Wednesday, November 21, 2012

UPDATE TO MY CASE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.

“All victims of human rights abuses should be able to look to the Human Rights Council as a forum and a springboard for action.”
- Ban Ki-moon, UN Secretary-General, 12 March 2007, Opening of the 4th Human Rights Council Session

What is Next? Since the IACHR, has failed to take any precautionary measures, against Canada, on my behalf and also in order to prevent, any further harm to me, by that country, then the United Nations Human Rights Council, must now take precautionary measures, against the Canadian government, to also prevent, the irreparable harm, that is presently being done, by that country, against me.

THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA'S ATTITUDE TOWARDS MY CASE: WHO CARES ABOUT YOUR URGENT MOTION TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS? THE ANSWER IS ALSO SIMPLE, I DO.


On May 30, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada, received the hard copy
of an urgent motion, that I had filed with that court. The S.C.C. already
had my application for leave, in regards to appealing the decision, of
the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

June 1, 2012, I was told that the motion was before the Registrar, and so I had decided, to wait for a written response, from the court.

June 12, 2012, I contacted the Supreme Court of Canada, for an update, in regards to that urgent motion, and was told that there was no information
available, because a decision was also not made, with regard to the matter.


I have now determined that the Supreme Court of Canada, wants to act corruptly, in regards to my case and that is why it has also not made any decisions, with regards to my urgent motion, that was filed on May 30, 2012. Since the Canadian government also has other human rights agencies, such as the IACHR, which also has a petition
that I had filed with the IACHR, against that country, in 2010, also backing its actions, it is also prepared, to continue to act corruptly, regarding my matters before the Canadian courts.

Since Canada was also a member, of the UN Human Rights Council, up until 2009, it will be interesting, to see how the other members, also view its actions, in regards to its persecution of me, presently. I am now prepared to have some of those countries, also intervened, with regards to the present situation, that I am now facing from that government, regarding the abuse of my rights currently.

I know that the process, with the Supreme Court of Canada, is also slow, but it has also acted in a manner, that has also violated, my human rights already. This is where other countries, need to also step in, to make sure that it does not continue to do so. It is also not a stretch of the imagination, as to why Canada, is also no longer a part of the UN Human Rights Council, with its dastardly behaviour, regarding its persecution, of human rights victims, in that country.

THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

NEW UPDATES REGARDING MY CASE:

In the interest of justice and of the public, I will continue to report on my case, that is also before, the Supreme Court of Canada, currently.

New information from the Supreme Court of Canada, regarding the urgent
motion, that I had filed on April 11,2012. And what I have been told, by the
S.C.C. office of the Registrar, concerning that motion.

On Monday May 14, 2012, I was told, by the office of the registrar, of the S.C.C. by a telephone message, that was left on my voicemail, that my urgent motion for a stay of execution, of the order of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, on April 4, 2012, "would be presented to Justice Deschamps, this afternoon", of the Supreme Court of Canada, for his decision on the matter. I was also asked to present any other information, that I have regarding the case and send it in by fax, or email.

On Tuesday May 15, 2012, after sending the information, to the Supreme Court of Canada, and after contacting the S.C.C. I was told by a registry officer, that, the manager, Joanne Laniel, in the office of the registrar, has informed her, that the motion, would be heard, by Justice Fish, of the Supreme Court of Canada, on May 15, 2012.

The question that I have asked, since receiving this information, from the S.C.C. is how can the urgent motion, be presented before one judge, Justice Deschamps, on one day, May 14 and to another judge, Justice Fish, the next day? It is also quite obvious, that the motion was also never heard, by Justice Deschamps, on May 14, as I had been told. The Supreme Court of Canada is aware, that I am also following the case, publicly, as well. If what I have been told by the court, so far, is in fact not true, and a lie, perpetrated upon the public, concerning my motion, that is before the S.C.C. and on the part of the office of the registrar.

Wouldn't you also say, that, they have also brought, disrepute, upon the court? I hope for their sake, that they have also been telling me the truth, concerning the matter. That is usually, also, what corruption is, by the way. Personally, I believed, also, that some persons, such as Micheline Alam, Eric Shalom and Joanne Laniel, in the office of the registrar, of the Supreme Court of Canada, has also tried to interfere, personally, with my case, before the S.C.C. and has also tried to cause, undue delay, in the hearing of my urgent motion, before the Supreme Court of Canada.

As the public has been made aware of my case before the Supreme Court of Canada, in which I am appealing the decision of the Court of Appeal, to dismiss my appeal, claiming a lack of jurisdiction, by the Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court of Canada must also now decide, in the interest of the public, if the Court of Appeal for Ontario, had made the right decision, or if it has also violated any of my rights,
under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, through my appeal before the S.C.C.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

HUGES IDHOLO, THE MAN WHO WAS CHARGED, ON JULY 9, BY THE POLICE, FOR "THREATENING AN ANIMAL".
THE MAN HAD TRIED, TO MURDER, THE ANIMAL AND ALSO TOLD THE POLICE, OF HIS INTENTION, TO KILL THE ANIMAL.

THE TORONTO POLICE, 14 DIVISION, ALSO DID NOT COMPLY, WITH THE LAW, REGARDING HIS RELEASE.

He was released immediately and without any undertaking, by the police.
The police also knew that his actions involved violence, or threats of violence, including direct statement madet to the police by the accused, of his intentions, to commit a violent act, in this case.

IDHOLO HUGUES, OR HUGUES IDHOLO?

According to the police report, Idholo Hugues, is the right name for this man, who had almost brutally, murdered my animal, on July 9, 2012. I was contesting the name of this man, by the police, from the moment, they had arrested him, on July 9th and one of the arresting officers, also commented, that, "its not what you tell us his name is, it's what he tell us his name is". He is known to use both names, interchangeably.

From the beginning, the police, has also tried to protect him and they are also, proceeding, with their charges against him for threatening to kill an animal, my cat, with the fictitious name of Idholo Hugues, in order to protect this criminal. The man was also in court, at Old City Hall courthouse, in Toronto, on August 21, 2012 and since then, I've been waiting to get his bail conditions, which for some reason, also, the court cannot find. It has been missing from his file in the court.

I also spoke with these managers, at both the Old City Hall courthouse and College Park court, Susan Nhiem and Pat Mckinnon and they all claimed to be "looking for his bail conditions" and will get back to me about it. When I also reminded them, that, they are also, endangering my safety, and also the safety of the public, by also not providing that document, they've responded, that, they are aware of this and will also try to get that document to me. In a letter from the victim witness program, at Old City Hall, to me, on August 15, also has the accused, Hugues Idholo's name, written as Idholo Hugues. I also share the same address, with this man and also know him, by different names, including Alphonzo and Hugues Idholo Yala.

I have also been able to get the following information about him:
1. He is African national and also from the Repulic of the Congo.
2. He has been living in Canada for 3 years.
3. He has no family, or relatives, living in Canada,
4. He is a single male, 34 years old.
5. He has previously been on welfare, and also under the name, of Hugues Idholo Yala
6. He also currently works as a labourer.
7. He has also been known, to receive, government documents, at his present address, with the name of Hugues Idholo and not Idholo Hugues, as the Toronto police, 14 division, in their corruption, regarding this case, has also claimed.

8. His landlord, also, allegedly, claimed that the room that he has rented, since
November of 2011, he has also done so, using a different name, and in fact, she
did not recognized him, as Hugues Idholo, either.

I will also post a copy, of my letter, from the court, which also shows, his name, on court documents, as Idholo Hugues and not Hugues Idholo. And this may also be, why his bail release document, with the same name, is also "missing" from the court file, currently. One of the managers of that court, Old City Hall courthouse, has also told me, that, she is not sure if the police, had in fact, forwarded, his release conditions, to the court. It turns out that the police had also not entered into any undertakings with the accuses, despite the charge, which also involved violence. The charge that the police laid against the accused is for "threatening an animal' and one would also think that the very act of threatening also involved violence, not withstanding that the accused was also heard on the 911 tape, telling of his intention also to kill the animal. The police also violated the criminal code by also not entering into an undertaking, with the accused, and this is also contrary, to the law. The 14 division police had also released him on a form 10, which is just a promise to appear, in court, and also backed on to the same property, where I also lived, with my animal, that he also tried to kill and also threatened to kill, on July 9, 2012. The fact that the man was also in court, on August 21, also seemed unlikely that the court, also did not have that document, as well.

The Toronto police has claimed, on July 9, that, they also had to hear, the 911 tape first, in which the man, Hugues Idholo, could also be heard, threatening to kill my animal, before they also arrested him. After they had listened to the 911 tape, in their police cruisers, they then took the man, to the police station and released him shortly after wards. I was also told by the police, 14 division, that they had a "discussion" at the station and then decided to release him. Keep in mind that this incident, also involved, a weapon, a knife and the police claimed that they made the right decision, to release the man, Hugues Idholo, in this case. They also disregarded the fact, that, he had also told them directly, that he also intended to kill the animal, both on the 911 tape and also when they were arresting him. The police also release the man, into the same property, as the victims, after his release. His bail conditions is also "missing" from the court file, as well. And also endangering further, the victims safety, in this case.

I believe that both the police and the court, are also working, together, to protect the accused, and also to prevent justice, in this case.

PROTEST AGAINST HARPER'S BILL C-30

WHY DO THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT, INSIST ON SPYING ONLINE AND TAKING AWAY THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT, TO USE THE INTERNET, UN-OBTRUSIVELY, OR OPENLY, FOR THAT MATTER?.

Vic Toews, Minister of Public Safety and along with Prime Minister Steven Harper, one of the main proponents, of Bill C-30.
There are also calls for his resignation, also in relations to his personal life.


I am talking about the new bill, C-30, that was introduced, recently, by the Canadian parliament, that also has the public in an up roar, because of its broad powers, given to the police, for conducting online surveillance, without even a warrant.

Bill c-30 would now require that the internet providers, along with telephone providers, to also cooperate, with the police and to provide for an infrastructure, where the police could gather information, about anyone of their users, even if they are using an anonymous identity, to the police, for their investigation, or for other purposes. With this access given to the police, they can now monitor the online activities, of all Canadians without their knowledge and to also use this information later, if required, against them.

They claim that it is for catching on line criminals, such as pedophiles and other dangerous criminals, lurking on the internet and also using the telephone, for this purpose. But others who are also concerned with this breach of privacy, by the Canadian government, of those internet users, by the extensive powers that has been given to the police to conduct online surveillance, The internet users and also the internet providers and telephone companies, also has a legitimate reason to be concern, against this possibly breach of civil liberty, by the Canadian government.

It is a net that encompasses everyone and not just criminals alone. It means that anyone and everyone will also be monitored by the police, at their discretion, regardless of whether they have used those means, provided by the internet, for committing a crime, or not. To put it more in proper perspective, the government wants to have the personal information, of all Canadians, who uses the internet and for whatever purposes, good or bad. From your emails, to your blogs and other aspects of the social media, everything that you say or do, in this case, also, pertaining to freedom of speech, will also be monitored, by the Canadian government and its police. So in this case, every Canadian internet users will be monitored and their information provided to the police, when asked for by them.

Once the bill is also passed, it will also be made into law and will also be reflected in the Criminal Code of Canada. The bill is also getting some opposition from some members of parliament as well, including the NDP, and a few other liberal minded politicians. But it also seem set to be passed, although their has also been questions raised, about the way in which those who are in favour of bill c-30, has also tried to side step, some of the usual processes involved, in getting this bill approved. Including referring it back, for full reconsideration, before parliament.

Those who has opposed this measure, has also claimed that the bill was also in its proper form and therefore ready to be passed. However, questions still arise, in regards to this process, by some of the politicians themselves, some of whom also believed that the current bill, is also in violation of the Standing Order 68(1) and 68 (3), both of which also supported a motion, before the bill is to be also passed into law. Never mind all of that, however, those who want this bill enacted, will also see to it, that it does get pass into law and with its passing, also, the eradication of any vestige of privacy, by any Canadians, who also uses the internet, their cell phones and other such services.

Many internet users, such as bloggers and activists, has also long known, about the Canadian government's monitoring, of their movements online, so this is not entirely news to them. But now it also has the law to back up its actions.

CANADA'S REMOVAL, FROM THE UNITED NATIONS, HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL.

CANADA'S REMOVAL, FROM THE UNITED NATIONS, HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL, WAS ALSO NECESSARY, FOR THE PROTECTION, OF HUMAN RIGHT ABUSE VICTIMS, IN THAT COUNTRY. SINCE 2009, CA NADA'S ROLE, AS A MEMBER, OF THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL, WAS NO LONGER ACTIVE.














CANADA HAS COMMITTED THE FOLLOWING ATROCITIES:

Crimes Against Humanity
Torture And Other Acts
The Persecution of Human Rights Activists, Including Some Writers,
and Journalists, Like Myself And Also Abusing Their Human Rights.
Open Racism Against Some Minority Groups.
Corruption In The Canadian Courts, That Has Also Denied, Members of Such
Groups, From Receiving Equal Treatment, From The Canadian Judicial System.

Canada has backed Israel's human rights abuse of the Palestinians.
Canadian Mining Companies, has exploited poor, or developing countries, in
Africa ,Latin America and also elsewhere.
Canada has abused the rights of its First Nations People
Canada has also been operating as a police state, giving broad powers to the police and infringing on those rights, which are also protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in its Constitution.
Canada has continued to ignore international requests, to also conformed, to
human rights standards, concerning its own country.


Exposing, the Canadian government, human rights abuse, before the world, has not been enough, so far, to also have its expulsion, from international human rights organizations, or from participating among other nations, with regards to those same
human rights organizations. But as a person of conscience, who is also, currently, being persecuted, by that country, I also have the hope that my efforts, to exposed that country's actions, will also pay off in the long run. Already, I have also given it more exposure, than any other so called, human rights organizations, presently, in that country, and where they are also in league, with the actions of that government.
THE CONSPIRACY, SURROUNDING THE CROWN'S, WITDRAWAL, OF THE CHARGES, AGAINST THE ACCUSED.


On Tuesday, September 25, the accused, Idholo Hugues aka Hugues Idholo Yala, was in court at the Old
City Hall courthouse, inToronto, where he was also facing the criminal charge, of threatening, pertaining to the animal, whose life, he had threatened and also tried to kill back in July.  The charge against him, was also withdrawn by the court, upon the recommendation of the crown.
This happened, also, despite the fact that the crown attorney's office and also the police officer, who was in charge of the case, Robert Monteiro, of the 14 Division precinct, were earlier informed by Patricia Wilson, the manager, of the Victim Witness Programme, on behalf of the victim in this case, regarding the questionable identity, of the accused, which should have also been investigated by them, and also addressed, by the court.  This also did not happen in this case. The police also had direct knowledge, of the accused, using different names, as his legal name, but also did nothing about it.

Then there is also the 911 tape, and what both the crown attorney's office and also the police, also did with that piece of evidence. Where the accused could also be heard, in the background, making his threats to kill the animal, as the victim also called the police. The most damaging piece of evidence, however, was the accused, Idholo Hugues, own self incriminating statements to the police, directly, as he was being arrested
on July 9th, regarding his intentions. "I'm going to kill it, I don't care", he was heard to tell the police. He had also challenged, the owner of the animal earlier, by saying, "bring it, i.e cat, into the kitchen, I am going to kill it right now", as he also took up a knife and advanced towards the victim.  Two other witnesses were also present, as the accused had attacked the victim and also tried to kill her animal and had continued to ranted on about his intentions. What had led up to the attack, was the accused not wanting the animal, on the premises and was also incited, when the victim had washed her cat in the kitchen sink earlier. The victim was talking to the landlord, over the matter, when the accused also attacked her and also attempted to carry out his threats to kill her animal. His chilling words were disregarded by the police, when they also put him back into the same house, as the victims, in this case.

Still the police wanted to be convinced, about the accused actions, so they called in, to listen to the 911 tape at the scene and afterwards they took the accused into custody. They also told the victim after listening to the 911 tape, that it was unlikely that the accused, would be let back into the residence, after his arrest. That also changed at the police station, after they "had a discussion" and the accused was released on his own recognizance, with no undertakings by the police, including the fact that the accused was also free, to continue to have contact with the victim, in this case and to continue to live on the same premesis.

The Toronto police officer, Robert Monteiro, and other officers from the 14 division precinct, also, later fabricated their version, of the events, in their report to the court. This should also not be surprising, because Robert Monteiro, is the same cop, who was also charged, previously, for stealing drugs and money, from dealers, as a part of the now infamous and also defunct, drug squad. Another police officer, associated with this case, Steven Correia, was also just convicted, in June of 2012, for his role as an undercover officer, with the drug squad and where he was also charged and convicted, with the following charges of , assault, theft, perjury, conspiracy to obstruct justice and extortion. One of the charge that he had also faced, for perjury, was for falsifying his notes and then lying about it later at a preliminary hearing.  He was also previously charged with fraud. So it should also surprised no one, that their old habits, should also resurfaced, with the Idholo Hugues, aka Hugues Idholo case. That is what I was up against, and the fact that they been able to work with both the crown and also the court, in this case, in having the charge also withdrawn, against the accused.




CANADA'S HYPOCRITICAL ROLE, WITH THE ICC.

CANADA IS GUILTY, OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.
REVEALING THE CONSPIRACY, OF SILENCE, TO ALSO COVER UP ITS ACTIONS.

Canada was one of those countries, that was instrumental, in working with the ICC, in prosecuting its first criminal case, against a know human rights violator, Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Lubanga was tried and also convicted, as a war criminal, for his role in the use of child soldiers, in his militia group, that was focused on carrying out acts of violence, some of them, including the rape and murder, of innocent civilians.

What the world has been focused on, is the open crimes and human rights abuse, in some countries and not others. When countries such as Canada, that has also carried out act of violence and human rights abuse, is also condoned for its actions, by the international community, then something is also really wrong, with the attitude and also the decisions, of the international community, in deciding which country, or persons in those countries, to also prosecute, for those crimes, that has been carried out, either against an individual, or against groups of people.

Maintaining its role internationally, as a so called "human rights defender", Canada has also been able to avoid, being labeled, as a country that has also carried out, human rights abuse. It also doesn't help the situation, when the human rights organizations, in Canada, has also been to help that country, to cover up its crimes against humanity and to be able to deceive the entire world, about its actions.

The fact is that Canada, has also persecuted, those who has been exposing, its actions, to the rest of the world. Writers, like myself, who are also subjected to the attrocities, that most activists in other countries are also subjected to.

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, ANGELO CREMISIO, ACTED DISGRACEFULLY.

Copy of the charge, against the crown attorney, Eliabeth Kozak, that the Justice of the Peace, Angelo Cremisio, claimed that he could also not read.
OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION AT OLD CITY HALL COURTHOUSE.

PUBLIC PROTEST SCHEDULED AGAINST CORRUPTION AT THAT COURT.

The Justices Of The Peace, At The Old City Hall Court, Has Prevented Criminal Charges Against The Police and Crown Attorneys, At That Court.

Equal Rights, Under The Charter of Rights and Freedoms? Not In This Case.

Justice of the Peace, Angelo Cremisio, has acted corruptly. He has blocked criminal charges, against the Toronto 14 Division police offiers, as well as against two crown attorneys, Ruth Neilson and Elizabeth Kozak, at the Old City Hall Court, in Toronto. The laying of the private information, by the informant, me, in this case, was also prevented, by all of the justices of the peace, at that court. Including Diane McAleer, Angelo Cremisio and others

He also tried to get the informant to give specific details about the circumstances, surrounding the charges, BEFORE, he would also accept the information. When the informant, refused, he then also refused to lay the information.
The justice of the peace, Angelo Cremisio, also claimed, that, he could also not read the informant's handwriting, yet he also used a yellow highligher, on her infornmation, the informant was also told by the clerk, thereby sabotaging it. He then held on to the original copy, claiming, that it was now a part of the court's record. The inofrmant was then given copies, of her original documents, forcing her to rewrite the information and to file it again. All of this just because he and the other justices of the peace at that court, did not want the informant, to exercise her rights, and to also lay those charges.

If Justice of the Peace Angelo Cremisio, could not read the informant's handwriting, what was he highlighting then? And did he not know, that, by doing so, that, he was in fact, also preventing, the informant, from laying the charges, against them? The informant has to file the information over again? He knew and also acted deliberately. Protests are scheduled to take place, in front of the Old City Hall courthouse, in November.

Justices of the peace, or judges, who do not respect people's rights, under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, should also be removed from their positions.



Court document showing the accused name as Idholo Hugues.




Accused name is shown as Hugues Idholo






 




Crown attorney withdrew the charge and also did not present the 911 tape of the accused threats to the court.




Monday, November 12, 2012

THE POLICE STEPPED UP ITS HARASSMENT.

This morning, as I left my home, an unmarked police car, with a single female inside and wearing dark glasses, drove off, as soon as I began to video tape her, as she sat idly in the car and watching me.  A few
days previous to that, it was a white van, with the windows all shaded out, that was also parked, at the top of street. It was night, so I couldn't see the occupant clearly, until I got up close.  This time it was a guy and as soon as he saw me enter the street where I lived, he too drove off, immediately.  Of course, I still have to put up with the police surveillance, that is also carried out, in marked cruisers and sometimes there are several of them, all at the same time. 

For a while it had stopped, or at least the ones in the marked police vehicles, but started up again some weeks ago.  That I could also plainly identify, as definitely watching me.  Somehow the idea of being video taped, also does not appealled to them, for they will always, immediately, drive off.
The police has also stepped up its harassment, through its agent provocateurs, who has also been increasing their attacks against me. The court, last week, has also blocked my charges against them, as well as the police. I am pressing for other media, to take up this story, as well, because I am also convinced, that, some of those persons, who has been working, with the Toronto 14 division police, in this case, should also be investigated further. Since that police division, has also blocked, all investigations and charges against them. It is a major cover-up, that also need more exposure more in the media.

ONTARIO JUDGE, RACHEL GRINBERG AND JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, DIANE MCALEER, UPHOLDS RACISM, IN THE CANADIAN COURTS.

A PUBLIC DEMAND, FOR RECORDINGS, IN CANADIAN COURTROOMS, TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS, OF VULNERABLE PERSONS, APPEARING, BEFORE THE COURT. A To...