Thursday, May 31, 2012

TORONTO SHERIFF, DAVID USHER CHARGED.

THE LINK BETWEEN THE ACTIONS OF THE SHERIFF AND THE BROADER CONSPIRACY WITH THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.

THE IMPENDING CHARGES WITH THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT OF JUSTICE REGARDING THOSE OTHER PERSONS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA WHO WERE ALSO INVOLVED IN THE CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND WHO ALSO OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE IN REGARDS TO THAT CASE.

Charges for corruption against the Supreme Court of Canada: The Applicant was told that: 1. "The same motion was heard twice by the same judge", 2. "This was the proper procedure of the Supreme Court of Canada", 3. Registrar officers of the Supreme Court of Canada, can also makes the decisions in those cases. 4. Registrar officers, of the Supreme Court of Canada, has also stated, officially, that under rule 75, of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, there is no motion to reconsider. 5. Complaints against the registrar officers involved, were also not investigated by the Registrar, of the Supreme Court of Canada. 5. The registrar office has openly interfered with the administration of justice, by personally interfering in the case. 6. Registrar officers of the Supreme Court of Canada, has given out legal advice, to self represented litigants and acting in other ways that goes against the law, including, also, deciding upon cases, and/or personally interfering in those cases.


Criminal charges were laid recently against David Usher, Sheriff at the Toronto Enforcement Office, at 393 University Avenue, 19th floor, for obstructing justice, conspiracy to obstruct justice and counselling to commit an offence, for carrying out the illegal execution of a writ of possession, while the case was still before the court. Two other enforcement officers were also charged as well. They are Shawn Whittingham and Dora Charalham, who were charged with obstructing justice, conspiracy to obstruct justice, break and enter, trespassing, theft and cruelty to an animal. The latter charge was from those officers, leaving an animal in an apartment, after they had locked the door and afterwards left instructions with the superintendent of the building, not to let the owner of the animal, have any access to the animal and with the further instructions that the animal should be left alone, in the overheated apartment, in the 33 degrees weather for several days.

Six people were charged with criminal offences regarding that incident. The others included, lawyer Paula Boutis, from Iler Campbell Law Firm, in Toronto, who was charged, also, with obstructing justice, conspiracy to obstruct justice and counselling to commit an offence. The charges against her stems from the fact that she had direct knowledge of the case and was also aware at the time of the execution of the writ of possession, by the sheriff, that both a motion for a stay of execution and an application for leave, was still pending before the court. Under the law, this should have also stayed the actions of the sheriff, David Usher and his enforcement officers, in carrying out the writ of possession. I will include here, also, the sections of the law pertaining to that issue. The Supreme Court Act, section 65.1(1) clearly provided a stay of execution pending the case before that court, when there is a motion that is also filed, asking for that stay, as was also the situation in this case. The other sections of the law, which also prevented the actions of a third party, such as a sheriff, from taking any actions, while an appeal is still pending, is the Court of Justice Act, sections 63.01(1) and also the following subsections, (2), (3) and (4) especially. It is explicit in its detail about the staying of any proceeding, by a third party, while an appeal or motion, is still before the court and has not been decided upon.

That procedure was also not followed in this case and this was because of the conspiracy that was also involved, with regards to the court and the others who
were also involved. There are clear evidence also, that the registrar office of
the Supreme Court of Canada, were involved in trying to prevent the administration of justice in this case as well. Each time that a request was also made that would also protect the right of the applicant it was also denied, even though by doing so that would also cause injury to the person and also interfered with the rights of the applicant. The so called protection of the charter of rights and freedoms also did not apply in this case. And in this case, especially, the right to the equal protection and benefit of law.

Clearly the sheriff, David Usher and his enforcement officers, had also acted inappropriately and also against the law, in this matter. In fact it was no coincidence, either, on the part of the sheriff, to ignore the law, in regards to this case, but also a deliberate attempt by them and the others involved in the conspiracy, to ignore the law, in regards to that case. They did not need to follow the law because they had the court and others backing their actions.

Criminal Charges of obstructing justice, conspiracy to obstruct justice, theft, tresspassing, break and enter and cruelty to an animal, were also laid against Lisa Lipowitz and Sandra Thompson, with regards to the same incident.

Monday, May 14, 2012

ALEX NEVE: CANADA ABHORS TORTURE.

Alex Neve's Comments to the National Post, regarding Canada's
Position On Torture. Canada has "Zero Tolerance on Torture".
Alex Neve also said that,"Canada abhors torture. We support
all efforts to abolish it and to punish torturers".


That comment is an insult to human rights victims in Canada.

Victims of Human Rights Abuse in Canada Are Saying: STOP
HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE IN CANADA NOW!



Alex Neve needs to check his facts, first, before he has also publicly claimed, that Canada, has been maintaining, human rights standards, in its own country.
Alexe Neve is also a case of contradictions. On the one hand, he and his organization, Amesty International, in Canada, has made claims of protecting human rights standards in Canada, which is also not true. On the other hand, Alex Neve has also acted as a spokesperson, on behalf of the Canadian government, in regards to its practice of human rights, in that country.

Alex Neve is also paid handsomely, for his efforts as well. Including having received, the order of Canada, for all the lies that he has also told, to the entire world, concerning that government's human rights abuse. It is a lie that both Alex Neve and the Canadian government, would also like to continue with, but is also coming up against opposition, from the very victims of human rights abuse, by the Canadian government, directly. Victims such as myself, who has not only been tortured, but has also seen other evidence of human rights abuse, also, that has also been conveniently, ignored, by the Canadian government.

What the victims of human rights abuse in Canada, also wants to see, is the legal protection of their rights, against that government's actions, against them. Both in that country, as well as internationally. Currently that is also not the case and Alex Neve and Amnesty International, is also not helping the situation, in that country, either, by white washing the truth, concerning the Canadian government's actions.

There has been many legitimate questions asked and rightly so, concerning Amnesty International and its role in the prevention of human rights abuse, by the Canadian government. Many people believed, also, that Alex Neve and Amnesty International, also cannot act in the position of being a so called protector of human rights, when that organization, is also not willing, to hold the Canadian government, accountable, also, for committing crimes, in the name of human rights, against the people living in that country, at present.

Alex Neve's loyalty also lies with the Canadian government and not with the victims of human rights abuse by that country and this is also an undisputed fact. And as long as this is the case, I will also continue to advocate, against Amnesty International and other human rights organizations, currently, in Canada. Including also Human Rights Watch, Transparency International Canada, The International Center For Human Rights and Democratic Development, The Canadian Center for International Justice and many other ones, that are also currently getting funds from the public, for the work of human rights in that country, which they also do not carry out. At least not adequately. And in the process also many victims of human rights abuse, by the Canadian government, are left out from their services and also deliberately by them.

It is also time that the truth got out concerning those so called human rights organization and how they do not help the victims of human rights abuse in Canada, against that government abuse, of their human rights.

As for Alex Neve's comments. Is it intended for the protection of human rights, as he also claimed, or to be on the good side of the Canadian government?

Sunday, May 6, 2012

THE HOUSING FUNDING AND RISK MANAGEMENT BRANCH. WHERE EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION ABOUNDS.

THESE TORONTO CITY OFFICIALS AND OTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, ARE CRIMINALS, HIDING BEHIND THEIR POSITIONS. IT IS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY AND THEY CONTROL IT. MORE TRANSPARENCY IS NEEDED IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT.

The Funding and Risk Management Branch attracts the wrong kinds of city officials. Criminals hiding behind their positions. They control the money and who gets it. The misappropriation of funds, through their allocation programs, to fund private companies, that also manages, those City of Toronto buildings.

The recent attempt by Mintz & Partners Ltd. and Kehilla Residential Programme, at the acquisition of the Moshav Noam Non Profit Cooperative Housing Corporation, through the dummy corporation, that they have also set up to do so, "Moshav Orr" and all of this, with the complete backing, also, of these Toronto City and government officials


Brenda Patterson, Deputy City Manager. She is also in charged, of the Social Housing Unit Department, of the City of Toronto.





Keith Extance, Director, Funding & Risk Management Branch, of the Ministry of Housing.









Phil Brown, General Manager, with the Toronto Social Housing Unit.











Philip Abrahams, Director of the Toronto Social Housing Unit.







Allegations of racism and sexual misconduct by Kehilla Residential Programme staff, did not deter these Toronto City Officials, from continuing to promote this private company, or their other business interests, for funding with the city of Toronto.

They all have high sounding titles but what they do with the tax payers money should make us all take another look at these wolves in sheep clothing. And only by exposing their actions can we actually get rid of them. Their very actions also demonstrated the lack of transparency in the local government, as well as with the entire government, in general.

The residents of the Moshav Noam Non Profit Cooperative Housing Corporation, are still wondering what has happened, since they have agreed to allow the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, to take over the building, or so they were told, by Maria Varlokostas, Manager of the Funding & Risk Management Branch, of the Social Housing Unit, in July of 2008, concerning the present building. That transfer of the assets of the coop, over to the TCHC, has also never happened. Instead what the residents has today, is the receiver and manager of the building, Mintz & Partners Ltd. and also Kehilla Residential Programme, trying to take over completely, the operation of the Coop, by setting up this dummy corporation, "Moshav Orr", that they also intend to used, to take over the assets and management of the coop.

It turns out also that the current managers of the coop, Mintz & Partners and Kehilla Residential Programme, has also not been able to continue with the management of the coop, by simply extending their 12 month term, as the receiver has also done, since 2004 and they have now come up with a clever way of acquiring the building permanently, by changing its name from Moshav Noam Non Profit Cooperative Housing Corporation, to Moshav Orr, and that this new company is what they will actually used to try to take over the coop permanently. The transfer of the assets of Moshav Naom Coop, over to Moshav Orr, is also supported by those city of Toronto officials, in the Funding & Risk Management Branch, of the Social Housing Unit, as well as within the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Funding & Risk Management Branch.

It is clear that they have also been working together in regards to this purchase, without consulting with the residents of the coop and by contacting the residents of the coop, recently, they are also not being entirely up front with them either about the whole process. Since also the Minister's consent, is really the last stage, in the process to acquire the building. The residents were never told about any court dates, prior to this, where they could have also objected to the transfer of the coop, and also of the receiver and manager Mintz & Partners continuing to managed the coop. However, they still have the opportunity, to prevent the take over of the coop, by the current managers, Mintz & Partners and Kehilla Residential Programme, through the corporation, Moshav Orr, that they have also set up to do so, by also sending in their objection, to the Ministry of Housing, of this transfer, or purchase, of the Moshav Noam Non Profit Cooperative Housing Corporation, over to them.

The board of directors for Moshav Orr, will also be made up entirely of Kehilla's current and past employees and not a single resident of the coop, will also be on the board of Moshav Orr , according to the information, that the residents has also received from them. If Mintz & Partners and Kehilla Residential Programme thought that they were the only clever ones, in all of this, they were also wrong. The residents of the coop, who has also never trusted them, since the court appointed receiver and manager of the building, Mintz & Partners Ltd. has also never told the truth to them, of its intention to stick around past 2008 and that the TCHC was not really going to take over the ownership and management of the coop, as the residents were also told by them and those corrupt city officials, in the Funding and Risk Management Branch.

Both Mintz & Partners and its parent company Deloitte & Touche, has been managing the coop, since 2008, when they also claimed that the building was also being transferred over to the ownership of TCHC. They have also been renewing, their 12 month term, as the receiver and manager, of the coop. And the only way that they could have done all of this, was also with the recommendation, of those in the funding and risk management branch, who has also gone to court, on a yearly basis and continued to recommend them, to continue, with the management of the building. They have also ignored, every single complaint, from the residents, about their management of the coop.

The receiver and manager Mintz & Partners and also Kehilla, had gone about quietly trying to procure the building and by giving as little information as possible to the residents, they had also hoped to completely take over the ownership of the coop.

What these two private companies and those government officials, also did not count on, was that the residents of the coop, are also not keen on the take over of the building, by either the receiver and manager, or Kehilla, or by any other company that they have also set up to do so and it doesn't matter the clever attempts, that they have also come up with, in order to acquire the building, the residents also do not want them to continue, either directly, or indirectly, to have control of the building, or even to continue with the management of the coop. This was made clear by the petition that was also started by the residents, to stop their actions entirely.

Kairool Kapoor is the person within the Ministry of Housing, who had also recently informed the residents of the coop, of the intention of the City of Toronto, to have both Mint & Partners, as well as Kehilla, whose term has also officially ended in May of 2012, to continue with the take over the coop, through Moshav Orr, and to acquire the assets of the coop, through this dummy company that they have also set up specifically for this purpose and with the consent of these government officials, who should also know better. The fact that they had also intended the current staff of Kehilla, to also be the new board members, of Moshav Orr, also says a lot, since Kehilla and its staff has also acted in ways that goes against the coop, in more ways than one.

For instance, it was Kehilla's employee, Sandra Thompson, who is also the current on site property manager of the coop, who was also accused of wrong doing, and more specifically, of sexual misconduct, while carrying out her duties, as the on site property manager of the building. The other person implicated in that situation, the part time superintendent of the coop, was also fired immediately, by Kehilla, but it has kept on Sandra Thompson, as the on site manager of the coop and with the consent of the other Toronto City officials, as well.

The current managers of the coop, Mintz and Partner, as well as Kehilla Residential Programme, and also the city of Toronto and the other government officials, that I have mentioned, have also been preying upon the residents of the coop and have also taken advantage of the fact that the residents also has limited knowledge of the operations of the coop, in order to exploit them and also the city's financial resources.

These Toronto city officials, also do not seem to have any morality of their own either, as they have also demonstrated, in their corrupt practice, of continually selecting, the same private companies, to acquire those city of Toronto buildings, or to manage them, without also making their actions more transparent, in the process. They have also completely ignored the bidding process and the law, regarding this practice. Which has included, excluding all other applicants, or companies for the position, besides those that they had selected, personally, through this unfair process.

Monopolizing the bidding process is also illegal, but not to them. Selecting their own hand picked agent to take over these buildings is also a crime, with regards to the bidding process, which they have also monopolized, by also excluding any other qualified applicants, from having this opportunity to also make those procurements of those city of Toronto buildings. In the past, one Toronto Social Housing Unit, official, has also claimed that she has sent out applications to several different applicants, i.e. companies, for the position of taking over the management of the building. When she was also asked to produce the name of just one of those other applicants, she also could not. Need I say more?.

This and other "oversights" on the part of these Toronto city and government officials, are what makes their actions also illegal. Each year the Funding and Risk Management Branch of the Toronto Social Housing Unit, continues to dole out money to these private companies, such as Kehilla Residential Programme and Mintz & Partners and the latter's former, as well as current companies, that the Receiver and Manager, Mintz & Parners, has also created, such as M & P Property Management, and now also the new company, "Moshav Orr", to attempt to take over the coop, as well as to receive funding and to continue to operate and manage the building.

The problem with this arrangement is that those government officials, such as Keith Extance, the Director, in the Funding and Risk Management Branch, of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and also those other Toronto city officials, are also directly responsible, for the continuation of this fraud upon the public. They have continually approved and or assisted with the selection of these private companies that are also hand picked by them also, including of course, the current managers of the building, that they are also in league with, regarding their attempt to take over the current building and also to continue to receive public funds, as well and despite their despicable records with the public. Their candidates for these positions are also unqualified, based on their actions, but they have also recommended them anyway. They also do not listen to, or care about what the residents, or the rest of the public, has to say about their actions as well. Which has also been covered up.

The illegal practice of the city of Toronto officials involved, or those other government officials, which has also included, other evidence of corruption, by them, as well and the most obvious of which is the conflict of interest, that is also apparent, in regards to their decisions, regarding this situation. I have also said before, in another article about the same thing and I say now, also, that they all seem to have a pecuniary interest, in the decisions, that they all make, regarding the current managers of the coop and also their intention to acquire the building.

The Funding and Risk Management Branch of the Toronto Social Housing Unit and also the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, should also stop this illegal process of choosing their own candidate for the position of either procuring, or managing these publicly funded buildings and should also allow a more fair bidding process by allowing other qualified companies, to have the opportunity also to acquire those buildings and to also managed them, for the city of Toronto. Those within the Funding and Risk Management Branch, of the Social Housing Unit, such as Philip Abrahams, its Director and also Phil Brown, its General Manager, as well as Keith Extance, the Director of the Funding and Risk Management Branch, within the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, are also to be blamed for the perpetuation of this crime, that they has also been committed against the public by them.

The Deputy City Manager Brenda Patterson cannot also be excluded from this arrangement as well. By overlooking the actions of those in the Toronto Social Housing Unit, including its Director Philip Abrahams, and also Phil Brown's actions, in yearly recommending, those same private companies, to continue with the management of those publicly funded buildings and despite public complaints against them.

They certainly do not care about the interests of the people that they are supposed to protect in all of this. The residents of those buildings that are also managed by these unscrupulous private companies, that are only out to benefit for themselves, in the process.

They have always selected a company of their own choosing, even though this process is also illegal. The conflict of interest, of course, lies in whether or not, they or the private companies that they have also selected, such as Mintz & Partners and Kehilla, also stands to benefit financially, or otherwise, from the decisions that they have also made, in regards to their actions.

We know that this is of course the answer when it comes to the current managers of the building, Mint & Partners and also Kehilla Residential Programme. Both of which also stands to benefit financially from the new company that they have also set up to take over the coop, "Moshav Orr". As the board members as well, they will also control exclusively all of the decisions of the coop, since none of the residents are also included as the board members for this new corporation, Moshav Orr, that they have also set up to take over the ownership and also managment of the building.

Moshav Noam Non Profit Cooperative Housing Corporation, currently, is also not a part of any regulatory body, such as the Cooperative Federation of Toronto, who might have also been able to temper some of their actions, against the coop members, should they also contravened any of the regulations, of the coop, while they have also been managing it.

ONTARIO JUDGE, RACHEL GRINBERG AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DIANE MCALEER, UPHOLDS RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.

A PUBLIC DEMAND, FOR RECORDINGS, IN CANADIAN COURTROOMS, TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS, OF VULNERABLE PERSONS, APPEARING, BEFORE THE COURT. A To...