Thursday, September 24, 2015

PART 11: CANADA IS CORRUPT. THE COUNTRY HAS AN OPEN DISREGARD, FOR HUMAN...


PART 1: CANANDA IS CORRUPT: HUMAN RIGHTS ARE NON-EXISTANT AND RACISM, I...


EXPOSING THE RACISM, OF PETER WALLACE. TORONTO CITY MANAGER.


THE REASON, THAT PETER WALLACE, THE ACTING CITY MANAGER, FOR TORONTO, NEED TO BE REPLACED.

The Toronto City Manager, has reneged on his promise while taking office. And to act, according to his own words, with " openness, transparency and accountability". Wallace, in fact, has acted corruptly. He has not only reneged on his promise, but he has also not fulfilled his obligations, set out by Toronto City Council, on some of  his other duties regarding his office. 


Peter Wallace, perpetrates, the systematic racism that exist in Canada, by also carrying out some of those actions, directly, himself.  





WHAT TORONTONIANS, NEED TO KNOW, ABOUT THE NEW CITY MANAGER, PETER WALLACE:

HE PROMOTES RACISM AND INTOLERANCE, HE ACTS CORRUPT, HIMSELF. AND HE IS NOT ABOUT THE INTEGRATION OF SOCIETY, BUT THE EXCLUSION OF OTHER GROUPS, BY TREATING THEM WITH CONTEMPT.  HE IS ALSO ACCUSED OF COVERING UP, THE INVESTIGATIONS, OF OTHER CORRUPT CANADIAN OFFICIALS, AT THE LOCAL LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT.



When Peter Wallace, the current Acting City Manager, for Toronto, was competing for the position, and also for the highest administrative job, with the city of Toronto. He also ran on a platform of making the local municipal government, “more transparent and accountable”, according to him. In the few months since he has taken over the position, however, Peter Wallace has done the very opposite, of what he said that he was going to do. Which is to act corruptly, himself. 

Not only that, the city manager is also accused of being outright racist, towards certain members of a minority group. Wallace also refused to investigate, as he should, other corrupt members of the local government. He and his staff are also involved in the cover-up, regarding those investigations. And he has stalled any and all investigations, involving those persons. It was Wallace's executive assistant, Julie Scarchello, who also came on record, saying that her boss, Peter Wallace, is indeed looking into the allegations, of those other city officials. And there is absolutely no proof provided by that office, that this is the case. What has instead come to light, since she gave that interview on camera, was that both she and the City Manager, has been working with others, to undermine the very investigation. In other words to cover it up. And this also coming from someone, who also holds one of the highest positions, in government, albeit at the local level. 

Toronto speaks of tolerance, multiculturalism, and all of the things that one should also expect from a government, that respects the different members, of society. The reality of course, is much different. The local government in Canada, is just as corrupt, as those in the higher levels. In fact, you might see more corrupt practices, at the local level, than you would also get to see, at the higher levels of government, in Canada.
The reason is because those government officials, at the local level, also deal with the public, one on one. So the public gets to see them in action.  And it is not always positive.  Sometimes, behind the facade that they like to wear, they will also show their true colors. The right circumstances, will often bring out what they are truly about. Not the image that they also present to the public, but the one which they upholds, behind closed door.  Whether at City Hall, or in their private interactions with the public.  This is where you will see the evidence of corruption, from them.  And also evidence of their true nature, or personality.  Including those harboring racist attitudes, towards other members of society. 

If we are foolish enough to take the words of this corrupt civil servant, literally, when upon taking over his role as the City Manager, where he has also falsely stated, that, "We have an obligation to be transparent and accountable”. And that he will also operate his office with “openness, transparency and accountability”. Does he, as the City Manager, also believe that only some members of the public, deserve to be treated in such manner , while others do not? Is that the reason why he has acted racist, towards certain members of society, himself? We know that these people who run the city are not what they also profess to be, publicly. They have their own personal prejudices and bias. Which, not to the surprise of any, also comes out on specific occasions, where they are concerned. 





Saturday, September 19, 2015

Reporting on Human Rights Abuse in Canada. Canada's Obligation, To Uphol...




Corruption in Local Government:


The Ombudsman, for the City of Toronto, Fiona Cream, and Peter Wallace, the City Manager, Peter Wallace, need to answer, for their role in the cover-ups, involving other city officials. 

We need a public response, from Peter Wallace, the City Manager, for the City of Toronto and also from the Ombudsman, Fiona Cream.

 

Monday, September 14, 2015

Toronto Municipal Government, and Corruption.

TORONTO: THE OMBUDSMAN, FIONA CREAM AND THE CITY MANAGER, PETER WALLACE, ARE EXPOSED IN THEIR RACISM, DURING, THE INVESTIGATION OF THOSE TORONTO CITY OFFICIALS.

Does the City Manager for Toronto, Peter Wallace, promotes racism? The answer is yes!. And so do many other Canadian government officials, at both the local and national levels of government. Disrespect, for certain individuals and groups, is quiet common among their actions.

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

SERIOUS FLAWS, EXIST, WITH THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. "WE HAVE OUR OWN RULES" SAYS ONE ADJUDICATOR, ESI A. CODJOE.


THIS BLOG IS ABOUT EXPOSING CORRUPTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE, IN CANADA. THIS MEANS THAT THE CANADIAN INSTITUTIONS, ALSO, WHICH HAS A PENCHANT FOR ABUSING THE RIGHTS OF THE COMMON PEOPLE, ARE ALSO EXPOSED HERE, ON THIS BLOG.  THE FOCUS OF THIS ARTICLE IS ON THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. WHICH ROUTINELY ACTS IN FAVOUR OF LANDLORDS AND WHICH IS ALSO A WELL KNOWN AND ESTABLISHED FACT. THAT BOARD HAS ALSO, RECENTLY, ACTED IN A CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME. AND FOR WHICH I WILL ALSO PROVIDE THE EVIDENCE OF THAT, IN THIS ARTICLE AS WELL.  BUT THE FOCUS ON THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, IS TO ALSO SHOW THAT CANADIAN OFFICIALS, ACT CORRUPTLY, AND MOST PARTICULARLY, IN AREAS OF THE LAW. MEANING, THAT, ONE CAN ALSO EXPECT THE COURT, THE TRIBUNALS, POLICE AND OTHERS WHO ENFORCE THE LAW, TO ACT CORRUPTLY. THIS IS A WELL KNOWN FACT.
Esi Codjoe, Adjudicator
Landlord and Tenant Board, in Toronto. She is known
to act corruptly. Here is one of her comments, to a tenant
at the Board, "We have our own rules", referring to the
Landlord and Tenant Board's disregard for the rules of law. 














TWO ADJUDICATORS, WHO ARE KNOWN TO ACT CORRUPTLY, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, ARE LOUISE HORTON AND ESI A. CODJOE, BOTH LAWYERS. YET THEY ALSO PREY ON THE TENANTS WHO APPEAR BEFORE THEM, RELYING ON THE FACT, THAT, MOST TENANTS DO NOT HAVE A FULL KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW, AND HOW TO APPLY IT, IN ORDER TO PROTECT THEIR RIGHTS, BEFORE THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. THEY ALSO ALLOW PARALEGALS, TO RUN AMUCK WITH THEIR SHENINGANS, AT THOSE HEARINGS.  I HAVE ALSO ACCUSED BOTH OF THOSE AJUDICATORS, OF ACTING IN A CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME, WITH OTHER CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS. THIS WOULD ALSO EXPLAIN WHY, THEY BOTH DID NOT WANT TO HEAR MY EVIDENCE, AT THE HEARINGS AND ALSO MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SUPPRESS IT. INCLUDING CLAIMING THAT THE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, ALSO DID NOT WORK. OR THAT MY DEVICE WAS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THEIRS, AT THE BOARD (COMMENT OF ESI CODJOE), AND THEREFORE COULD NOT BE ACCEPTED. AND TO DISMISS MY (EMERGENCY) APPLICATIONS, AT THE PRELIMINARY STAGE, RATHER THAN TO HEAR IT. BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE WOULD ALSO HAVE BEEN TOO GREAT AGAINST THE LANDLORD. KIND OF LIKE A CROWN ATTORNEY, REFUSING TO PROCEED ON A CRIMINAL CHARGE AGAINST AN ACCUSED, IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE ACCUSED, THAT THEY ARE ALSO IN LEAGUE WITH. EVEN ON THE ADVICE OF THE COURT, TO DO SO. LIKEWISE THESE TWO ADJUDICATORS, WITH THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, ACTS IN A SIMILAR MANNER, AND ESPECIALLY IF THERE IS ALSO A CONSPIRACY INVOLVED, WHICH WAS ALSO THE CASE.

THERE ARE SOME SERIOUS FLAWS, WITH THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD.  THE HEARINGS ARE ALSO A MOCKERY TO THE RULES OF LAW. (Where they do not apply). RESULTING, IN SERIOUS LEGAL CONSEQUENSES.  ACCORDING TO ONE ADJUDICATOR, ESI CODJOE, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, IN TORONTO. “We have our own rules”.  This should also show how corrupt she is, because she is a lawyer and  also know how important it is, to apply those rules of law, in order to protect one's rights. She has made this comment to this writer, who was also a litigant at the Landlord and Tenant Board on September 4th, in regards to her emergency application, to have her landlord restore her power. Esi Codjoe, who is also black, made it clear that she was also not going to hear the evidence of the tenant, me, which would have also substantiate her claim against the landlord, for cutting off her vital service, or electricity, in this case. Esi Codjoe, as the Adjudicator at that hearing, also claim that the equipment was broken, and that it could not play the dvd, containing the video evidence, against the landlord. She had the security guard claim that my dvd was also incompatible with the equipment, in the hearing room and cannot be played. Therefore my evidence against the landlords, could also not be included at the hearing. What hearing?. Since there was also no hearing, and as a result, my right to be heard, was also not upheld, or even respected by her. Or by the subsequent adjudicator, Louise Horton, on September 9th. At both stages of the hearing of my application, they were dismissed at the preliminary stage. That is, before an actual hearing, where all of the evidence could also be heard, the decision was made not to hear my emergency applications, (at the preliminary stage, of course brought up by the landlord's agent and paralegal) they were also dismissed. The ground according to him was that I was "abusing the process". An argument which I also had no chance to refute, with my video evidence, since it was not accepted at the hearing, for various and also ridiculous reasons. The first time was on September 4th, I had refused to continue with a hearing, when my evidence (videos) could also not be heard. It was also crucial for it to be heard, as it also contained the evidence against the landlords, including one of them cussing me out and also stating the reason for my power being disrupted. The evidence against the landlord was so explosive and also irrefutable, that neither Louise Horton, nor Esi Codjoe, as the adjudicators hearing that matter, on September 4th and also the 9th, also wanted that evidence included. The consequence of which they would have been forced to hear the video evidence against the landlords and therefore force to deal with the natural course of justice to follow.
FACT:  THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, ACT AGAINST TENANTS AND IN FAVOUR OF LANDLORDS. TENANTS NEITHER GETS THE COMPENSATIONS THAT THEY ARE ENTITLED TO, WHEN THEIR RIGHTS ARE VIOLATED BY A LANDLORD. NOR DO THE BOARD ALSO PENALIZED THE LANDLORDS, WITH ANY CONSIDERABLE FINES, IF AT ALL, ACCORDING TO THE EVIDENCE THAT ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM MOST TENANTS, AGAINST THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. EVEN THE TENANT'S DUTY COUNSEL, AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, WILL ALSO ADVISE THE TENANTS, NOT TO EXPECT ANY KIND OF COMPENSATION, THAT WOULD EVEN BE CONSIDERED JUST, UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES, FROM THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD.  TO GET THAT KIND OF COMPENSATION, TENANTS ARE OFTEN ADVISED TO WITHDRAW THEIR APPLICATION, WITH THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, AND TO TAKE THE MATTER TO THE COURT DIRECTLY. MANY TENANTS ALSO TAKE THIS ADVICE. IT IS SIMPLY  NOT WORTH THE EFFORT FROM THE LANLDORD AND TENANT BOARD, WHEN YOU ALSO HAVE A LANDLORD FROM HELL. FOR ME, PERSONALLY, I HAVE ALSO SUFFERED PHYSICAL INJURY, FOR EXAMPLE TO MY HEARING, AS A RESULT OF MY LANLDORD'S ACTIONS, WHICH ONLY A CIVIL ACTION IN A COURT, CAN ALSO ADDRESS AT THIS STAGE. OTHER TENANTS HAS ALSO COMPLAINED TO ME, ABOUT LOSING THEIR PROPERTY, OR THAT IT WAS SO DAMAGED BY THE LANDLORD'S ACTIONS AND ALSO NOT RECEIVING ANY ADEQUATE COMPENSATION FROM THE BOARD. IN MOST CASES, ONLY A FEW HUNDRED DOLLARS.

AT THE BOARD,  THERE ARE NO REAL DIRECTIONS, OR RULES OF LAW TO FOLLOW. EVERYTHING IS DONE AD HOC.  PARALEGALS, WHO REPRESENTS THEIR CLIENTS, ALSO HAVE A FIELD DAY, AS THEY ALSO DO NOT HAVE TO ADHERE TO ANY RULES. WHAT YOU ALSO HAVE IS A SYSTEM THAT IS BROKEN. NOT FLAWED, BUT BROKEN. IN ORDER FOR TENANTS TO PROTECT THEIR RIGHTS, THEY MUST APPEAL THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD’S DECISIONS, THROUGH THE COURT. THEY WILL NEITHER GET THE MONETARY COMPENSATION THAT THEY DESERVE, OR HAVE THEIR MATTER PROCEEDED IN A MANNER, EVEN CLOSELY REPRESENTING THE RULES OF LAW. BOTH THE ADJUDICATORS AND ALSO THE PARALEGALS, WHO ARE SEEN MOSTLY AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD AND OTHER TRIBUNALS, SINCE THEY ALSO HAVE NO LEGAL JURISDICTION TO ACT IN A COURT, AT LEAST NOT IN THE APPEAL COURT. THEY CAN REPRESENT CLIENTS ON SOME SUMMARY MATTERS, INCLUDING TRAFIC TICKETS, ETC. BUT THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO ACT AS A LEGAL COUNSEL IN A COURT. SO THEY TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE TRIBUNALS, SUCH AS THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD. MAKING IT ALSO EXTREMELY DIFFICULT, FOR TENANTS TO PROTECT THEIR RIGHTS. TENANTS MUST THEN SEEK A RECOURSE THROUGH THE COURTS. LANDLORDS USE THE SERVICES OF PARALEGALS MORE OFTEN THAN TENANTS DO, BECAUSE THEY ARE CHEAPER THAN A LAWYER AND NO ONE IS REALLY WATCHING, HOW THEY CONDUCT THEMSELVES. AT LEAST NOT THE BOARD. AND WHERE THE COURT WILL POINT OUT AN ERROR, ON THE PART OF A LAWYER, OR TO CORRECT HIS CONDUCT, A POPULAR PARALEGAL AT THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, CAN ACTUALLY DO WHATEVER HE WANTS, ONCE HE IS ON GOOD TERMS WITH THE BOARD. AND THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD WILL ALSO OVERLOOK THIS FACT, AND OFTEN DO.
WHEN COMPLAINTS ARE ALSO MADE AGAINST ADJUDICATORS AND MEMBERS OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BOARD, THE BOARD STILL KEEP THEM ON. THIS IS ALSO WHERE THE PROBLEM LIES, WITH THE BOARD. IF AN ADJUDICATOR ACTS CORRUPTLY AND NOT AT ALL IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC, THEY SHOULD BE REMOVED. THEY STAY ON IN MOST CASES, BECAUSE NO ONE EVER REPORTS ON THEIR ACTIONS, PUBLICLY. THIS MUST ALSO CHANGE.
 

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

PART 1: REPORTING FROM TORONTO CITY HALL, AND FROM PETER WALLACE , TORON...


THE PUBLIC DEMANDS AN ANSWER, FROM THE CITY MANAGER, PETER WALLACE, OVER MUNICIPAL LICENSING STANDARDS AND BUILDING DIVISION'S CORRUPTION.

TORONTO CITY MANAGER, PETER WALLACE, WHO IS ALSO NO STRANGER, TO BEING UNDER PUBLIC SCRUTINY, DUE TO HIS FORMER POSITION AT QUEEN'S PARK, IN COMMENCING ON HIS NEW JOB, ALSO MADE A PLEDGE TO THE PUBLIC, THAT, HE WOULD ALSO ACT WITH "OPENNESS, TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY". NOW HE HAS ALSO BEEN PUT TO THE TEST, IN THE INVESTIGATION, OF THOSE CITY OFFICIALS, IN MLS AND BUILDING. YES, WE THE PUBLIC, PLAN TO HOLD YOU TO YOUR WORDS.



Watch Part 11, of this video segment and hear what the City Manager's staff, Julie Scarchelo, comments are, on the matter. She may also be giving us a spin, on what has actually transpired with that office and also the investigation. The public demand of an official response to the inquiry, over MLS, Building and other city officials, corrupt practices, may have also caught them off guard. Still, they also had a response ready, while the camera was rolling.  And perhaps, because they also realized, that they also had to provide one to the public.

How ironic, that Peter Wallace, as the City Manager, must also be reminded of his pledge to the people of Toronto?. That upon taking his office, as he has also told the public, that he was going to act with "openness, transparency and accountability", to the public. One also wonders where those actions are, in regards to the investigation, of corrupt city of Toronto officials?. The City Manager, himself, has also faced public scrutiny during his time at Queen's Park. So he is also no stranger, to answering hard questions from the public. In this case, it is about what he also plans to do, over corrupt city officials?. Will he conduct a serious and also full investigation?. Or will he, like the Ombudsman, Fiona Cream, tries to hide it further from the public, by covering up the investigation?

Do any of them also consider that the public do deserve an answer from them?

PART 11: REPORTING FROM TORONTO CITY HALL AND PETER WALLACE, T.O. CITY M...


Wednesday, September 2, 2015

PART 11: EXPOSING CANADIAN RACISM. A VERY COMMON HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE.

PART 1: EXPOSING CANADIAN RACISM. A VERY COMMON HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE.

EXPOSING RACISM, IN MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT IN TORONTO, INVOLVING, THE OMBUDSMAN, FIONA CREAM, THE DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, JOHN LIVY AND THE CITY MANAGER, PETER WALLACE. ALL AVOIDING THE CORRUPTION INVESTIGATION, OF MUNICIPAL LICENSING STANDARDS EXECUTIVES, TRACY COOK AND MARK SRAGA.
H
CONSPIRACY AND CORRUPTION, AS WELL AS OPEN RACISM, ARE NOW A PART OF THE ACTIONS, OF THOSE CITY OFFICES.

ONTARIO JUDGE, RACHEL GRINBERG AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DIANE MCALEER, UPHOLDS RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.

A PUBLIC DEMAND, FOR RECORDINGS, IN CANADIAN COURTROOMS, TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS, OF VULNERABLE PERSONS, APPEARING, BEFORE THE COURT. A To...