danger to the lives of the tenants", hence the notice under section 15(1), to removed person from the rooming house.

On March 20, 2017, Captain Rob Patten, had posted an earlier notice, under sec. 15(1), to "eliminate ignition sources" and then proceeded to removed the electrical cords, from two stoves in the two kitchens, on the main floor and also the basement, of the illegal rooming house. Unbelievably, he also reinstated, the "ignition sources" back on again in the building, within less than 24 hours after removing them. The 7 tenants who were also not removed from the building, (but who were supposed to have been removed, according to the Ontario fire code regulations and also according to the statements, of other officers involved in the investigation), were now allowed to use the kitchen stove again, on the main floor of the house, just 24 hours after Captain Rob Patten, had turned it off, as one of the "ignition source", as noted in the notice that he issued on March 20th. And which was a also pretext, as I have stated in a previous article, since this same Toronto fire captain, Rob Patten, also did not take any actions in regards to public safety, regarding the complaint made to the Toronto Fire Services, concerning the lack of fire code regulations being implemented, by the owner of the illegal rooming house, for a whole week. The captain ignored the complaint, which also directly put the lives of the tenants at risk for a week and did not take any actions, to eliminate that immediate danger, (see the video posted below), during that time.  There was nothing done to the rooming house, to make it any safer, during the 24 hours that the "ignition sources" were turned off and then turned back on, by Captain Rob Patten,. Yet the Toronto fire captain, Rob Patten, who in his eyes, had "removed the immediate source of danger to the lives of the tenants, so that he did not have to remove, all of the tenants from the building

This Blogger then consulted the Toronto Fire Services and Captain Rob Patten, to update the story that she had also published on her Blog and it was that action, that also made the Toronto fire captain to investigate the property, on March 20 and subsequently, also, on March 21st and also in issuing those notices. What he also, conspicuously, did not do, was to lay any kind of charges under the fire code, against the owner of the illegal rooming house.  In fact he did worst, when he actually endangered the lives of the tenants, further, not only in reducing (deliberately),the number of occupants living there at the time, but also in not taking any steps to alleviate any danger from a fire, by  the overcrowded rooming house, by shutting it down and only allowing the legal amount of people, to occupy the building. Since it was originally constructed to house a family of four. All additions to the illegal rooming house, was also made by the landlord, without a building permit and also without fire code regulations, or zoning bylaws. Thus endangering the lives of the tenants living there. What is equally disturbing is the fact that when there is a fire, in that area of congested and illegal rooming houses, the Toronto Fire Services, is also silent on the causes of those fires. They will not even mention any contributing factors, such as overcrowding. Which is the main cause of fires in the area and also the main problem, with all of those townhouses, including the current one, at 27 Four Winds Drive, which is the subject of this article. They are allowed to remain overcrowded, because in the eyes of those corrupt, City of Toronto Fire Services personnel, like Captain Rob Patten, as well as other city divisions,they also seem to meet the needs for the lack of housing, for students attending the university nearby.

Captain Rob Patten, corrupt action in regards to that rooming house, cannot be excuse, because has has put the lives of members of the public at risk, in order to protect a very greedy landlord. You just cannot lie about the number of occupants in a building that has been deemed as unsafe under the fire codes, in order not protect a landlord, who may be losing revenues from the loss of tenants, when his illegal rooming house, is forced to convert back to a single family dwelling. I will be reporting more on this story, to exposed more of those corrupt officials, actions.. If the rooming house has been completely shut down, as I was told that it was going to be, by another official, then I will also report on this fact. In the mean time, not only is it still operating, but I have also learned that one of the tenants in the basement units, who was asked to leave on March 21at, in regards to the notice and was staying temporarily in a hotel nearby, as the landlord also had to house those disperse tenants, who were removed on March 21st, had actually returned to the building, the very next day and was observed to be moving his kitchen items such as pots and pans from the kitchen, that was located in the basement of the townhouse, to the main floor kitchen, that Captain Rob Patten, had also reinstated on March 21st, as well, has now returned to use it. This tenant was seen cooking, as well as moving his property, to the upper main floor. Captain Rob Patten has also ignored my call to his office, yesterday, in regards to this latest development, where the very "ignition source" meaning the stove, that he had turned off in his notice, just a few days earlier, was now subjected to more use, by the tenants, that has also remained in the illegal rooming house.  And until I have absolute proof, that all but the legal number of tenants, that are allowed under the fire code, are living there, I will also continue to exposed those involved in this corruption. It is also the worse kind of corruption, because it involved endangering the lives of the public, by those Toronto Fire Services officers, and also those officers, with the Municipal Licensing Standards, who are in charge of enforcing such factors as overcrowding, and maintenance standards, in rental housing.

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

The Toronto Fire Services Corruption.


NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, AT 27 FOUR WINDS DRIVE, UNIT 1, IN NORTH YORK.

SHOCKING EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION, FROM THE TORONTO FIRE SERVICES. NEW REVEATIONS, INVOLVING, THE PERSONAL CORRUPTION, OF THE FOLLOWING OFFICERS:  Toronto Fire Chief, Jim Stoops, Division Chief, Larry Koon, Captain Rob Patten, and Captain Paul Fortuna.

Among the charges, or claims, levied against them are:   * breach of public trust
                                                                                           * abuse of power
                                                                                           * endangering the safety of the public
                                                                                           * conspiracy and corruption

The Toronto Fire Services overstepped its jurisdiction in using a clause in the Ontario Fire Protection and Prevention Act, under sec. 15 (1), to take reprisal actions against a tenant who had made a complaint to the Toronto Fire Services, regarding the lack of smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors, at the rooming house in North York, illegally housing 12 tenants.

On March 20, 2017, Toronto Fire Captain, Rob Patten, issued a notice to the landlord of the illegal rooming house on Four Winds Drive, in North York, (a suburb of Toronto, where rooming houses are not allowed, under the law). The notice showed (see image below), that the Toronto Fire Captain, Rob Patten, had ticked off, under Sec.15(1), of the Ontario Fire Code, "eliminate ignition sources", thereby preventing any likelihood of a fire starting, from those sources. The sources being the electrical cords to the stoves in the basement and also on the first floor of the rooming house. The tenants on all three floors, were told to use a microwave oven instead, in both kitchens of the rooming house.  


The two Toronto Fire Services captains, Rob Patten and Captain Paul Fortuna, who are in charged of the North Command region in Ward 8, in North York, are also responsible for the disturbing and illegal illegal phenomena in the area, near the York University campus, involving the illegal rooming houses. Kind of like how the CIA runs the drug trade operations in the US. Captain Rob Patten has told this Blogger, directly, that he "knows of the fact that there are many illegal rooming houses, in that area". To which he also does nothing and even when it is exposed.  But his actions and especially those that endangers public safety, are more than just ignoring this fact. The fire captain has directly contributed to this, through his personal corruption, in investigating those illegal rooming houses, which all breaks the fire code.  For instance, after investigating the illegal rooming house at 27 Four Winds Drive, Unit 1, in North York and located in the Keele and Finch area, which is under his command, the Toronto Fire Captain, later did a number of shocking things to which he has also broken the law. Among his actions include a breach of public trust, by reducing the number of tenants in the illegal rooming house, from 12 tenants, to 9 tenants. Captain Rob Patten did so in order to avoid removing the other 7 tenants who are all living on the second floor of the rooming house.
 He did not issue any charges against the landlord, nor gave any indications that he was going to.  In fact, the very opposite. Instead of shutting down all of the rooming house as he should have done, or to reduced the number of tenants to the legal limit of only four tenants, under the fire code, if he also believed that there was an immediate danger to their lives due to a fire, then that also did not occur. The Toronto fire captain, Rob Patten, had told the landlord that he was going to issue an order against him, if he did not ask one of the tenants on the main floor, (according to the statement of the landlord) who had made the complaint about the fire code violations to cooperate and to leave immediately, due to an immediate danger posed by a fire.(A "danger" that he was still undecided about, at that time and was willing to leave the matter still undecided, "until the next day, or the next day" he had also stated. Captain Rob Patten, chose to use a section of the Ontario Fire Prevention and Protection Act, under sec. 15(1), to try to evict one of the tenants (there are two) on the main floor of the rooming house, (as well as the three tenants in the basement of the house), who had made the complaint to the Toronto Fire Services, over the fire code violations, by the landlord. Captain Rob Patten, who also ignored the complaint for a week, believed that there was an immediate danger to the lives to those four tenants, of the illegal rooming house, but also chose to ignore the other tenant on the main floor of the rooming house. (The Toronto Municipal Licensing Standards officers, who attended the property afterwards, later declared that both tenants on the main floor of the rooming house, were in the same predicament, since their rooms were made of dry wall and later turned into a "room", by the landlord. And for the fire captain to want to remove only one of those tenants, did not make any sense, they had declared). In fact the MLS officers also indicated that the fire captain, Rob Patten, has the responsibility to removed all of the tenants of the illegal rooming house, if there was an immediate danger to their lives from a fire. Including, those tenants on the second floor of the rooming house, with the double occupancy rooms. At the very least, only four tenants are allowed to remain at the rooming house, under the Ontario fire code regulations. WHAT IS GLARING HYOCRITICAL AND ALSO CORRUPT, ABOUT CAPTAIN ROB PATTEN'S ACTIONS, IN DECLARING WHICH TENANTS SHOULD BE REMOVED, UNDER SECTION 15 (1) OF THE FIRE CODE, WHICH HE ALSO INSTRUCTED THE OWNER, THAT HE WAS "THINKING" OF ISSUING AN ORDER ABOUT, ON MARCH 21, 2017, BECAUSE HE ALSO BELIEVED THAT THERE WAS AN "IMMEDIATE DANGER" TO THE LIVES OF "SOME OF THE TENANTS (NOT ALL OF THEM), FROM A FIRE, (AND WE ARE ALSO TALKING ABOUT OVERCROWDING HERE, WHERE THE NUMEBER OF TENANTS IN THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE ARE 12), IS THE FACT THAT THE THOUGHT FOR ANY OF THEIR SAFETY, ALSO DID NOT OCCUR TO HIM, DURING THE TIME THAT HE HAS SUPPRESSED THE REPORT OF THE COMPLAINT, AGAINST THE LANDLORD AND DID NOT ACT UPON IT FOR AN WHOLE WEEK! WAS THE DANGER TO THEIR LIVES ALSO NOT PRESENT TO THOSE TENANTS, DURING THAT TIME AS WELL?
The Toronto Fire Captain also chose to ignore the other eight remaining tenants on the second floor of the rooming house, (in his thinking). With some of the rooms holding two tenants at a time, or double occupancy. And this is the part where the corruption and a lack of concern for the safety of all of the tenants of the illegal rooming house, REALLY comes in. THE FIRE CAPTAIN, ROB PATTEN, SHOULD HAVE REMOVED ALL OF THE 12 TENANTS, FROM THE ROOMING HOUSE, ON MARCH 21, 2017. IF HE HAD THOUGHT THAT THERE WAS A DANGER FROM FIRE. THE CORRUPT TORONTO FIRE CAPTAIN, IN THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE LANDLORD, JUST FOCUSED ON ONLY FOUR TENANTS AND THAT WOULD HAVE ALSO LEFT A REMAINING 7 TENANTS, STILL OCCUPYING THE ILLEGAL ROOMING HOUSE, AT THE TIME OF ANY FIRE! The Ontario fire code stipulates that the landlord is allowed to have four tenants legally (and under the Ontario municipal zoning bylaws, that number is only two tenants, legally). AND AGAIN, If the Toronto Fire captain, Rob Patten, was really concerned about the danger to the lives of the tenants, on March 20, 2017,why did he wait for one week to respond to the complaints, about the rooming house?. And over such a thing as a lack of smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors, in the rooming house. Did not his delay of a week, also further endangers the lives of the tenants, during that time?. Obviously. The fire captain, Rob Patten,  also reportedly made it clear that "he was not shutting down the illegal basements units", which has no windows and also housed three tenants.  Nor was he also shutting the entire rooming house down, due to an immediate danger from a fire, to the tenants. He was only asking four of those tenants to immediately leave, pending an order that he has told the landlord that he would be back to the premises on March 21st, after "having a meeting with the Toronto Fire Services Divisional Chief, Larry Koon and also The Toronto Fire Chief Jim Stoops. Do you think that a responsible fire chief and also a divisional chief would also agree to issuing an order immediately removing only four of the tenants from the rooming house and instead of all twelve tenants?. Due to the immediate dangers to their lives?. I wonder what they were also doing this past week thinking about all of this?. Captain Rob Patten had also stated to the owner of the illegal rooming house, that he was using section 15(1) of the Act to displace the four tenants, due to an immediate risk to their lives. Yet, he also waited for one week prior to this by not even taking any actions at all. And what about the eight other tenants on the 2nd floor of the illegal rooming house?. The Toronto fire captain Rob Patten, did not see an immediate danger to their lives, yet they all occupied the same dwelling. According to inspectors from the Municipal Licensing Standards Department, who also showed up at the property to investigate, the Toronto fire captain Rob Patten, should have also removed all of the tenants in that situation, they said. If under their jurisdiction only four tenants can remain in the rooming house, then eight tenants should be removed, the inspectors said. But where will they also be relocated?.


Tenants do have rights under the Residential Tenancies Act, and if the Toronto Fire Services, is going to removed tenants from a residential dwelling, due to a fire code regulation, under sec. 15(1), then it must also advised the landlord, that those tenants also has to have an alternative accommodation, provided by the landlord and during this time. Tenants cannot just be removed from their homes, by the Toronto fire services and not be relocated, to suitable accommodation, while a building is deemed unsafe by the fire services officers. And while captain Rob Patten had suggested that the landlord of the illegal rooming house provides hotel accommodations, for the three tenants in the basement of the illegal rooming house, that he wanted removed, under the Act, he also made no suggestions about one of the tenants on the main floor of the rooming house, that he also had included, in that order. Though, based on his actions he cared nothing about the tenant who had made the complaint, the fire captain also failed to mention to the landlord, that he had to take care of an alternative accommodation, for that tenant as well. That is perhaps why he is also "thinking" of issuing the order, on the "next day, or the "next day". And believe me, an imminent danger of fire to the lives of those tenants, from the date of the inspection of the dwelling, would not permit such a delay. There was either an immediate danger, or there wasn't. (Again, the said fire captain had waited one week, already, in regards to that "immediate" danger to the tenants, while he had considered acting upon the complaint). And nothing had happened to the tenants during that time. Something could have happened, but nothing did. Besides, if the entire building is unsafe as the fire captain also claimed, then all of the tenants would need to be evacuated and not just some.





A landlord puts a smoke detector on the 2nd floor
of an illegal rooming house, at 27 Four Winds Drive,
 unite 1, in North York, and near to the York University
campus, while two Toronto Fire Services officers watched.
 Captain Rob Patten, (shown in this video), also took one week to
respond to the complaint, of the illegal rooming house. And only
after this Blogger, had contacted him on March 20th, to do an update
 to the previous article, that she had posted on the matter.

On March 20th the fire captain, Rob Patten, attended the illegal rooming house, twice and on the first visit during the day, he chose to advised the landlord, that he was only supposed to have four tenants maximum, under the fire code. He also issued no notices or orders during his first inspection of the rooming house, earlier in the day. Among the disturbing questions that should be asked, why did he not do so, since there were obviously fire code violations, which he then later issued a notice to the landlord for.
Toronto Fire Captain, Rob Patten, has also issued no orders against the landlord of the illegal rooming house to shut it down. Nor did he proceed with any charges against him, either. Please remember, that in that area, this is also a regular occurrence. Which the Toronto Fire Services has also overlooked most of the time. And was also prepared to do the same in this case as well. Yet only two years ago, two tenants died in a fire, again in the same vicinity. All of this all under the jurisdiction of Captain Rob Patten. Viewing from the occurrence that I have described in this article, Captain Rob Patten, IS capable of sitting on such a complaint and do absolutely nothing. In wanting to "evict" some of the tenants of the illegal rooming house, (including the one who had complained, and also immediately, but the tenant had also asked the Toronto Fire Captain, what was the "immediate" danger, since he had also taken a week to respond to the complaint and thought of no danger to the lives of the tenants during that time. Coupled, with the fact that the landlord of the rooming house, had also claimed that the Toronto Fire Captain Rob Patten had "pressured" him, into asking some of the tenants to "cooperate" with an order he was going to make under sec.15(1) of the fire code, to removed only four of the tenants (including the "troublemaker" tenant), immediately, due to a danger to their lives. But the danger  from a fire and from the overcrowding had existed for all of the tenants of the rooming house, for a whole week prior to this decision. So was it an act of reprisal from the Toronto Fire Captain, to target the tenant who had complained in the first place?. The captain also told the landlord of the rooming house, that, "it was not definitive, has yet", if he was going to make the actual order on March 21st. (This Blogger has in her possession a copy of the actual statements and or actions, of the Toronto fire captain, Rob Patten, to be published at a later time).